You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP44-17 USE OF DECIPHER PROSTATE BIOPSY TEST IN MEN WITH FAVORABLE RISK DISEASE UNDERGOING CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT IN THE SEER REGISTRY Alec Zhu, Ashwin Ramaswamy, James Proudfoot, Ashley Ross, Yang Liu, Elai Davicioni, Nicholas Zaorsky, Angela Jia, Daniel Spratt, Edward Schaeffer, Valentina Petkov, and Jim Hu Alec ZhuAlec Zhu More articles by this author , Ashwin RamaswamyAshwin Ramaswamy More articles by this author , James ProudfootJames Proudfoot More articles by this author , Ashley RossAshley Ross More articles by this author , Yang LiuYang Liu More articles by this author , Elai DavicioniElai Davicioni More articles by this author , Nicholas ZaorskyNicholas Zaorsky More articles by this author , Angela JiaAngela Jia More articles by this author , Daniel SprattDaniel Spratt More articles by this author , Edward SchaefferEdward Schaeffer More articles by this author , Valentina PetkovValentina Petkov More articles by this author , and Jim HuJim Hu More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003290.17AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was linked to the Decipher 22-gene expression classifier (GC) for men with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined the use of conservative management (active surveillance/watchful waiting) for GC tested and untested men and assessed factors associated with adverse pathology (AP; grade group ≥3, pathological stage ≥pT3b, or lymph node invasion) at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Men in the registry diagnosed with favorable risk (grade group [GG] 1 and 2) PCa from 2016 to 2018 were linked to data from GC testing conducted between 2016 to 2020 (Veracyte, San Diego, CA). GC scores (range 0-1) and GC risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) were used for continuous and categorical analyses. Multivariable logistic regressions quantified the association of GC test results with conservative management as well as the association of GC test results with AP at RP in comparison to tumor volume as measured by the percentage of positive cores with cancer (PPC). RESULTS: A total of 100,279 men were evaluated (2,889 tested with GC at biopsy and 97,390 untested). Overall, conservative management increased from 20% to 23% and 33% to 37% from 2016 to 2018 in the untested and tested populations, respectively. In men aged <70 years, conservative management increased from 20% to 24% and 35% to 37% from 2016 to 2018 in the untested and tested populations, respectively. In adjusted analyses, GC testing was significantly associated with greater odds of conservative management (OR [95% CI] 2.1 [1.9-2.4], p<0.001). Conservative management use was highest for GC low risk men (41%) as compared to intermediate (31%) or high (16%) GC risk men. Higher GC and PPC were associated with RP surgery; but for men treated with RP, only higher GC was significantly associated with adverse pathology (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: GC testing was independently associated with a two-fold increase in conservative management utilization for favorable risk disease. Men with lower GC scores were more likely to undergo conservative management. Both higher GC scores and tumor volume (as measured by PPC) were associated with increased likelihood of RP. Higher GC was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of AP at time of RP, while higher tumor volume was not. Source of Funding: There was no direct funding from an outside organization or sponsor © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e618 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Alec Zhu More articles by this author Ashwin Ramaswamy More articles by this author James Proudfoot More articles by this author Ashley Ross More articles by this author Yang Liu More articles by this author Elai Davicioni More articles by this author Nicholas Zaorsky More articles by this author Angela Jia More articles by this author Daniel Spratt More articles by this author Edward Schaeffer More articles by this author Valentina Petkov More articles by this author Jim Hu More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...