Risk Of Postoperative Liver Failure Research Articles

Laparoscopic right upper transversal hepatectomy: Strategies for right hepatic vein resection and reconstruction

ObjectiveThe right upper transversal hepatectomy (RUTH) is considered a complex technique of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies. The intraoperative management of the right hepatic vein (RHV) is still controversial because it may cause obstruction of outflow in the remnant hepatic segment. The aim of this study is to present our experience of laparoscopic RUTH and the strategy of RHV resection and reconstruction in different settings. MethodsFive patients who underwent laparoscopic RUTH for liver tumor were enrolled retrospectively. Clinical and pathological features of the patients, peri-operative treatment, as well as short- and long-term outcomes were collected for analysis. ResultsLaparoscopic RUTH was successfully performed in all five patients. Two individuals underwent RUTH while preserving RHV. Among the remaining patients who underwent RUTH with RHV resection, one patient underwent RHV reconstruction but the others did not. Immediate or long-term venous related complications did not occurred in a median follow-up period of nine months. ConclusionsLaparoscopic RUTH surgery for tumors in the right upper region of the liver is safe and feasible. The strategic workflow we proposed for the resection and reconstruction of the RHV offers a reliable method for preserving liver parenchyma and reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure.

Portal vein embolization prior to major hepatectomy: A multidisciplinary approach for advanced liver tumors in Chile

One of the main limitations to achieving a complete tumor resection in patients with technically resectable liver tumors is the presence of a small future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) allows hypertrophy of the non-embolized lobe, reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure. To describe the experience of portal embolization prior to hepatectomy and its effectiveness in converting advanced unresectable liver tumors into resectable tumors. Non-concurrent cohort study. All patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy between 2016 and 2020 in our center were included. Demographic and diagnostic variables, pre and post-PVE volumes, perioperative variables, and global and disease-free survival were analyzed. Nineteen patients were included. Median age 66 (54-72) years and 57.9% (n= 11) were women. Bilateral metastases were present in 78.9% (n= 15). Sixteen patients (84.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient (5.3%) had a complication after PVE. The median time between embolization and volumetry was 5.3 weeks (4.7-7.1). Median FLR before and after PVE were 19.8% (16.2-27.7) and 30% (25.2-40.5), respectively. The median percentage of hypertrophy was 48% (40.4-76.5). Fifteen patients (78.9%) underwent hepatectomy. Significant complications occurred in 26.6% (n= 4); among them, three patients (20%) presented postoperative liver failure. PVE is safe and effective in promoting FLR hypertrophy in the presence of chemotherapy, allowing patients with advanced liver tumors to undergo surgery with curative intent.

The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 on the Energy Metabolism of Hepatocytes: Multiphoton Microscopy and Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging

A decrease in the regenerative potential of the liver during the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is observed in the vast majority of patients with diabetes mellitus type 1, significantly increases the risk of postoperative liver failure. In this regard, it is necessary to develop new approaches for the rapid intraoperative assessment of the condition of liver tissue in the presence of concomitant liver pathology. A modern label-free approach based on multiphoton microscopy, second harmonic generation (SHG), and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) allow for the evaluation of the structure of liver tissue as well as the assessment of the metabolic state of hepatocytes, even at the cellular level. We obtained optical criteria and identified specific changes in the metabolic state of hepatocytes for a reduced liver regenerative potential in the presence of induced diabetes mellitus type 1. The obtained criteria will expand the possibilities for the express assessment of the structural and functional state of liver tissue in clinical practice.

Volumetric Remodeling of the Left Liver After Right Hepatectomy: Analysis of Factors Predicting Degree of Hypertrophy and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure

BackgroundThis study investigated the volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy looking for factors predicting the degree of hypertrophy and severe post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). MethodsIn a cohort of 121 right hepatectomies, we performed CT volumetrics study of the future left liver remnant (FLR) preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors influencing FLR degree of hypertrophy and severe PHLF were identified by multivariate analysis. ResultsAfter right hepatectomy, the mean degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate of the left liver remnant were 25% and 3%/day respectively. The mean liver volume recovery rate was 77%. Liver remodeling volume was distributed for 79% on segments 2 and 3 and 21% on the segment 4 (p<0.001). Women showed a greater hypertrophy of segments 2 and 3 compared with men (p=0.002). The degree of hypertrophy of segment 4 was lower in case of middle hepatic vein resection (p=0.004). Left liver remnant kinetic growth rate was associated with the standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) (p<0.001) and a two-stage hepatectomy (p=0.023). Severe PHLF were predicted by intraoperative transfusion (p=0.009), biliary tumors (p=0.013), and male gender (p=0.022). ConclusionsVolumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy is not uniform and is mainly influenced by gender and sacrifice of middle hepatic vein. Male gender, intraoperative transfusion, and biliary tumors increase the risk of postoperative liver failure after right hepatectomy.

Extended Right Hepatectomy to Inferior Vena Cava Under Total Vascular Exclusion, Veno-Venous Bypass and In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion of the Future Liver Remnant.

Venous obstruction at the hepatic veins-inferior vena cava confluence can be particularly challenging to manage if an associated liver resection is needed. Total vascular exclusion (TVE) with veno-venous bypass (VVB) and hypothermic in situ perfusion (HP) of the future liver remnant can be used in these conditions.1,2 METHODS: The patient was a 58-year-old with a voluminous adrenal cancer invading the kidney, the right liver and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava with intraluminal thrombus extending up to the hepatic veins confluence. A right hepatectomy, extended to segment 1, the right kidney, and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava was planned. The parenchymal liver transection was performed under a TVE, VVB, and HP of the left liver to decrease blood losses and risk of postoperative liver failure. Vena cava reconstruction was achieved by a ringed Gore-Tex prosthesis with reimplantation of the left renal vein. Total duration of veno-venous bypass and liver vascular exclusion were 2 h 40 min and 2 h 10 min, respectively. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 17. Total vascular exclusion with veno-venous bypass and in-situ liver hypothermic perfusion increases the safety of major liver resection requiring complex vascular reconstruction.1,2 TVE under VVB and HP of the future liver remnant is used at our institution when: (1) TVE will last more than 30 min; (2) vascular reconstruction is needed; (3) in the presence of venous obstruction; (4) in the presence of injured liver parenchyma; and (5) in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities.

Prognostic biomarkers in and selection of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prognostic biomarkers in and selection of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Impact of Preoperative Jaundice and Biliary Drainage on Short- and Long-term Outcomes among Patients with Gallbladder Cancer

ObjectivesTo characterize the prognostic implication of jaundice and preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcomes among patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) undergoing surgical resection. MethodsPatients who underwent surgical resection of GBC identified from a multicenter database between January 2000 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical and pathological details, as well as short- and long-term overall survival (OS), were obtained and compared among patients with and without preoperative jaundice and biliary drainage. ResultsAmong 449 patients with GBC, median and 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS were 17.4 months, 63.7%, 28.4%, and 22.1%, respectively. Patients who presented with preoperative jaundice (n = 100, 22.3%) were more likely to have advanced disease, a lower incidence of R0 resection (29.0% vs. 69.1%, p < 0.001), as well as a higher incidence of postoperative liver failure (4% vs. 0, p = 0.002), and worse long-term survival versus patients without jaundice (median OS, 10.4 vs. 27.1 months, p < 0.001). Preoperative biliary drainage was performed for the majority of jaundiced patients (77.0%) and was associated with decreased risk of postoperative liver failure (1.3% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.041); preoperative biliary drainage failed to improve long-term survival (median OS, 10.2 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.679). On multivariable analysis, R0 resection (17.5 vs. 7.6 months, p < 0.001) and adjuvant therapy (15.6 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.027) were associated with improved long-term survival among jaundiced patients. ConclusionsWhile preoperative biliary drainage of jaundiced GBC patients decreased the risk of postoperative liver failure, it did not impact long-term outcomes. Rather, preoperative jaundice was associated with a lower chance at R0 resection and worse long-term survival.

Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy following a novel optimized portal vein embolization: a video case report

BackgroundThis article is the first report of laparoscopic major hepatectomy of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following optimized portal vein embolization (oPVE).Case presentationThe patient was diagnosed with a single 3 × 3.5 cm HCC located in segment 5 and 8 detected by enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The lesion was adjacent to the right anterior and posterior portal veins, making it difficult to confirm the adequate liver functional remnant volume, surgical margin and R0 resection. In addition, the liver cirrhosis induced by a long history of chronic hepatitis B virus increased the potential risk of postoperative liver failure and refractory ascites. Therefore, we conducted a laparoscopic surgery following oPVE, by which the safe tumor margin was ensured and the outcome of the surgery was improved. The patient was discharged on the seventh day after the surgery. The AFP gradually decreased to a normal level during the 90-day follow-up.ConclusionThis case report demonstrates that, in experienced hands for selected patients, laparoscopic hepatectomy after portal vein embolization is feasible and may be an alternative to open liver resection.

Preoperative morphometric measurements of liver vasculature to predict postoperative liver failure: bicentric study.

Patients that require major liver resection for various hepatic diseases have a high risk of postoperative liver failure if the remaining postoperative liver is not adequate. Preoperative volumetry of the future liver remnant is not a strong predictor of postoperative liver failure, as function does not always correlate with volume. Our study proposed a new indicator of postoperative liver failure based on preoperative ratio of the diameter of the portal vein (inflow) and the hepatic vein (outflow), which are more predictive of postoperative liver failure than standard volumetry.

Liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of biliary drainage failure on postoperative outcome. Results of an Italian multicenter study

BackgroundPreoperative biliary drainage may be essential to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, infectious complications related to preoperative biliary drainage may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. The strategy and optimal drainage method continues to be controversial. MethodsThis is a retrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 14 Italian referral hepatobiliary centers. The primary end point was to evaluate independent predictors for postoperative outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after preoperative biliary drainage. ResultsOf the 639 enrolled patients, 441 (69.0%) underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8.9% (12.5% after right-side hepatectomy versus 5.7% after left-side hepatectomy; P = .003). Of the patients, 40.5% underwent preoperative biliary drainage at the first admitting hospital, before evaluation at referral centers. Use of percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at referral centers than at community hospitals where endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent type. The overall failure rate after preoperative biliary drainage was 43.3%, significantly higher at community hospitals than that at referral centers (52.7% v 36.9%; P = .002). Failure of the first preoperative biliary drainage was one of the strongest predictors for postoperative complications after right-side and left-side hepatectomies and for mortality after right-side hepatectomy. Type of preoperative biliary drainage (percutaneous versus endoscopic) was not associated with significantly different risk of mortality. ConclusionFailure of preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at community hospitals and it was an independent predictor for postoperative outcome. Centers’ experience in preoperative biliary drainage management is crucial to reduce the risk of failure that is closely associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Multimodal treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Half of CRC patients develop liver metastases during the course of the disease, with a 5-year survival rate close to zero in the absence of therapy. Surgical resection remains the only possible curative option, and current guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in a 5-year survival rate exceeding 50%. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is not indicated in cases with simple resection but should be offered to all patients with extensive bilobar disease. Personalised systemic treatment is essential to convert upfront non-resectable lesions to resectable ones. Anatomical resections, non-anatomical resections and two-stage hepatectomies can be performed though open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) surgery. The extent of a hepatic resection is limited by the risk of postoperative liver failure due to a too small liver remnant, inflow or outflow obstruction or insufficient biliary drainage. About 75% of patients are diagnosed with non-resectable liver metastases not amenable to a standard upfront resection. In recent years, effective therapeutic approaches have revolutionised liver surgery and new strategies have enabled the conversion of primarily non-resectable metastatic disease for resection. These strategies include oncological and surgical therapies, as well as combinations of the two. From an oncological perspective, colorectal liver metastases&nbsp; may be treated by systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy, or selective intra-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, depending on the extent of the disease and the mutational status. In surgery, we often apply two-stage strategies using portal vein occlusion, such as portal vein embolisation or ligation, or complex two-stage hepatectomy such as associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Other additive tools to reach curative resection are tumour ablations (electroporation, microwave or radiofrequency). The role of stereotactic radiation of liver metastases is not yet well defined. Modern radiation techniques, including image guidance, breath hold and gating, were only introduced for a larger patient population in recent years. Therefore, prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are still pending. Over the last decade, liver transplantation has gained increasing attention in selective cases of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases, with promising cohort studies, but definitive recommendations must await the results of ongoing randomised controlled trials. The optimal treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases requires the timely association of various strategies, and all cases must be discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. While colorectal liver metastases was a uniformly lethal condition a few decades ago, it has become amenable to curative therapies, with excellent quality of life in many scenarios. This review reports on up-to-date treatment modalities and their combinations in the treatment algorithm of colorectal liver metastases. &nbsp; &nbsp.

Resection of Retro-Hepatic Vena Cava (RHVC) En-bloc with Caudate Lobe without Vascular Exclusion for a Low Grade Leiomyosarcoma of Inferior Vena Cava

BackgroundLeiomyosarcomas (LMS) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) originate in the retrohepatic (RHVC) portion in 15% of cases.1 Due to complex anatomy and need to preserve venous outflow from the infra-diaphragmatic viscera, the operation may require total vascular exclusion, veno-venous bypass and hypothermic liver resections.2,3 In this video, virtual planning of the operation allowed a parenchyma-sparing radical resection in a patient with limited liver reserve.MethodsA 12-cm LMS of RHVC invading the entire segment 1 (i.e., Spiegel’s lobe, paracaval portion, and caudate process) was diagnosed in a man with metabolic steato-hepatitis (BMI: 34). He had no response to previous chemotherapy. Major hepatectomy was excluded considering the high risk of postoperative liver failure. 3D-reconstruction of regional anatomy allowed planning of a parenchymal-sparing, en bloc resection of tumor, RHVC, and caudate lobe while avoiding hilar and suprahepatic venous clamping.ResultsThe operation strategy relied on the en bloc separation of caudate lobe, RHVC, and tumor from the hepatic veins confluence and the posterior segments after complete mobilization of the liver. Vessel loop-assisted hanging maneuver, encircling tumor, and RHVC with superimposed 3D-reconstructions guided the parenchymal transection, while preserving the middle hepatic vein outflow. RHVC was replaced with prosthetic material.ConclusionsComplex resection of primary tumor of the IVC en bloc with caudate lobe and RHVC can be attempted in chronic liver diseases at-risk of postoperative failure. Preservations of transhepatic flow and liver function depends on tumor size and preservation of noninvaded hepatic-veins confluence. Preoperative virtual 3D reconstruction is crucial in surgical planning.

ALPPS como opción quirúrgica en terapia reversa aplicado al tratamiento de las metástasis hepáticas del cáncer rectal sincrónico

The risk for postoperative liver failure is the most important limitation for the treatment of patients with primary or secondary liver cancer. Among the different strategies used to increase resectability in liver tumors, a technique known as ALPPS (associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) was developed for patients with tumors previously considered unresectable.We report the case of a male patient referred to our center with a diagnosis of synchronous multiple liver metastases of colorectal cancer considered unresectable who underwent ALPPS using liver-first reverse approach.

"Zoom Resection": A Two-Step Wedge Liver Resection Technique to Resect Deep Tumors and Spare Parenchyma

In certain cases, huge liver resections are required to deal with deep tumors located near vascular pedicles. However, this implies a higher risk of postoperative liver failure and mortality. Liver parenchyma sparing techniques play an essential role in decreasing these risks. In November 2018, our surgical team reported a new two-step wedge liver resection technique to resect deep tumors in an easy way. Although it was a case report, more patients have already been successfully operated with this approach since then. Regarding the technique itself, intraoperative ultrasound is a very important tool employed to plan and guide both steps of the procedure. Initially, we put stitches and resect a cylindrical piece of normal liver parenchyma above the deep tumor. This way, we can "superficialize" the tumor. After that, we place stitches on the future specimen and resect it in the same way it is done with superficial metastases. The main advantage of this procedure is the clear sight and vascular control that can be achieved in those cases in which the tumor is close to vascular pedicles. As a result, the bigger the chance of preserving vascular pedicles, the bigger the chance of sparing parenchyma as well. We have named this procedure “zoom resection” because its dynamics is similar to that of the photograph camera telescopic system.

Reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein using a vein graft from the resected portion of the liver

BackgroundThe middle hepatic veins are often infiltrated by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Reconstruction of the hepatic vein plays a critical role in preserving more of the residual liver volume and reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure in extreme hepatectomy. We here report a novel way to reconstruct middle hepatic vein by using vessel grafts from wasted liver.Case presentationCase 1: A 64-year-old man was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The bifurcation and left branch of the portal vein were stenosed, and the root of the middle hepatic vein was infiltrated by the tumor. An extended left hepatectomy was performed, the portal vein was resected and reconstructed, and the middle hepatic vein was reconstructed by anastomosing the proximal left hepatic vein to the distal middle hepatic vein. Case 2: A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The tumor was located in the left lobe of the liver and the left and middle hepatic veins were infiltrated by the tumor. An extended left hepatectomy was performed, and the left portal vein was used as a vein graft to reconstruct the middle hepatic vein. Both of the two patients’ postoperative ultrasound showed vessel graft patency.ConclusionUsing a vein graft from the resected portion of the liver to reconstruct the middle hepatic vein was a useful technique and showed good result.

Combined extensive liver resections in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular cancer – clinical cases

Currently the main way of curable treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC)* is a liver resection. Candidates for surgery are patient with good score of liver function (Child-Pugh A group), without destruction of great vessels and distant metastases. Hemihepatectomy is associated with a high risk of postoperative liver failure (including portal hypertension, cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis). This reason leads to premature failure of the operation. According to current clinical guidelines, system therapy is more suitable, despite of the lack of reliable data on its effectiveness in such clinical situations. The presented cases may support the selection of advanced hemihepatectomy as a treatment for hepatocellular cancer C stage BCLC classification.

New frontiers in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

SummaryLiver resection is one of the main curative options for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis and is the treatment of choice in non-cirrhotic patients. However, careful patient selection is required to balance the risk of postoperative liver failure and the potential benefit on long-term outcomes. In the last decades, improved surgical techniques and perioperative management, as well as better patient selection, have enabled the indications for liver resection to be expanded. In this review, we aim to describe the main indications for liver resection in the management of HCC, its role compared to percutaneous ablation and liver transplantation in the therapeutic algorithm, as well as the recent advances in liver surgery that could be used to improve the prognosis of patients with HCC.

Current status of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in treatment of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

At present,radical resection remains the best treatment strategy for liver metastasis of colorectal cancer,and patients with large or multiple tumors often face the problem of insufficient residual liver volume after hepatectomy,which may lead to serious complications including liver failure after surgery. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy( ALPPS) is a novel two-step hepatectomy that allows rapid proliferation of the residual liver after primary surgery and can improve the resectability of liver tumors and reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure. Although ALPPS can achieve R0 resection or tumors and prolong patients' survival time,there are still controversies over its application due to high incidence rates of complications and mortality rate. With reference to related studies in China and foreign countries,this article reviews the current application status and clinical value of ALPPS in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.

The technique and outcomes of central hepatectomy by the Glissonian suprahilar approach

IntroductionCentral hepatectomy (CH) is technically challenging and seldom-used to treat centrally located tumors. However, CH is a parenchyma-sparing resection that may decrease the risk of postoperative liver failure. This retrospective study presents our technique of CH and assesses the outcomes. MethodsAll CH performed in our department over two decades (1997–2017) were identified. Indications and short-term outcomes were compared between the two decades. Long-term outcomes were assessed. ResultsSixty-four patients underwent CH using a suprahilar approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC: n = 30), metastasis (n = 23), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA: n = 9) or other diseases (n = 2). CH represented 6% of 1004 major hepatectomies, (7.4% (n = 35) before 2007 vs 5.4% (n = 29) after 2007). The mean operating time was 219 ± 56 min. A perioperative blood transfusion was required in 14 patients (22%). Intraoperative bile duct injuries occurred in 5 patients (8%), and they were repaired. One patient died postoperatively (1,5%). Ten patients (16%) experienced a major complication. Nine patients (14%) suffered from bile leakage, of which 6 healed spontaneously. Only one patient had low grade liver failure. The R0-resection rate was 69%. After 2007, there were no bile duct injuries (0/29 vs 5/35, p < 0.05), and the average hospital stay was shorter but not significantly (11 vs 14 days). Actuarial 5-year survival was 56% for HCC patients and 34% for those with colorectal metastasis ConclusionsCH is associated with significant biliary morbidity and may increase positive surgical margins. Nevertheless, it should be recommended in selected patients to avoid the risk of postoperative liver failure.

Safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with palliative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDThere is a close relationship between cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has good clinical effect in treating the complication of portal hypertension. However, because of the risk of postoperative liver failure, severe complications, and low survival rate for HCC, TIPS is contraindicated in patients with portal hypertension and liver cancer. We studied a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent TIPS for recurrent variceal bleeding and/or ascites.AIMTo assess the safety, efficacy, and survival rate in patients with HCC who underwent TIPS.METHODSGroup A comprised 217 patients with HCC and portal hypertension who underwent the TIPS procedure between 1999 and 2014. After TIPS deployment, these patients received palliative treatment for HCC. Group B comprised a cohort of 136 HCC patients with portal hypertension who did not undergo TIPS placement. Group B received palliative treatment for HCC plus medical therapy for portal hypertension. The clinical outcomes and survival rate were assessed.RESULTSIn Group A, the primary technical success rate was 97.69% for TIPS placement, and no severe procedure-related complications of TIPS placement were reported. The control of variceal bleeding (VB) within 1 mo did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.261). Absorption of refractory ascites within 1 mo, recurrence of VB, and recurrence of refractory ascites differed significantly between the groups (P = 0.017, 0.023, and 0.009, respectively). By comparison, the rate of hepatic encephalopathy in Group B was lower than that in Group A (P = 0.036). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were significantly different between Groups A and B (χ2 = 12.227, P = 0.018; χ2 = 12.457, P = 0.014; χ2 = 26.490, P = 0.013; χ2 = 21.956, P = 0.009, and χ2 = 24.596, P = 0.006, respectively). The mean survival time was 43.7 mo in Group A and 31.8 mo in Group B. Median survival time was 50.0 mo in Group A and 33.0 mo in Group B. Mean and median survival differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.000, χ2 = 35.605, log-rank test). The mortality rate from VB in Group A was low than that in Group B (P = 0.006), but the rates of hepatic tumor, hepatic failure, and multiorgan failure did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.173, 0.246 and 0.257, respectively).CONCLUSIONTIPS combined with palliative treatment is safe and effective for portal hypertension in patients with HCC.