Laboratory based isometric and isokinetic (concentric and eccentric) dynamometry is negatively associated with Hamstring strain injury (HSI) risk. A field-based posterior lower limb strength test assessing maximal isometric hamstring contraction via a portable force platform is sensitive to fatigue induced changes in hamstring strength following a soccer match, but it is not known if the posterior lower limb strength test reflects the more robust dynamometry strength measures. PURPOSE: To investigate laboratory isometric (ISOdyno), concentric (CONdyno) and eccentric (ECCdyno) dynamometry strength measures relative to the field-based isometric posterior lower limb (ISOplat) test using a portable force platform. METHODS: 21 amateur soccer players (Male, 24 ± 3.1 yrs, 75.5 ± 9.5 Kg, 178.2 ± 6.3 cm) were recruited and familiarised with ISOdyno, CONdyno,/ECCdyno and ISOplat at least one week prior to experimental testing. The test order was standardised as part of a larger project. In week one players performed two maximum ISOplat tests (supine, 30° Knee flexion, 5 sec), and ≥7 days later performed two maximum ISOdyno (prone, 30° Knee flexion, 5 sec), followed by two CONdyno/ECCdyno (prone, 0-135° Knee Flexion 60°.S-1) tests using the dominant limb. At least 2-minutes rest between contractions was provided during each assessment. Pearsons correlations (r) between measures were performed with significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Average force measured 224.4 N (ISOplat), 125.5 Nm (ISOdyno) 131.1 N.m (ECCdyno) and 96.4 N.m (CONdyno). ISODyno was positively associated with both CONdyno (r2= 0.57, p= <0.0001, 95% CI 0.485-0.896), and ECCdyno (r2= 0.53, p = 0.0002, 95% CI 0.430-0.882) but no other significant correlations were observed. CONCLUSION: Evidence has shown isometric and isokinetic dynamometry is related to HSI risk. The absence of any correlation between the isometric posterior lower limb hamstring test with these dynamometer strength measurers suggests this test may not have a similar predicative capacity. These results could be explained by the anatomical position of the subject, or activation of hip extensor muscles that may have influenced the maximal force produced during ISOplat.