Risk Of Revision Research Articles

Outcomes of distal femoral replacement versus internal fixation for metastatic bone diseases of the distal femur

BackgroundIn clinical practice, internal fixation (IF) is a commonly utilized technique for metastatic bone disease (MBD) to the distal femur. Additionally, distal femoral reconstruction (DFR) has shown to be an effective surgical technique for primary tumors and MBD in the distal femur. The existing body of research comparing these methods has not focused on MBD or pathological fractures and thus does not guide surgical approach in the case of distal femoral MBD. MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective review of musculoskeletal oncology patients treated surgically with IF (n = 29) or DFR (n = 34) for distal femoral MBD between 2005 and 2023. Overall survival, revision risk, and functional status were assessed. Results5-year patient overall survival was 47.9 % (CI, 29.5–77.6 %) and 46.6 % (CI, 31.5–68.8 %), for DFR and IF, respectively (p = 0.91). After competing risk analysis, the 5-year risk of implant revision for DFR was 18 % (95 % CI: 5.1–37 %) and 11 % for IF (95 % CI: 2.4–28 %) (p = 0.3). DFR had longer operative times (p = 0.002), higher blood loss (p < 0.001), and greater postoperative (p = 0.006) complications than IF. In addition, patients undergoing DFR had more distal lesions than patients who received IF (p = 0.003). ConclusionDespite similar overall survival and revision rates, IF may be preferable for patients due to its shorter operative time and lower rates of complication than DFR. However, specific anatomic location in the distal femur must be considered prior to deciding which procedure is optimal.

Impact of surgeon variability on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 2188 surgeons

BackgroundThere has been limited evaluation of surgeon-specific factors on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The goals of this study were (1) to determine the impact of surgeon procedural volume, career duration, practice type, and fellowship training on TSA outcomes at 2-year follow-up and (2) to evaluate the relative importance of surgeon variables in relation to patient variables in influencing outcomes. MethodsThe PearlDiver Mariner database was queried to identify all surgeons who performed a minimum of 11 TSA procedures from 2010 to 2018. An Internet search of publicly available data was performed to determine the career duration, practice type, and fellowship training of each surgeon. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to determine the relationship between surgeon-specific variables and 2-year surgical complications and revisions and 90-day readmissions. Variable importance of patient-specific and surgeon-specific factors was determined by the Akaike information criterion increase of these models. ResultsA total of 2188 surgeons who performed 93,122 TSA procedures were identified in this database. Higher reverse TSA surgical volume was associated with fewer surgical complications and revisions, although such a relationship was not observed for anatomic TSA. Revision after anatomic TSA was more common among surgeons who were in their first 5 years of practice. There was a higher risk of surgical complication and readmission among academic surgeons, but this did not equate with a higher risk of revision. The impact of these surgeon-specific factors on outcomes was small in relation to patient-level variables, such as age, sex, and number of medical comorbidities. ConclusionSurgeon procedural volume, career duration, and practice setting influence the surgical complication, revision, and readmission rates after TSA. The impact of surgeon factors was small relative to patient variables, highlighting the importance of patient selection in mitigating adverse outcomes.

The outcomes of conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acetabular erosion is an important complication in hemiarthroplasty and may lead to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion. The results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with primary total hip arthroplasty. PRISMA guidelines were used and Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane libraries were searched. Both, studies comparing the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with the outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty and the outcome of cohort studies limited to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies checklist. Meta-analysis was performed concerning pooled annual revision, dislocation and infection rates. A total of 27 studies were available for analysis; four comparative studies and 23 cohort studies. Comparative studies were defined as high quality and cohort studies as medium quality. Analysis revealed a significantly higher overall revision risk (Hazard Ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.14) after total hip arthroplasty as a conversion compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. The annual revision rate of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion was 1.63% (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.33) in the comparative studies and 1.40% (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.66) in the cohort studies. A pooled infection rate of 4.34% (95% confidence interval 2.66 to 7.01) and dislocation rate of 4.79% (95% confidence interval 3.02 to 7.53), was found. Literature concerning the results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion is limited. The risk of revision after conversion of hemiarthroplasty is higher compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Time trends in case-mix and risk of revision following hip and knee arthroplasty in public and private hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis based on 476,312 procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

This study aims to assess time trends in case-mix and to evaluate the risk of revision and causes following primary THA, TKA, and UKA in private and public hospitals in the Netherlands. We retrospectively analyzed 476,312 primary arthroplasties (public: n = 413,560 and private n = 62,752) implanted between 2014 and 2023 using Dutch Arthroplasty Register data. We explored patient demographics, procedure details, trends over time, and revisions per hospital type. Adjusted revision risk was calculated for comparable subgroups (ASA I/II, age ≤ 75, BMI ≤ 30, osteoarthritis diagnosis, and moderate-high socioeconomic status (SES). The volume of THAs and TKAs in private hospitals increased from 4% and 9% in 2014, to 18% and 21% in 2022. Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES compared with public hospital patients. In private hospitals, age and ASA II proportion increased over time. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated a lower revision risk for primary THA (HR 0.7, CI 0.7-0.8), TKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9), and UKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9) in private hospitals. After initial arthroplasty in private hospitals, 49% of THA and 37% of TKA revisions were performed in public hospitals. Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES com-pared with public hospital patients. The number of arthroplasties increased in private hospitals, with a lower revision risk compared with public hospitals.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Reoperation and Revision Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty with an Anatomic Convertible Prosthesis.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains a valuable tool for treating inflammatory, degenerative, and traumatic elbow conditions. This study aimed to understand the incidence of and risk factors for reoperation following TEA at a high-volume center utilizing an implant with a convertible linkage and the potential for anatomic lateral column reconstruction. All patients undergoing primary TEA with the Latitude prosthesis (Stryker) from July 2001 to May 2020 were identified. Patient characteristics, the surgical indication, and implant characteristics were obtained. Additionally, the indications and timing were identified for reoperations. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed to assess cement quality, implant position, lateral column reconstruction, and distal humeral bone loss. Two hundred and nineteen TEAs were performed in 206 patients; 162 (74.0%) were in female patients, the mean patient age was 61 years (range, 23 to 95 years), and the mean follow-up was 11.8 years (range, 2 to 21 years). The most common indication for surgery was sequelae of trauma (36%). Ninety elbows (41.1%) required 200 reoperations at a mean of 19.6 months. Forty TEAs (18.3%) required revision of nonmodular implants, with 14 (6.4%) undergoing definitive explantation. The 5 and 10-year survivorship was 86.1% and 79.7%, respectively. The most common of the reasons for revision was aseptic loosening (53.8%), and the most common cause for non-revision reoperation was infection (23%). Younger age and greater follow-up duration were associated with greater revision and reoperation risks. Aseptic ulnar loosening was associated with a short ulnar stem length and component linkage (30% of short linked ulnar stems loosened; p < 0.001). Aseptic humeral loosening was associated with less-than-adequate cement-mantle quality (p = 0.04). Extended follow-up of the Latitude prosthesis at a high-volume center demonstrates that TEA continues to be hampered by a high reoperation rate, primarily due to infection and aseptic loosening. Technical factors such as good cement-mantle quality, longer stem length, and unlinked implants may play a role in preventing aseptic loosening. Further work is required to optimize long-term outcomes following TEA through improved understanding of appropriate surgical indications, techniques, and implant utilization. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Selective Use of Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Revision in Patients Aged 65 or Greater: An Analysis from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

Modern highly porous surfaces have increased confidence and use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the United States. As cementless TKA use increases, there remains a paucity of literature regarding associated risk of revision in patients aged ≥65 years. We analyzed the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) data from January 2012 to March 2020 identifying patients aged ≥65 years undergoing primary TKA with linked cases to supplemental centers for Medicare and Medicaid data. Patients with hybrid fixation, reverse hybrid fixation, missing component data, highly constrained implants, and stem extension/augmentation were excluded. We identified 442,745 cemented TKAs and 19,841 modern cementless TKAs with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Cumulative incident function (CIF) curves and cause-specific Cox models evaluated the risk of all-cause revision and revision for mechanical loosening, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), sex, age, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS) femoral design, patellar resurfacing, and Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI). Patients with cementless compared with cemented TKA were younger (mean age: 71.9 vs. 73.2 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be male sex (48.8 vs. 39.0%, p < 0.001), more likely to have a CR femoral design (81.1 vs. 45.7%, p < 0.001), less likely to have patellar resurfacing (92.7 vs. 95.0%, p < 0.001), and had a lower CCI (mean: 2.9 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) showed no difference in associated risk for all-cause revision (HR: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.24; p = 0.382) or revision for mechanical loosening (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.9-2.12; p = 0.14) for cementless versus cemented TKA. Our results suggest that current selective use of cementless fixation for TKA in patients aged ≥65 years in the United States is not associated with an increased risk of revision. While encouraging, further study is necessary to establish indications for use in this age group prior to broader adoption in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Knee

The June 2024 Knee Roundup360 looks at: The estimated lifetime risk of revision after primary knee arthroplasty influenced by age, sex, and indication; Should high-risk patients seek out care from high-volume surgeons?; Stability and fracture rates in medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties; Rethinking antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures post-arthroplasty; Evaluating DAIR: a viable alternative for acute periprosthetic joint infection; The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee; Patient health-related quality of life deteriorates significantly while waiting six to 12 months for total hip or knee arthroplasty; The importance of looking for diversity in knee implants.

10-Year Cumulative Incidence and Indications for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Patients Who Have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

BackgroundLong-term complications following total joint arthroplasty are not well established for patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), a group of connective tissue disorders. This study compared 10-year incidence of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who have and do not have EDS. MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2021 to identify patients who underwent primary TKA or THA. Patients who had and did not have EDS were propensity score–matched by age, sex, and a comorbidity index. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the cumulative incidence and risks of revision experienced by patients who have and do not have EDS. ResultsThe EDS patients who underwent TKA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.09 to 2.07, P < .014) and risk of revision due to instability (HR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.52, P < .003). The EDS patients who underwent THA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.65, P < .001), revision due to instability (HR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.17 to 8.36, P < .001), and mechanical loosening (HR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.05 to 6.44, P < .001). ConclusionsPatients who had EDS were found to have a higher incidence of revision within 10 years of undergoing TKA and THA compared to matched controls, especially for instability. Patients who have EDS should be counseled accordingly. Surgical technique and implant selection should include consideration for increased constraint in TKA and larger femoral heads or dual mobility articulations for THA.

Bariatric surgery patients have 5-year risk of revision following total shoulder arthroplasty comparable to that of class III obesity patients

BackgroundObesity has been correlated with heightened risk of complications after orthopedic surgeries. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective tool commonly utilized for the reduction of body mass index. However, the impact of BS on complications in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains inadequately investigated. This study examines the 5-year risk of revision following TSA in patients with a history of BS compared to matched cohorts without history of BS. MethodsUtilizing the PearlDiver Mariner database, a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on over 157 million U.S. patients from January 2010 to October 2021. Inclusion criteria identified patients undergoing primary TSA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Propensity-score matching was employed to control for covariates, comparing BS patients with a matched control and a matched class III obesity control without history of BS. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes, including 5-year cumulative incidence of revision were analyzed. ResultsThe 5-year cumulative incidence of all-cause revision within the BS group was found to be 4.6%. While this represented a higher risk than that of the general population (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.39), there was no significant difference when compared to controls with class III obesity. The BS cohort had higher risk of revision secondary to dislocation/subluxation and rotator cuff tear than in the general population. When compared to the class III obesity cohort, only the risk of revision due to rotator cuff tear was found to be higher. ConclusionIndividuals with a history of BS showed a higher risk of revision than a cohort without history of BS and an equivalent risk of revision compared to a cohort of class III obesity controls after undergoing TSA. Though obesity is an important risk factor for complications after TSA, BS might not be an effective tool for preoperative risk optimization.

Impact of fixation method on femoral bone loss: a retrospective evaluation of stem loosening in first-time revision total hip arthroplasty among two hundred and fifty five patients

PurposeImplant loosening represent the most common indication for stem revision in hip revision arthroplasty. This study compares femoral bone loss and the risk of initial revisions between cemented and uncemented loosened primary stems, investigating the impact of fixation method at primary implantation on femoral bone defects.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 255 patients who underwent their first revision for stem loosening from 2010 to 2022, receiving either cemented or uncemented stem implants. Femoral bone loss was preoperatively measured using the Paprosky classification through radiographic evaluations. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the survival probability of the original stem, and the hazard ratio assessed the relative risk of revision for uncemented versus cemented stems in the first postoperative year and the following two to ten years.ResultsCemented stems showed a higher prevalence of significant bone loss (type 3b and 4 defects: 32.39% vs. 2.72%, p < .001) compared to uncemented stems, which more commonly had type 1 and 2 defects (82.07% vs. 47.89%, p < .001). In our analysis of revision cases, primary uncemented stems demonstrated a 20% lower incidence of stem loosening in the first year post-implantation compared to cemented stems (HR 0.8; 95%-CI 0.3-2.0). However, the incidence in uncemented stems increased by 20% during the subsequent years two to ten (HR 1.2; 95%-CI 0.7–1.8). Septic loosening was more common in cemented stems (28.17% vs. 10.87% in uncemented stems, p = .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a modestly longer revision-free period for cemented stems within the first ten years post-implantation (p < .022).ConclusionDuring first-time revision, cemented stems show significantly larger femoral bone defects than uncemented stems. Septic stem loosening occurred 17.30% more in cemented stems.

Postoperative revision, complication and economic outcomes of patients with reverse or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at one year: a retrospective, United States hospital billing database analysis

BackgroundData on the one-year postoperative revision, complication, and economic outcomes in a hospital setting after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are sparse. MethodsA retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database, a hospital-billing data source, evaluated one-year postoperative revision, complication, and economic outcomes of reverse (RTSA) and anatomic (ATSA) TSA for patients who underwent the procedure from 2015 until 2021. All-cause revisits, including revision-related events (categorized as either irrigation and débridement or revision procedures and device removals) and shoulder/non-shoulder complications were collected. The incidences and costs of these revisits were evaluated. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the associations between patient characteristics and revision and complication occurrences and costs. ResultsAmong 51,478 RTSA and 34,623 ATSA patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] ages RTSA 71.5 [8.1] years, ATSA 66.8 [9.0] years), one-year adjusted incidences of all-cause revisits, irrigation/débridement, revision procedures/device removals, and shoulder/non-shoulder complications were RTSA: 45.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44.6%-45.5%), 0.1% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.2%), 2.1% (95% CI: 2.0%-2.2%), and 17.8% (95% CI: 17.5%-18.1%) and ATSA: 42.3% (95% CI: 41.8%-42.9%), 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.1%), and 14.4% (95% CI: 14.0%-14.8%), respectively; shoulder-related complications were RTSA: 12.4% (95% CI: 12.1%-12.7%) and ATSA: 9.9% (95% CI: 9.6%-10.3%). Significant factors associated with a high risk of revisions and complications included, but were not limited to, chronic comorbidities and noncommercial insurance. Per patient, the mean (SD) total one-year hospital cost was $25,225 ($15,911) and $21,520 ($13,531) for RTSA and ATSA, respectively. Revision procedures and device removals were most costly, averaging $22,920 ($18,652) and $26,911 ($18,619) per procedure for RTSA and ATSA, respectively. Patients with revision-related events with infections had higher total hospital costs than patients without this event (RTSA: $60,887 (95% CI: $56,951-$64,823) and ATSA: $59,478 (95% CI: $52,312-$66,644)), equating to a mean difference of $36,148 with RTSA and $38,426 with ATSA. Significant factors associated with higher costs of revision-related events and complications included age, race, chronic comorbidities, and noncommercial insurance. ConclusionsNearly 45% RTSA and 42% ATSA patients returned to the hospital, most often for shoulder/non-shoulder complications (overall 17.8% RTSA and 14.4% ATSA, and shoulder-related 12.4% RTSA and 9.9% ATSA). Revisions and device removals were most expensive ($22,920 RTSA and $26,911 ATSA). Infection complications requiring revision had the highest one-year hospital costs (∼$60,000). This study highlights the need for technologies and surgical techniques that may help reduce TSA healthcare utilization and economic burden.

Does timing of total elbow arthroplasty after distal humerus fracture affect 2-year complication rates?

BackgroundOpen reduction internal fixation (ORIF) remains the gold standard for adult distal humerus fractures (DHF). However, indications for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) continue to expand and the incidence of primary and salvage TEA for DHF has increased. The objective of this study was to compare complication and reoperation rate for acute versus delayed primary and salvage TEA performed for DHF. MethodsPatients who underwent TEA for DHF were identified in the PearlDiver database. Patients were sorted into three cohorts: (1) acute TEA (within 2 weeks of diagnosis), (2) delayed TEA (between 2 weeks and 6 months after diagnosis), and (3) salvage TEA (after failed ORIF, malunion, nonunion, delayed treatment between 6 months-1 year or post-traumatic arthritis). Multivariate analysis was utilized to assess for confounding variables and covariates when identify differences in complications between cohorts. Results788 patients underwent acute TEA, 213 patients underwent delayed TEA, and 422 patients underwent salvage TEA after DHF. The incidence of PJI (8.5% vs. 3.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.60, P=0.002) and triceps injury (2.4% vs. 0.4%, OR 6.29, P=0.012) were higher in the delayed compared to acute cohort. The incidence of revision (8.5% vs. 2.1%, OR 3.76, P< 0.001), periprosthetic fracture (4.3% vs. 1.1%, OR 3.64, P=0.002), PJI (14.7% vs 3.4%, OR 4.36, P< 0.001), triceps injury (2.6% vs. 0.4%, OR 5.70, P=0.008), and wound complications (6.9% vs 2.9%, OR 2.33, P=0.002) were higher in the salvage compared to acute cohort. There was an increased rate of revision (8.5% vs. 1.9%, OR 6.08, P=0.002) in the salvage compared to delayed cohort. ConclusionPatients undergoing salvage TEA after DHF have increased rates of at 2 years postoperatively including revision, periprosthetic fracture, PJI, triceps injury, and wound complications. The salvage cohort also had an increased risk of revision when compared to the delayed cohort. However, other than revision rates, patients in the salvage and delayed cohorts have similar postoperative complication rates.

Planovalgus Foot Deformity in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Risk of Falls, Implant-Related Complications, and Revisions: A Case-Control Analysis

BackgroundPes planus occurs due to the loss of the longitudinal arch of the foot, resulting in altered gait mechanics. This may lead to increased complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effects that pes planus has on rates of falls, implant complications, fall-related injuries, and times to revision among THA patients. MethodsA retrospective review of a private insurance claims database was conducted from 2010 to 2021. Patients who had a diagnosis of congenital or acquired pes planus and cases of THA were identified. Patients undergoing THA with a diagnosis of pes planus were matched to control patients 1:5 based on age, sex, and comorbidity profiles. Logistic regression was utilized to assess for differences in complication rates. ResultsA total of 3,622 pes planus patients were matched to 18,094 control patients. The pes planus group had significantly higher rates of falls than the control group (6.93 versus 2.97%, OR [odds ratio]: 2.43; CI [confidence interval]: 2.09 to 2.84; P < .001). Pes planus patients also had significantly greater odds of dislocation (OR: 1.89; CI: 1.58 to 2.27; P < .001), mechanical loosening (OR: 2.43; CI: 2.09 to 2.84; P = .019), and periprosthetic fracture (OR: 2.43; CI: 2.09 to 2.84; P < .001). The pes planus group had significantly greater rates of proximal humerus fractures (P = .008), but no difference was seen in distal radius fractures (P = .102). The time to revision was significantly shorter in the pes planus group (190 versus 554 days, P < .001). ConclusionsPes planus in patients undergoing THA is associated with increased risk of complications and faster time to revision. These findings may allow orthopaedic surgeons to identify those patients at risk and allow for more educated patient counseling and operative planning.

Traumaplasty: When and How to Perform Acute Arthroplasty for Fractures Around the Hip in the Elderly Patient

Acute fractures around the hip are prevalent injuries associated with potentially devastating outcomes. The growing utilization of arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly is likely a result of improvements in reoperation rates and postoperative function. Compared to hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty is associated with a slight functional benefit that is unlikely noticeable for many patients, as well as minimal differences in complications and patient reported outcome measures. However, the evidence supporting cement use in femoral stem fixation is robust. Multiple high power randomized controlled trial-based studies indicate cement fixation brings more predictable outcomes and fewer reoperations. In the setting of acute acetabular fracture, total hip arthroplasty is a favorable approach for elderly patients and fracture patterns associated with increased risk of revision after open reduction and internal fixation. Variations in patient characteristics and fracture patterns demand careful consideration whenever selecting the optimal treatment. In fracture patient populations, comanagement is an important consideration when seeking to reduce complications and promote cost-effective quality care.

Challenges in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Prior Spinal Arthrodesis: A Comprehensive Review of Biomechanics, Complications, and Surgical Strategies.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized patients' lives with hip osteoarthritis. However, the increasing prevalence of THA in individuals with prior lumbar arthrodesis (LA) poses unique challenges. This review delves into the biomechanical alterations, complications, and surgical strategies specific to this patient subset, highlighting the need for tailored preoperative assessments and planning. Due to altered pelvic and spinal biomechanics, patients with LA undergoing THA face a higher risk of dislocation and revision. The complex interplay between spinal and hip biomechanics underscores the need for meticulous preoperative planning. Comprehensive clinical examination and radiographic evaluation are vital for understanding patient-specific challenges. Various radiographic techniques, including computed tomography (CT)/X-ray matching and standing/seated studies, provide insights into postural changes affecting pelvic and spinal alignment. Complications following THA in patients with LA highlight the necessity for personalized surgical strategies. Careful consideration of implant selection, the surgical approach, and component positioning are essential to prevent complications. In summary, THA in patients with prior LA demands individualized preoperative assessments and planning. This approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and mitigate the heightened risks of complications, underlining the importance of tailored surgical strategies.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement

Despite increased use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) in joint arthroplasty over recent decades, current evidence for prophylactic use of ALBC to reduce risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is insufficient. To compare the rate of revision attributed to PJI following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ALBC vs plain bone cement. This international cohort study used data from 14 national or regional joint arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US. The study included primary TKAs for osteoarthritis registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, and followed-up until December 31, 2021. Data analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Primary TKA with ALBC vs plain bone cement. The primary outcome was risk of 1-year revision for PJI. Using a distributed data network analysis method, data were harmonized, and a cumulative revision rate was calculated (1 - Kaplan-Meier), and Cox regression analyses were performed within the 10 registries using both cement types. A meta-analysis was then performed to combine all aggregated data and evaluate the risk of 1-year revision for PJI and all causes. Among 2 168 924 TKAs included, 93% were performed with ALBC. Most TKAs were performed in female patients (59.5%) and patients aged 65 to 74 years (39.9%), fully cemented (92.2%), and in the 2015 to 2020 period (62.5%). All participating registries reported a cumulative 1-year revision rate for PJI of less than 1% following primary TKA with ALBC (range, 0.21%-0.80%) and with plain bone cement (range, 0.23%-0.70%). The meta-analyses based on adjusted Cox regression for 1 917 190 TKAs showed no statistically significant difference at 1 year in risk of revision for PJI (hazard rate ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52) or for all causes (hazard rate ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.89-1.40) among TKAs performed with ALBC vs plain bone cement. In this study, the risk of revision for PJI was similar between ALBC and plain bone cement following primary TKA. Any additional costs of ALBC and its relative value in reducing revision risk should be considered in the context of the overall health care delivery system.

Total knee arthroplasty survival rates are lower in younger men,as well as rheumatoid patients and after previous high-tibial osteotomy: A registry study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate if patient's gender significantly affected the long-term outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to provide a cross-gender comparison of a large patient sample from a single regional register. The Registry of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implant of Emilia Romagna (RIPO) investigated all primary TKAs performed from July 2000 to December 2020 by collecting data of menand womenseparately. Primary bicompartmental and tricompartmental TKAs were included. The survival rates and the reasons for revision were assessed to check if any other factor could have influenced implantfailure. In total,66,032 TKAs were included and analysed, comprising 46,774 women and 19,258 men. The 15-year Kaplan-Meier survival percentage was 93.6% for womenand 92.5% formen (p = 0.001). Men exhibited a higher revision risk following primary TKA(p = 0.012), particularly when the primary diagnosis was arthritis resulting from rheumatic disorders (p = 0.018) and arthritis following high-tibial osteotomy (p = 0.024). Failure risk was also higher for men below the age of 60 years(p = 0.038). The long-term outcome in TKA showed significant differences between men and women, with a significantly lower survival rate in men at 15 years, especially when they areunder 60 years old or with a diagnosis of rheumatic disorders or arthritis following high-tibial osteotomy. It is necessary to design specific studies to have relevant data concerning gender differences in prosthetic surgery and to customise treatments to improve outcome and patient satisfaction. Level III.

Range-of-Motion Predictors for Repeat Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Revision Surgery for Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is a first-line treatment for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but predicting outcomes after MUA can be difficult. Purpose: We sought to determine the association between pre-MUA range-of-motion (ROM) and the risk of repeat MUA and revision in patients who underwent primary TKA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 543 MUAs for stiffness at a single institution. Mean age was 62.5 years, and 64% were female. Second MUA or revision TKA were considered failures of treatment. Penalized logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors for failures. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was used to examine survivorship free from second MUA or revision. Results: Before and after MUA, there was significant improvement in knee flexion (78.0° vs 112.8°, respectively) and extension (4.1° vs 0.8°, respectively); 6.4% of patients required repeat MUA and 5.3% required revision TKA. Survivorship free of second MUA was 90.9%, revision for stiffness was 92.4%, and all-cause revision was 88.2% at 2 years post-MUA. Patients with pre-MUA flexion contracture of ≥5° were more likely to undergo second MUA revision for stiffness and any revision. There were significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes postoperatively. Conclusions: This retrospective chart review suggests that MUA is an effective treatment for post-TKA stiffness, with good early survivorship, and that worse pre-MUA ROM is associated with MUA failure and need for repeat MUA or revision. This information may have implications for patient counseling and management.

No difference in 10-year survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty vs. hemiarthroplasty for avascular necrosis of the humeral head

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is characterized by osteonecrosis secondary to disrupted blood flow to the glenohumeral joint. Following collapse of the humeral head, arthroplasty, namely, total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or humeral head arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty), is recommended standard of care. The literature is limited to underpowered and small sample sizes in comparing arthroplasty modalities. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to compare the 10-year survivorship of TSA and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of AVN of the humeral head and (2) to identify differences in their revision etiologies. Patients who underwent primary TSA and hemiarthroplasty for AVN were identified using the PearlDiver database. TSA patients were matched by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to the hemiarthroplasty cohort in a 4:1 ratio because TSA patients were generally older, sicker, and more often female. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of all-cause revision was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard modeling. χ2 analysis was conducted to compare the indications for revisions between matched cohorts including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, mechanical loosening, broken implants, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness. In total, 4825 patients undergoing TSA and 1969 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for AVN were included in this study. The unmatched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 7.0% and 7.7%, respectively. The matched 10-year cumulative incidence of revision for patients who underwent TSA and hemiarthroplasty was 6.7% and 8.0%, respectively. When comparing the unmatched cohorts, TSA patients were at significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.39; P=.017) when compared to hemiarthroplasty patients. After matching, there was no significant difference in risk of 10-year all-cause revision (HR: 1.29; P=.148) and no difference in the observed etiologies for revision (P>.05 for all). After controlling for confounders, only 6.7% of TSA and 8.0% hemiarthroplasties for humeral head AVN were revised within 10 years of index surgery. The demonstrated high and comparable long-term survivorship for both modalities supports the utilization of either for the AVN induced humeral head collapse.

Risk of early revision in total hip arthroplasty: the relative contribution of the surgeon versus the hospital.

Early revision for total hip arthroplasty is a serious adverse outcome. There are multiple contributing risk factors for early revision. Risk factors can exist at the level of the surgeon and the level of the institution. The primary research question of this study was to determine the relative contribution of surgeon-level and hospital-level variance to rates of early revision (overall and for infection) after primary total hip arthroplasty. This is a registry-based study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Data for the most commonly used stem (Exeter V40) were used to reduce prosthesis variation from the analysis. A mixed effects Cox Model (also known as a frailty model) with crossed random effects for surgeon and hospital was used. Outcomes were early revision (within 2 years) for all causes and for infection. This model allowed for the risk of early revision to be explained by the variability at the surgeon level or hospital level. There were 32 031 procedures performed by 735 surgeons across 250 hospitals between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Surgeon variability significantly contributed to overall variation in revision for any cause and revision for infection (P < 0.0001). There was no significant contribution of hospital-level variation to overall revision or for infection. Surgeon-level factors play a more important role than institution-level factors in early revision after primary total hip arthroplasty. If surgeons are identified as having a higher risk of revision, there is potential for surgeon-level practice change to reduce the risk of early revision.