Risk Factor For Graft Survival Research Articles

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Using Left and Right Liver Grafts in Adult-to-adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry

Background. Living-donor liver transplantation has been widely performed as an alternative to the scarce liver grafts from deceased donors. More studies are reporting favorable outcomes of left liver graft (LLG). This study compared the clinical outcomes between living-donor liver transplantation using LLG and right liver graft (RLG) with similar graft-to-recipient body weight ratios. Methods. This study analyzed 4601 patients from a multicenter observational cohort using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry between 2014 and 2021. After matching the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score and graft-to-recipient body weight ratios because of the extremely different number in each group, the LLG and RLG groups comprised 142 (25.1%) and 423 (74.9%) patients, respectively. Results. For donors, the median age was higher in the LLG group than in the RLG group (34 y [range, 16–62 y] versus 30 y [16–66 y] ; P = 0.002). For recipients, the LLG group showed higher 90-d mortality than the RLG group (11 [7.7%] versus 9 [2.1%]; P = 0.004). The long-term graft survival was significantly worse in the LLG group (P = 0.011). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for graft survival, LLG was not a significant risk factor (hazard ratio, 1.01 [0.54-1.87]; P = 0.980). Otherwise, donor age (≥40 y; 2.18 y [1.35-3.52 y]; P = 0.001) and recipients’ body mass index (<18.5 kg/m2; 2.98 kg/m2 [1.52-5.84 kg/m2]; P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for graft survival. Conclusions. Although the short-term and long-term graft survival was worse in the LLG group, LLG was not an independent risk factor for graft survival in multivariate analysis. LLGs are still worth considering for selected donors and recipients regarding risk factors for graft survival.

Improved survival of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation recipients after introduction of the pediatric prioritization system: Analysis of data from a Japanese national survey.

In Japan, there has never been a national analysis of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation (pDDLT) based on donor and recipient factors. We constructed a Japanese nationwide database and assessed outcomes of pDDLT focusing on the pediatric prioritization system introduced in 2018. We collected data on pDDLTs (<18 years) performed between 1999 and 2021 from the Japan Organ Transplant Network and Japanese Liver Transplantation Society, identified risk factors for graft survival and compared the characteristics and graft survival in pDDLTs conducted before and after the introduction of the pediatric prioritization system. Overall, 112 cases of pDDLT were included, with a 1-year graft survival rate of 86.6%. Four poor prognostic factors were identified: recipient intensive care unit stay, model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease score, donor cause of death, and donor total bilirubin. After the introduction of the system, allografts from pediatric donors were more reliably allocated to pediatric recipients and the annual number of pDDLTs increased. The 1-year graft survival rate improved significantly as did pDDLT conditions indicated by the risk factors. Under the revised allocation system, opportunities for pDDLT increased, resulting in favorable recipient and donor conditions and improved survival.

Pediatric Transplant Experience from a Single Center in South India

Background and Objective: Pediatric renal transplantation is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage renal disease. This study aims to analyze the outcomes of pediatric renal transplants at our center, focusing on patient demographics, donor sources, surgical techniques, posttransplant complications, graft survival, and rejection rates. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Data on recipient age, gender, donor type, pretransplant dialysis, donor characteristics, surgical techniques, native kidney disease, induction therapy, maintenance immunosuppression, posttransplant infections, graft survival, and rejection episodes were collected and analyzed. Results: We performed 43 pediatric kidney transplants in total. The average age was 13.7 years (±3.81), with 8 (18.6%) being under the age of ten, 11 (25.6%) being between the ages of eleven and fourteen, and 24 (55.8%) being between the ages of fifteen and eighteen. There were 43 recipients: 27 males and 16 females. There were four (9.3%) deceased donor renal transplants and 39 (90.7%) live-related kidney transplants. Right internal iliac artery and right external iliac vein anastomosis were found in 32 (74.4%) cases, right external iliac artery and right external iliac vein in 9 (20.9%), right common iliac artery and right common iliac vein in 1 (2.3%), and right common iliac and right internal iliac in 1 (2.3%). Induction was used in 27 recipients (62.8%). Graft survival was seen at 1 year in 42 (97.7%) patients and at 5 years in 34 (81%). Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 22 (51.2%) of the recipients, with antibody-mediated rejection occurring in 8 (18.6%) and cellular rejection occurring in 22 (51.2%). Graft loss was caused by acute cellular rejection in three (23.1%) cases, graft pyelonephritis in 2 (15.4%), and an unknown cause in 2 (15.4%). There were no significant connections with antibody-mediated rejection. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the outcomes of pediatric renal transplantation at our center. Despite the challenges of graft rejection and posttransplant infections, favorable graft survival rates were achieved. Cellular rejection emerged as a significant risk factor for graft survival, highlighting the importance of effective immunosuppressive management. Our findings emphasize the need for close follow-up, infection control measures, and individualized immunosuppressive strategies to optimize long-term outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Further research is warranted to refine protocols and address the specific needs of this vulnerable patient population.

Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia Is Correlated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy.

Co-infection of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is uncommon in kidney transplant recipients, and the prognosis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia on graft outcomes in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN). A total of 140 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV replication and PyVAN, 122 without concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia and 18 with JCPyV-DNAemia were included in the analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify prognostic factors for graft survival. A nomogram for predicting graft survival was created and evaluated. The median tubulitis score in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group ( P = 0.048). At last follow-up, the graft loss rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group (50% versus 25.4%; P = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was lower than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group ( P = 0.003). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio = 4.808; 95% confidence interval: 2.096-11.03; P < 0.001). The nomogram displayed favorable discrimination (C-index = 0.839), concordance, and clinical applicability in predicting graft survival. Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia is associated with a worse graft outcome in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with PyVAN.

Comparative Analysis of Donor Liver Allograft Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Liver Transplant.

Liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma involves 3 main types of donor allografts: donation after brain death, donation after cardiac death, and donation after brain and cardiac death. Data on this topic are limited, and controversies exist regarding liver transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who have received these allografts. Data from 490 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received liver transplant from 2015 to 2021 at the Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were divided into 3 cohorts according to allograft type: donation after brain death, donation after cardiac death, and donation after brain and cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate patient survival, graft survival, and recurrence-free survival rates after liver transplant. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 3-year patient survival rates were 69.2% for donations after brain death, 69.2% for donations after cardiac death, and 46.6% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .42); the 3-year graft survival rates were 53.3% for donations after brain death, 56.4% for donations after cardiac death, and 46.6% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .44); and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 55% for donations after brain death, 56.6% for donations after cardiac death, and 39.5% for donations after brain and cardiac death (P = .46). Complications were also similar across the 3 cohorts (P = .36). Multivariable analysis showed that intraoperative red blood cell transfusion (hazard ratio: 1.820; P = .042) and early allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio: 3.240; P = .041) were independent risk factors for graft survival. Similar outcomes can be achieved for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who undergo liver transplant with donations after brain death, donations after cardiac death, or donations after brain and cardiac death allografts, especially when strict donor selection criteria are applied.

#5887 RESULTS OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN VERY-HIGHLY SENSITIZED PATIENTS INCLUDED IN AN EXCHANGE PROGRAM BASED ON VIRTUAL CROSSMATCH

Abstract Background and Aims In 2012, a kidney transplant (KT) exchange program for very-highly sensitized patients (panel reactive antibody [PRA] ≥95%) began in Andalusia between the 5 KT centers based on virtual crossmatch. Method Retrospective cohort study of KT recipients within the Andalusian very-highly sensitized patients’ program from 2012 to December 2021. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. We performed a multivariable analysis using Cox regression for pre-KT risk factors for graft survival. Results During the study period, 213 KT were performed. The median PRA was 98%. of them, 18.7% were KT from type-III non-heart-beating donors and 69.5% were retransplanted patients. The median time on renal replacement therapy until KT was 1509 days and, from their inclusion in the very-highly sensitized patients’ program, 334 days. The median post-KT follow-up time was 1103 days. Patient/graft survival was 97.5%/91.7% and 82%/76.5% at one year and 5 years, respectively. Graft survival was lower in patients who had received more than one KT (P = .029). However, we found no differences when comparing PRA (&amp;lt; or ≥98%) or type of donor. In the multivariable analysis, the number of previous KT was a predictor of graft loss. We had more detailed information on renal function and post-KT complications in patients from 3 centers (n=104). Six patients (5.7%) developed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (1 class I, 3 class II, 2 class I and II) after a median of 267.5 days post-KT. Ten patients (9.3%) presented acute rejection (AR) diagnosed by biopsy: 4 T-cell-mediated rejection (3.7%) and 6 antibody-mediated rejection (5.6%). Active antibody-mediated chronic rejection (CR) was diagnosed in 5 patients and BK nephropathy in 2. Three graft losses were due to immunological causes (1 RA, 2 RC). Median renal function at one year was: Crp 1.3 mg/dl and glomerular filtration rate 55.1 ml/min. Conclusion Despite being a high-risk group, the survival results have been very satisfactory. The number of previous KT is a risk factor for graft survival.

Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Infection and Its Impact on Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation in South Korea: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common pathogen, causes infectious complications and affects long-term survival after transplantation. Studies examining living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are limited. This study analyzed the risk factors for CMV infection and its impact on the survival of LDLT patients. A nested case-control design retrospectively analyzed data from 952 patients who underwent LDLT from 2005-2021. The incidence of CMV infection for the study cohort was 15.2% at 3 months for LDLT patients managed preemptively. Patients with CMV infections were matched with those without the infection at corresponding time points (index postoperative day) in a 1:2 ratio. Graft survival was significantly lower in the CMV infection group than in the control group. CMV infection was an independent risk factor for graft survival in the matched cohort (HR 1.93, p = 0.012). Independent risk factors for CMV infection were female sex (HR 2.4, p = 0.003), pretransplant MELD (HR 1.06, p = 0.004), pretransplant in-hospital stay (HR 1.83, p = 0.030), ABO incompatibility (HR 2.10, p = 0.009), donor macrovesicular steatosis ≥10% (HR 2.01, p = 0.030), and re-operation before index POD (HR 2.51, p = 0.035). CMV infection is an independent survival risk factor, and its risk factors should be included in the surveillance and treatment of CMV infections after LDLT.

The Effect of Topical Normobaric Oxygen Therapy on Composite Graft Survival in Fingertip Amputation

Background: Though composite grafting is an easy, simple treatment for fingertip amputation, it is known to have a low survival rate. To increase the likelihood of composite graft survival, various adjuvant therapies such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, ice-cooling, or vasodilator agents have been used. In this study, we attempted to validate the hypothesis that topical normobaric oxygen therapy (tNBO) could improve composite graft survival in fingertip amputation.Methods: Patients who sustained fingertip amputations and who were treated with composite grafting between January 2015 and July 2020 were included. The patients (n=154) were divided into two groups: those who received tNBO (n=102) and those who had not (n=52). The effect of tNBO on graft survival, survival rate by level of amputation, and risk factors of graft survival (age, smoking, time to surgery, diabetes mellitus, and crush-avulsion injury type) were examined.Results: tNBO significantly increased composite graft survival (75.3% vs. 50%, P&lt;0.001) in amputations distal to the nail base area. Among risk factors, time to surgery &gt;5 hours (odds ratio, 48.6; P=0.001) and crush-avulsion injury type (odds ratio, 10.1; P&lt;0.001) significantly decreased graft survival in both groups. Smoking decreased graft survival only in the non-tNBO group (odds ratio, 28; P=0.015), not in the tNBO-treated group.Conclusion: tNBO increased composite graft survival in fingertip amputation distal to the nail base area. It can be helpful for composite graft survival in smokers.

Does aetiology of urethral stricture influence the survival of the buccal mucosa graft?-comparative study in patients with penile urethral stricture due to lichen sclerosus vs. idiopathic group.

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is one of causes of male urethral stricture, mainly penile or anterior urethra, and frequently associated with phimosis. This disease involves penile skin and surrounding tissues, which might affect long-term graft survival after a substitution urethroplasty. The aim of this study is to assess LS impact on urethral grafts, comparing outcomes in the LS group versus idiopathic urethral stricture. Retrospective descriptive analysis of male patients who underwent urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft (BMG) at our academic institution during the last decade [2008-2021]. Patients were allocated to LS group or idiopathic group depending on the aetiology of urethral stricture. The LS was confirmed by histology. Data collected included patient baseline characteristics, stricture description, perioperative parameters, surgical technique and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess graft survival in both groups, as univariate and multivariate analysis were performed trying to identify independent risk factors for graft survival. Primary outcome was treatment success, defined as the no need for further treatments. Forty-eight male patients underwent substitution urethroplasty, 11 in LS group and 37 in idiopathic group. Baseline characteristics between both groups were different mainly in terms of age and stricture features (length), with larger strictures in LS group (6.8 vs. 3.5 cm). All grafts were procured from buccal mucosa, while no differences in grafts survival were observed between both groups (40.3 vs. 38.4 months). Mean of patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) score was 2.1 in LS group vs. 2.4 in idiopathic group. Age, aetiology and smoking habit seems to be independent risk factors for graft survival, but not in multivariate analysis. Patients with LS have longer strictures than idiopathic group. No differences were found in graft survival between both groups and independent risk factor for graft survival were not identified.

Single kidney transplantation from pediatric deceased donors in China: the outcomes and risk factors of graft survival.

Pediatric deceased donors offer great potential for expanding the organ donor pool. The utilization of pediatric donor kidneys has been explored by numerous transplant centers; however, the transplant outcome and risk factors have not been well elucidated. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and risk factors of transplant outcome from pediatric deceased donors. We retrospectively analyzed 484 cases of single kidney transplantation (SKT) with pediatric donor kidneys performed at our center from January 2012 to March 2021. The recipients were grouped by age: child (≤12 years; n=143), adolescents (12-18 years; n=86), and adults (≥18 years; n=255). The overall prognosis of the recipients was analyzed, and the post-transplant outcomes were compared among the three groups and assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional risk model. The median follow-up time was 26.7 months. The 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 98.7% and 96.8%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year death-censored graft survival (DCGS) was 96.1% and 92.7%, respectively. The overall estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at 1 and 3 years were 80.0±24.5 and 84.2±25.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; the 3-year eGFR of the three groups were comparable and all were over 80 mL/min/1.73 m2. Rejection was an independent risk factor for death-censored graft failure within 3 years after transplantation [hazard ratio (HR) =3.85; P=0.001], and was the primary cause of graft losses in the adolescent group. Thrombosis was more common within 1-month post-transplant in the child recipients (P<0.05), and its incidence was higher in recipients with donor body weight (DBW) ≤11 kg. SKT from pediatric donors could achieve decent outcomes. Rejection was an independent risk factor of graft survival, especially for adolescent recipients. Child recipients may compromise early transplant outcomes due to vascular thrombosis, which might be related to small (DBW ≤11 kg) pediatric donors.

Immune reaction after penetrating keratoplasty depending on graft size and centration

Immune reaction (IR) after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is aserious complication with ahigh risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to analyze and evaluate the risk factors for IR, in particular, the influence of graft size and centration. Atotal of 2133patients who underwent PKP between January 2009 and July 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The following endpoints were analyzed: frequency of IR, graft origin, donor and patient age, diagnosis, corneal diameter and ratio of the graft size to the recipient cornea size. In addition, the role of graft centration, with the help of distance measurements of the graft margins to the vascularized limbus at four locations, was investigated in detail. Overall, 8.25% of patients suffered from IR during the observational period. The frequency of IR was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with the ratio of the graft size to the recipient cornea size. In addition, astatistically significant correlation was found between the occurrence of IR and asmall distance to the limbal margins in the Y‑axis (inferior and superior). In particular, the correlation coefficient was larger at the inferior limbus (p < 0.001). An IR after PKP is anot uncommon complication and is significantly related to graft size and centration. Alarge graft chosen in relation to the recipient cornea and the proximity of the graft to the vascularized limbus at the inferior and superior sites significantly correlate with the occurrence of IR. These are important risk factors for graft survival, which can be influenced by the corneal microsurgeon and could possibly be further optimized in the future.

Kidney Retransplantation after Graft Failure: Variables Influencing Long-Term Survival.

Background There is an increasing demand for kidney retransplantation. Most studies report inferior outcomes compared to primary transplantation, consequently feeding an ethical dilemma in the context of chronic organ shortage. Objective To assess variables influencing long-term graft survival after kidney retransplantation. Material and Methods. All patients transplanted at our center between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method, and risk factors were identified using multiple Cox regression. Results We performed 1,376 primary kidney transplantations and 222 retransplantations. The rate of retransplantation was 67.8% after the first graft loss, with a comparable 10-year graft survival compared to primary transplantation (67% vs. 64%, p=0.104) but an inferior graft survival thereafter (log-rank p=0.026). Independent risk factors for graft survival in retransplantation were age ≥ 50 years, time on dialysis ≥1 year, previous graft survival <2 years, ≥1 mild comorbidity in the Charlson–Deyo index, active smoking, and life-threatening complications (Clavien–Dindo grade IV) at first transplantation. Conclusion Graft survival is comparable for first and second kidney transplantation within the first 10 years. Risk factors for poor outcomes after retransplantation are previous graft survival, dialysis time after graft failure, recipient age, comorbidities, and smoking. Patients with transplant failure should have access to retransplantation as early as possible.

MO979: Influence of BK Virus Plasma Viral Load in Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS BK virus infection (BKi) is an important cause of kidney transplant (KT) loss. Besides to reducing immunosuppression, the rest of the therapies have not shown a clear benefit. Our purpose is to analyze the risk factors for BKi and the influence of BK plasma viral load on KT outcomes. METHOD Prospective cohort study of KT with BKi, defined by the presence of BK viremia in ≥3 consecutive determinations, from 01 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. BK viremia was determined every 10 days during the first 3 months, at 6th month, 12th month and in case of impaired renal function. In patients with positive viremia, immunosuppressive therapy was changed (reduction/discontinuation of mycophenolate and/or switching to everolimus). Patients with high-level viremia (≥10 000 copies/mL) and low-level viremia (&amp;lt;10 000 copies/mL) were compared. To identify risk factors for BKi, for each KT with BKi, we selected two matched controls and performed a logistic regression analysis. Graft survival was analyzed according to BK viremia (high-level, low-level and negative) using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for graft survival. RESULTS 849 KT were performed, of which 67 (7.9%) presented BKi. Six KT were excluded due to incomplete data. Finally, 61 KT BKi (n = 27, high-level viremia; n = 34 low-level viremia) and 122 controls were analyzed. The median post-KT time to BKi was 2 months. In the multivariable analysis, male recipient, older age and re-KT were risk factors for BKi. Proven BK-associated nephropathy was diagnosed in five KT recipients and nine patients had persistent BK viremia, all of them from the high plasma viral loads group. Only one patient lost the graft due to BK-associated nephropathy. Patients with low-level viremia had worse renal function one month after KT than controls but without differences at the first year. Patients with high-level viremia had worse renal function one year after KT and worse graft survival than recipients with low-level viremia and controls (P = 0.037). In the multivariable analysis, when we analyzed exclusively patients with BKi, high-level viremia was a risk factor for kidney graft survival (HR: 16.31; P = 0.034). CONCLUSION BKi is not an uncommon complication after KT. Only high BK viral load was associated with BK-associated nephropathy, persistent viremia, and poorer graft survival. BK viremia &amp;lt;10 000 copies/mL did not affect KT outcomes. Therefore, monitoring BK plasma viral loads and changes in immunosuppression to reduce viremia are effective strategies to minimize the impact of BK virus on graft survival.

Surgical Wound Dehiscence in Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Impact on Graft Survival

Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT) but there is not enough evidence of its impact on graft survival. A retrospective cohort study including all KT patients with SWD in our center from January 2015 to July 2020 was performed. A case-control study was performed and for each case of SWD, 2 controls were selected (2:1). To identify risk factors for SWD, a logistic regression analysis was carried out and a multivariable Cox regression was used to describe risk factors for graft survival. In our center, 503 KT were performed, and 39 patients presented SWD. They were older (62.1 vs 57.1 years; P=.030), most had diabetes mellitus (59% vs 28.6%; P=.002) and their body mass index was higher (31 vs 26.9 kg/m2; P < .001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (P=.024) and a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 at time of transplantation (P=.018) were predictors of SWD. A higher rate of delayed graft function was described in SWD (P=.013) and it was associated with a longer hospital stay (20.9 vs 15 days; P=.004). Graft survival was lower in patients with SWD (P=.036). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, time in renal replacement therapy (P=.020) and SWD (P=.028) were predictors of shorter graft survival. SWD is a risk factor for graft survival. The presence of diabetes mellitus and a higher body mass index are predictors for the appearance of this complication.

Risk Due to ABO Incompatibility and Donor-Recipient Weight Mismatch in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study.

The effect of donor-recipient weight mismatch is not well established in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). A total of 2584 LDKT patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of ABO incompatibility and donor-recipient weight mismatch (donor-to-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) < 0.8). In a multivariable Cox analysis, the combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility (n = 124) was an independent risk factor for graft survival (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.11–6.70) and patient survival (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.39–9.04), whereas neither factor alone was a significant risk factor for either outcome. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was not an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven graft rejection (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.88–1.82); however, it was an independent risk factor for pneumonia (HR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.64–5.57). The mortality rate due to infection was higher among patients with both ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility than among patients with neither factor or with either factor alone. The combination of ABO incompatibility and DRWR incompatibility was an independent risk factor for graft and patient survival after LDKT, whereas neither factor alone significantly affected graft or patient survival. Thus, donor-recipient weight matching should be cautiously considered in LDKT with ABO incompatibility.

Assessment of Donor Liver Pathology Predicts Survival After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The aims of this study were to investigate the pathologic manifestation of pretransplant biopsy and to provide an accurate assessment method for liver graft of China Donation after Citizen's Death (CDCD). A retrospective analysis was performed based on clinical and biopsy data of 96 CDCD liver transplantations completed between January 2012 and December 2017. The pretransplant pathologic sections were semiquantitatively scored according to Banff Schema recommendations on liver allograft pathology. Graft overall survival (OS) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rates were observed. The histologic analysis of the 96 CDCD liver graft biopsy specimens was summarized, including portal area neutrophilic infiltrate, macrovesicular steatosis, microvesicular steatosis, and hepatocellular swelling. Among these pathologic characteristics, only portal area neutrophilic infiltrate ≥20% was an independent risk factor for graft survival, although it has limited effect on the recipient's short-term prognosis. We found that portal area neutrophilic infiltrate ≥20% was an independent risk factors for long-term graft survival. According to this criterion, we can identify liver transplant recipients at risk for poor prognosis and make timely interventions.

Indications and long-term outcomes of pediatric penetrating keratoplasty in a hispanic population

To analyze the main indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), risk factors for graft survival, and visual outcome in a pediatric population.

Risk factors affecting graft survival after parathyroidectomy and parathyroid autotransplantation in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

To investigate the risk factors affecting the survival of parathyroid autograft following total parathyroidectomy combined with autologous sternocleidomastoid muscle transplantation (TPTX + AT) in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) complicated with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This retrospective study was conducted among the patients on maintenance hemodialysis with SHPT, who underwent successful parathyroidectomy and autotransplantation from January, 2010 to February, 2020 in our hospital. The clinical data and serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, intact parathyroid hormone, hemoglobin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) of the patients were collected. The enrolled patients were divided into survival group with bilateral forearm parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ratio > 1.5 and death group with a ratio < 1.5 at 2 weeks after surgery for comparison of the clinical data and perioperative indicators. The risk factors of postoperative parathyroid autograft survival were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. A total of 87 patients were included in the study, among whom the graft survival rate after parathyroid transplantation was 78.16%. In both groups, serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, iPTH and ALP decreased and hemoglobin level increased significantly at 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that serum ALP level was an independent risk factor for graft survival following parathyroid autotransplantation [OR=1.003, 95% CI: 1.001-1.005, P=0.004]. TPTX+AT is a safe and effective treatment for SHPT, and parathyroid autografts are less likely to survive following parathyroid transplantation in patients with high preoperative level of ALP.

MO938PATIENT SURVIVAL AFTER LIVING DONOR KIDNEY DONATION

Abstract Background and Aims Living donor kidney transplantation [LDKT] is associated with best patient survival and life quality among kidney replacement therapies in case of chronic kidney disease. Yet, numerous previous studies have reported inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of recipient and donor characteristics on LDKT recipients in our center. Method All LDKT recipients from 01.01.1997 to 18.03.2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the biological relationship between recipient and donor, recipients were grouped into “related” (biologically related) and “unrelated” (not related). Endpoints of this study were patient survival, death-censored graft survival and graft survival including death analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Independent risk factors were estimated with Cox-regression. Results Among 946 LDKT recipients we identified n=548 related and n=398 unrelated recipients. Over a median observation time of 6.3 years 9.1% (86) of grafts failed and 10.8% (102) of recipients died. Rates of graft failure and deaths were 8.8% and 7.1% in related recipients and 9.5% and 15.8% in unrelated recipients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier-analysis showed 5, 10 and 15 year overall patient survival of 93.8%, 85.6% and 76.0%; death-censored graft survival of 94.7%, and 87.3% and 79.8%; graft survival including death were 89.8%, 76.3% and 62.7%. There was a significant difference between subgroups in patient survival (p&amp;lt;0.001) and graft survival including death (p&amp;lt;0.001) but not in death-censored graft survival (p=0.280). (figure 1, 2, 3) In the multivariate analysis we observed recipient age in years (Hazard Ratio [HR]:1.08; p&amp;lt;0.001) and donor age in years (HR:0.97; p=0.008) to be independent risk factors for patient mortality. The occurrence of a delayed graft function (HR:2.52; p&amp;lt;0.001) as well as recipient age in years (HR:1.04; p&amp;lt;0.001) were risk factors for graft survival including death, while delayed graft function (HR:4.05; p&amp;lt;0.001) was the only independent risk factor for death-censored graft survival. Conclusion LDKT recipients without a biological relationship to their donors have an inferior patient survival and graft survival including death. The donor relationship as well as delayed graft function, recipient age and donor age should be taken into account during patient evaluation. Recipients subjected to these characteristics should be informed about their individual risks and carefully monitored long term. Further evaluations are needed particularly including the effects of immunosuppressive medication.

P1646SURVIVAL OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS ACCORDING TO PRESENCE OF HLA ANTIBODIES WHEN DONORSPECIFIC ANTIBODIES ARE SCREENED DURING POSTTRANSPLANT FOLLOW-UP

Abstract Background and Aims Posttransplant kidney survival depends on several risk factors. A careful immunogenetic matching and the absence of HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) seem to determine the longevity of the transplant. Method Screening the presence of donor specific HLA antibodies in our posttransplant outpatients was implemented in 2010 (every 6 months in case of DSA free patients for two years, then yearly, and every 3 months in case of DSA + patients for two years, then twice a year). At the same time a treatment protocol was implemented, omitting reduction of immunosuppressive drugs in case of newly detected DSA, and most important with preventing steroid withdrawal in this case.The present single center study reports the long-term survival and kidney function from patients undergoing HLA-screening after transplantation between 2010 and 2016 with a follow-up until 2018. Using a Kaplan-Meier analysis patients without HLA antibodies (no HLA-ab), with HLA antibodies but without DSA (NDSA), and with donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) were compared by logrank-testing. Results A full dataset was obtained from 318 patients. The mean overall survival (patients and organ function) didn´t differ between the three groups, p=0.318: no HLA-ab 7.2 years (95%confidence interval 6.7;7.6), NDSA 6.6 (5.9;7.2), DSA 6.8 (6.1;7.5), overall 7.0 (6.6;7.3), events are given in Table1. Whereas the mean patient survival didn´t differ between the groups (p=0.715), the mean death-censored graft survival differed significantly, p=0.008, with a reduced transplant survival in the patients with HLA antibodies but without donorspecific antibodies: no HLA-ab 8.0 years (95%confidence interval 7.7;8.3), NDSA 7.0 (6.4;7.6), DSA 7.6 (7.1;8.2), overall 7.7 (7.4;8.0), numbers are given in Table1. Conclusion In conclusion, the presence of HLA antibodies was associated with a reduced transplant survival. Patients with HLA antibodies had a worse survival than patients with DSA undergoing HLA screening with a personalised immunosuppressive regimen. Immunosuppressive regimen of the groups, as well as other known risk factors of graft survival have to be further analysed. The results of these multivariate analyses have to be awaited to determine whether the risk for graft loss inferred by HLA antibodies is independent from other factors.