Risk Of Spinal Cord Ischemia Research Articles

Implementation of a bundled protocol significantly reduces risk of spinal cord ischemia after branched or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveSpinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication after branched or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (B/FEVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic disease. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the impact of a bundled clinical care protocol designed to reduce the risk of SCI in this population of patients. MethodsA bundled SCI prevention protocol including cerebrospinal fluid drainage, blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and pharmacologic adjuncts (steroids, naloxone) was initiated in May 2015. Before that date, portions of the protocol (cerebrospinal fluid drainage in particular) were used in an informal fashion in patients perceived to be at high risk. B/FEVAR cases completed from January 2012 to May 2016 were reviewed, and outcomes before (n = 223) and after (n = 70) SCI bundle application were compared. The primary end point was the incidence of SCI events. Secondary end points included length of stay, complications, and survival. High-risk patients for SCI were defined as those undergoing B/FEVAR resulting in aortic coverage equivalent to open Crawford extent I to III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis. ResultsPostprotocol patients were more likely to be older (75 ± 7 vs 72 ± 8 years; P = .03), to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 designation (94% vs 81%; P = .04), and to be treated for TAAA (67% vs 56%; P = .004). Postprotocol pre-emptive spinal drain use was greater in high-risk patients (100% vs 87%; P = .04) but significantly decreased in lower risk patients (suprarenal aneurysm or extent IV TAAA: 5% after protocol implementation vs 21% before protocol implementation; P = .04). Rates of any SCI before and after implementation of the bundled protocol were 13% (n = 29 of 223) and 3% (n = 2 of 70; P = .007), respectively. In comparing high-risk patients, protocol use resulted in an even more significant reduction in SCI rate (19% [28 of 144] vs 4% [2 of 50]; P = .004). Postoperative morbidity (41% vs 33%; P = .2) and 30-day mortality (5% vs 1%; P = .3) were not different between groups. However, patients treated on protocol had significantly improved 1-year survival (99% ± 1% after protocol implementation vs 90% ± 2% before protocol implementation; log-rank, P = .05). ConclusionsImplementation of a bundled multimodal protocol may significantly reduce risk of SCI after B/FEVAR, with the greatest risk reduction occurring in the most vulnerable patients. Interestingly, reduction in SCI risk was associated with improvement in 1-year survival.

Early Results of the PETTICOAT Technique for the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Conventional surgical techniques for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) generally fail to address residual dissection in the descending aorta. The persistence of a false lumen is associated with visceral malperfusion in the acute setting and adverse aortic remodeling in the chronic setting. Hybrid aortic arch repair techniques may improve perioperative and long-term mortality by expanding the true lumen and obliterating the false lumen. However, there is a limit to the extent of aortic coverage due to the concomitant risk of spinal cord ischemia. In Type B dissection, the PETTICOAT (Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment) technique, which entails stent graft coverage of the primary intimal tear followed by bare metal stent placement distally, may improve true lumen caliber and promote false lumen thrombosis without increasing the risk of spinal cord ischemia, as intercostal branches remain perfused through the bare metal stents. The technique of hybrid arch with surgical creation of a Dacron landing zone covering a stent graft in the proximal descending aorta and bare metal stents in the thoraco-abdominal aorta is a promising concept in the treatment of ATAAD.

Evaluation of visible spinal arteries on computed tomography angiography before and after branched stent graft repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intercostal and lumbar segmental arteries (SAs) detectable on computed tomography angiography (CTA) on the risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in patients undergoing single-step or two-staged branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR). MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients treated with branched stent grafts for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm at a single institution from January 2009 to June 2015 was performed. Data including preoperative comorbidities, perioperative and aneurysm-related parameters, presence and type of endoleak, and rate of severe SCI at discharge or 30 days after the procedure were collected. Preoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced CTA images were semiquantitatively analyzed by two independent investigators, and the number of visible SAs in the stented aorta before and after BEVAR was evaluated to find a possible correlation with severe SCI. ResultsSeventy-seven patients were treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with BEVAR (47 men; mean age, 71.0 years), 40 (51.9%) of them with temporary aneurysm sac perfusion (TASP; open branch/TASP group) and 37 without (single-step group). The groups were comparable regarding parameters related to the patient, aneurysm type, and endovascular procedure. Severe SCI or paraplegia was observed in 10 patients (12.3%), and SCI was lower in the open branch/TASP group (2/40) compared with the single-step group (8/37; P = .032). The number of visible SAs in the intentionally overstented aortic segment was significantly reduced on postoperative CTA (10.0 vs 15.57 SAs; P < .001) in comparison to preoperative CTA imaging, with similar results in the open branch/TASP group (9.48 vs 15.83 SAs) and the single-step group (10.57 vs 15.30 SAs; P < .001 for both groups). Within the open branch/TASP group, more visible SAs were detected during the TASP interval in comparison to postoperative CTA after side branch completion (12.93 vs 9.48 SAs; P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the single-step group revealed a cutoff point of 15 SAs on preoperative CTA with correlation to severe SCI (P = .006). In the high-risk subgroup of patients with 15 or more overstented SAs during BEVAR, staged open branch/TASP procedures again reduced the risk of SCI in comparison to the single-step patients (1/20 vs 8/22; P = .008). ConclusionsMore spinal arteries are visible during the TASP interval, supporting the open branch and TASP concept with a reduction of severe SCI during BEVAR. An intentional coverage of more than 15 SAs is related to an increased risk of SCI, and the rate of paraplegia was reduced after staged BEVAR with open branch/TASP in these high-risk patients.

Implementation of a Bundled Protocol Significantly Reduces Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Branched/Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair

Implementation of a Bundled Protocol Significantly Reduces Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Branched/Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair

Lower extremity weakness is associated with elevated blood and cerebrospinal fluid glucose levels following multibranched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveHyperglycemia is associated with worsened clinical outcomes after central nervous system injury. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between lower extremity weakness (LEW) and the glucose levels of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients undergoing multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair (MBEVAR) of thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysms. MethodsBlood and CSF samples were collected preoperatively, immediately after aneurysm repair, and on postoperative day 1 in 21 patients undergoing MBEVAR. Data on demographics, operative repair, complications, and outcomes were collected prospectively. ResultsThere were 21 patients who underwent successful MBEVAR. Two patients had pre-existing paraplegia from prior open aortic surgery and were excluded from the current analysis. The mean age was 73 ± 8 years, and 15 of 19 (79%) were men. In the postoperative period, 7 of 19 (37%) patients developed LEW. This was temporary in 5 of 19 (26%) patients and permanent in 2 of 19 (11%) patients. The LEW group was older than the non-LEW group (77 ± 6 vs 70 ± 9 years, respectively; P = .10), had a lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate (58.6 ± 18.5 vs 71.4 ± 23.5 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P = .24), and was more likely to be taking a statin (100% vs 67%, respectively; P = .13), but these did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, lung disease, or peripheral artery disease between the LEW and non-LEW groups. There was also no difference in operative time, blood loss, contrast material volume, or fluoroscopy times between the two groups. Preoperative blood and CSF glucose levels were similar in those with and without LEW. During the postoperative period, glucose values in the blood and CSF were significantly higher in those patients who developed LEW compared with those who did not develop LEW. In all patients with LEW, the elevation in the blood or CSF glucose level preceded the development of LEW. In a multivariable logistic regression model, CSF glucose concentration on postoperative day 1 was significantly and independently associated with the development of LEW (odds ratio, 2.30 [1.03-5.14] per 10 mg/dL increase in CSF glucose; P = .04). ConclusionsElevated blood glucose and CSF glucose levels are associated with postoperative LEW in patients undergoing MBEVAR. The protective effect of euglycemia deserves further study in patients at risk for spinal cord ischemia.

Sonographic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Associated with Supra- versus Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Quantification of changes in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) using ocular sonography (OS) constitutes an elegant technique for estimating intracranial and intraspinal pressure. Aortic aneurysm repair (AAR) is associated with a reasonable risk of increased spinal fluid pressure, which is largely dependent on the extent of aneurysm repair (supra- vs. infrarenal). The aim of this study was to compare ONSD measurements in patients with suprarenal AAR (sAAR) or infrarenal AAR (iAAR). Thirty patients who underwent elective endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (Group iAAR) were included in the study; the characteristics in these cases were prospectively analyzed and compared with those in a previously investigated group of 28 patients treated for suprarenal aortic aneurysms (Group sAAR). Six measurements of ONSDs were performed in each patient at five consecutive time points. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. A highly significant difference between pre- and postinterventional values could be detected in both patient groups (P < .01). In Group sAAR, there was a mean .3-mm increase of the ONSD, whereas in Group iAAR, a mean .2-mm decrease could be detected. Both groups roughly reached baseline values by the end of their inpatient stay. ONSD changes seem to be a reliable marker to estimate spinal perfusion. Since OS provides a suitable bedside tool for rapid reevaluation, it may guide physicians in the identification and treatment of patients at high risk for spinal cord ischemia.

The Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia in ThoracoLumbar Spine Surgery: Attempt to Quantify Predictive Factor

The Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia in ThoracoLumbar Spine Surgery: Attempt to Quantify Predictive Factor

Repeated total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastases at different sites in one patient.

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is accompanied by preoperative embolization of segmental arteries, which is limited to three consecutive levels to avoid the risk of spinal cord ischemia. We retrospectively examined the efficacy and safety of repeated TES with embolization of more than three levels of segmental arteries. Seven patients underwent TES twice for spinal metastases at different levels. Every patient underwent embolization of the bilateral segmental arteries before each surgery. We assessed the total number of segmental arteries embolized, the existence of Adamkiewicz arteries during the embolization procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the motor function of the lower limbs, using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score. No patient experienced any motor deficit after embolization. During the embolization procedure, an Adamkiewicz artery was depicted in five patients, which precluded embolization at that level. The median number of segmental arteries embolized in total was 9 (9-11). Intraoperative blood loss (median, IQR) was 480 (420-630) ml during the first surgery and 520 (280-600) ml during the second surgery. The ASIA motor scores (median, IQR) were as follows; 100 (98-100) (first admission), 100 (100-100) (first discharge), 100 (98-100) (second admission), and 97 (94-100) (second discharge). No patients had developed statistically significant neurological deterioration, and there had been no local recurrence after a median follow-up of 17.8months (range 1-51months). Repeated TES procedures can be performed safely even if more than three levels of segmental arteries are embolized.

Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms

The practice of using fenestrated endografts to treat juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) has become more accepted, but long-term outcomes are still unknown. We report long-term survival, complications, and branch-related outcomes from a single-center experience. The study included consecutive patients enrolled prospectively into a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption classified as undergoing group IV TAAA or juxtarenal aneurysm repair by the treating surgeon using fenestrated endografts. Device morphology was used to subclassify this group of patients. Long-term survival and a composite outcome of secondary intervention, branch occlusion, stent migration, endoleak, aneurysm growth, or spinal cord injury were calculated. Descriptive analysis of branch-related outcomes and need for any reintervention was performed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of mortality and the composite outcome was performed to determine associative risks. Long-term survival for patients with juxtarenal and group IV TAAA aneurysms treated with fenestrated stent grafts was 20% at 8 years. Multivariate analysis showed long-term survival for this patient population was negatively associated with increasing age, congestive heart failure, cancer, and previous aneurysm repair. The risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in this group was 1.2% and of aortic-related mortality was 2%. The risk of a spinal event increased with coverage above the celiac artery (52 mm of coverage above the celiac artery in patients with SCI vs 33 mm without SCI; P = .099). More complex device configurations were more likely to require an increased rate of reinterventions, and patients with celiac fenestrations were more likely to experience celiac occlusion over time (3.5% vs 0.5%; P = .019). However, less complex designs were complicated by an increased risk of type I endoleak over time (10.4% for renal fenestrations only vs 1.9% for others; P < .01). As experience evolved, there was a trend to increase the number of fenestrations in devices treating the same anatomy. The use of fenestrated devices to treat juxtarenal and group IV TAAA is safe and effective in long-term follow-up. Mortality in this patient population is largely not aortic-related. Devices designed for fenestrated repair of juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms within a physician sponsored investigational device exemption have changed over time. Further research is needed to determine the best configuration to treat aneurysms requiring coverage proximal to the celiac artery.

Multiple factors predict the risk of spinal cord injury after the frozen elephant trunk technique for extended thoracic aortic disease.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) after the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is more frequent than after endovascular aneurysm repair. This study aimed to identify risk factors of SCI after the FET technique. We performed the FET technique for extended thoracic aortic disease in 224 patients (mean age, 72.1 ± 10.9 years) from September 1997 to December 2011. The patients included those with acute type A aortic dissection (n = 103), acute type B aortic dissection (n = 30), chronic type B aortic dissection (n = 11) and thoracic atherosclerotic aneurysm (n = 80). Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was preoperatively performed for 18 elective cases with a high risk of spinal cord ischaemia from January 2003. Postoperative SCI was present in 8 (3.5%), including complete paraplegia in 3, patients and transient or permanent paraparesis in 5 patients. CSFD was not a significant independent risk factor (P = 0.93) for SCI. Univariate logistic regression analysis identified pathology (P = 0.001), diabetes (P = 0.001), previous aortic operation (P = 0.003), atherosclerotic aorta (P = 0.003), distal position of the stent graft below the ninth thoracic vertebral level (Th9; P = 0.001) and low blood pressure after the operation (P = 0.009) as significant independent risk factors for SCI. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the distal position of the stent graft below Th9 (P = 0.003; odds ratio [OR], 15.167; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.568-89.578), mean pressure <70 mmHg (P = 0.008; OR, 11.470; 95% CI, 1.920-68.546) and diabetes (P = 0.009; OR, 9.621; 95% CI, 1.779-52.032) as significant independent risk factors for SCI. There were multiple factors predicting the risk of SCI after the FET technique. Paraplegia may be prevented by avoiding deep insertion of the stent graft and by keeping blood pressure elevated after the operation.

Surgical and anesthetic considerations for the endovascular treatment of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms

Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (rDTAA) is a life-threatening disease. In the last decade, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has evolved as a viable option and is now considered the preferred treatment for rDTAAs. New opportunities as well as new challenges are faced by both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. This review describes the impact of current developments and new modalities for the surgical and anesthetic management of rDTAAs. A collaborative approach between the anesthesiologist and surgeon during critical moments such as induction, moment of aortic occlusion and placement of the aortic stent-graft is mandatory. Important issues to consider on preoperative imaging evaluation are correct sizing of the aortic stent-graft and localization of the artery of Adamkiewicz. Emergency TEVAR should preferentially be started under local anesthesia and could be switched to general anesthesia after stent placement. Patients should be kept in permissive hypotension preoperatively and during the intervention before stent-graft deployment and relative hypertension after deployment. The use of a proactive spinal cord protection protocol could decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia and/or paraplegia and consists of permissive hypertension after stent deployment, cerebrospinal fluid drainage to maintain adequate spinal cord perfusion, relative hypothermia and possibly use of mannitol. In order to improve outcomes of TEVAR for rDTAA, a close communication between the anesthesiologist and the surgeon and a thorough understanding of the events during the procedure is mandatory. The use of a proactive spinal cord protection protocol may decrease the rates of devastating spinal cord ischemia.

Changes of cerebrospinal fluid pressure after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Background Decreasing the intracranial pressure has been advocated as one of the major protective strategies to prevent spinal cord ischemia after endovascular aortic repair. However, the actual changes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and its relation with spinal cord ischemia have been poorly understood. We performed CSF pressure measurements and provisional CSF withdrawal after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and compared the changes of CSF pressure in high risk patients and in patients with new onset paraplegia and paraparesis. Methods Four hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated for the risk of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients with identified risk factors before the procedure constituted group H and received prophylactic sequential CSF pressure measurement and CSF withdrawal. Patients who actually developed spinal cord ischemia constituted group P and received rescue CSF pressure measurements and CSF withdrawal. Results Among the 419 patients evaluated, 17 were graded as high risk. Four patients actually developed spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair. The incidence of spinal cord ischemia in this investigation was 0.9%. The patients who actually developed spinal cord ischemia had no identified risk factors and had elevated CSF pressure, ranging from 15.4 to 30.0 mmHg. Six of the 17 patients graded as high risk had elevated CSF pressure: &gt;20 mmHg in two patients and &gt;15 mmHg in four patients. Sequential CSF pressure measurements and provisional withdrawal successfully decrease CSF pressure and prevented symptomatic spinal cord ischemia in high-risk patients. However, these measurements could only successfully reverse the neurologic deficit in two of the patients who actually developed spinal cord ischemia. Conclusions Cerebrospinal fluid pressure was elevated in patients with spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Sequential measurements of CSF pressure and provisional withdrawal of CSF decreased CSF pressure effectively in high risk patients and provided effective prevention of spinal cord ischemia. Risk factor identification and prophylactic measurements play the key role in prevention of spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

CASE 11–2014Successful Open Repair of an Extensive Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm in a Complex Patient

The patient's additional past history included hypertension, a traumatic right internal jugular vein injury, and a 2010 Heller myotomy for achalasia of the esophagus. The patient reported no dysphagia for liquids and solids. His physical examination was consistent with his history and otherwise was within normal limits. His laboratory studies were all within normal limits, except for an elevated partial thrombo- plastin time (PTT). Recent transthoracic echocardiography revealed normal biventricular function and no significant valvular disease. A myocardial stress test was negative for ischemia. His carotid ultrasound studies revealed no significant disease. Review of his coagulation studies revealed a normal profile over time, except for an isolated chronically elevated PTT in the range of 36-41 seconds (normal range 20-34 seconds) with no clinical bleeding tendency or history of heparin exposure. There was no family history of a bleeding diathesis. There were no clinical features consistent with the antiphospholipid syndrome. Consultation with hematology confirmed no immediate contraindication to surgery and suggested elective investigation for an isolated mild clotting factor deficiency, if indicated, at a later time. Given that the patient was currently in the hospital with ongoing aortic pain despite strict blood pressure management, the decision was reached to proceed with definitive DTAA repair. Even though the bleeding risk posed by the elevated PTT was trivial to mild, this risk was still very relevant for possible neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar spinal catheter for CSF drainage and an epidural catheter for perioperative analgesia. After a team discus- sion and review of the benefits and risks of CSF drainage, a joint decision was reached to proceed with DTAA repair without a lumbar spinal catheter or an epidural catheter, given that the risk for spinal cord ischemia was low in this case and alternative analgesic options were available. Furthermore, the team opted for aortic repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest to maximize spinal cord protection in this unusual setting. 7 Given this decision about perfusion management after team discussion, intraoperative mon- itoring with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was deemed essential to guide perfusion management, including adequate vent- ing of the left ventricle from the left chest. 8 Because of his previous

Onyx injection by direct puncture for the treatment of hypervascular spinal metastases close to the anterior spinal artery: initial experience

Presurgical devascularization of hypervascular spinal metastases has been shown to be effective in preventing major blood loss during open surgery. Most often, embolization can be performed using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microparticles. However, in some cases, the close relationship between the feeders of the metastases and the feeders of the anterior spinal artery (ASA) poses a risk of spinal cord ischemia when PVA microparticle embolization is performed. The authors present their early experience in the treatment of spinal metastases close to the ASA; in 2 cases they injected Onyx-18, by direct puncture, into hypervascular posterior arch spinal metastases situated close to the ASA. Two women, one 36 and the other 55 years of age, who presented with spinal lesions (at the posterior arch of C-4 and T-6, respectively) from thyroid and a kidney tumors, were sent to the authors' department to undergo presurgical embolization. After having performed a complete spinal digital subtraction angiography study, a regular angiography catheter was positioned at the ostium of the artery that mainly supplied the lesion. Then, with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, direct puncture with 18-gauge needles of the lesion was performed using roadmap guidance. Onyx-18 was injected through the needles under biplanar fluoroscopy. Satisfactory devascularization of the lesions was obtained; the ASA remained patent in both cases. The metastases were surgically removed in both cases within the 48 hours after the embolization and major blood loss did not occur. Presurgical devascularization of hypervascular spinal metastases close the ASA by direct puncture with Onyx-18 seems to be an effective technique and appears to be safe in terms of the preserving the ASA's patency.

No Increased Risk of Spinal Cord Ischemia in Delayed AAA Repair Following Thoracic Aortic Surgery

To examine the results of open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair following prior open or endovascular thoracic aortic surgery. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent AAA repair in a delayed fashion following prior thoracic aortic surgery at a single university hospital between 1999 and 2011 was performed. Thirteen patients underwent AAA repair following prior thoracic aortic repair. Mean age was 68.9 ± 6.9 years and 77% (n = 10) were male. Three patients experienced transient delayed-onset spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following initial thoracic surgery. Mean time interval between initial thoracic aortic surgery and subsequent AAA repair was 2.0 ± 1.8 years. Overall rate of SCI and 30-day mortality after delayed AAA repair was 0%. This series does not demonstrate any evidence of increased risk of perioperative mortality or SCI in patients undergoing delayed AAA repair after prior thoracic aortic surgery.

Tailored Endovascular Repair of Traumatic Aortic Disruptions with “Stacked” Abdominal Aortic Extension Cuffs

The management paradigm for traumatic aortic disruptions has evolved from open to endovascular repair. Thoracic stent grafts designed to treat aneurysmal disease, however, have disadvantages, including size mismatch in younger trauma patients and current standard lengths, which may needlessly necessitate coverage of at least 10 cm of thoracic aorta, increasing the risk of spinal cord ischemia. The "off-label" use of abdominal aortic extension cuffs to treat traumatic aortic disruptions may provide an advantage in this regard by better size matching for the younger trauma patient, reduced thoracic aortic coverage, and less cost to the institution. From 2008 to 2011, a total of 16 traumatic aortic disruptions were evaluated and managed with endovascular techniques. The last six were treated with abdominal aortic extensions cuffs (Excluder Extension Cuffs; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) rather than traditional thoracic stent grafts. In addition to demographics and trauma-related data, additional endpoints evaluated in this retrospective review included operative time, number of cuffs used, stent cost data, procedural complications, and follow-up. All six patients (five men/one woman) with traumatic aortic disruption were successfully treated with complete exclusion of the disruption using abdominal aortic cuffs. There were no complications including death or spinal cord ischemia. The average age was 27 years (range, 18-44 years). The average number of cuffs used to cover the traumatic tear was 2.6 per patient (range, 2-3 cuffs per patient), covering an average of 5.3 cm of thoracic aorta (range, 4-6 cm). Mean procedure time was 70 minutes. Hospital cost for each cuff was $2200 (average total stent cost per patient, $5720). For comparison, a single 10-cm conformable thoracic aortic graft (CTAG) (Gore) costs $14,500. Average follow-up of all six patients for up to 3 years demonstrates no complications or migration of the stent grafts. Traumatic aortic disruptions can be safely and selectively managed with "stacked" abdominal aortic extension cuffs. This tailored therapy may provide advantages over traditional thoracic stents, including improved size match in a younger trauma patient, less aortic coverage, and reduced cost.

Spinal Cord Injury After Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch Replacement Combined with Antegrade Stent Grafting: Role of Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage

Ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement combined with antegrade stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta represents an emerging hybrid surgical approach for complex and extensive thoracic aortic disease. We present a case of a patient at low risk for spinal cord ischemia who underwent hybrid thoracic aortic surgery (aortic arch replacement and E-vita prosthesis implantation) and developed a spinal cord injury (SCI) after the intervention. Treatment aimed at increasing spinal cord perfusion pressure with the aid of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was effective in recovering neuromuscular function.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Evolution of therapy, patterns of use, and results in a 10-year experience

The introduction of aortic stent grafting in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease has pioneered unique treatment options and gained rapid clinical adoption despite a paucity of long-term outcome data. The purpose of this analysis is to examine all operations performed using thoracic aortic stent grafts at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. A total of 502 operations involving thoracic aortic stent grafting were performed between April 1999 and April 2009. Patients were followed in a prospectively collected clinical perioperative registry, and long-term outcomes were determined from administrative data sources. Aortic pathologies included aortic aneurysm, acute aortic dissection (types A and B), hybrid arch repairs, reinterventions with additional stents, pseudoaneurysm, chronic type B dissection, traumatic transection, penetrating aortic ulcer, and other unique indications. Patients' mean age at the time of thoracic endovascular aortic repair was 70.1 ± 12.4 years, and 51% of the patients were aged more than 70 years. Some 41% of patients were female, and the majority of patients (87%) were hypertensive. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.1%. Multivariable risk factors for 30-day mortality included urgent/emergency, Stanford type A aortic dissection, perioperative spinal ischemia, type C aortic coverage, hybrid arch operation, aortic transection, chronic renal failure, and age. Neurologic complications included permanent complete or incomplete paraplegia in 17 patients (3.4%), reversible spinal cord ischemia in 26 patients (5.1%), transient stroke in 16 patients (3.2%), and permanent stroke in 23 patients (4.6%). Greater extent of aortic coverage was not associated with risk of spinal cord ischemia. Access complications, stroke, and endoleaks diminished with increased operative experience over time. Risk factors for late mortality included urgent/emergency indications, hybrid procedures, traumatic aortic transection, age, perioperative paralysis, and chronic renal failure. Patients undergoing stent grafting for type B dissection were more likely to survive than patients undergoing stent grafting for aneurysms or other indications. Thoracic aortic stent grafting has evolved to be a viable option to complement, augment, or even replace traditional treatments for aortic disease. These data illustrate the applicability of this evolving technology in the establishment of new treatment paradigms for complex aortic pathologies.

Debate regarding the best surgical option for type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Conventional open surgical repair, endovascular treatment, and the hybrid technique constitute the three treatment options for patients with type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Treatment is advocated to prevent rupture but yields significant risk for spinal cord ischemia, cardiovascular, and renal and respiratory complications, including death. Refinements in open surgical techniques and branched endovascular graft repair together with the development of hybrid techniques have been applied to the treatment of type IV-TAAAs to decrease the risk of these complications. However, much of the evidence of the argument is circumstantial. Large experiences are limited to a few centers worldwide with inherent disparity between patient groups and several limitations to the construction of a prospective randomized trial. This controversial subject is now open to discussion, and our debaters have been given the challenge to clarify the evidence to justify their preferred option for repair of type IV-TAAAs.

Reversal of Delayed-Onset Paraparesis After Revision Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an important surgical option for the emergency treatment of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms, but is associated with a risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Although risk factors for the development of SCI have been well described, the effectiveness of treatment to increase spinal cord perfusion pressure remains incompletely understood. We report the successful treatment of delayed-onset paraparesis after revision TEVAR for acute descending thoracic aortic rupture with the combined use of blood pressure augmentation and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, and management of SCI after TEVAR are reviewed.