Risk Factors For Recanalization Research Articles

Recurrent aneurysm 11 years after thoracoabdominal aortic replacement due to recanalization of intercostal arteries of the wrapping native aorta in Marfan syndrome: a case report

BackgroundPersistent blood flow is common in aortic aneurysms following endovascular repair. However, the recanalization of thrombosed intercostal arteries after open aortic repair is rare. We report a case of aortic aneurysm recurrence 11 years after thoracoabdominal aortic replacement resulting from recanalization of the intercostal arteries like a type II endoleak in a patient with Marfan syndrome.Case presentationA 50-year-old woman with Marfan syndrome presented with left-sided back pain after meals. She underwent abdominal aortic replacement at 35 years of age, distal aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement for type B chronic aortic dissection at 38 years of age, and aortic root to the remnant arch replacement with a mechanical valve conduit for type A acute aortic dissection at 43 years of age, which resulted in complete replacement of the entire aorta with prosthetic grafts. The patient has been taking warfarin since then. The prothrombin time-international normalized ratio levels were controlled almost within the range of 1.5–2.5 during the follow-up period, but it was elevated up to 3.4 at 1 month before she felt back pain and kept high at 4.2 on admission. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed an aneurysm between the descending graft and the remaining native aortic wall, compressing the esophagus. However, there were no abnormal findings on the CT performed 10 months prior to admission. Surgery revealed that the orifices of the intercostal arteries were patent with backflow. We closed the patent intercostal arteries using nonabsorbable sutures. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and the CT performed 1 year later showed no aneurysmal recurrence.ConclusionsHere, we describe a rare case of recurrent aortic aneurysm long term after graft replacement due to recanalization of the intercostal arteries of the remaining aortic wall. Our findings suggest that closing all orifices of the intercostal arteries during aortic repair, regardless of backflow, could prevent delayed reopening; systemic anticoagulation after aortic replacement may be a risk factor for recanalization, and that postoperative periodic CT follow-up is essential, especially in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.

Risk factors for recanalization of basilar tip aneurysm after endovascular treatment: a retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT Objectives Endovascular treatment (EVT) of basilar tip aneurysms (BTAs) is arduous because of the lesions’ angioarchitecture and the relatively high recanalization rate after EVT. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical characteristics of BTAs and evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for recanalization. Methods One hundred twenty-five patients with BTAs (11 ruptured, 114 unruptured) treated with EVT between 2009 and 2019 at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 113 patients were included in statistical analyses. The anatomical parameters of the aneurysms and clinical data were analyzed. Univariate (chi-square test and t-test) and multivariate (multiple logistic regression) analyses were performed to identify risk factors for recanalization. Results Recanalization of the BTA occurred in 15 patients (13.3%). One patient (0.9%) was retreated endovascularly. The mean follow-up duration was 49.8 months. Neck size, posterior cerebral artery (PCA) angle, maximum diameter, and the rupture rate differed significantly between the recanalization and non-recanalization groups (P=.007, P<.001, P=.006, and P=.048, respectively). The maximum diameter (odds ratio, 1.483 per mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.145–1.919; P=.003) and PCA angle (odds ratio, 1.020 per degree; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.039; P=.036) were independently associated with recanalization. Conclusions Of all investigated BTAs, 96.8% were wide-neck aneurysms. The recanalization rate of BTAs after EVT was 13.3%. The PCA angle and maximal aneurysmal diameter were independently associated with recanalization; no associations were observed regarding vertebral artery dominance or modality of treatment. As such, BTA patients with wide PCA angles should be carefully monitored over time.

Risk factors for short and long-term great saphenous vein recanalization in patients treated with endovenous radiofrequency ablation.

The aim of this retrospective single-center study is to describe and analyze short-, mid-, and long-term risk factors for great saphenous vein (GSV) recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA). All consecutive patients with GSV incompetence and varicose veins underwent RFA were enrolled between 2009 and 2018. Data on demographic, pre- and postoperative color Doppler scan (CDUS) findings, perioperative complications, and follow-up were prospectively collected. Primary outcome was GSV recanalization rate at 1week after RFA. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complication rate, as well as GSV recanalization rate at 1, 3, and 5years after RFA. Risk factors for recanalization were also analyzed, for each follow-up assessment, identifying differences in recanalized (Rec) and non-recanalized (nRec) groups. During the study period, 1297 patients were treated. Among these, 1265 had at least 1week of follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 3.0 ± 1.9years. Recanalization rate at 1week, 1, 3, and 5years was 2.4%, 4.3%, 9.3%, and 17.5%, respectively. After multivariate analysis for each follow-up evaluation, CEAP classes C4 and 5, as well as preoperative GSV diameter >6mm and history of smoking were found to be independent predictors of recanalization. Furthermore, age >61years and postoperative complications such as pigmentation, edema, and paresthesia were found to be dependent risk factors. RFA remains a safe and durable technique to ablate incompetent GSV. Despite this, particular attention should be paid to patients with high CEAP classes to avoid short and long-term recanalization.

Risk factors for saphenous vein recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation.

Target vein recanalization is defined as the postoperative detection of blood flow in a venous segment previously ablated. It can be occurred after thermal-tumescent procedures, as radiofrequency (RFA) and endovenous laser (EVLA) ablation techniques. Despite several papers described and analyzed incidence and consequences of recanalization, limited data are published on risk factors for this condition. The aim of this general review is to investigate clinical and instrumental risk factors for great and small saphenous veins recanalization after RFA, indicating their impact in the follow-up period. Articles were obtained through a detailed search of the scientific journal databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) for those published between January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020. The term "radiofrequency venous ablation" was combined with "risk factors", "recanalization" and "recurrence", to obtain the first article cluster. Risk factors analysis for saphenous vein recanalization after ablation is not a well-studied problem. Although several studies have analyzed recanalization patterns and anatomical causes of ablation failure, few and disaggregate data are available regarding clinical preoperative risk factors. BMI and saphenous trunk diameter seem to be the only two recognized characteristics that may affect short and long-term recanalization rate, though CVI status, sex, target vein treatment length and others factors may be taken into account. Physicians should consider risk factors for recanalization in patient selection and treatment recommendations, but also recognize that not all "ablation failures" are of clinical relevance.

Effect of Neck Size on the Inflow Magnitude Evaluated on 4D Flow MRI in Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms

BackgroundA neck size >4.0 mm is a risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization. The high inflow magnitude of pretreatment wide-neck aneurysms may be correlated to recanalization. We aimed to elucidate the effect of the neck size on the inflow magnitude evaluated on four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pretreatment unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. MethodsThirty-three untreated ICA aneurysms were subjected to 4D flow MRI to evaluate the inflow magnitude parameters including the maximum spatially-averaged inflow velocity (MSAIV), maximum inflow velocity, maximum inflow rate (MIR), and their ratios to each corresponding flow parameter in the parent artery. ResultsThe neck size was linearly correlated to all inflow parameters investigated in this study. A strong correlation was observed between the neck size and the following: MSAIV (r = .755, p < .0001), MIR (r = .715, p < .0001), MSAIV ratio (r = .724, p < .0001), and MIR ratio (r = .741, p < .0001). The predicted value of MIR ratio of an aneurysm with the neck size of 4.0 mm was 23.0% and 20.6%, based on the linear regression equation of all aneurysms and on that of aneurysms with the neck size >4.0 mm, respectively. ConclusionsThe neck size was linearly correlated with the inflow magnitude of unruptured ICA aneurysms. Inflow magnitude evaluation using 4D flow MRI may help to hemodynamically identify aneurysms with a high risk of recanalization after endovascular coil embolization.

Safety and efficacy of endovenous ablations in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians

ObjectiveEndovenous ablation of the lower extremity veins has become the primary treatment of symptomatic venous reflux disease. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) and recanalization are two well-known complications of these venous ablative procedures. Because the elderly represent the fastest growing demographic, our goal was to look at whether there is a difference of these complications and age distribution in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians vs the younger population. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted of 10,029 procedures that were performed from March 2012 to September 2018 on 8273 veins across 3218 patients who underwent endovenous ablation for lower extremity venous reflux; 6091 procedures were performed with radiofrequency ablation, and 3938 were performed with endovenous laser ablation. We reviewed charts of all patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser treatment during this time. Postprocedural venous duplex ultrasound was performed at 3 to 7 days to check for EHIT and recanalization, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. The χ2 test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. ResultsAges ranged from 15 years to 103 years. The average age of the patients was 61.9 ± 15.2 years. Average overall follow-up for all age groups was 25.8 ± 12.9 months. Of the 3218 patients, 2700 were younger than 80 years, 380 were between 80 and 89 years, 132 were between 90 and 99 years, and 6 were 100 years or older. Of the 10,029 procedures, 8730 were performed on patients younger than 80 years; 1124, on patients 80 to 89 years; 159, on patients 90 to 99 years; and 16, on patients 100 years or older. There were 111 patients who had bilateral procedures in the accessory saphenous vein, 1878 patients who had bilateral procedures in the great saphenous vein, 99 patients who had bilateral procedures in the perforator vein, and 760 patients who had bilateral procedures in the small saphenous vein. There were statistically significant increases in EHIT rates between octogenarians and those in the age group <80 years (P = .047); between nonagenarians and those in the age group <80 years (P = .04); and between the combined group of octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians and the age group <80 years (P = .012). No statistical difference was found in rates of EHIT between octogenarians and nonagenarians (P = .5). Overall age is a risk factor for the development of EHIT (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.04; P < .00001). There were statistically significant increases in recanalization rates between octogenarians and those in the age group <80 years (P = .000013); between nonagenarians and those in the age group <80 years (P = .00022); and between the combined group of octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians and the age group <80 years (P < .00001). No statistical difference was found in rates of recanalization between octogenarians and nonagenarians (P = .48). Statistical analysis of centenarians alone was not done because of zero patients available in the EHIT or recanalization category. Overall age was found to be a risk factor for recanalization (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04; P < .00002). ConclusionsWhereas there is a relatively higher chance of EHIT and recanalization in the age group >80 years, our study shows that the majority of EHITs were class 1 and class 2. According to our study, venous ablation is safe and effective across all age groups, and age alone should not be used to deny patients venous ablations.

Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation for incompetent small saphenous vein in terms of recanalization and sural neuritis.

Safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for incompetent small saphenous vein is not established. To report midterm clinical and ultrasonograhic results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small saphenous vein (SSV) in terms of recanalization and sural neuritis. We examined 39 patients (46 limbs) who had been examined using a duplex scan more than 1 year after RFA of SSV. Postoperative clinical results, risk factors for SSV recanalization, and sural neuritis were analyzed. CEAP score and CIVIQ2 score improved significantly in all patients (CEAP: 2.45 to 1.43 (p = .03); CIVIQ2: 25.34 to 13.21 (p = .01). SSV obliteration rate was 93.4% at 1 year and 89.1% at 2 years. Preoperative peak reflux velocity in the recanalization group (54.9 cm/s) was significantly higher (p < .01) than in the obliteration group (29.8 cm/s). Sural neuritis were detected in 12 limbs(26.1%), and median symptom duration was 3 months. The total length of RFA ablation was not different between the groups with and without postablation sural neuritis. RFA is an effective and safe treatment modality for incompetent SSV. Peak reflux velocity can be a risk factor for recanalization. Length of RFA segment in SSV does not affect recanalization and postablation sural neuritis.

Two-Year Follow-Up of Contrast Stasis within the Sac in Unruptured Aneurysm Coil Embolization: Progressive Thrombosis or Enlargement?

The fate of contrast stasis within an aneurysmal sac after coiling has not been established. We followed and evaluated the potential risks of recanalization of unruptured aneurysms embolized with BPCs for 2 years. A total of 301 unruptured aneurysms in 252 patients were treated with BPCs. Contrast stasis was observed on initial postembolization angiograms in 104 (34.6%) of these aneurysms. For follow-up, skull images by an angiographic unit (at 3, 9, 15, and 21 months), CE-MRA including TOF source images (at 6, 12, and 18 months), and DSA (at 24 months) were used. In 89 (85.6%) of the 104 aneurysms with contrast stasis, the stasis disappeared on 6-month MRAs and occlusions remained unchanged without recanalization for 2 years. In the remaining 15 (14.4%), recanalization occurred during follow-up. The presence of contrast stasis was not found to be associated with the obliteration rate (P = .641) or packing attenuation (aneurysms without contrast stasis 30.7% ± 11.18 versus aneurysms with contrast stasis 33.0% ± 12.11, P = .113). Contrast stasis was not found to be a risk factor for recanalization (15/104 [14.4%] versus 29/197 [14.7%], P = 1.000). Contrast stasis is a benign angiographic finding that can disappear within 6 months on follow-up MRA. In addition, contrast stasis was not found to be associated with a low obliteration rate or packing attenuation or to be a risk factor for recanalization. The present study shows that aneurysms with contrast stasis on initial postembolization angiograms are no more likely to recanalize than aneurysms without contrast stasis.