Risk Of Major Osteoporotic Fracture Research Articles

Ventricular and supraventricular ectopic beats burden is correlated with bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal females

Abstract Introduction Patients (pts) with osteoporosis (OP) have an increased 10-year cardiovascular death risk. Low bone mineral density (BMD) observed in OP may be associated with arrhythmic presentation of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Few studies assessed the relationship between OP and arrhythmia. Aim Arrhythmias assessment in pts with OP. Methods A total of 103 postmenopausal female pts (mean age 69 +/- 7), consulted by endocrinologist, were divided into 2 groups according to BMD (assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry). BMD measurements, expressed as T-score (T-sc), were taken from the femoral neck (T-sc Neck), entire total hip (T-sc TH) and/or spine (T-sc L2-L4, L1-L4). Arrhythmia was evaluated using 24-hour Holter-ECG monitoring (HM). Major osteoporotic and total hip fracture risks (MOFR and THFR, respectively) were assessed by the FRAX scale. We compared 51 pts with OP (T-sc ≤ -2.5), with 52 matched controls without OP, including 44 pts with osteopenia (T-sc > -2.5). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the history of stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease or arterial hypertension. Exclusion criteria included heart failure NYHA >II and/or LVEF <36%, acute coronary syndrome within the last 6 months, severe valvular disease, cardiac implantable electronic device. Results There was a trend towards a greater number of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the OP group compared to the controls. Arrhythmic burden was significantly correlated with BMD measures: correlations were observed between 24-hour ventricular ectopic beats (VEB) count with T-sc Neck (r=-0.20, p=0.04), with T-sc TH (r=-0.22, p=0.03). The number of supraventricular ectopic beats (SVEB) in HM was also correlated with BMD parameters: T-sc Neck (r=-0.21, p=0.03), T-sc TH (r=-0.23, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis (linear regression model) revealed that age and T-sc TH were independently related with ectopy: age (0.07; CI: 0.01 - 0.13, p=0.03) and T-sc TH (-0.58; CI: -1.07 - -0.08, p=0.02) were predictors for VEB, and SVEB were related to age (0.07; CI: 0.03 - 0.12, p<0.01) and, with borderline significance with T-sc TH (-0.34; CI: -0.699 - 0.012, p=0.058). Ectopic beats count was also positively correlated with osteoporotic fracture risk: VEB with THFR (r=0.206, p=0.04) and SVEB with MOFR (r=0.21, p=0.04). Conclusions The study showed an increased arrhythmia burden as detected in HM in pts with OP. Beside the T-sc TH, age was identified as an independent factor of increased SVEB / VEB. The main significant negative correlations were observed between the number of VEB / SVEB and BMD in femur (T-sc Neck, T-sc TH). Ectopic beats count was also positively correlated with osteoporotic fracture risk: VEB with THFR and SVEB with MOFR.

8455 Denosumab Is Associated With Decreased Mortality Compared To Zoledronic Acid In Diabetic Osteoporotic Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Abstract Disclosure: V. Rouach: Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc. H. Gortler: None. Y. Greenman: None. C. Gabriel: None. G. inbalL: None. Background: Anti-resorptive therapies are the mainstay of osteoporosis management, but evidence of their efficacy in the diabetic population is limited and comparison between treatments is lacking. A retrospective analysis, presented at the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2023 Annual Meeting, suggests that denosumab leads to greater reduction in fracture risk than zoledronic acid among treatment-naive postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. However, a comparative study recently published suggests higher mortality with denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates. Aim: To assess the association between zoledronic acid or denosumab and the risk of major osteoporotic fracture and mortality in osteoporotic patients with diabetes type 2. Methods: The study population was identified by electronic records of a diabetes registry cross-linked with an osteoporosis registry of a large provider healthcare organization in Israel. Index date was at osteoporosis registry entry. Demographics, Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes complications, bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores, hemoglobin A1c levels, eGFR, purchase of statins, and anti-resorptive agents were collected. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess the time to outcomes. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards survival model was performed. Results: A total of 27503 diabetic osteoporotic patients were identified, 13343 (48%) patients initiated treatment; 12214 (91.5%) started an oral bisphosphonate, 627 (4.7%) zoledronic acid and 502 (3.7%) denosumab. The median follow-up was 8.9 years. The denosumab treated patients were older (75.7 vs 71.9, p<0.01), had longer diabetes duration (8.4 vs 7.2, p<0.01), were more frequently treated with insulin (29.7 vs 23.9, p=0.02) and had a lower eGFR (59.4 vs 75.3, p<0.01). Male/Female ratio, BMI, CCI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, Hip BMD, HbA1c levels, microvascular complications, hypoglycemic events and statins prescriptions were similar. After propensity weighting, we observed a significant reduced risk of death among the denosumab treated patients (RR=0.72 [0.58-0.91]) without a significant difference in the risk of fracture (RR=0.9 [0.82-1.12]). Conclusions: In this cohort of diabetic osteoporotic patients, denosumab was associated with a significantly reduced mortality compared to zoledronic acid, without a significant difference in the risk of fractures. The effect of denosumab on mortality is yet to be explored. Presentation: 6/1/2024

9236 Denosumab Is Associated With Decreased Mortality Compared To Zoledronic Acid In Diabetic Osteoporotic Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Abstract Disclosure: V. Rouach: Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc. H. Gortler: None. Y. Greenman: None. C. Gabriel: None. G. inbalL: None. Background: Anti-resorptive therapies are the mainstay of osteoporosis management, but evidence of their efficacy in the diabetic population is limited and comparison between treatments is lacking. A retrospective analysis, presented at the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2023 Annual Meeting, suggests that denosumab leads to greater reduction in fracture risk than zoledronic acid among treatment-naive postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. However, a comparative study recently published suggests higher mortality with denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates. Aim: To assess the association between zoledronic acid or denosumab and the risk of major osteoporotic fracture and mortality in osteoporotic patients with diabetes type 2. Methods: The study population was identified by electronic records of a diabetes registry cross-linked with an osteoporosis registry of a large provider healthcare organization in Israel. Index date was at osteoporosis registry entry. Demographics, Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes complications, bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores, hemoglobin A1c levels, eGFR, purchase of statins, and anti-resorptive agents were collected. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess the time to outcomes. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards survival model was performed. Results: A total of 27503 diabetic osteoporotic patients were identified, 13343 (48%) patients initiated treatment; 12214 (91.5%) started an oral bisphosphonate, 627 (4.7%) zoledronic acid and 502 (3.7%) denosumab. The median follow-up was 8.9 years. The denosumab treated patients were older (75.7 vs 71.9, p<0.01), had longer diabetes duration (8.4 vs 7.2, p<0.01), were more frequently treated with insulin (29.7 vs 23.9, p=0.02) and had a lower eGFR (59.4 vs 75.3, p<0.01). Male/Female ratio, BMI, CCI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, Hip BMD, HbA1c levels, microvascular complications, hypoglycemic events and statins prescriptions were similar. After propensity weighting, we observed a significant reduced risk of death among the denosumab treated patients (RR=0.72 [0.58-0.91]) without a significant difference in the risk of fracture (RR=0.9 [0.82-1.12]). Conclusions: In this cohort of diabetic osteoporotic patients, denosumab was associated with a significantly reduced mortality compared to zoledronic acid, without a significant difference in the risk of fractures. The effect of denosumab on mortality is yet to be explored. Presentation: 6/1/2024

7281 Increased Incidence Of Fracture And Predicted Fracture Risk In Patients With Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion

Abstract Disclosure: R. Sagar: None. A. Saadulla: None. A. Abbas: None. Background: Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) is common in patients presenting with adrenal incidentalomas (AI) and has been associated with cardiovascular and metabolic co-morbidities. Whilst there is growing evidence to support the increased risk of cardiometabolic co-morbidity in this cohort, the bone health effects are less well characterised. Our study evaluated the prevalence of fragility fracture and fracture risk in patients with AI and MACS compared with a cohort of patients with benign, non-functional AI. Methods: Retrospective observational data were collected on 391 patients with MACS and an AI along with 626 patients with a benign, non-functional AI. Demographic, biochemical, radiological and bone health data were recorded. FRAX, a validated fracture risk stratifying tool, was used to calculated risk scores for all patients aged between 40 and 90 and risk category according to national guidance were also recorded. Results: MACS cohort (mean age 69±10 and 53% female) had a mean cortisol on overnight dexamethasone suppression test of 76.6±21nmol/l. Benign, non-functional patients had a mean age 61.4±12 and 57% female. Both cohorts had predominantly unilateral lesions (76% in MACS versus 84%). Patients with MACS had a significantly higher prevalence of all fragility fractures, 15.9% compared with 6.7% in the benign, non-functional group, p<0.0001. Patients with MACS had a significantly higher 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture (10.6±3.8% versus 7.1±5.4%, p<0.0001) and also hip fracture (7.2±4.1% versus 1.9±2.7%, p<0.0001). 17% of MACS cohort were classed as either high or very high fracture risk, with a further 28% classed as intermediate risk requiring further assessment of bone health compared with 3% high/very high risk in the non-functional group. Despite this only 31% of the MACS group had undergone DEXA scan to assess bone mineral density compared to 13% of the non-MACS group. Only 5% of MACS patients were on osteoporosis treatment (3% in non-MACS cohort). Conclusions: Patients with MACS make up a large proportion of those presenting with adrenal incidentaloma. Our study suggests an increased prevalence of fragility fractures along with increased fracture risk in patients with MACS compared to those with non-functional AI. However, we also demonstrate an unmet need, with less than 1/3 of patients with MACS undergoing formal bone health assessment and just 5% of the total cohort on treatment for osteoporosis despite a significant proportion meeting intervention thresholds. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Among people on osteoporosis medication, loss of appendicular or total body lean mass is an independent risk factor for hip and major osteoporotic fractures.

Sarcopenia increases fracture risk. If the risk persists after starting osteoporosis medication, patients may need to be encouraged to pursue strategies to prevent loss of lean mass. To estimate the effects of loss in appendicular lean mass (ALM) or total body lean mass (TBLM) on subsequent fracture risk and effect modification with anti-osteoporosis medication use. We conducted a registry-based cohort study linked to population-based data. We identified individuals ≥ 40years of age with two DXA assessments ≥ 1year apart and minimum 0.5years of observation. ALM and TBLM were estimated from weight, sex, and percent fat from DXA (R2 = 0.91 and 0.84 vs total body DXA, respectively). We report hazard ratios (HR) from Cox regression models estimating time to first incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture, adjusted for fracture risk; osteoporosis medication was included as an interaction term and used to stratify analyses. We included 21,249 individuals (mean 67 [SD 10] years, 95% female, 37% on osteoporosis medication). The mean follow-up was 7years (SD 4). A total of 1868 and 548 people had incident MOF and hip fracture, respectively. People with prior ALM loss (HR per SD 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15) or TBLM loss (HR per SD 1.09, 95% CI 1.42-1.14) had a higher risk of MOF. Hip fracture risk was greater in people with prior ALM loss (HR per SD 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33) and TBLM loss (HR per SD 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.38). There were no interactions with anti-osteoporosis medication use (all p > 0.3). When restricted to people on anti-osteoporosis medication, each SD in ALM or TBLM loss was associated with 8-9% increased MOF risk and 18-23% increased hip fracture risk. Loss of lean mass is associated with increased fracture risk among individuals on anti-osteoporosis medication. Patients should be encouraged to pursue strategies to prevent sarcopenia.

Long-Term Bone Density Changes and Fracture Risk in Myasthenia Gravis: Implications for FRAX® Tool Application.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients often require long-term glucocorticoid therapy, which may affect bone health. This study aimed to assess long-term changes in bone mineral density (BMD), evaluate osteoporotic fracture incidence, and examine the relationship between MG-specific factors and bone health outcomes over a 10-year period. This single-center, prospective cohort study included 28 MG patients. BMD, T-scores, Z-scores, and bone turnover markers were measured at baseline. FRAX® scores were calculated and adjusted for glucocorticoid dose. Fracture occurrence was monitored for over 10 years. Five (17.9%) patients experienced major osteoporotic fractures during follow-up. The fracture group had significantly lower baseline BMD and T-scores than the no-fracture group. Baseline FRAX® scores for major osteoporotic fracture risk were significantly higher in the fracture group (median 19.0% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.001). The fracture group progressed from osteopenia at baseline to osteoporosis by the end of this study. This study highlights the importance of early and regular bone health assessments in MG patients, particularly those receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy. The FRAX® tool may be valuable for fracture risk stratification in this population. These findings can inform clinical practice and improve long-term management strategies for MG patients who are at risk of osteoporotic fractures.

Fracture risk revisited: Bone mineral density T-score and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes.

To study the association between femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score and fracture risk in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study using the Danish National Health Service. BMD of the FN was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to study the association between FN BMD T-score and fractures in individuals with and without T2D separately, adjusted for age, comorbidities and comedication. The results from this analysis were used to estimate the 10-year absolute fracture risk. In total, there were 35,129 women (2362 with T2D) and 7069 men (758 with T2D). The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with risk of any, hip and major osteoporotic fracture in men and women with [adjusted hazard risk ratios (aHR) women, hip: 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-2.00, incidence rate (IR) 8.7; aHR men, hip: 1.55; 95% CI 1.01-2.36, IR 4.6] and without T2D (aHR women, hip: 1.75; 95% CI 1.64-1.87, IR 7.0; aHR men, hip: 1.97, 95% CI 1.73-2.25, IR 6.3), and its ability to predict fracture risk was similar. Fracture IRs were not significantly different for individuals with or without T2D, nor was the estimated cumulative 10-year fracture risk. The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with hip, non-spine and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men and women with and without T2D. Fracture risk for a given T-score and age was equal in individuals with and without T2D, as was the ability of the FN BMD T-score to predict fracture risk.

Increase in major osteoporotic fractures after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause severe and sometimes long-standing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Enhanced immune activation from ICI can theoretically result in osteoclast activation, bone loss and fracture. The...

Non-osteoporotic fractures are associated with increased risk of subsequent major osteoporotic fractures

SummaryWe studied the association between non-osteoporotic fractures and future major osteoporotic fractures, using UK health records. Non-osteoporotic fractures were found to increase the risk of major osteoporotic fractures, although to a lesser extent than osteoporotic fractures. This highlights the importance of considering all previous fractures in assessing future fracture risk.PurposePrevious studies demonstrated that osteoporotic fractures—minor and major—increase the risk for future major osteoporotic fractures; we test whether non-osteoporotic fractures are also associated with such increased risk.MethodsThe study is a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care electronic health records. Exposure groups were defined according to fracture location prior to the year 2011 (index date): major, minor, and non-osteoporotic. The outcome of incident major osteoporotic fractures following the index date was compared between the exposure groups and the general population.ResultsThe general study population included 1,951,388 patients. The exposure groups included 39,931 patients with a prior major osteoporotic fracture, 19,397 with a prior minor osteoporotic fracture, and 50,115 patients with a prior non-osteoporotic fracture. The standardized Incidence Rate Ratio for future major osteoporotic fractures was 2.73 (95% confidence interval: 2.64–2.82), 2.43 (2.32–2.54), and 1.83 (1.74–1.92), respectively.ConclusionNon-osteoporotic fractures are significantly associated with increased risk for future major osteoporotic fractures relative to the general population, yet to a lesser extent compared to major and minor osteoporotic fractures.

Performance of the Brazilian Fracture Assessment Risk Tool (FRAX) model and the age-dependent intervention thresholds according to National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines on fracture prediction in community-dwelling older adults: the São Paulo Ageing and Health (SPAH) Study.

To determine the performances of FRAX and age-dependent intervention thresholds according to National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines with and without bone mineral density (BMD) regarding fracture prediction in community-dwelling elderly Brazilians. Seven hundred and five older adults (447 women; 258 men) were followed for 4.3 ± 0.8years. FRAX risk for hip and major osteoporotic fractures with and without BMD was calculated at baseline. The bivariate analysis investigated the associations between the absolute probability of fracture (FRAX), as well as the age-dependent intervention thresholds (NOGG), and the incidence of vertebral fracture (VF), non-vertebral fracture (NVF), and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), segregated by sex. Age-adjusted Poisson's multiple regression and ROC curves were constructed to determine FRAX and NOGG's accuracies as fracture predictors. Fractures occurred in 22% of women and 15% of men. FRAX with and without BMD was higher in women with all types of fractures (p < 0.001). Only NOGG risk classification without BMD was associated with NVF (p = 0.047) and MOF (p = 0.024). FRAX was associated with NVF in the multiple regression, regardless of BMD. ROC curves of FRAX with and without BMD had AUCs of 0.74, 0.64, and 0.61 for NVF, VF, and MOF, respectively. The most accurate risk cutoffs for FRAX were 8% for MOF and 3% for hip fractures. No statistically significant associations were found in men. FRAX predicted NVF more accurately than VF or MOF in elderlies, regardless of BMD. These results reiterate that FRAX may be used without BMD, even considering that Brazilian elderlies have known higher fracture risk.

Prevalence of HIV-associated osteoporosis and fracture risk in midlife women: a cross-sectional study in Zimbabwe.

Antiretroviral therapy roll-out has dramatically reduced HIV-related mortality; more women are living to reach menopause. Menopausal estrogen loss causes bone loss, as does HIV and some of its treatments. However, data describing HIV's impact on osteoporosis prevalence and fracture risk are scarce in southern Africa. A cross-sectional study of women aged 40-60years (49% women with HIV [WLH]) was conducted in Harare, Zimbabwe. Menopause, fracture, and HIV history were collected, and anthropometry and BMD (by DXA) measured, and FRAX 10-year fracture probabilities quantified. The FRAX probability of a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) included HIV as a risk factor for secondary osteoporosis. Linear and Poisson regression determined the relationships between clinical risk factors and both femoral neck (FN) BMD and the 10-year FRAX probability of MOF respectively. The 393 participants had a mean (SD) age of 49.6 (5.8) years and mean (SD) BMI of 29.1 (6.0) kg/m2. 95% of WLH were antiretroviral therapy (ART) established (85% tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) and 81% had a viral load <50 copies/mL. A BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 was more common in WLH than those without, at both FN and lumbar spine (LS) (FN, 22 [11.4%] vs 5 [2.5%]; LS, 40 [20.8%] vs 9 [4.5%], respectively). Prior fracture was more prevalent in WLH: any fracture type (27 [14%] vs 14 [7%]); MOF (14 [7.3%] vs 5 [2.5%]). WLH had a higher 10-year MOF probability (median, 1.2%; IQR, 0.9-1.8) compared with those without HIV (1.0%; IQR, 0.9-1.5) (p < .001), although probabilities were low. Older age, low weight, and HIV infection were strongly associated with lower FN BMD. Higher probability of MOF was associated with older age, HIV infection, parental hip fracture and prior fracture, although adjustment attenuated the association with HIV. No woman reported anti-osteoporosis medication use. While osteoporosis and previous fractures were common and untreated in this relatively young population, particularly in WLH, the FRAX-predicted 10-year MOF risk was low. Clinical risk factors considered in fracture risk prediction tools in Zimbabwe may need contextual modification.

Increased risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures in 8463 patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation, a Swedish population-based study

SummaryIn this retrospective cohort study of adult stem cell transplanted patients (n = 8463), a significant increased risk of both MOF and hip fractures was seen compared with the Swedish population and occurred in mean more than 2 years after stem cell transplantation.PurposeTo explore the risk for osteoporotic fracture in patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) compared with the Swedish population.MethodsThe risk of osteoporotic fractures was determined in a retrospective population cohort study of adult (≥ 18 years) Swedish patients (n = 8463), who were transplanted with HSCT 1997–2016 and compared with all adults living in Sweden during the same period.ResultsIn the total study group (n = 8463), 90 hip fractures (1.1% both in males and females) and 361 major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) (3.2% in men and 6.0% in women) were identified. In the total study population, the ratio of observed and expected number of hip fracture for women was 1.99 (95% CI 1.39–2.75) and for men 2.54 (95% CI 1.91–3.31). The corresponding ratio for MOF in women was 1.36 (CI 1.18–1.56) and for men 1.61 (CI 1.37–1.88). From 2005 onwards, when differentiation in the registry between allo- and auto-HSCT was possible, the observed number of hip fracture and MOF in allo-HSCT (n = 1865) were significantly increased (observed/expected hip fracture 5.24 (95% CI 3.28–7.93) and observed/expected MOF 2.08 (95% CI 1.63–2.62)). Fractures occurred in mean 2.7 (hip) and 2.5 (MOF) years after allo-HSCT. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was not associated with an increased risk of fracture.ConclusionPatients who underwent HSCT had an increased risk of both hip and major osteoporotic fracture compared with the Swedish population and occurred in 4.3% of patients. GVHD was not statistically significantly associated with fracture risk.

Low-dose glucocorticoid increase the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a retrospective cohort study.

The effect of low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy on the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass was investigated. 119,790 66-year-old postmenopausal women with low bone mass based on bone mineral density (BMD) results were included. GC group consisted of patients who had been prescribed oral GCs within 6months of BMD testing. In GC group, GCs dosage was calculated by a defined daily dose (DDD), and divided into five groups according to GC usage (Group 1[G1]; < 11.25 DDDs, G2; ≥ 11.25, < 22.5 DDDs, G3; ≥ 22.5, < 45 DDDs, G4; ≥ 45, < 90 DDDs, G5; ≥ 90 DDDs). The risk of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and non-MOF was analyzed and compared with that of the control group during the 1-year follow-up. The risk of total fracture was higher in G3-G5 than in the control group (G3, hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.46; G4, 1.37 [1.13-1.66]; G5 1.45 [1.08-1.94]). The risk of MOF was higher in all groups except G2 than in the control group (G1, 1.23 [1.05-1.45]; G3, 1.37 [1.11-1.68]; G4, 1.41 [1.09-1.83]; G5, 1.66 [1.14-2.42]). The risk of spine fracture was significantly higher in all GC groups except G2 than in the control group. The risk of non-MOF was higher only in G4 than in the control group (G4, 1.48 [1.13-1.94]). Low-dose GC therapy can increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures, particularly spine fractures, in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Risk Factors for Ten-Year Risk of Osteoporosis in Type 2 DM Patients Attending Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Diabetic Center Cross-sectional Study

&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Background&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major contributing factor to osteoporotic fractures via different mechanisms. This study assessed the ten-year risk of osteoporosis and associated factors for osteoporotic fractures in T2DM patients. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Methods&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;: Data from 175 type diabetes mellites (T2DM) patients over 40 years attending a diabetes clinic at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) were collected. Demographic information, diabetic complications, blood sugar levels, and other medical illnesses were collected by a structured questionnaire and from an electronic medical record system. The 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool was used without bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with fragility fractures. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Results&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;: Half the participants were female, with a median age of 60. Most were married, well-educated, and urban residents. The median duration of diabetes was 11 years. The median FRAX score indicated a moderate 10-year risk of hip fracture (≥3%) and a high risk of major osteoporotic fracture (≥20%). Overall, 30.9% of patients had a high 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture. The majority (78.3%) had macrovascular complications, with neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy being the common ones. Higher FBS, higher HbA1c, and the presence of macrovascular complications were significantly associated with a higher risk of fractures. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Conclusion&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;: This study found a high prevalence (30.9%) of a 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in T2 DM patients. Poor glycemic control (higher HbA1c and FBS) and the presence of macrovascular complications were significantly associated with an increased 10-year osteoporotic fracture risk.

Predictive role of FRAX© for postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis with vertebral fracture after adult spinal deformity surgery.

To identify risk factors, including FRAX (a tool for assessing osteoporosis) scores, for development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), defined as Type 2 in the Yagi-Boachie classification (bone failure), with vertebral fracture (VF) after surgery for symptomatic adult spinal deformity. This was a retrospective, single institution study of 127 adults who had undergone corrective long spinal fusion of six or more spinal segments for spinal deformity and been followed up for at least 2years. The main outcome was postoperative development of PJK with VF. Possible predictors of this outcome studied included age at surgery, BMI, selected radiographic measurements, bone mineral density, and 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) as determined by FRAX. We also analyzed use of medications for osteoporosis. Associations between the selected variables and PJK with VF were assessed by the Mann-Whitney, Fishers exact, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis, as indicated. Forty patients (31.5%) developed PJK with VF postoperatively,73% of them within 6months of surgery. Statistical analysis of the selected variables found that only a preoperative estimate by FRAX of a > 15% risk of MOF within 10years, pelvic tilt > 30° at first standing postoperatively and lower instrumented level (fusion terminating at the pelvis) were significantly associated with development of PJK with VF. Preoperative assessment of severity of osteoporosis using FRAX provides an accurate estimate of risk of postoperative PJK with VF after surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Association of muscle health impairment and atherosclerosis with major osteoporotic fracture risk in Taiwanese Vegetarians.

Despite the beneficial effects of "vegetarian style" diet on atherosclerosis, it is also proven potentially detrimental to bone health. The influence of muscle health or atherosclerosis on major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk in vegetarians has rarely been explored. This prospective study aimed to investigate an association of MOF risk with muscle health and atherosclerosis in vegetarians. We conducted a questionnaire survey with the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) on 39 vegetarians. The 10-year probability of MOF was determined using the Taiwanese Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX®) calculator. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM) mass and bone mineral density were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Physical performance was evaluated using the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Common carotid artery intima-media thickness (ccIMT) was determined using sonography. Serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), Vitamin D, adiponectin, and leptin were measured. Eleven (28.2%) of 39 vegetarians had a moderate-high risk of MOF, defined by FRAX-calculated risk ≥10%. These subjects had lower ASM (P < 0.005) and 6MWT distances (P < 0.01) but greater ccIMT than those with low risk. The MOF risk was negatively correlated with ASM (r = -0.51, P < 0.001) and 6MWT distances (r = -0.62, P < 0.001) but positively correlated with ccIMT (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that MOF risk scores were negatively associated with ASM and 6MWT distance while positively associated with ccIMT. There was no significant association of MOF risk with MNA scores, serum levels of PTH, Vitamin D, adiponectin, or leptin. Decreased ASM mass, reduced physical performance, and atherosclerosis are significantly associated with MOF risk in vegetarians.

Association of systemic inflammatory response index with bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and future fracture risk in elderly hypertensive patients

ABSTRACT Objectives This study sought to investigate the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis, and future fracture risk in elderly hypertensive patients. Methods Elderly hypertensive patients (age ≥60 years) who attended our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023 and completed BMD screening were included in the study. Analyses were performed with multivariate logistic and linear regression. Results The multiple linear regression indicated that SIRI levels were significantly negatively correlated with lumbar 1 BMD (β = -0.15, 95% CI: −0.24, −0.05), lumbar 2 BMD (β = -0.15, 95% CI: −0.24, −0.05), lumbar 3 BMD (β = -1.35, 95% CI: −0.23, −0.02), lumbar 4 BMD (β = -0.11, 95% CI: −0.30, −0.10), femur neck BMD (β = -0.11, 95% CI: −0.18, −0.05) and Ward’s triangle BMD (β = -0.12, 95% CI: −0.20, −0.05) among elderly hypertensive patients, after fully adjusting for confounders. Furthermore, we observed that SIRI was positively associated with future fracture risk in elderly hypertensive patients. Specifically, SIRI was associated with an increased risk of major osteoporotic fractures (β = 0.33) and hip fractures (β = 0.25). The logistic regression analysis indicated that there is an association between the SIRI level and an increased risk of osteoporosis (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.37, 1.87), after fully adjusting for confounders. Conclusions Our findings indicate a potential association between SIRI and BMD, osteoporosis, and the risk of future fractures in elderly hypertensive patients. However, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

The efficacy of nutritional screening indexes in predicting the incidence of osteosarcopenia and major osteoporotic fracture in the elderly.

The effect of nutritional status on osteosarcopenia (OS) and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) among the elderly is still unclear. So we aimed to compare the efficacy of the Mini-Nutrition Assessment-Short Form (MNA-sf), the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) for predicting OS and MOF among the elderly. A total of 409 participants were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood biochemical indexes, nutritional status, and bone- and muscle-related examinations were assessed at initial visit to the outpatient. Participants were divided into 4 groups: (1) control; (2) osteopenia/osteoporosis; (3) sarcopenia; (4) osteosarcopenia, and then followed for 5years, recording the occurrence time of MOF. The frequency values of osteopenia/osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and OS, at baseline, were respectively 13.4, 16.1, and 12% among the study samples. Correlation analysis showed that nutritional status scores were associated with body mass index, handgrip strength, albumin, bone mineral density, and physical functions. According to multivariate models, poor nutritional status was significantly associated with a higher risk of OS and MOF (P<0.05). Survival analysis showed that the MOF rate in malnutrition group was significantly higher than normal nutrition group (P<0.05). The receiver operator characteristic curve shows that the value of MNA-sf to diagnose OS and MOF is greater (P<0.05). The poor nutritional status was associated with a higher risk of both OS and MOF. MNA-sf showed a superior diagnostic power for OS and MOF among the elderly. Early nutrition assessments and interventions may be key strategies to prevent OS and fractures.

TBS correlates with bone density and microstructure at trabecular and cortical bone evaluated by HR-pQCT.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) estimates bone microstructure, which is directly measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT). We evaluated the correlation between these methods and TBS influence on fracture risk assessed by FRAX. We evaluated 129 individuals (82 women, 43 postmenopausal) 20 to 82.3 years without prevalent clinical or non-clinical morphometric vertebral fractures, using DXA (spine and hip), HR-pQCT at distal radius (R) and tibia (T) and TBS which classifies bone microarchitecture as normal (TBS ≥ 1.350), partially degraded (1.200 < TBS < 1.350), or degraded (TBS ≤ 1.200). Spine and hip BMD and HR-pQCT parameters at cortical bone: area (T), density (R,T) thickness (T) and trabecular bone: density (R,T), number (T) and thickness (R) were significantly better in the 78 individuals with normal TBS (group 1) versus the 51 classified as partially degraded (n = 42) or degraded microarchitecture (n = 9) altogether (group 2). TBS values correlated with age (r = -0.55), positively with spine and hip BMD and all cortical and trabecular bone density and microstructure parameters evaluated, p < 0.05 all tests. Binary logistic regression defined age (p = 0.008) and cortical thickness (p = 0.018) as main influences on TBS, while ANCOVA demonstrated that HR-pQCT data corrected for age were not different between TBS groups 1 and 2. TBS adjustment increased FRAX risk for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures. We describe significant association between TBS and both trabecular and cortical bone parameters measured by HR-pQCT, consistent with TBS influence on fracture risk estimation by FRAX, including hip fractures, where cortical bone predominates.

P164 Fracture risk in axial spondyloarthritis: a retrospective analysis of the use of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in a cohort of affected patients

Abstract Background/Aims Fractures are common in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. The FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) score is a validated tool for the assessment of fracture risk. Unlike axSpA, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is counted as a risk factor in FRAX. The primary aim was to calculate a FRAX score in a cohort of axSpA patients. In addition, a second FRAX score was determined by ticking the “RA risk” as positive on the second assessment. Methods Data were examined on a cohort of axSpA patients attending the St James’s Hospital Spondylitis service. Bone mineral density was assessed at the neck of femur on the patient’s dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This, plus the individual patient’s risk factors, were added to the FRAX score calculator. The analysis was then repeated with the RA risk box ticked as positive. The effect of such an adjustment (taking account of their diagnosis of axSpA) on the fracture risk status of these patients was made to assess if this resulted in an additional number of patients within the cohort being at risk of fracture. A patient with a 10-year hip fracture risk of &amp;gt; 3% or 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk of &amp;gt; 20% is high risk. Results Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the cohort. All (100%) of the patients met ASAS axSpA criteria and 85% met Modified New York (mNY) criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. Five patients had known osteoporosis and an additional 9 patients were classified as being at increased fracture risk using the FRAX Tool. A further 7 patients could be classified as being at increased fracture risk when the FRAX was adjusted for the axSpA diagnosis, by ticking the RA risk box as positive. Conclusion Fracture risk is a significant issue in patients with axSpA; however, this risk is frequently under-recognised. The use of the FRAX score improves the detection of those at fracture risk, and its use should be strongly encouraged in all rheumatology clinics managing axSpA patients. When the same weighting is given to axSpA as RA, there is a further increase in the identification of patients at risk of fractures. Disclosure P. Mulkerrin: None. F. O'Shea: None. G. Fitzgerald: None.