Risk Factor For Fragility Fractures Research Articles

Prevalencia de los factores de riesgo de fractura por fragilidad en varones de 40 a 90 años de una zona básica de salud rural

Osteoporosis and as a consequence fragility fractures have emerged in recent years as a major public health issue in developed countries. Although its epidemiology and risk factors in postmenopausal women are well known, few studies exist focused on analyzing this pathology in men. Our objective is to determine the prevalence of fragility fracture risk factors in men belonging to our population and to calculate the absolute risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture.Cross-sectional study conducted in a Rural Health Basic Area. The target population was composed by males between 40 and 90 years old. Causes of exception were not considered. Personal interviews were carried out collecting the following data: age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), previous fractures, background on parent hip fracture, smoking habits, use of corticosteroids, background on rheumatoid arthritis, secondary osteoporosis, alcohol and bone mineral density (BMD). With this data, later in our Health Center, the Absolute Fracture Risk and the Hip Fracture Risk were calculated using the FRAX ® tool.431 cases were studied. Mean age 65,8 ± 13,9 years old and BMI 28,4 ± 4,3 kg/m². BMD had not been determined for any of the patients. Prevalence of risk factors: previous fracture 3,7%; parents with hip fractures 10,4%; smokers 21,1%; glucocorticoids 2,8%; rheumatoid arthritis 0,9%; secondary osteoporosis 2,3%; alcohol 30,9%. Absolute fracture risk, 3,7 ± 3,1 95% CI (3,43-4,02); hip fracture risk 1,7 ± 2,5 95% CI (1,51-1,98).Particularly important for males, the elimination of alcohol and tobacco.

Factores de riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad en una cohorte de mujeres españolas

Introduction Fragility fractures are an important public health issue. The aim of this study was to analyze the association of the main osteoporotic risk factors related to fragility fracture in a cohort of women with an indication of bone densitometry (BD). Methods A retrospective cohort was followed-up until a fragile fracture occurred, in a population of women aged 40 to 90 years with a first visit for BD between January 1992 and February 2008. We calculated the incidence rate of fracture per 1000 women-years of follow-up, and the hazard ratio (HR) of fragile fracture using a Cox regression model. Results A total of 49,735 women were studied. The average age of participants was 57.8 years (SD: 8.5). Of these, 3631 women (7.1%) reported a new fragility fracture in post-baseline visits. Risk factors with higher adjusted HR were age ≥ 75 years compared with age < 55 years (HR: 3.8; 95% CI: 3.3-4.4) and having a BC result evaluated as osteoporosis compared to normal (HR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.8-2.2). A personal history of humerus, hip or vertebral fractures had an adjusted HR of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1-1.3). Conclusions The main risk factors for fragility fracture were advanced age, BD result and a personal history of fracture, although 74% of fractures were detected with a bone mineral density classified as normal or osteopenia. Other relevant factors were rheumatoid arthritis or having received prolonged corticosteroid therapy.

Hip bone geometry in HIV/HCV-co-infected men and healthy controls

People with both HIV and hepatitis C are more likely than those with HIV alone to have wrist, hip, and spine fractures. We compared hip strength between HIV/HCV-co-infected men and healthy men and found that HIV/HCV-co-infected men had decreased hip strength due to lower lean body mass. Hepatitis C co-infection is a risk factor for fragility fracture among HIV-infected populations. Whether bone strength is compromised in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients is unknown. We compared dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived hip geometry, a measure of bone strength, in 88 HIV/HCV-co-infected men from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinic to 289 men of similar age and race and without HIV or HCV from the Boston Area Community Health Survey/Bone Survey. Hip geometry was assessed at the narrow neck, intertrochanter, and shaft using hip structural analysis. Lean body mass (LBM), total fat mass (FM), and fat mass ratio (FMR) were measured by whole-body DXA. Linear regression was used to identify body composition parameters that accounted for differences in bone strength between cohorts. HIV/HCV-co-infected men had lower BMI, LBM, and FM and higher FMR compared to controls (all p < 0.05). At the narrow neck, significant differences were observed between HIV/HCV-co-infected men and controls in bone mineral density, cross-sectional area, section modulus, buckling ratio, and centroid position. After adjustment for race, age, smoking status, height, and weight, only buckling ratio and centroid position remained significantly different between cohorts (all p < 0.05). Substituting LBM, FM, and FMR for weight in the multivariate model revealed that differences in LBM, but not FM or FMR, accounted for differences in all narrow neck parameters between cohorts, except buckling ratio and centroid position. HIV/HCV-co-infected men have compromised hip strength at the narrow neck compared to uninfected controls, which is attributable in large part to lower lean body mass.

Defining High Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture

: There is no universally accepted definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture. : This study aimed to survey Spanish rheumatologists; to obtain opinions about risk factors, and an acceptable definition for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture; and to compare daily practice patterns with current osteoporosis guidelines. : A total of 174 rheumatologists from throughout Spain completed an online survey about various risk factors for fragility fracture and about the management of patients with osteoporosis in clinical practice. Results were reviewed by a coordinating committee of osteoporosis experts and were compared with published national and international guideline recommendations. : Almost all rheumatologists who completed the survey (99%) consider that a group of patients exists with a high risk of osteoporotic fracture and that this group should be managed appropriately. Previous fracture is considered the most important risk factor, particularly in cases of multiple fracture, severe vertebral fracture, hip fracture, or fracture despite osteoporosis treatment. However, in osteoporosis guidelines, age, bone mineral density, and previous fragility fracture are the most important risk factors for new fracture. Furthermore, Spanish rheumatologists tend to treat patients at high risk of fracture with anabolic therapy (e.g., teriparatide), whereas guidelines make no such recommendation. : In osteoporosis, a large gap exists between implementation of guideline recommendations and actual clinical practice; this may be due, in part, to heterogeneity among existing guidelines. Thus, inclusion in guidelines of a practical definition of high risk of osteoporotic fracture may provide significant opportunities to improve patient care and prevent future fragility fractures. :

Low CD4 Count Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Fragility Fracture in HIV-Infected Patients

Low bone mineral density in HIV-infected patients is an increasingly recognized clinical problem. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, prevalence, and risk factors for development of low trauma or fragility fractures in an HIV-infected population. A 1:2 matched case-control study was performed of HIV-infected patients attending the Alfred Hospital between 1998 and 2009. Controls were matched on gender, age, and duration of HIV infection. The overall fracture incidence rate was 0.53 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43 to 0.65] and period prevalence of 3.34 per 100 patients (95% CI: 2.66 to 4.13). There were 73 low trauma fractures in 61 patients. Patients were predominantly male (89%) with a mean age of 49.8 years. Independent risk factors for fragility fracture were a CD4 cell count <200 cells per microliter odds ratio (OR): 4.91 (95% CI: 1.78 to 13.57, P = 0.002), corticosteroids OR: 8.96 (95% CI: 1.55 to 51.88, P = 0.014) and anti-epileptic medications OR: 8.88 (95% CI: 1.75 to 44.97, P = 0.008). There were no significant associations between HIV viremia (P = 0.18), use of or class of antiretroviral medication, and risk of fracture. Eighty-eight percent of patients with fracture had established osteopenia or osteoporosis. This is the largest clinical study to date of fragility fractures occurring in an HIV-infected population. The study found that risk of fracture was strongly associated with a low CD4 cell count, use of corticosteroids, and anti-epileptic medications. There were no associations between fracture risk and viral load, use of class, or duration of antiretroviral agent.

Screening for Osteoporotic Fractures in the Elderly: Current Guidelines and Future Directions.

Osteoporotic fragility fractures are a major health concern causing increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Major risk factors for fragility fractures include, but are not limited to, advanced age, low Bone Mineral Density (BMD), and a personal or familial history of a prior adult fragility fracture. Additional factors, such as chronic oral corticosteroid use and a history of recurrent falls, have also been identified to be important risk factors in the development of fragility fractures in the elderly. Current Canadian screening and treatment guidelines are based on regular BMD testing to identify individuals at risk; however, emerging evidence continues to emphasize the importance of analysis of the many risk factors for fragility fractures in combination with BMD measurements. Risk factor assessment tools, such as the FRAXâ„¢ tool developed by the World Health Organization, are promising new methods for screening and preventative care of the elderly. In addition, changes in screening methodology within the family practice setting, such as the utilization of specific electronic medical record templates for the elderly, are potential directions for improving screening of fragility fractures in the elderly patient population.

Cost–effectiveness of strontium ranelate for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Strontium ranelate has been introduced recently for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Europe and in many countries worldwide. This article reviews the published cost–effectiveness literature pertaining to strontium ranelate. Six studies were identified: two in the UK, two in Belgium and two in Sweden. The findings were consistent across the literature, suggesting that strontium ranelate is a cost-saving drug for women with osteoporosis aged over 80 years, and it is a cost-effective treatment compared with no treatment for osteoporotic women aged over 70 years and for younger women with clinical risk factors for fragility fracture. Strontium ranelate was also shown to be cost effective compared with branded risedronate in osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. Further analyses are required to assess the effectiveness and adherence to strontium ranelate in real-life settings, as well as to evaluate the cost–effectiveness of strontium ranelate in other countries and in populations of men.

Epidemiology, costs, and burden of osteoporosis in Argentina, 2009

Summary Osteoporosis is a major public health concern for elderly subjects. Old age is a risk factor for fragility fractures; countries with aging population face a heavy burden of fractures and their consequences.

Obesity and fractures in postmenopausal women

Low body mass index (BMI) is a recognized risk factor for fragility fracture, whereas obesity is widely believed to be protective. As part of a clinical audit of guidance from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), we have documented the prevalence of obesity and morbid obesity in postmenopausal women younger than 75 years of age presenting to our Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). Between January 2006 and December 2007, 1005 postmenopausal women aged less than 75 years with a low-trauma fracture were seen in the FLS. Of these women, 805 (80%) underwent assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and values for BMI were available in 799. The prevalence of obesity (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)) and morbid obesity (BMI > or = 35 kg/m(2)) in this cohort was 19.3% and 8.4%, respectively. Normal BMD was reported in 59.1% of obese and 73.1% of morbidly obese women, and only 11.7% and 4.5%, respectively, had osteoporosis (p < .0001). Multiple regression analysis revealed significant negative associations between hip T-score and age (p < .0001) and significant positive associations with BMI (p < .0001) and previous fracture (p = .001). Our results demonstrate a surprisingly high prevalence of obesity in postmenopausal women presenting to the FLS with low-trauma fracture. Most of these women had normal BMD, as measured by DXA. Our findings have important public heath implications in view of the rapidly rising increase in obesity in many populations and emphasize the need for further studies to establish the pathogenesis of fractures in obese individuals and to determine appropriate preventive strategies.

A cross-sectional study of bone health in multiple sclerosis

Osteoporosis is an important risk factor for fragility fractures. Although osteoporosis is considered common in multiple sclerosis (MS), few previous studies focused on fractures in MS. Using the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry, we investigated the frequency of osteoporosis, fractures, and clinical risk factors for fracture in MS. In 2007, 9,346 NARCOMS participants reported fractures and clinical risk factors for fractures including history of osteoporosis or osteopenia (low bone mass), sedentary level of physical activity, falls in the last year, current smoking status, family history of osteoporosis, and impaired mobility. Among responders, 2,501 (27.2%) reported low bone mass. More than 15% of responders reported a history of fracture after age 13 years (n = 1,482). Among those reporting fractures, 685 (46.2%) reported multiple fractures, while 522 (35.2%) reported a wrist fracture, 165 (11.1%) reported a vertebral fracture, and 100 (7.4%) reported a hip fracture. Excluding age, 1,413 (15.1%) participants had 1 clinical risk factor for fracture, 2,341 (25.0%) had 2, and 5,393 (57.7%) had 3 or more. Among participants with a history of fracture, 746 (55%) reported taking calcium supplements, 858 (68.8%) reported taking vitamin D supplements or a multivitamin with vitamin D, and 334 (22.5%) reported taking a bisphosphonate. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often have multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Many patients with MS with low bone mass or previous fractures are not taking supplemental calcium or vitamin D, suggesting a potential area of improvement in care.

Practical Operationalizations of Risk Factors for Fracture in Older Women: Results From Two Longitudinal Studies

Several guidelines on osteoporosis have proposed algorithms to identify persons at high risk of fractures. Although these algorithms include well-known risk factors, it is not clear how they can best be operationalized for use in general practice. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive performance of different operationalizations of four categories of risk factors for fractures that can be used in general practice. This study included 4157 women of > or =60 yr of age (mean +/- SD: 74.1 +/- 9.1 yr) with a median follow-up of 8.9 yr of the Rotterdam Study and 762 women of > or =65 yr of age (mean +/- SD: 76.0 +/- 6.7.yr) with a median follow-up of 6.0 yr of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). At baseline, information on four categories of risk factors was obtained, including (1) family history of hip fractures, (2) type of prior fractures, (3) low body weight/body mass index (BMI), and (4) mobility impairment. The occurrence of fragility fractures, including hip, pelvic, humerus, and wrist fractures, was used as outcome measure. We quantified the predictive performance of each risk factor by a chi(2) statistic, calculated as the difference in -2 Log likelihood attributable to the risk factor, with adjustment for age and other risk factors. In the Rotterdam Study, 399 fragility fractures occurred during 31,472 person-years (PY) of follow-up. In this study, any prior fracture in the past 5 yr (chi(2) = 6; p = 0.02), body weight < 64 kg (versus > or =64 kg; chi(2) = 6.7; p = 0.01), BMI < 22 kg/m(2) (versus > or =22 kg/m(2); chi(2) = 8.7; p = 0.003), and use of a walking aid (chi(2) = 7.5; p = 0.004) were the most practical operationalizations of the risk factor categories, after adjustment for age and other risk factors. In LASA, 52 fragility fractures occurred during 3935 PY of follow-up. Associations were similar as in the Rotterdam Study, except that low body weight and BMI were not associated with fragility fracture. None of the usual operationalizations of family history of hip fractures was independently associated with fragility fracture in either study. Prior osteoporotic fracture, body weight <64 kg, a BMI <22 kg/m(2), and the use of a walking aid are practical operationalizations of risk factors for fragility fractures. On the basis of the results of this study, a simple, practical algorithm can be developed for use in general practice.

Association Between Change in BMD and Fragility Fracture in Women and Men

Our objective was to estimate the relationship between longitudinal change in BMD and fragility fractures. We studied 3635 women and 1417 men 50-85 yr of age in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study who had at least two BMD measurements (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and trochanter) within the first 5 yr of the study and fragility fractures (any, main, forearm/wrist, ribs, hip) within the first 7 yr. Multiple logistic regression was used to model the relationship between baseline BMD, BMD change, and fragility fractures. We found that, among nonusers of antiresorptives, independent of baseline BMD, a decrease of 0.01 g/cm(2)/yr in total hip BMD was associated with an increased risk of fragility fracture with ORs of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01; 1.32) in women and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.78) in men. The risk of fragility fractures in subgroups such as fast losers and those with osteopenia was better estimated by models that included BMD change than by models that included baseline BMD but excluded BMD change. Although the association between baseline BMD and fragility fractures was similar in users and nonusers of antiresorptives, the association was stronger in nonusers compared with users. These results show that BMD change in both men and women is an independent risk factor for fragility fractures and also predicts fracture risk in those with osteopenia. The results suggest that BMD change should be included with other variables in a comprehensive fracture prediction model to capture its contribution to osteoporotic fracture risk.

Deleterious Effect of Late Menarche on Distal Tibia Microstructure in Healthy 20-Year-Old and Premenopausal Middle-Aged Women

Late menarche is a risk factor for fragility fractures. We hypothesized that pubertal timing-dependent alterations in bone structural components would persist from peak bone mass to menopause, independent of premenopausal bone loss. We studied the influence of menarcheal age (MENA) on femoral neck BMD (FN aBMD) by DXA and microstructure of distal tibia by HR-pQCT in healthy young adult (YAD; 20.4 +/- 0.6 [SD] yr, n = 124) and premenopausal middle-aged (PREMENO; 45.8 +/- 3.4 yr, n = 120) women. Median of MENA was 13.0 +/- 1.2 and 13.1 +/- 1.7 yr in YAD and PREMENO, respectively. In YAD and PREMENO (n = 244), FN aBMD (R = -0.29, p = 0.013), as well as total volumetric BMD (Dtot; R = -0.23, p = 0.006) and cortical thickness (Ct.Th; R = -0.18, p = 0.011) of distal tibia were inversely correlated to MENA. After segregation by the median of MENA in EARLY and LATE subgroups, the significant influences of both MENA (p = 0.004) and chronological age (p < 0.0001) were observed for FN aBMD and trabecular bone volume fraction of the distal tibia with similar differences in T-scores between LATE and EARLY subgroups in YAD (-0.36 and -0.31 T-scores) and PREMENO (-0.35 and -0.42 T-scores) women. Ct.Th was negatively influenced by MENA, whereas trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) was negatively influenced by chronological age. There was a striking inverse relationship between cross-sectional area and Ct.Th (R = -0.57, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the negative influence of late menarcheal age at weight-bearing sites as observed by the end of skeletal growth remains unattenuated a few years before menopause and is independent of premenopausal bone loss. Alterations in both bone mineral mass and microstructural components may explain the increased risk of fragility fractures associated with later menarcheal age.

Role of iron metabolism and oxidative damage in postmenopausal bone loss

It has been suggested that iron-deficient rats have lower bone mass than iron-replete animals, but a clear association between bone and iron repletion has not been demonstrated in humans. A growing body of evidences also suggests a relation between lipid oxidation and bone metabolism and between iron metabolism and LDL oxidation. Iron availability to cells also depends on haptoglobin (Hp) phenotypes. Hp has also important antioxidant properties according to its phenotype, hence we evaluate whether Hp phenotype could influence bone density, iron metabolism and lipid oxidation. This cross-sectional study enrolled 455 postmenopausal women affected by osteoporosis (260) or not (195). Bone mineral density, markers of bone and iron metabolism, levels of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and Hp phenotype were measured in all the subjects. Hp 1.1 and 2.2 frequency was higher and Hp 2.1 was lower in the patients with fragility fractures (80) compared with the controls. We therefore evaluate different Hp phenotypes as risk or protective factors against fragility fracture: Hp 2.1 is a protective factor against fracture while 1.1 is an important and 2.2 a moderate risk factor for fragility fractures. Lower serum iron was associated with elevated transferrin in patients with Hp 1.1; moreover patients had relative iron deficiency compared with the controls and fractured patients had higher level of oxLDL. We found that both iron metabolism and oxLDL varies according to Hp phenotypes and are predictive of bone density. Our data indicate that Hp 2.1 is a protective factor for fragility fractures, depending on its role on iron metabolism and its antioxidant properties.

Risk Factors For Fragility Fracture in Seremban District, Malaysia: A Comparison of Patients With Fragility Fracture in the Orthopedic Ward Versus Those in the Outpatient Department

Osteoporosis is a silent disease and becomes clinically significant in the presence of fragility fracture. Identifying risk factors that are associated with osteoporosis in the community is important in reducing the incidence of fragility fracture. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with fragility fracture in the Seremban District of Malaysia. This is a population comparison study between orthopedic ward patients and outpatients attending a community health clinic for 6 months. Epidemiological data and the possible risk factors for osteoporosis were collected by direct interview. This study demonstrates that advancing age, low body weight, smoking, lack of regular exercise, low consumption of calcium containing foods, and using bone depleting drugs (steroids, thyroid hormone, and frusemides) are major risk factors for fragility fracture. Most of these risk factors are modifiable through effective lifestyle intervention.

Who is at risk of osteoporosis?

This contribution assesses who is at risk of osteoporosis, by delineating the key risk factors involved in the condition. Osteoporosis represents a major public health problem through its association with fragility fractures, primarily of the hip, spine and distal forearm. Some risk factors for fragility fracture act through bone mineral density (BMD), for example female gender, asian or Caucasian race, premature menopause, primary or secondary amenorrhoea, primary and secondary hypogonadism in men, prolongued immobilisation, low dietary calcium intake, vitamin D deficiency. However, a number of others contribute significantly to fracture risk over and above their association with BMD (age, high bone turnover, poor visual acuity, neuromuscular disorders, previous fragility fracture, glucocorticoid therapy, family history of hip fracture, low body weight, cigarette smoking, excess alcohol consumption).

Risk factors for fragility fracture in middle age. A prospective population-based study of 33,000 men and women

Risk factors for fragility fracture in middle age. A prospective population-based study of 33,000 men and women

Risk factors for fragility fracture in middle age. A prospective population-based study of 33,000 men and women

The incidence of fragility fractures begins to increase in middle age. We investigated prospectively risk factors for low-energy fractures in men and women, and specifically for forearm, proximal humerus, vertebral, and ankle fractures. The population-based Malmö Preventive Project consists of 22,444 men and 10,902 women, mean age 44 and 50 years, respectively, at inclusion. Baseline assessment included multiple examinations and lifestyle information. Mean follow-up was 19 and 15 years for men and women, respectively, regarding incident fractures. Fractures were ascertained from radiographic files. At least one low-energy fracture occurred in 1,262 men and 1,257 women. In men, the risk factors most strongly associated with low-energy fractures were diabetes [relative risk (RR) 2.38, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.65-3.42] and hospitalization for mental health problems (RR 1.92, CI 95% 1.47-2.51). Factors associated with mental health and lifestyle significantly increased the fracture risk in most of the specific fracture groups: hospitalizations for mental health problems (RR 2.28-3.38), poor appetite (RR 3.05-3.43), sleep disturbances (RR 1.72-2.95), poor self-rated health (RR 1.80-1.83), and smoking (RR 1.70-2.72). In women, the risk factors most strongly associated with low-energy fractures were diabetes (RR 1.87, CI 95% 1.26-2.79) and previous fracture (RR 2.00, CI 95% 1.56-2.58). High body mass index (BMI) significantly increased the risk of proximal humerus and ankle fractures (RR 1.21-1.33) while, by contrast, lowering the risk of forearm fractures (RR 0.88, CI 95% 0.81-0.96). Risk factors for fracture in middle-aged men and women are similar but with gender differences for forearm, vertebral, proximal humerus, and hip fracture whereas risk factors for ankle fractures differ to a certain extent. The risk-factor pattern indicates a generally impaired health status, with mental health problems as a major contributor to fracture risk, particularly in men.

Prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in Scottish adults with non-vertebral fragility fractures

ABSTRACTBackground: It is well established that vitamin D levels are sub-optimal in the elderly and that adults with fragility fracture are more likely to have serum vitamin D levels either lower than those of control patients of similar age, or below the normal range.Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in an elderly population presenting to the South Glasgow Fracture Liaison Service with non-vertebral fragility fractures in order to assess the extent of the problem.Research design and methods: The retrospective arm of this study used data from an established database to identify patients aged over 50 years admitted to South Glasgow University Hospitals over the previous 4 years with hip fracture. The prospective arm identified the first 50 patients aged over 50 presenting with a clinical non-vertebral fragility fracture with osteoporosis as measured by axial spine and/or hip DEXA (T‐score < –2.5) after November 2004.Results: In the retrospective arm, 626 patients were identified from the database: mean age 80.5 years; 94% were aged over 60 and 74% were aged over 75. Data analysis was limited to 548 patients aged over 60 years with vitamin D recordings and not receiving supplementation with calcium and vitamin D. The mean vitamin D level was 24.7 nmol/L (9.9 ng/ml) SD = 17, however, it is likely that the true mean is lower since in approximately 25% of cases vitamin D levels were reported as < 15 nmol/L (effectively unrecordable). These were transcribed as 15 nmol/L in order to permit a numerical value to be calculated. In the absence of an agreement on what should constitute a diagnostic serum level of vitamin D inadequacy, a number of thresholds were considered – 97.8% had vitamin D levels below 70 nmol/L and 91.6% had vitamin D levels below 50 nmol/L. There were no significant differences by patient sex, age or season of presentation.The mean age of patients in the prospective arm was 65.8 years (range 50.6–83.8), 72% were aged over 60 and 16% were aged over 75. The mean vitamin D level was 44.1 nmol/L (18.4 ng/ml) SD = 25.3; 82% had vitamin D levels below 70 nmol/L and 72% had vitamin D levels below 50 nmol/L. Although numbers were too small to justify extensive subgroup analyses, the mean vitamin D level in the 13 patients with hip fracture (34.5 nmol/L) was lower than in the 37 with non-hip fractures (48.2 nmol/L).Conclusions: This study confirms almost universal vitamin D inadequacy among 548 elderly patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture, regardless of whether a threshold of 50 nmol/L or 70 nmol/L was used. However, among a prospective subset of 50 patients with clinical fragility fractures, especially those with non-hip fractures, the prevalence of inadequacy was substantially lower. It may be that vitamin D represents a correctable risk factor for fragility fracture in the elderly, possibly specifically for the hip.

Bone Resorption and Osteoporotic Fractures in Elderly Men: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study

Among the potential risk factors for fragility fractures, bone turnover is considered an important determinant. In a case-cohort control study of 151 elderly men followed prospectively over 6.3 years, high bone resorption as assessed by S-ICTP was associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture, independent of BMD. Combining measurements of BMD and bone turnover may improve fracture prediction in elderly men. Approximately one-third of osteoporotic fractures occur in men. Among the potential risk factors for fragility fractures, bone turnover is considered an important determinant. The association between fracture risk and rates of bone turnover has not been well established in men. We examined this relationship in elderly community-dwelling men. This case-cohort control study included 50 men with incident low-trauma fractures (cases; age, 72.3 +/- 6.7 years) and 101 men without fracture (controls; age, 70.4 +/- 4.1 years), who have been prospectively followed in the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study for a median of 6.3 years (range, 2-13 years). BMD at the lumbar spine (LSBMD) and at the femoral neck (FNBMD) and markers of bone turnover were measured at baseline. Bone resorption was assessed by measuring nonfasting serum concentrations of the carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (S-ICTP) and of a linear octapeptide derived from the carboxyterminal type I collagen telopeptide (S-CTX). Bone formation was assessed by measuring the serum levels of the aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (S-PINP). Men with subsequent fractures had lower BMD at baseline, both at the femoral neck and the spine, lower dietary calcium intake, and higher S-ICTP levels than age-and weight-matched controls. Smoking habits, S-CTX, and S-PINP did not differ between groups. Based on univariate regression analyses, S-ICTP (relative risk [RR] for 1 SD change: 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3) and serum creatinine levels (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7) were associated with increased risk of fracture. In multivariate regression analyses, S-ICTP (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9) and FNBMD (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3) remained independent predictors of fracture risk. Men within the highest quartile of S-ICTP had a 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4-5.4) increased risk of fracture compared with those in the lowest quartile. The incidence of osteoporotic fractures was 10 times higher in men with high S-ICTP and low FNBMD compared with men with low S-ICTP and high FNBMD. Of the fracture risk in the population, 20% was attributable to high S-ICTP and low FNBMD, and S-ICTP contributed 17% to this increased risk. High bone resorption is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in elderly men, independent of BMD. Combining measurements of BMD and bone turnover, which correlated with fracture in this cohort, could improve fracture risk prediction in elderly men.