Risk Of Stent Thrombosis Research Articles

In-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: emerging knowledge on biological pathways.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly over the past four decades. Since its inception, in-stent restenosis (ISR)-the progressive reduction in vessel lumen diameter after PCI-has emerged as the main complication of the procedure. Although the incidence of ISR has reduced from 30% at 6 months with bare-metal stents to 7% at 4 years with drug-eluting stents (DESs), its occurrence is relevant in absolute terms because of the dimensions of the population treated with PCI. The aim of this review is to summarize the emerging understanding of the biological pathways that underlie ISR. In-stent restenosis is associated with several factors, including patient-related, genetic, anatomic, stent, lesion, and procedural characteristics. Regardless of associated factors, there are common pathophysiological pathways involving molecular phenomena triggered by the mechanical trauma caused by PCI. Such biological pathways are responses to the denudation of the intima during balloon angioplasty and involve inflammation, hypersensitivity reactions, and stem cell mobilization particularly of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). The results of these processes are either vessel wall healing or neointimal hyperplasia and/or neo-atherosclerosis. Unravelling the key molecular and signal pathways involved in ISR is crucial to identify appropriate therapeutic strategies aimed at abolishing the 'Achille's heel' of PCI. In this regard, we discuss novel approaches to prevent DES restenosis. Indeed, available evidence suggests that EPC-capturing stents promote rapid stent re-endothelization, which, in turn, has the potential to decrease the risk of stent thrombosis and allow the use of a shorter-duration dual antiplatelet therapy.

Preferred monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, no studies have compared P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT. We aimed to compare available strategies for DAPT duration and post-DAPT antiplatelet monotherapy following PCI. MethodsSeven DAPT strategies [ticagrelor or clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT, aspirin following 3–6 months of DAPT (reference strategy), aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor following 6–18-months of DAPT, and DAPT for ≥18 months] were compared using a network meta-analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The primary bleeding outcome was trial-defined major or minor bleeding. ResultsOur analysis identified 25 eligible RCTs, including 89,371 patients who underwent PCI. Overall, none of the strategies negatively affected the primary efficacy outcomes. For primary bleeding outcomes, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.57–0.95). Clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT was also associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.34–0.85), however, the strategy was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Similar trends were observed among patients with acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk. ConclusionsCompared with aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes without increasing any ischemic outcomes.

Safety of routine protamine in the reversal of heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo determine the safety and efficacy of protamine in the reversal of heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BackgroundHeparin is routinely used for anticoagulation in PCI. Protamine is not used routinely to reverse heparin's effects in PCI, partly due to the perceived risk of stent thrombosis. MethodsRelevant studies published in English were searched for in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to April 26th, 2023. Our primary outcome of interest was stent thrombosis in patients receiving PCI for all indications. Secondary outcomes included mortality, major bleeding complications, and hospitalization length. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI), while continuous outcomes were analyzed using an inverse variance random-effects model expressed as mean differences (MD) with their 95% CI. Results11 studies were included in our analysis. Protamine use was not associated with stent thrombosis: OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.33, 1.01 (p = 0.05) nor with mortality (p = 0.89). Protamine administration was associated with a decreased incidence of major bleeding complications: OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.95 (p = 0.03) and decreased length of hospitalization (p < 0.0001). ConclusionsIn patients pre-treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), protamine may be a safe and efficacious option to facilitate earlier sheath removal, reduce major bleeding complications, and reduce length of hospitalization without increased risk of stent thrombosis.

A Novel Metamaterial-Based Stent with Dual Properties of Auxetic and Self-Expanding

Vascular stents have been widely used in various cardiovascular diseases associated with atherosclerosis, while the potential risks of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST) still restrict its further development. Here, by combining the self-expanding (SE) mechanism and auxetic metamaterial, a novel SE stent called MBS was proposed and systematically studied. Through the finite element (FE) method, a stent-artery coupling model was established to study the crimping, expanding, and pulsating behaviors of the proposed MBS. Results show that the MBS well retains various advantages, including a large recoverable strain, a large radial resistance force (RRF), and a smaller radial opening force (ROF). Meanwhile, due to the auxetic effect of the adopted re-entrant honeycomb, the MBS shows a significant negative foreshortening behavior, which can be designed from about -5% to about -50%. Besides, fatigue analysis also shows that all strain-based points are within the design criteria. Geometric parameter of RE cell shows a great effect on the comprehensive performance of the MBS, which needs a further optimal design for ideal radial force, foreshortening effect and fatigue performance. In conclusion, the novel design is expected to improve the mechanical properties of the traditional stent, which should be given more attention in further research.

Thirty-day outcomes of in-hospital multi-vessel versus culprit-only revascularization strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel coronary disease.

Many studies have demonstrated the benefit of complete multivessel revascularization versus culprit-only intervention in patients of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, only a few single-center retrospective studies were performed on small Chinese cohorts. Our study aims to demonstrate the advantage of multivessel percutaneous intervention (PCI) strategy on 30-day in-hospital outcomes to patients with STEMI and multivessel disease in larger Chinese population. From the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project, 5935 patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing PCI and hospitalized for fewer than 30 days were analyzed. After 5: 1 propensity score matching, 3577 patients with culprit-only PCI and 877 with in-hospital multivessel PCI were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, all-cause death, stent thrombosis, heart failure, and stroke. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that in-hospital multivessel PCI was associated with lower risk of 30-day MACCE (adjusted OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98, P = 0.032) than culprit-only PCI and conferred no increased risk of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or bleeding. Subgroup analysis showed that MACCE reduction was observed more often from patients with trans-femoral access (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.74) than with trans-radial access (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.66-1.16, P for interaction = 0.017). The in-hospital multivessel PCI strategy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day MACCE than culprit-only PCI in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Clinical case of a 29 weeks pregnant patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

HighlightsThis clinical case describes the management of a 29 weeks pregnant patient with myocardial infarction. The material will be useful for cardiologists, physicians, obstetricians and gynecologists, and endovascular surgeons. AbstractUnavoidable drastic changes in lifestyle due childbirth are pushing women to postpone it to an older age, thus increasing the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in pregnant women. This can be a problem not only for patients, but also for specialists. Currently there are 3-6 cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) per 100 thousand pregnancies, meaning such cases occur rarely in real clinical practice. Discomfort in the chest area does not directly indicate cardiac problem, so women do not visit cardiologist right away, and thus ACS remains undiagnosed. Besides traditional risk factors for CAD (age, dyslipidemia, smoking, physical inactivity), there are some additional obstetric factors: preeclampsia, thrombophilia and postpartum bleeding. About 40% of patients have myocardial infarction in the third trimester. Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of ACS, with coronary artery spasms, coronary artery dissection and thrombosis following behind. Currently the maternal mortality due to MI has decreased from 20% to 5% due to introduction of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) into the treatment of ACS. There are not enough data on the use of thrombolytics and other medicine in the treatment of CAD, because pharmacological therapy can be dangerous in the early pregnancy at the peak of organogenesis. Moreover, PCI should be used with caution due to harmful effects of radiation on the pregnant woman and the fetus. The main task in later stages of pregnancy is to balance out the risk of stent thrombosis upon discontinuing double antiplatelet therapy and bleeding during childbirth and in the postpartum period. This article describes a clinical case of a 29 weeks pregnant patient with myocardial infarction.

Is It Really Safe to Discontinue Antiplatelet Therapy 12 Months After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?

The prevalence of AF in patients with coronary artery disease is high. The guidelines from many professional groups, including the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and Heart Rhythm Society, recommend a maximum duration of 12 months of combination single antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and who have concurrent AF, followed by anticoagulation alone beyond 1 year. However, the evidence that anticoagulation alone without antiplatelet therapy adequately reduces the well-documented attritional risk of stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation is relatively sparse, particularly given that very late stent thrombosis (>1 year from stent implantation) is the commonest type. By contrast, the elevated risk of bleeding from combined anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy is clinically important. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence for long-term anticoagulation alone without antiplatelet therapy 1 year post-percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with AF.

Drug-coated balloon therapy is more effective in treating late drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis than the early occurring one-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) remains one of the important assignments to be resolved in interventional cardiology, as it is present in 5%-10% of total percutaneous coronary intervention cases. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) utilization is promising, as it comes with long-term protection from recurrent restenosis in optimal conditions without the hazard of higher risk for stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis. We aim to reduce the need for recurrent revascularization in DES-ISR, specifying the population in which the DCB therapy should be used. In this meta-analysis, the results of studies containing data on the time frame between drug-eluting stent implantation and the clinical presentation of in-stent restenosis and concomitant drug-coated balloon treatment were summarized. A systematic search was performed in Medline, Central, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase databases on November 11th, 2021. The QUIPS tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The occurrence of a major cardiac adverse events (MACE) composite endpoint, containing target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, and cardiac death, and each of these separately, was assessed at 12 months after the balloon treatment. Random effects meta-analysis models were used for statistical analysis. Data of 882 patients from four studies were analyzed. Across the included studies, a 1.68 OR (CI 1.57-1.80, p < 0.01) for MACE and a 1.69 OR (CI 1.18-2.42 p < 0.01) for TLR were observed, both in favor of late DES-ISR. The main limitation of the study is the relatively low patient number. Nevertheless, this analysis shows the first statistically significant results for the effect of DCB treatment in the early or late presentation of DES-ISR. As to date, intravascular imaging (IVI) remains limitedly accessible, other landmarks as the time frame of in-stent restenosis development are to be pursued to advance therapeutic outcomes. In consideration of other biological, technical and mechanical factors, time frame of occurrence as a prognostic factor could reduce the burden of recurrent revascularization in patients at an already high risk. Systematic Review Registration: identifier [CRD42021286262].

Management of Bifurcation Culprit Lesion in the Setting of Anterior ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Introduction: Coronary bifurcation lesions are considered one of the challenging entities in the field of coronary intervention due to the risk of side branch loss and higher risk of stent thrombosis. However, there is limited data about the proper management of such lesions in the setting of myocardial infarction as most bifurcation lesion studies excluded patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of single-stent and two-stents strategy in the management of bifurcation culprit lesions in patients presenting with anterior STEMI.&#x0D; Methods: This retrospective multi-center study included all patients presented with anterior STEMI who underwent primary PCI between January 2017 and December 2019, coronary angiography showed true bifurcation lesion with sizable side branch that can be managed by stenting. Patients with left main bifurcation, those indicated for urgent CABG, and patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Included patients were divided into two groups according to the stenting strategy either single or two stents. Six months follow up data were collected by telephone calls and by examination of medical records.&#x0D; Results: Out of 1355 anterior STEMI patients presented between January 2017 and December 2019, 158 patients (11.6%) were identified to have bifurcation culprit lesions with a sizable diagonal branch. 93 patients (59%) were treated by single stent while 65 patients (41%) were managed by two-stents strategy. The baseline characteristics and angiographic findings were similar in both groups except for higher side branch involvement in the two stents group (83.31%±11.20 vs 71.88%±15.05, t= -5.39, p &lt;0.001). Mean fluoroscopy time (23.96±8.90 vs 17.81±5.72 mins) and contrast volume (259.23± 59.45 vs 232.58± 96.18 ml) were significantly higher in two stents group than single stent group (p=0.049). However, the angiographic success rates (residual stenosis ≤30% and restoration of TIMI flow grade II or III) were comparable (96.8% vs 99%, MCp=0.151). There is no significant difference in the overall incidence rate of MACE in both groups 6 months following the index procedure (13.9 % vs 16.9%, FEp=0.698), with no difference between different bifurcation stenting techniques in patients managed with two stents.&#x0D; Conclusion: Although two stents strategy in the setting of STEMI is much complex with more fluoroscopy time and contrast volume, the procedural success rate and the incidence of MACE were comparable to one stent strategy, on medium-term follow up.

P227 THE UNEXPECTED CONSEQUENCES OF A 30 METERS FALL

Abstract Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a rare but often lethal consequence of a blunt cardiac trauma. Falls leading to coronary artery dissections are rare, thus underlining the lack of experience in their management. Case report description: a 55–year–old male patient with type 2 diabetes and no relevant past medical history was admitted to our hospital facility after a 30–meter fall during rock–climbing. On arrival, he was hemodynamically and neurologically stable. He underwent a full trauma evaluation: multiple facial bones fractures were diagnosed. An electrocardiogram revealed a QS morphology of the QRS and ST elevation in the precordial lead from V1 to V3 with reciprocal ST depression in the inferior leads. High sensitivity (hs) Troponin T was slightly elevated (49 ng/L, normal values &amp;lt;14 ng/L). A cardiac ultrasound documented a left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF 40%) with akinesia of mid–apical antero–septal and anterior walls. Biomarkers further increased with Troponin reaching 199 ng/L and creatinine phosphokinase–MB 24,7 ug/L (normal value &amp;lt;5 ug/L). Coronary angiography demonstrated proximal occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery with an image consistent with traumatic coronary artery dissection, confirmed by a cardiac CT scan showing the proximal occlusion of the LAD with retrograde perfusion of its downstream portion. Considering the left ventricular dysfunction, the elevation of cardiac biomarkers (peak CK–MB 187 ug/L, peak hs troponin T 5400 ng/L) and the acceptable hemorrhagic risk in spite of the need for facial surgery, a coronary angioplasty was performed. A dual antiplatlet therapy with acetilsalicidic acid and clopidogrel began. Nine days later the patient underwent the maxillo–facial surgery: clopidogrel was stopped provisionally and a bridge strategy using tirofiban was chosen. Post–operatory was uneventful. A full recovery of cardiac function was assessed after one year (LVEF of 55%). Discussion Few cases of blunt cardiac trauma with coronary artery dissections have been reported and treated successfully, with the LAD being the most frequently involved vessel (76%). If urgent non–cardiac surgery can be postponed, a percutaneus revascularization eventually followed by tirofiban as bridge therapy can be suggested, carefully considering the risk of stent thrombosis and the hemorrhagic risk conveyed by the trauma itself.

P201 DRUG–COATED BALLOON AND DIABETES MELLITUS: A MATTER OF SURVIVAL

Abstract Background Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk of restenosis and stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and drug eluting stent (DES) positioning. Limited although interesting data are available on prognosis after revascularization with drug–coated balloon (DCB) in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of DCB use in patients affected by DM. Methods Patients with DM enrolled in a retrospective multicenter registry were identified and matched to a control population of diabetic patients treated with DES enrolled in another retrospective registry, according to a propensity score calculated on the independent predictors of main adverse cardiac events (MACE). The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints were the independent components of the primary endpoint, or target lesion failure (TLF). Results 150 patients were identified in the DCB group and matched with 150 DES–treated patients. However, patients treated with DCB displayed more often a previous cardiovascular history and received a more complete pharmacological therapy. Target vessel diameter and the percentage of stenosis were lower in DCB patients, whereas binary in–stent restenosis was more common. At a median follow–up of 545.5 days, MACE occurred in 54 (19.4%) of the patients, with no difference according to the PCI strategy. Although a trend toward higher TLF was found (p=0.06), overall death was significantly reduced in diabetic patients (3.6% vs 10.9%; adjusted HR[95%CI]= 0.27[0.08–0.91], p=0.03). Conclusion Although limited by some differences among the groups, the present propensity–matched study shows that, among patients with DM undergoing PCI for in–stent restenosis or de novo lesions, the use of DCB is associated to a similar rate of MACE and a possible increase in TLF, but a significantly improved survival as compared to use of DES.

Treatment of Ostial Right Coronary Artery Narrowings: Outcomes From the Multicenter Prospective e-ULTIMASTER Registry.

Treatment of right coronary artery (RCA) aorto-ostial (AO) lesions with bare-metal stents and first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was associated with worse outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effect of RCA-AO stenting with current-generation DES on the clinical outcome. The large all-comer, multicontinental e-ULTIMASTER registry included 37,198 patients of whom 4775 underwent ostial and proximal RCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the Ultimaster stent (Terumo). The primary clinical end point was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death; target vessel-related myocardial infarction; or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. We compared 591 (12.4%) patients who underwent RCA-AO PCI with 4184 (87.6%) patients who underwent proximal RCA PCI. The RCA-AO group included more men and recorded significantly more comorbidities and more complex coronary anatomy. After propensity matching, the primary end point TLF occurred in 4.49% of the RCA-AO group compared with 3.00% of the proximal RCA group (P = .06). Target vessel revascularization (3.29% vs 1.90%; P = .03) and stent thrombosis (1.23% vs 0.42%, P = .01) were significantly higher among patients with RCA-AO lesions than those among patients with proximal RCA lesions. All-cause mortality was similar between the groups (2.97% vs 2.26%; P = .30). The treatment of RCA-AO with DES is feasible, with similar rates of TLF but with an increased risk of target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Is There an Advantage of Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents over Second- and Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents?

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are considered the gold standard of care for revascularization. By reducing neointimal hyperplasia, drug-eluting coronary stents decrease the need for repeat revascularizations compared with conventional coronary stents without an antiproliferative drug coating. It is important to note that early-generation DESs were associated with an increased risk of very late stent thrombosis, most likely due to delayed endothelialization or a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to the polymer. Studies have shown a lower risk of very late stent thrombosis with developing second-generation DESs with biocompatible and biodegradable polymers or without polymers altogether. In addition, research has indicated that thinner struts are associated with a reduced risk of intrastent restenosis and angiographic and clinical results. A DES with ultrathin struts (strut thickness of 70 µm) is more flexible, facilitates better tracking, and is more crossable than a conventional second-generation DES. The question is whether ultrathin eluting drug stents suit all kinds of lesions. Several authors have reported that improved coverage with less thrombus protrusion reduced the risk of distal embolization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Others have described that an ultrathin stent might recoil due to low radial strength. This could lead to residual stenosis and repeated revascularization of the artery. In CTO patients, the ultrathin stent failed to prove non-inferiority regarding in-segment late lumen loss and showed statistically higher rates of restenosis. Ultrathin-strut DESs with biodegradable polymers have limitations when treating calcified (or ostial) lesions and CTOs. However, they also possess certain advantages regarding deliverability (tight stenosis, tortuous lesions, high angulation, etc.), ease of use in bifurcation lesions, better endothelialization and vascular healing, and reducing stent thrombosis risk. In light of this, ultrathin-strut stents present a promising alternative to existing DESs of the second and third generation. The aims of the study are to compare ultrathin eluting stents with second- and third-generation conventional stents regarding procedural performance and outcomes based on different lesion types and specific populations.

"Burying" covered coronary stents under drug-eluting stents: A novel approach to ensure long-term stent patency.

Covered coronary stent (CS) implantation is associated with a high risk for in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). We describe the outcomes after overstenting ("burying") CS using contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). We analyzed short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients who had had a CS implanted, which was consecutively covered ("buried") with a third-generation DES. CSs were primarily post-dilated and then covered with a longer DES overlapping the proximal and distal edges of the CS. To ensure optimal stent expansion and appositions, all lesions were post-dilated using adequately sized non-compliant balloons. Between 2015 and 2020, 23 patients (mean age 67 ± 14 years, 74% males) were treated using this novel approach. Reasons for implanting CS included treatment of coronary aneurysms (n = 7; 30%), coronary perforations (n = 13; 57%), and aorto-ostial dissections (n = 3; 13%). All CSs were successfully deployed, and no peri-procedural complications occurred. The median time of follow-up was 24.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 11.7-37.9) months. All patients had a 1-month follow-up (FU) and 19/23 (83%) patients had 12-month FU (FU range 1-60 months). No probable or definite STs occurred, and no cardiovascular deaths were observed. Among patients undergoing angiographic FU (11/23 [48%]), 1/23 showed angiographically significant ISR 6 months post CS implantation. Burying a coronary CS under a DES appears to be a safe and promising strategy to overcome the limitations of the currently available CS devices, including a relatively high risk for target lesion failure due to ISR and ST.

Guided vs. conventional anti-platelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Whether guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is effective in improving net clinical benefits compared with conventional antiplatelet therapy remains controversial. Therefore, we assessed the safety and efficacy of guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to select the relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the guided and conventional antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. The primary and safety outcomes are major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding, respectively. The efficacy outcomes included myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death. We selected the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect size and calculated it using the Review Manager software. In addition, we evaluated the final results by trial sequential analysis (registered by PROSPERO, CRD 42020210912). We selected seven randomized controlled trials and included 8,451 patients in this meta-analysis. Guided antiplatelet therapy can significantly reduce the risk of MACE (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.76, P < 0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.79, P = 0.0001), all-cause death (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.85, P = 0.003), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.66, 0.49-0.90, P = 0.009). In addition, there is no significant difference between the two groups in stent thrombosis (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-1.03, P = 0.07) and major bleeding (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.13, P = 0.27). The subgroup analysis showed that the guided group based on genotype tests could bring benefits in MACE and myocardial infarction. The guided antiplatelet therapy is not only associated with a comparable risk of bleeding but also with a lower risk of MACE, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and stent thrombosis than the conventional strategy in patients with ACS.

Sex Differences in 10-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights From the DECADE Cooperation.

Although some studies have investigated sex-related outcomes up to 5 years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), analyses at longer follow-up (ie, to 10 years) in large cohorts treated exclusively with drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to define whether sex-related differences in long-term outcomes after PCI persist both in the DES era and at longer-term follow-up. Individual data of patients treated with DES in 5 randomized controlled trials with 10-year follow-up were pooled. Patients were divided into 2 groups by sex. The analysis of individual participant data was performed using a 1-stage approach by entering a clustering effect by parent study in all univariable and multivariable models focusing on sex. The main outcomes of interest for this analysis included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis to 10 years after PCI. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the time to first event, and differences between the 2 groups were tested with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated with a Cox proportional hazards model. Conventional multivariable analyses with adjustment for relevant variables were performed. Among 9700 patients undergoing PCI with DES implantation included in the present analysis, 2296 were women and 7404 were men. Through to 10 years, cardiovascular death occurred in 407 of the 2296 female patients and 1012 of the 7404 male patients (adjusted HR [HRadj], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.80-1.11]). Female sex was associated with a lower risk of repeat revascularization of the target lesion (HRadj, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74-0.87]), target vessel (HRadj, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.87]), and nontarget vessels (HRadj, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.62-0.77]). Compared with male patients, female patients displayed an increased risk of myocardial infarction in the first 30 days after PCI with DES (HRadj, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.24-2.19]) but a comparable risk of myocardial infarction thereafter. The risk of definite stent thrombosis was not significantly different between female and male patients (HRadj, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.89-1.47]). Through to 10-year follow-up after PCI with DES, female patients are at increased risk of early myocardial infarction, receive fewer repeat revascularizations, and have no difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with male patients.

Pro-Con Debate: Are Patients With Coronary Stents Suitable for Free-Standing Ambulatory Surgery Centers?

With increasing implantation of coronary artery stents over the past 2 decades, it is inevitable that anesthesiologists practicing in the outpatient setting will need to determine whether these patients are suitable for procedures at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Appropriate selection of patients with coronary artery stents for a procedure in an ASC requires consideration of factors that affect the balance between the risk of stent thrombosis due to interruption of antiplatelet therapy and the thrombogenic effects of surgery, and the risk of perioperative bleeding complications that may occur if antiplatelet therapy is continued. Thus, periprocedure care of these patients presents unique challenges, particularly for extensive surgical procedures that are increasingly scheduled for free-standing ASCs, where consultation and ancillary services, as well as access to percutaneous cardiac interventions, may not be readily available. Therefore, the suitability of the ambulatory setting for this patient population remains highly controversial. In this Pro-Con commentary, we discuss the arguments for and against scheduling patients with coronary artery stents in free-standing ASCs.

Early Stent Patency After Endovascular Therapy for Tandem or Isolated Carotid Steno-Occlusive Disease

Early Stent Patency After Endovascular Therapy for Tandem or Isolated Carotid Steno-Occlusive Disease

Extended dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in clinically important patient subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is routinely given to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting; however, optimal duration remains uncertain in some situations. We assessed the benefits and harms of extending DAPT beyond 1 year after PCI in clinically important patient subgroups. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library) and grey literature (from inception to Nov. 5, 2021) and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of extended DAPT (> 12 mo) compared with DAPT for 6-12 months following PCI with stenting. The primary outcome was death (all cause, cardiovascular, noncardiovascular); secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, stent thrombosis and bleeding. Subgroups were based on prespecified patient characteristics (prior MI, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], diabetes mellitus, age, smoking status). Data were analyzed by random-effects pairwise meta-analysis. We identified 9 RCTs that provided subgroup data. We found that extended DAPT reduced the risk of MI and stent thrombosis but increased the risk of bleeding, compared with standard DAPT, with no difference in the risk of all-cause death (relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.42) or cardiovascular death (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74-1.30). We found that patients with a prior MI, with ACS at presentation, without diabetes or aged younger than 75 years may derive the most benefit from extended DAPT. Among patients who received extended DAPT, the risk of all-cause death was significantly increased among those with no prior MI (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08-2.24), whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause death between standard and extended DAPT for patients with ACS (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.51-2.83), with diabetes (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.86-1.89), aged older than 75 years (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.39-4.54) or who smoked (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.42-1.92). Similar results were found for cardiovascular death, where data were available. Patients with a previous MI with ACS at presentation, without diabetes, or aged younger than 75 years may derive the most benefit from extended DAPT. These findings support the need for careful selection of patients who may benefit most from extended DAPT. PROSPERO no. CRD42018082587.

Descriptive and prognostic study at 5 years of percutaneous coronary intervention by long active stents ≥ 40 mm

The treatment of long coronary lesions often requires long stents, which carries a higher risk of stent thrombosis, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical and angiographic results, immediate, in the medium and in the long-term of the coronary angioplasties with very long active stents ≥ 40 mm. We carried out a retrospective, multicenter, descriptive and prognostic study, during a period of 5 years between January 2015 and January 2020 in four Tunisian centers, including all patients who underwent coronary angioplasty with an active stent ≥ 40 mm in length. Four hundred and eighty patients were included. Our population was at high cardiovascular risk: the mean age was 62.45 years with a sex ratio of 3.40. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were as follows: arterial hypertension: 61.1%, diabetes: 56.6% and tobacco: 60.5%. The most common clinical presentation was acute coronary syndromes in 69.70%. The artery most frequently stented with a very long stent was the anterior interventricular artery in 49.4%. The treated lesions were complex: 23.5% were calcified, 8.7% were total chronic occlusions and 25% had bifurcations. The average length of the implanted stents was 47.72 mm. The long coronary lesion required an overlap by a 2nd stent in 16.45% of the interventions. Angiographic and clinical success was observed in 96% and 95% of cases respectively. Seventeen cases of per-procedural complications were recorded during the procedure (3.55%). Angiographic control was only performed during the follow-up in 21.7% of patients. The stent thrombosis rate was 0.83%. The incidence of MACE, TVR and TLR and was 16.3%, 9.2% and 7.9%, respectively. Diabetes appeared to be predictive factors of TLR (survival without TLR at 12 months = 99% vs. 93.7%; P = 0.01). The study of the characteristics lesion showed that ostial lesions and bifurcation lesions are predictive factors for increased TLR (ostial lesion: survival without TLR at 5 years = 78.2% vs. 87.4%; P = 0.001/bifurcation lesion: survival without TLR at 5 years = 84% vs. 92.7%; P = 0.03). Coronary stenoses requiring treatment with long stents are generally associated with high cardiovascular risk and complex atheromatous disease. They can be revascularized with a long active stent (≥ 40 mm) with an acceptable MACE, TLR, TVR and thrombosis rate.