Common Cancer Risk Factors Research Articles

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in childhood and incidence of cancer in adulthood in never smokers in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition

The association between childhood environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and adult cancer risk is controversial; we examined this relationship in never smokers within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Over an average of 10 years, 8,372 cases of cancer were diagnosed in 112,430 never smokers in EPIC. Childhood ETS was self-reported by participants at baseline, along with other lifestyle factors. Hazard ratios (HR) for ETS exposure in childhood and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models stratified by age, sex, and study center and adjusted for education, alcohol drinking, body mass index, physical activity, non-alcoholic energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, and adulthood ETS exposure. Models were further adjusted for reproductive factors for female cancers, for meat intake for digestive system cancers, and for diabetes status for pancreatic cancer. No association was observed between childhood ETS exposure and overall cancer risks (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.92-1.02), and for selected sites. The only exception was pancreatic cancer, as previously reported by Vrieling et al., among those who had been exposed daily in childhood (overall HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.14-3.84). In conclusion, childhood ETS exposure might not be a major risk factor for common cancers in adulthood.

Opportunities for Cancer Epidemiology and Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Report from the American Society for Preventive Oncology International Cancer Prevention Interest Group

Despite steady decreases in the cancer burden in industrialized countries, its rapid increase in the developing world means that the number of cancer cases and deaths will likely more than double worldwide over the next two decades ([1][1]). Already a leading cause of death around the globe, cancer

Making Sense of Cancer News Coverage Trends: A Comparison of Three Comprehensive Content Analyses

Cancer stories (N = 5,327) in the top 50 U.S. newspapers were analyzed by a team of four coders and the results were compared with the earliest analyses of this type (from 1977 and 1980). Using cancer incidence rates as a comparison, three cancers were found to be consistently underreported (male reproductive, lymphatic/Hodgkin's, and thyroid) and four cancers were found to be consistently overreported (breast, blood/Leukemia, pancreatic, and bone/muscle). In addition, cancer news coverage consistently has focused on treatment rather than on other aspects of the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention), portrayed lifestyle choices (e.g., diet, smoking) as the most common cancer risk factor, and rarely reported incidence or mortality data. Finally, the data were compatible with the idea that personalization bias (e.g., celebrity profiles, event coverage) may explain some news coverage distortions.

Projecting the probability of survival free from cancer and cardiovascular incidence through lifestyle modification in Japan

Objectives To promote prevention strategies aimed at reducing the incidence of cancer or cardiovascular disease (CVD), we present a method to project the probability that a subject with given lifestyle risk factors will survive free from either of cancer or CVD. Methods Projection models were developed from data from a cohort study conducted in Japan. During 1990–2003, 96,592 subjects were followed and 5797 cancer and 2591 CVD cases and 2395 deaths were identified. Smoking, alcohol intake and body mass index (BMI) were used as common risk factors in projection models. Results According to the projection of individualized probability, avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol intake and high BMI increased 10-year disease-free survival probability from 81.4% to 92.9% and from 88.0% to 94.3% in 50- to 54-year-old men and women, respectively. In terms of population average risk, smoking cessation and avoidance of excess alcohol exerted a large impact, while decreasing BMI had a small impact due to the small at-risk population. Conclusions Current smoking, excess alcohol intake and obesity were suggested as common risk factors for cancer and CVD. Considering the distribution of risk factors in the Japanese population, smoking prevention/cessation and reduction of excess alcohol intake would prevent a large number of incident cases.

Adiposity and Age are Statistically Related to EnhancedRASSF1ATumor Suppressor Gene Promoter Methylation in Normal Autopsy Kidney Tissue

Age, adiposity, and smoking are risk factors for the development of renal cell carcinoma. Hypermethylation of the RAS association domain family 1A gene (RASSF1A) promoter belongs to the most frequently detected epigenetic alterations in human cancers including renal cell carcinoma. RASSF1A is functionally involved in cell cycle control in normal cells and depletion promotes a number of cellular changes increasing the risk for neoplastic growth. We investigated the hypothesis that age, modulated by the factors adiposity and anthracosis as a surrogate for smoking, is a predictor of RASSF1A promoter methylation in normal kidney tissue. Using a cross-sectional study design, we quantitatively analyzed RASSF1A methylation in 78 normal autopsy kidney tissues by quantitative combined bisulfite and restriction analysis and bisulfite sequencing, and statistically evaluated the degree of relative methylation for a relationship with the predictor age and study factors adiposity and state of anthracosis. Statistical analysis showed that age (regression analysis; P < 0.001), adiposity (univariate analysis; P = 0.016), and state of anthracosis (t test; P = 0.005) are each significantly associated with an increase of RASSF1A promoter methylation in normal kidney tissue. However, only age (P = 0.008) and adiposity (P = 0.008) were identified as independent predictors of RASSF1A promoter methylation using covariance analysis. This study provides statistical evidence that the common cancer risk factors age and adiposity enhance RASSF1A promoter methylation in nonmalignant kidney tissue.

The Predominance of the Environment over Genes in Cancer Causation: Implications for Genetic Epidemiology

It has generally been accepted that most cancers result from the combined effects of environmental factors and inherited susceptibilities and that only few cancers are “solely” of genetic origin ([1][1], [2][2]). Yet, the current strategies for identifying genetic risk factors for common cancers

Polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase loci as a risk factor for common cancers.

Though a developing body of data indicates polymorphism at GST genes influences cancer susceptibility, it is unclear why a genotype is associated with one cancer but not another. We believe the GST exert a critical role in normal cell house-keeping activities. GSTM1, GSTM3 and GSTT1 influence tumorigenesis because these enzymes utilise the products of UV-induced oxidative stress. Further support for the importance of these genes in the protection of skin from UV comes from studies in systemic lupus erythematosus (Ollier et al, 1996). Thus, GSTM1 null is associated with increased anti-Ro (but not anti-La) antibodies, a phenotype associated with photosensitivity. At present there is no basis for predicting which cancers will be influenced by GST polymorphisms though other studies do indicate that the GSTs are critical in the metabolism of environmental carcinogens. For example, GSTT1 null confers an increased risk of astrocytoma (Hand et al, 1996). While brain tumours are not clearly associated with environmental pollutants, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, processed meats and occupation have been implicated. Why GSTT1 but not GSTM1 or GSTM3 influences the risk of astrocytoma is unclear. GSTM3 appears a good susceptibility candidate, as some astrocytes demonstrate strong expression (Hand et al, 1996). Susceptibility to squamous cell cancer of the larynx, a pathology associated with chronic consumption of tobacco and alcohol, is also influenced by allelism at GSTM3 (Jahnke et al, 1996). The roles of CYP2D6 and CYP1A1 are even more unclear, though the finding that systemic agents such as arsenic predispose to multiple BCC, suggests that CYP2D6-mediated hepatic detoxification of photosensitizing agents may be important. Importantly, the extent of altered risk conferred by genotypes is generally 2-3 fold and it is necessary to identify which other genes interact with the GST so that haplotypes associated with 10-20 fold increases in risk can be defined.

Americans' Knowledge of Cancer Risk and Survival

Background.There are more than 500,000 deaths from cancer each year in the United States. This study examines Americans' knowledge of risk factors for breast, cervical, colon, and prostate cancers, which account for over 130,000 of these deaths, and their knowledge of the prospects of surviving these cancers following early detection.Methods.Data were obtained from 12,035 subjects who completed the 1992 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement which includes questions about cancer risk factors and survival.Results.The majority of respondents were unable to identify major cancer risk factors when prompted with a list. Approximately two-thirds did not recognize that age increased the risk for breast and colon cancer, that diet increased the risk for colon cancer, or that multiple sex partners increased the risk for cervical cancer. Knowledge about survival was also poor. Only about half thought they had a good chance of survival following early detection of colon and cervical cancers, for which 5-year relative survival exceeds 90%.Conclusions.Americans lack knowledge about major risk factors for common cancers and about the prospects of survival following early detection. Knowledge about risk factors and about survival from cervical and colon cancers was poor at all ages, among all races, at all income levels, and at all educational levels. It was poorest among blacks and Hispanics and among those with the lowest income and least education. Americans need education about cancer risk factors and survival.