Risk Of Major Bleeding Research Articles

Factors related to the choice of warfarin for treating newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are associated with safety outcomes during anticoagulation: A new‐user, active‐comparator, retrospective cohort study

AbstractBackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, warfarin is still used. This study examined why physicians may choose warfarin over DOACs and the associated safety outcomes in patients with NVAF.MethodsWe conducted a new‐user, active‐comparator cohort study in newly diagnosed patients with NVAF to assess safety outcomes after the introduction of DOACs in Japan.ResultsThe median observation period was 1120 days; 1428 patients started anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and 1551 with DOACs. Warfarin was chosen for patients with lower creatinine clearance and left ventricular ejection fractions and those using aspirin and verapamil. The unadjusted risk of major bleeding was considerably higher in the warfarin group but was nonsignificant after adjusting for variables associated with the choice of warfarin, in addition to age and sex. The risk of death was higher in the warfarin group, even after adjustments for relevant variables. However, high‐risk subgroups, including those with older ages and multiple comorbidities, such as renal impairment, for whom warfarin was more likely to be selected, had severely compromised prognoses with either anticoagulant. The risk of stroke/systemic embolism was not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsWarfarin is often chosen for older patients with multiple comorbidities characterized by reduced renal function, which is associated with a higher risk of major bleeding and mortality. These high‐risk patients seem to have a poor prognosis regardless of the type of anticoagulant used. Thus, safe anticoagulant therapy remains a challenge for such patients.

Bleeding Associated With Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Nationwide Population Cohort Study.

This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug. Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded. Propensity score matching compared those taking both DOACs and antiarrhythmic drugs with those on DOACs alone. There was an increased risk of major bleeding in patients concomitantly taking DOACs with amiodarone when compared with matched patients taking DOACs alone (hazard ratio [HR],1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.0044), particularly in patients taking dabigatran (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03-1.38]; P=0.0175). No significant difference in bleeding risk was found for propafenone, dronedarone, flecainide, or sotalol. The small sample sizes in the flecainide and sotalol groups limit interpretation. Notably, intracranial bleeding risk was higher in patients on DOACs and amiodarone, regardless of age. Additionally, patients <80 years old taking dabigatran with amiodarone or propafenone had a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Concomitant use of DOACs with amiodarone, but not dronedarone or propafenone, increases the risk of major bleeding, particularly intracranial bleeding. This study provides new evidence to guide clinicians to tailor concomitant anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis.

Comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin's efficacy and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis (LC). Evidence of the pharmacodynamics of DOACs is limited in patients with AF and LC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the largest hospital system in Taiwan, involving patients with AF and LC for the years 2012 to 2021. Hazards of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism), intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were investigated with a new-user, active comparator design. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounders between treatment groups. In total, 478 DOAC users and 247 warfarin users were included. DOACs and warfarin demonstrated similar trends in preventing thromboembolic events, namely ischemic stroke [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.42-2.61)], transient ischemic attack [aHR, 1.36 (95% CI: 0.18-10.31)], and systemic embolism [aHR, 0.49 (95% CI: 0.14-1.70)]. DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of intracranial hemorrhage [aHR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.26-1.59)] and gastrointestinal bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.39-1.03)], a decreased risk of major bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42-0.99)], and a reduction in mortality [aHR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54-0.99)]. DOAC users exhibited a significant reduction in major bleeding risk in patients with Child-Pugh class A (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.70). DOACs showed potential safety advantages over warfarin for patients with nonvalvular AF and LC, particularly in reducing major bleeding risk in those with Child-Pugh class A.

Incidence, characteristics, and prognostic impact of cancers in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry

Abstract Background Cancers and atrial fibrillation (AF) are all aging-related diseases. Coexistence of the two conditions makes management complex due to increased risk of both thromboembolism and bleeding. Purpose The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence and prognostic impact of cancers in patients with AF in the GLORIA-AF registry. Methods GLORIA-AF registry is a prospective multi-centered international multi-centered AF cohort studies. We characterized these patients according to the presence or absence of a cancer diagnosis when enrolled. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major bleeding; the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Results The prevalence of cancers was 9.7%. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores in cancer patients were higher than in non-cancer patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc 3.5 vs. 3.2, P&amp;lt;0.001; mean HAS-BLED score 1.6 vs. 1.3, P&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with cancers had higher oral anticoagulant use than non-cancer patients (84.4% vs. 81.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001) and were more likely to receive NOACs (58.4% vs. 54.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001). During a mean follow up period of 3 years, AF patients with cancers had significantly higher all-cause mortality (15.0% vs. 8.3%, P&amp;lt;0.001), major bleeding rate (5.3% vs. 3.1%, P&amp;lt;0.001), the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding (20.0% vs. 12.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001), and composite of all-cause mortality, thromboembolism, and major bleeding than non-cancer patients (21.0% vs. 12.0%, P&amp;lt;0.001), but nonsignificant differences in cardiovascular mortality (3.6% vs. 3.1%, P=0.2), any stroke, transient ischemic attack, or non-central nervous system embolism (3.2% vs. 2.7%, P=0.1), and OAC discontinuation (29.0% vs. 28%, P=0.2). Among the cancers, hematological cancer was associated the highest risk of all-cause mortality (HR=3.7, 95%CI 2.69-5.0, P&amp;lt;0.001) while respiratory cancer was associated the highest risk of major bleeding (HR=2.62, 95%CI 1.24-5.5, P=0.011). After multivariable adjustment, cancer was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.30, 95%CI 1.05-1.62, P=0.018), composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding (HR=1.32, 95%CI 1.04-1.68, P=0.022), and composite of all-cause mortality, thromboembolism, and major bleeding (HR=1.29, 95%CI 1.04-1.60, P=0.022), but the risk of major bleeding was nonsignificantly different (HR=1.16, 95%CI 0.71-1.87, P=0.6). Conclusions Cancer is a common comorbidity in patients with AF and is independently associated with increased risk of poor outcomes including all-cause mortality and MACEs. However, cancer did not increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality, major bleeding, and discontinuation of OAC. Cancer in patients with AF should receive appropriate treatments for the cancer itself and appropriate OAC, although strategies may vary between different cancers.Distribution of caners in GLORIA-AFKaplan-Meier curves for the outcomes

Ischemic and bleeding risk after ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction in patients with active cancer

Abstract Background Treatment of patients with cancer presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is complex given the increased risk of both thrombotic and major bleeding complications. We evaluated the risk of major bleeding and re-infarction in patients with or without cancer following admission with STEMI Methods A nationally-linked cohort of STEMI patients between January 2005 and March 2019 were obtained from the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) registry and the UK national Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC) registry. Cox proportional hazard models were used, and Kaplan-Meier survival and cumulative survival curves were constructed. Results A total of 322,776 STEMI indexed admissions were identified between Jan 2005 and March 2019. Of those, 7050 (2.2%) patients were diagnosed with active cancer. Cancer patients were older with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Cancer patients received invasive coronary angiography (62.2% vs 72.7%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and PCI (58.4% vs 69.5%) less often compared to patients without cancer and were less likely to be prescribed DAPT (85% vs 95.4%). Major bleeding rate at one year was higher in cancer patients (6.5% vs 3.5%) while re-infarction rates were similar (cancer 5.7%, no cancer 5.1%). Adjustment for differences in baseline covariates, a similar risk of re-infarction (SHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.27) and a 50% increased risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30-1.71) was observed in cancer patients. Conclusion Compared to non-cancer patients, cancer patients have a higher risk of major bleeding but not of re-infarction. Mitigating bleeding risk in STEMI patients with cancer is of paramount importance to improve outcomes.bleeding risk at 1 yearRe-infarction risk at 1 year

Edoxaban dose, frailty, and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: the ETNA-AF-Europe 4-year follow-up

Abstract Background Frailty is a common reason to choose non-recommended (non-rec) doses of non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it is not known how this practice affects stroke and bleeding outcomes. Purpose To assess clinical outcomes in frail patients with AF receiving non-rec vs recommended (rec) doses of edoxaban using 4-yr follow-up data from ETNA-AF-Europe. Methods The prospective, observational ETNA-AF-Europe study followed patients with AF receiving edoxaban for up to 4 yrs. In ETNA-AF-Europe, perceived frailty was based on investigators’ own clinical binary judgement in each patient. Objective frailty was determined using a simplified adaptation of the Rockwood’s Frailty Index. For objective frailty, patients with missing index were categorised as non-frail. Patients with perceived or objective frailty were combined for this analysis. Baseline characteristics and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) assessing risk of outcomes in frail patients prescribed non-rec vs rec edoxaban doses (i.e., non-rec 60mg vs rec 30mg and non-rec 30mg vs rec 60mg) are presented. Data were adjusted for age, sex, and derived versions of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. Net clinical benefit was defined as any stroke/systemic embolic event (SEE), transient ischaemic attack, venous thromboembolic event, major bleeding, or cardiovascular death, whichever came first. Results Of 13164 patients, 1786 were frail (13.6%; perceived frailty [n=1410], age [IQR]: 82.0 [78.0-86.0] yrs, women: 57.9%; objective frailty [n=540], age [IQR]: 77.0 [71.0-82.0] yrs, women: 31.9%; both, n=164). Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Risk of all-cause death was higher in frail patients treated with non-rec 30mg vs rec 60mg (HR [95% CI]: 1.44 [1.06,1.96]). The annualised rate [CI] of any stroke/SEE was non-significantly higher (HR [95% CI]:1.60 [0.80,3.20]) with non-rec 30mg (n=169; 2.25 [1.25,4.06]) vs rec 60mg (n=622; 1.54 [1.08,2.20]). There was, however, no association between treatment received and risk (HR [95% CI]) of major bleeding (1.19 [0.58,2.43]) or net clinical benefit (1.26 [0.84,1.87]) (Figure 1). In frail patients who received non-rec 60mg (n=183) vs rec 30mg (n=695), risk of any stroke/SEE (HR [95% CI]) was higher (2.15 [1.03,4.49]), but there were no significant differences in the risk (HR [95% CI]) of major bleeding (1.03 [0.52,2.01]), net clinical benefit (1.15 [0.78,1.71]), or all-cause death (0.79 [0.59,1.05]) (Figure 1). Conclusions In this large European AF registry, the presence of frailty should not drive dosing recommendations for edoxaban. In particular, when compared with the rec 60mg dose, the non-rec 30mg (reduced) dose, was associated with more all-cause death and no benefits on major bleeding.Baseline Characteristics

Diabetes mellitus and adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation: implications of insulin treatment: a report from the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase III

Abstract Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are both associated with adverse clinical events, but the associations has not been fully elucidated, especially in relation to insulin use. Purpose To analyze the associations between DM and the risk of clinical adverse events in patients with AF, and second, explore the impact of insulin treatment in these patients. Methods We studied patients with AF from the prospective Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Anti-Thrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) registry with 3-years follow-up. Clinical events included all-cause death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, thromboembolism (TE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). MACE was defined as a composite of stroke, MI and major bleeding. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of clinical events. Multivariable cox regression models with subgroups were used to estimate the association between DM and the risk of mortality and clinical events. Results A total of 15,861 AF patients were included (mean age 70.00 ± 10,21 years old; 55% male, 20% Asia), of which 3,666 had DM (mean age 70.04 ± 9.54 years old; 59% male, 21% Asia). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that AF patients with DM had higher cumulative hazard of all outcomes, including all-cause death (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.38-1.77), CVD (OR: 1.72, 95%CI: 1.44-2.06), major bleeding (OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 1.17-1.67), stroke (OR: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.04-1.61), TE (OR: 1.26, 95%CI:1.02-1.56), MI (OR: 1.88, 95%CI: 1.48-2.39) and MACE (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.41-1.84). After adjustment by prior disease and drugs, the outcomes of stroke (OR: 1.19, 95%CI: 0.95-1.49) and TE (OR: 1.22, 95%CI: 0.98-1.52) showed not significant. Subgroup analysis found that increased risks of stroke were found in female (OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.03-1.98, Pinteraction = 0.062) and non-Asian patients (OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.06-1.82, Pinteraction = 0.175) with DM. For all cause death, subgroup results were similar with overall patients. In addition, insulin use increased the risk of all cause death (OR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.45-2.29), CVD (OR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.22-2.37), major bleeding (OR: 1.54, 95%CI: 1.08-2.18), MI (OR: 1.72, 95%CI: 1.12-2.64), MACE (OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.28-2.11) in patients with AF and DM. Multivariable model showed similar result. Conclusions DM was independently associated with higher risk of all-cause death, CVD, MI, major bleeding, and MACE in patients with AF. Insulin use was associated with higher risk of all-cause death, CVD, MI, major bleeding, and MACE in patients with AF and DM.Figure 1Figure 2

Gender and racial differences in outcomes among patients with NVAF treated with oral anticoagulants: a real-world evaluation of Medicare beneficiaries

Abstract Introduction Anticoagulation therapies are essential component of disease management for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran have shown greater benefit in reducing stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and bleeding risk compared to warfarin. However, few studies have assessed whether the beneficial effects of DOACs are consistent across gender and race. Purpose To assess the association between apixaban use and the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding (MB) compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran; and to determine whether the associations differ by gender and race. Methods Adult patients with AF diagnosis who initiated warfarin or a DOAC between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019 were identified using Medicare claims databases. Patients were classified into warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban cohorts based on index prescription. Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between DOAC therapy initiation and risk of stroke/SE and MB, overall and among gender and race. Results Among a total of 1,079,540 included patients, 486,257 (45.04%) were in the apixaban cohort, 46,920 (4.35%) in the dabigatran cohort, 267,991 (24.82%) in the rivaroxaban cohort, and 278,372 (25.79%) in the warfarin cohort. Overall, the risks of stroke/SE and MB were lower for apixaban when compared with warfarin (stroke/SE: HR: 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.74], MB: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.57-0.60]), rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.92], MB: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.58-0.61]) and dabigatran(stroke/SE: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80-0.95], MB: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.72-0.80]). Among 140,587 females, the risk was lower for apixaban as compared with warfarin (stroke/SE: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.67-0.78], MB: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.58-0.62]) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.83-0.93], MB: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.57-0.61]), but similar risk of stroke/SE was noted for apixaban compared to dabigatran (stroke/SE: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.86-1.11]). Among 137,785 males, the risk of stroke/SE and MB were lower for apixaban compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Among 16,288 Black patients, the risk was lower for apixaban as compared with warfarin (stroke/SE: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.63-0.83] MB: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.54-0.65]), also lower risk of MB was noted for apixaban as compared with rivaroxaban (MB: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.5-0.62]), but a similar risk of stroke/SE was noted compared to rivaroxaban and dabigatran, and similar risk of MB was noted compared to dabigatran. Among 247,642 White patients, the risk of stroke/SE and MB were lower for apixaban compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. All the results along with comparisons are displayed in the accompanying figures. Conclusion Apixaban demonstrated lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding when compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran across most race and gender subgroups.Figure 1_Risk of stroke/SEFigure 2_Risk of Major Bleeding

Adherence to the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway and outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A report from the APHRS-AF registry

Abstract Background The Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is based on three pillars: "A" avoid stroke with oral anticoagulation, "B" better symptoms control, and "C" optimization of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyles. This integrated approach has been associated with improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but few data are available in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Purpose To investigate the correlation between chronic kidney disease, adherence to the ABC pathway, and the occurrence of adverse events in patients with AF enrolled in the Asian-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society-AF Registry. Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with CKD, warfarin use and rhythm control strategies. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age≥75 years, paroxysmal AF, CHA2DS2VASc≥2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and ABC adherence was used to calculate Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the risk of primary outcomes in patients with CKD (eGFR &amp;lt;60 ml/min/1.73m2). Sensitivity analyses were performed in moderate (eGFR 59-30) and severe CKD (eGFR&amp;lt;30). Interaction analysis investigated the effect of ABC pathway based on presence or absence of CKD. Primary outcomes were the risks of all-cause death, major cardiovascular events (MACE: Cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndromes, thromboembolic events, and acute heart failure) and major bleeding. Results We included 2 578 AF patients without CKD (age 66.5±11.3 years, 32.5% females) and 1 047 AF patients with CKD (75.3±10.3 years, 40.8% females). Lower ABC pathway full adherence was observed in CKD patients (42.1% vs 29.5%, p&amp;lt;0.001), primarily due to low adherence to "A" and "C" criteria. Logistic regressions confirmed the lower likelihood of anticoagulation (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.61, 95%CI 0.44-0.83), a higher use of warfarin (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.23-1.83) and lower use of rhythm control strategies (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.66-0.94) in CKD patients. After one-year follow up, patients with CKD had a higher incidence of all-cause death (1.6% vs 7.2%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and MACE (3.4% vs 8.1%, p,0.001) compared to those without CKD. On Cox multivariable analysis (Figure 1, Panel A-D), CKD and ABC adherence were independently associated with the risk of all-cause death (HR 2.54, 95%CI 1.69-3.80 and HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.35-0.93, respectively) and MACE (HR 1.58, 95%CI 1.14-2.20 and HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.46-0.95, respectively). The risk of primary outcomes was the highest in those with severe CKD. No association was found with the risk of major bleeding. The interaction analysis confirmed that the beneficial effect of ABC pathway adherence on death (p int= 658) and MACE (p int= 0.568) was irrespective of CKD. Conclusion AF patients with CKD have low ABC pathway adherence and high risk of all-cause death and MACE. Efforts to improve the ABC pathway adherence in AF patients with CKD are needed to improve their long-term clinical outcomes.Figure 1.Cox regression analyses

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of combined mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (CSAMI) is a severe complication associated with unacceptably high mortality rates. Since early revascularisation was introduced more than 20 years ago, no subsequent innovation has demonstrated conclusive efficacy in reducing mortality in CSAMI. While mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has emerged as a potential intervention, randomised controlled trials evaluating independent use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) have not shown benefit in CSAMI. In contrast, systematic reviews of observational studies have revealed significant mortality reduction when CSAMI was treated with combined use of MCS, specifically VA-ECMO in conjunction with a left ventricular (LV) unloading device (Impella or IABP). Combination MCS (VA-ECMO + LV unloading) may therefore present a promising approach to CSAMI, but an unresolved dilemma concerning the optimal selection between two LV unloading devices (VA-ECMO + Impella vs VA-ECMO + IABP) warrants further investigation and clarification. Purpose We perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the short-term efficacy and safety of VA-ECMO + Impella versus VA-ECMO + IABP in treatment of CSAMI. Methods A systematic search was performed on the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Studies reporting the short-term (30-day/inpatient) mortality and complications of adult patients with CSAMI treated with VA-ECMO + Impella and VA-ECMO + IABP were included. Fixed effect meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel model was used to analyse the pooled odds ratio for short-term mortality and major complications. Subgroup analysis was performed including studies with ACS predominant CS (Cause of CS 100% by AMI). Results Four observational studies with 14,247 patients were included. These studies showed high heterogeneity for the total CSAMI cohort and low heterogeneity for the ACS predominant cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality between VA-ECMO + Impella and VA-ECMO + IABP 56.5% vs 66.5%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79–1.02; P=0.09. However, VA-ECMO + Impella was associated with significantly lower mortality in patients with ACS predominant CS 53.2% vs 67.7%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62–0.85; P&amp;lt;0.0001. VA-ECMO + Impella was associated with significantly higher risk of major bleeding 15.1% vs 8.6%; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.50–2.32; P&amp;lt;0.00001 and vascular complications 15.0% vs 6.7%; OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.41–2.18; P&amp;lt;0.00001. Conclusions When comparing LV unloading devices in patients with CSAMI requiring combination MCS, VA-ECMO + Impella was superior in mortality reduction only in the cohort where 100% of CS was caused by AMI. Concomitantly, VA-ECMO + Impella was associated with greater risk of major bleeding and vascular complications. Additional randomised studies are needed to validate and strengthen the findings presented in these observational data.Forrest plot on short-term mortalityForrest plot on major complications

Comparison of 600 mg VS 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose for patients with ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background While a 600-mg loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel has demonstrated superior inhibition of platelet function compared to 300-mg LD, the clinical evidence supporting this superiority is limited. The debate centers on whether a higher clopidogrel LD regimen in primary percutaneous coronary intervention outperforms the standard 300 mg LD, with potential benefits being more pronounced in higher-risk patients. Balancing enhanced platelet inhibition to reduce ischemic events against the associated risk of increased bleeding remains a critical consideration in determining the optimal loading dose of clopidogrel for patients with ischemic heart disease. Purpose The objective of this meta-analysis is to validate current randomized trials that investigate the efficacy and safety of two clopidogrel loading regimens (600 mg vs 300 mg) in patients with ischemic heart disease treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Method A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials was performed comparing 600 mg with 300 mg LD of clopidogrel using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov. and Herdin PH. Studies included those between 2010 - 2023 involving human subjects. The primary efficacy endpoint was a 1-month rate of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and the primary safety outcome was bleeding adverse effects. Result Nine randomized control studies involving 29,827 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 30 days. Only 8 studies were eligible for safety analysis. Compared with standard LD clopidogrel, high LD significantly reduced incidence of overall MACE (OR:0.82, 95% CI:0.74-0.91, p=0.0002), nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR:0.56; 95% CI:0.32-0.99, p = 0.15) and target vessel revascularization (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, p = 0.03 ), without significant difference in terms of cardiac death (OR:0.89; 95% CI:0.76-1.04, p=0.15) and stroke (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26, p = 0.61). However, major bleeding risk was higher in the 600 mg LD (1.9%; 261/13288) compared with 300 mg LD (2.4%; 328/13242) [OR:1.27; 95% CI:1.08-1.49, p=0.005] without significant difference in minor bleeding (OR:1.05; 95% CI:0.94-1.17, p=0.35). Conclusion The administration of 600 mg of clopidogrel LD reduces the overall risk of MACE with an associated increased risk of major bleeding in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.MACE OUTCOMES

Risk of death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in elderly patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Complexity who are not taking oral anticoagulation

Abstract Background Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) often exhibit Clinical Complexity (CC), defined as ≥2 features, i.e. patients aged ≥75 years plus a body mass index (BMI) &amp;lt; 23/kg/m2 and/or bleeding history and/or chronic kidney disease. No data are available about the clinical course of patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking oral anticoagulation (OAC). Purpose To assess the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and CC who are not taking OAC. Methods Retrospective study with a health care research network (TriNetX). Based on the ICD-10-CM codes entered between 2011-2022 from 85 health care organizations mainly located in the United States, AF patients ≥75 years with CC were categorized into two groups based on the use of OAC during the last year before the study period. The primary outcomes were the one-year risk of death, major cardiovascular events ([MACE]: heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction), and major bleeding (central nervous system, gastrointestinal, internal bleeding, and hypovolemic shock). Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome and catheter ablation. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs following propensity score matching 1:1. Results Overall, we identified 271,402 AF CC patients not on OAC (80.1±6.8 years, 46.5% females) and 87,101 AF CC patients on OAC (79.8±6.5 years, 47.6% females). Before PSM, AF CC patients not on OAC showed no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding risk factors but were less treated with pharmacological treatment than AF CC patients on OAC. After PSM, no significant differences were found between the two groups, but AF CC not on OAC were at higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.50-1.57), MACE (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16), and major bleeding (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.31-1.38), when compared to AF CC on OAC. AF CC patients not on OAC were associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and with a lower use of catheter ablation procedures (HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.43-0.54) (Table 1). The risk of the composite outcomes was the highest in those with all the three CC components. A progressive increase in OAC prescription was observed during the follow-up period, with increasing of NOACs and lower use of warfarin being observed. There was a clear temporal relationship between increasing OAC prescription and incidence of bleeding in CC patients (Figure 1) Conclusions AF CC patients not on OAC have a high risk of all-cause death, thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Over time, increasing NOAC use was associated with more bleeding in CC patients. New antithrombotic approaches aimed at reducing thrombotic risk without increasing bleeding risk are needed in these patients.Figure 1 OAC new prescriptions

Direct oral anticoagulants exhibit lower risks of mortality and bleeding compared to vitamin-k antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients on chronic hemodialysis: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are equally or more effective than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with moderate CKD, evidence claiming the benefits of DOACs over VKAs in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is scarce. Purpose This meta-analysis aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with AF on chronic HD by comparing the clinical outcomes of DOACs versus VKAs. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted across various databases to retrieve studies focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis comparing DOACs and VKAs. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model in Review Manager 5.4. Statistical significance was set at p &amp;lt;0.05. Results Nine studies with 39, 831 patients were included. The risk of all-cause mortality [RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.88; p=0.001], major bleeding [RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.76; p&amp;lt;0.00001], gastrointestinal bleeding [RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.85; p=0.0009], intracranial hemorrhage [RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.84; p=0.004], all-cause stroke [RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.81; p=0.0001], and ischemic stroke [RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.96; p=0.04] were lower in the DOAC group than in the VKA group. The risk of cardiovascular-related death [RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.69, 2.60; p=0.39], and clinically relevant non-major bleeding [RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.08; p=0.26] showed no significant differences. Conclusion The risks of all-cause stroke, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in the patients with AF undergoing chronic HD were lower in the DOAC group than in the VKA group. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to generate more robust evidence through adequately powered studies, leading to conclusive results that are applicable to real-world scenarios.

Application of DOAC Score for the risk-stratification of major bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on direct oral anticoagulants: insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2

Abstract Background/Introduction Bleeding complications are still a major concern in anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE), even in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era. Thus, the risk stratification of bleeding during anticoagulation therapy is essential, although most of currently available bleeding risk scores have been developed from patients receiving vitamin K antagonists, which could have limited validity in those receiving DOACs. Very recently, the DOAC Score has been developed to predict major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs; however, the score has not yet been validated in patients with VTE. Purpose The present study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the DOAC Score in patients with VTE, using a large-scale multicenter observational database of patients with VTE. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. The present study population was consisted of 3539 patients with VTE who received DOACs and had a calculated DOAC Score. The eligible patients were classified into 5 risk categories: very low (score 0–3), low (score 4–5), moderate (6–7), high (score 8–9), and very high (score ≥10). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the cumulative incidence and assessed the discriminatory ability of the DOAC Score for major bleeding at 1 year by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also assessed the discriminatory ability of the VTE-BLEED and RIETE scores. Results In the present study population, the very low-risk group accounted for 1437 patients (41%), low-risk group for 828 (23%), moderate-risk group for 812 (23%), high-risk group for 326 (9.2%), and very high-risk group for 136 (3.8%). The proportion of anemia was highest in the very high-risk group (71%) and lowest in the very low-risk group (47%). The prevalence of active cancer was highest in the low-risk group (36%) and lowest in the very high-risk group (18%). During the first year of anticoagulation therapy, major bleeding occurred in 180 patients. The cumulative 1-year incidence of major bleeding seemed to be different according to the 5 groups, but the risks could not be well-stratified (Figure 1). The discriminating power of the DOAC Score was relatively low with a C-statistic of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.48–0.57) (Figure 2), while those of VTE-BLEED and RIETE scores were modest with C-statistics of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60–0.73) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64–0.71), respectively. Conclusions The risk of 1-year major bleeding on DOACs in patients with VTE was not well-stratified according to the risk categories by the DOAC Score, which might suggest that patients with VTE have different risk factors for bleeding on DOACs as compared to those with atrial fibrillation. A new bleeding risk score for DOAC specifically in patients with VTE would be warranted in the future.Figure 1Figure 2

The association between steroid use and recurrent venous thromboembolism: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2

Abstract Background It is well known that use of oral steroids is a risk factor for development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the impact of use of oral steroids on VTE recurrence has not been fully evaluated in the era of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), which has been a clinically relevant issue in the decision-making of anticoagulation strategies for patients who need oral steroids after VTE diagnosis. Purpose We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes in VTE patients treated with oral steroids after VTE diagnosis in the DOAC era. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. The current study population were divided into 2 groups according to the use of oral steroids after VTE diagnosis; the steroid group and the non-steroid group. We compared clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes including recurrent VTE, major bleeding and all-cause death, between the 2 groups. Results Patients with steroids and those without accounted for 693 (13%) and 4,504 (87%), respectively. Patients with steroids more often had chronic kidney disease (29% vs. 18%, P&amp;lt;0.001), autoimmune disease (50% vs. 5.4%, P&amp;lt;0.001), thrombocytopenia (7.7% vs 4.9%, P=0.002), and anemia (64.4% vs 54.1%, P&amp;lt;0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in the mean age (68.5 vs. 67.6 years old, P=0.16), the prevalence of women (62% vs 58%, P=0.06), active cancer (30% vs. 29%, P=0.42), and history of VTE (8.4% vs 6.8%, P=0.12) between the 2 groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy were not significantly different between the 2 groups (61.5% vs. 58.5%, log-rank P=0.16). The cumulative 5-year incidences of recurrent VTE nor major bleeding were not significantly different between the 2 groups (10.4% vs. 9.4%, log-rank P=0.55; 16.9% vs. 13.3%, log-rank P=0.16, respectively). Even after adjusting confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE nor major bleeding were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.65-1.45, P = 0.89; adjusted hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.84-1.50, P = 0.44). The cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death was significantly different between the 2 groups (44.2% vs. 30.2%, log-rank P&amp;lt;0.001). Even after adjusting confounders, the risk of all-cause death remained significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.56-2.12, P&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions Use of oral steroids after VTE diagnosis was not significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence in the DOAC Era, which might suggest that there could be no major concerns on an increased risk of recurrent VTE with oral steroids after VTE diagnosis under appropriate anticoagulation therapy.

Association of cardiac amyloidosis with periprocedural complications in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been frequently observed in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be an option, the association of CA with risk of periprocedural complications has not been well evaluated. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the association of CA with periprocedural complications after TAVR in patients with severe AS. Methods A literature search was performed for studies evaluating patients with severe AS undergoing AVR, comparing periprocedural safety endpoints for patients with and without CA. The primary endpoints were vascular complications and bradyarrhythmias post-TAVR requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural acute kidney injury (AKI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and major bleeding events. Endpoints were defined using the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The search was not restricted to time or publication status. Results 6 studies with 1,138 patients with severe AS (150 with CA, 988 without CA) met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 82 years, 52.4% were men, all except 1 study assessed only patients with ATTR CA. Echocardiographic mean aortic valve parameters included valve area of 0.718 cm2, mean gradient of 40.8, and peak velocity of 4.13 m/s. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55.2%. The presence of CA was not associated with an increased risk of periprocedural vascular complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.25-1.88; p=0.47). While a trend toward higher risk of periprocedural PPM implantation was observed in patients with CA, this finding did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.51; 95% CI 0.77-2.94; p=0.23). The presence of CA was not associated with increased risk of periprocedural AKI, CVA, or major bleeding (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.32-5.3; p=0.72, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.17-2.41; p=0.52; OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.16-1.87; p=0.34). Conclusion In the context of patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, the presence of cardiac amyloidosis did not increase the risk of periprocedural complications, including vascular complications, AKI, CVA, or major bleeding. Although a trend toward a higher risk of bradyarrhythmias requiring PPM implantation was noted in patients with CA, further studies are warranted to confirm this observation. Overall, these findings contribute valuable insight into the safety profile of TAVR in the patients with CA.Figure 1Figure 2

Clinical implications of hepatorenal function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the SAKURA PCI2 registry

Abstract Background Hepatorenal function is a prognostic predictor for heart failure, cardiac surgery, and transcatheter intervention for structural heart disease. However, the clinical implications of hepatorenal function assessed by the Model for End-stage Liver Disease eXcluding International normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score is still unclear in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose This study aimed to clarify the association between clinical prognosis and the MELD-XI score. Methods We analyzed 993 patients who underwent PCI from June 2020 to July 2022 in the SAKURA PCI2 registry, a prospective multicenter registry. Patients were stratified into high (&amp;gt;10) or low (≤10) MELD-XI scores. Primary outcome was defined as 2-year major adverse cardio or cerebrovascular event (MACCE), including all-cause death, ischemic stroke, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcome was defined as major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5. Results Of study participating patients, 253 patients (25.5%) were stratified into a high MELD-XI score group and had a higher prevalence of the high bleeding risk than patients with a low MELD-XI score (92.5% vs. 53.7%, p&amp;lt;0.01). Patients with a high MELD-XI score were associated with MACCE (13.1% vs. 2.7%, p&amp;lt;0.01; adjusted HR 3.78, 95%CI 1.78-8.03, p&amp;lt;0.01) and major bleeding (4.0% vs. 1.3%, p&amp;lt;0.01: unadjusted HR 3.32, 95%CI 1.35-8.18, p=0.01). Moreover, these associations remained consistent in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndrome (MACCE, p for interaction=0.89; major bleeding; p for interaction=0.64). Conclusion A high MELD-XI score was associated with an increased risk of MACCE and major bleeding within two years. Therefore, the MELD-XI score could provide information for risk stratification in patients undergoing PCI.Outcomes

Choosing the most effective and safest P2Y12 Inhibitor for use in &amp;gt;70-year-old acute coronary syndrome patients: a network meta-analysis

Abstract Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a significant health burden, especially in elderly patients. Antiplatelet therapy forms the cornerstone of medical treatment for ACS, prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred for their rapid action and proven efficacy. Despite their benefits, the comparative effectiveness and safety of prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel, especially in elderly ACS patients, represents a true gap of knowledge. Aim This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS, focusing on outcomes such as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stroke, major or moderate bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Thirty-seven studies were included in our network meta-analysis (NMA), with data extracted on various outcomes. Data reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Our NWM revealed that there is no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between prasugrel and ticagrelor or clopidogrel (RR 0.91 [0.67, 1.25] and RR 0.86 [0.64, 1.15], respectively). Stroke outcomes also showed no significant difference (RR 0.88 [0.60, 1.28] for prasugrel vs. ticagrelor; RR 0.73 [0.52, 1.02] for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel). Ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel significantly increased the risk of major or moderate bleeding (RR 1.23 [1.08, 1.39]). Significantly decreased risks of cardiac mortality were found for prasugrel and ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (RR 0.88 [0.78, 0.98] and OR 0.81 [0.73, 0.90], respectively). Prasugrel significantly reduced the risk of revascularization compared to ticagrelor and clopidogrel (RR 0.57 [0.42, 0.78] and RR 0.75 [0.64, 0.88], respectively). For stent thrombosis, prasugrel and ticagrelor both showed significantly decreased risks compared to clopidogrel (RR 0.71 [0.55, 0.92] and RR 0.76 [0.62, 0.93], respectively). for MI, no significant difference was observed between prasugrel and ticagrelor (RR 0.88 [CI 0.64-1.20]), prasugrel and clopidogrel (RR 0.81 [0.60-1.09]), or ticagrelor and clopidogrel (RR 0.92 [CI 0.73-1.16]). Similarly, all-cause mortality rates did not significantly differ, with an RR of 0.93 [0.68-1.27] for prasugrel vs. ticagrelor, and an RR of 0.80 [0.61-1.06] for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel. Conclusion Our NMA suggests that while there are no significant differences among prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in reducing the risk of MACE, stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality in elderly ACS patients, ticagrelor may increase the risk of bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor offer advantages in reducing cardiac mortality, revascularization, and stent thrombosis.

Safety and effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the SPUM-ACS study

Abstract Aims Data on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) use in real world ACS patients following the introduction of potent P2Y12 inhibitors and newer generation stents are scant. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization, effectiveness, and safety of GPI in a large prospective cohort of contemporary ACS patients. Methods SPUM-ACS is a prospective, multicentre study in which ACS patients between 2009 and 2017 were recruited. The primary endpoint of the present study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke at one year. Any bleeding events, BARC 3-5 bleeding, and net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) comprised the secondary endpoints. Results A total of 4395 ACS patients were included in the analysis. GPI-treated patients had more total coronary artery occlusion (56% vs 35%, p&amp;lt;0.001) and thrombus (60% vs 35%, p&amp;lt;0.001) at angiography. Among the propensity score matched (PSM) population (1992 patients equally split into two groups), GPI-treated patients showed lower MACE risk (PSM adjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99) but a higher risk of any (PSM adj HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06-1.99) and major bleedings (PSM adj HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09-2.76), resulting in a neutral effect on NACE (PSM adj HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.17). These results remained consistent across all subgroups. When including only patients treated with potent P2Y12, the incidence of MACE was not different between the two groups, (log rank p=0.50 and PSM adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.60-1.48). In the PSM population, GPI use (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99, p=0.04), TIMI 3 at the end of the procedure (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.30, p&amp;lt;0.001) and potent P2Y12 inhibitor use (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99, p=0.04) were protective independent predictors of MACE at follow-up, while oral anticoagulation at discharge (4.48, 95% CI 2.10-9.52, p&amp;lt;0.001), multivessel disease (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.09-3.48, p=0.02) and KILLIP class ≥ 2 at admission (HR 1.98, 95% CI 0.99-3.95, p=0.05) were adverse independent predictors. Conclusion In ACS patients undergoing PCI and broadly treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors, GPI use reduced the risk of MACE at 1 year, while increasing the risk of major bleedings, with a neutral effect on NACE. The routine use of these pharmacological agents should be discouraged, while in selected patients GPI use should be considered following personalized balancing between ischaemic and bleeding risk.Events in PSM populationEvents in PSM population

Temporal trends in major bleeding after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 2003 to 2017: the Western Denmark Heart Registry

Abstract Background Management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has changed during the last two decades. Introduction of more potent platelet inhibitors may carry an increased risk of bleeding complications, while other therapeutic options, such as use of radial artery access and proton pump inhibitors may reduce bleeding risk. The combined impact of these treatment changes on bleeding risk in patients with STEMI remains unknown. Purpose To examine temporal trends in 1-year risk of major bleeding after STEMI treated with primary PCI from 2003 to 2017. Methods We used the Western Denmark Heart Registry to identify first-time PCI-treated patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI from 2003 to 2017. Patients were divided into 4 calendar periods based on the time of STEMI. The main outcome was 1-year risk of major bleeding defined as a hospital admission for bleeding using a validated definition with high accuracy. Additionally, the 1-year risk of major bleeding in STEMI patients was compared with the risk in an age- and sex-matched general population cohort without prior coronary artery disease. Results From 2003 to 2017, we identified 18,540 patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI (median age 64 years, 75% men)and 92,700 age- and sex-matched individuals. The 1-year risk of major bleeding after STEMI was similar across the different time periods; 4.1% in 2003-2006, 3.8% in 2007-2010, 3.8% in 2011-2014, and 4.5% in 2015-2017. The adjusted HR for bleeding in STEMI patients was 1.03 (95% CI 0.83-1.26) when comparing the latest period with the earliest period. The age- and sex-matched general population exhibited a 1-year risk of major bleeding of around 1% in all time periods (Figure 1). Conclusions Despite changes in management, the 1-year risk of major bleeding remained stable around 4% after primary PCI-treated STEMI from 2003 to 2017. This risk was approximately 4 times higher than the bleeding risk observed in an age- and sex-matched general population.