Risk Factor For Allograft Loss Research Articles

Persistent Chronic Active T-Cell-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation Is Associated With Poor Allograft Survival.

Histopathological findings of chronic active T-cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) have been reported to potentially improve with treatment. However, whether this improvement is associated with a better renal prognosis remains unclear. This study was performed to analyze the impact of the histological response to therapy on kidney allograft survival in patients with CA-TCMR. The data of patients diagnosed with CA-TCMR between January 2018 and May 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. A composite graft endpoint was defined as a two-fold increase in the serum creatinine level or the development of end-stage kidney disease. Thirty-seven patients with CA-TCMR underwent 46 follow-up biopsies. Eleven patients who were diagnosed with CA-TCMR at the last biopsy were classified as the persistent group, while the remaining 26 patients were classified as the transient group. Both before and after treatment, there were no significant changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or proteinuria in either group. However, the transient group showed a significant reduction in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy without a specific etiology (IFTA). This improvement was attributed to better histopathological Banff scores after treatment. Patients with persistent CA-TCMR had significantly worse graft survival than those with transient CA-TCMR (p = 0.002), even after adjusting for significant clinical factors (hazard ratio: 11.4; 95% CI: 1.1-120.0; p = 0.043). Our findings suggest that the persistence of histopathologic evidence of CA-TCMR after treatment is a significant risk factor for allograft loss compared with transient CA-TCMR.

Progress in Noninvasive Surveillance for Acute Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Real-World Analysis of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA-Based Surveillance Protocol.

Acute cellular (ACR) and antibody-mediated (AMR) rejection are risk factors for allograft loss in heart transplant (HT) recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), although considered the gold standard for rejection surveillance, is invasive and has high interobserver variability. Noninvasive donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) sampling has a high negative predictive value (NPV) for rejection in adults and is increasingly used in pediatrics. This single center study aimed to test the performance of dd-cfDNA in screening for acute rejection (AR) and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in pediatric HT recipients. Blood samples for dd-cfDNA were obtained per clinical protocol for all eligible HT recipients in our center from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Primary endpoints were episodes of AR, pathology grading of EMBs temporally related to ddcfDNA sampling (0-150 days), and presence of DSAs. There were 471 interpretable samples, in 192 unique patients. Of those, 199 dd-cfDNA tests were paired with EMB ± DSA in 152 patients. Abnormal dd-cfDNA (> 0.2%) was found in 77 samples (median 0.48%, range 0.21%-11%) and led to EMB, where one sample was positive for ACR (grade 2R), 13 for AMR, yielding an NPV of 97% for AMR. After excluding abnormal ddcfDNA testing associated with AR, 65 abnormal dd-cfDNA tests were paired with DSA testing. The NPV of the test for detection of DSAs was 93%. Implementation of noninvasive rejection surveillance with dd-cfDNA in a pediatric cohort demonstrates high NPV for AR and high DSAs, making it an ideal screening tool for long-term monitoring of allograft health in pediatrics.

Cytomegalovirus Matching in Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: Results From a U.S. National Simulation Model.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects >60% of adults and can pose an independent risk factor for allograft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a nationwide implementation of CMV seromatching (donor/recipient: D-/R- and D+/R+) in the U.S. deceased donor kidney allocation system (KAS). Adult candidates on the U.S. kidney-only transplant waiting list and deceased donor kidneys offered to the U.S. transplant centers were considered. A discrete-event simulation model, simulating the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2018, was used to compare the performances of currently employed KAS-250 policy (without CMV matching) to various simulated CMV matching policies parameterized by calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold. Outcomes included CMV serodistribution, waiting time, access to transplantation among various groups, transplant rate, graft survival, kidney discard rate, and antigen-mismatch distribution, stratified by CMV serostatus. CMV matching policy with a calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold of 50% (namely, the CMV">50%" policy) strikes a better balance between benefits and drawbacks of CMV matching. Compared with KAS-250, CMV">50%" reduced CMV high-risk (D+/R-) transplants (6.1% versus 18.1%) and increased CMV low-risk (D-/R-) transplants (27.2% versus 13.1%); increased transplant rate for CMV R- patients (11.54 versus 12.57) but decreased for R+ patients (10.68 versus 10.48), yielding an increase in aggregate (11.09 versus 10.94); and reduced mean time to transplantation (by 6 wk); and reduced kidney discard rate (25.7% versus 26.2%). Our findings underscore the feasibility and potential advantages of a nationwide CMV seromatching policy in kidney transplantation.

Effects of Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection on Clinical Outcome and Survival of Kidney Transplant Patients

There is no consensus on whether the development of urinary tract infections (UTIs) leads to high mortality or graft loss in kidney transplant patients. A high incidence of multidrug resistant (MDR) infections was observed worldwide and is associated with these complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of UTIs on the clinical outcome and survival in kidney transplant patients. This retrospective study evaluated 601 kidney transplant patients who were categorized as follows: group 1 (G1) patients without a UTI, group 2 (G2) patients with a UTI, and group 3 (G3) recipients with a recurrent UTI. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after transplantation. Graft survival, risk of graft loss, and risk of developing a UTI were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and logistic regression methods, respectively. Differences with P < .05 were considered statistically significant. The proportion of rejection episodes was higher in G3 (32.35%) than in G1 (20.89%) and G2 (21.88%) (P < .001). The graft survival after the 10-year follow-up was better in G1 (73.29%) than in G3 (61.62%) (P=.019). UTI recurrent episodes increased the risk of graft loss >2.5-fold. Women and those who received a kidney from a deceased donor (DD) were at risk of at least 1 UTI event during follow-up. A greater proportion of MDR infections was observed in G3 than in G2 (P < .001). The risk factors for developing a UTI were female sex, receiving a DD kidney, susceptibility to other infections, episodes of rejection, and delayed graft function. Moreover, a UTI, especially a recurrent UTI, was an important risk factor for allograft loss.

Treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A retrospective cohort study of 37 transplants.

Data on the treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) are scarce, and therapeutical strategies for CA-TCMR have not been established. We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes and effects of treatment on pathological and clinical findings in patients with CA-TCMR. This study comprised 37 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institute who were diagnosed with CA-TCMR between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were followed until October 2021. A total of 32 of the 37 patients were treated. During the observation period, two patients died (5%), and five patients developed allograft loss (13%). A univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that indication biopsy, higher spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and Banff ci/ct scores were risk factors for allograft loss. Of the treated patients, 23 underwent follow-up biopsies. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant improvement in the Baff scores for "ti", "i-IFTA", "t" and "t-IFTA" after treatment. On pathology, 13 (57%) of the patients who underwent follow-up biopsy improved to "no evidence of rejection" or "borderline change." Assuming that improvement in pathology to "borderline change" or "no evidence of rejection" on follow-up biopsy indicates response to treatment, multivariate logistic analysis showed that lower UPCR was a predictive factor for response to treatment. No specific effect of treatment type was observed. Our results indicate that treatment could improve the pathological findings in CA-TCMR.

Risk factors for renal allograft survival with China novel donation category: Donation after brain death followed by cardiac arrest

IntroductionTo meet the need for transplantable organs, a new donation program was initiated by the Chinese government. This novel policy created three categories for deceased organ donations: donation after circulatory death cardiac death (DCD), donation after brain death (DBD), and donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) meaning complete cardiac arrest. In fact, the DBCD method is a combination of both DBD and DCD methods. A DBCD donor meets the criteria of for brain death, but the organ procurement begins after the withdrawal of life support and the subsequent cardiac arrest death. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in our center with the DBCD policy. Potential risk factors for affecting the renal allograft survival were also analyzed based on our data. MethodA retrospective study, involving 421 kidney transplants derived from 214 donors, was conducted between December 2011 and October 2019. In particular, 373 (88.6%) transplanted organs met the criteria for DBCD, and 48 (11.4%) for DCD. The log-rank test was used to compare the difference in survival. The Cox regression analysis was used for risk factor screening. ResultAnalysis showed that the DBCD group was better than the DCD group in terms of overall (p = 0.031) as well as death-censored (p = 0.026) allograft survival using the log-rank test. A Cox regression analysis revealed that increasing donor age (p = 0.002, HR = 1.820/10 years incremental older), increasing recipient age (p = 0.028, HR = 1.521/10 years increment older), prolonged dialysis duration (p = 0.007, HR = 1.018), occurrence episodes of acute rejection (p = 0.016, HR = 2.697), delayed graft function (p = 0.012, HR = 2.962), mismatch ≥4 HLA loci (p = 0.038, HR = 3.606), and warm ischemia time > 15 min (p = 0.022, HR = 2.915), were all independent risk factors affecting the graft survival. ConclusionThe new DBCD policy of donation produced acceptable results similar or even better than the DCD practice. Based on our analysis, the graft survival of DBCD transplants may be better than DCD transplants. The main risk factors for allograft loss included an increasing donor age, recipient age, warm ischemia time > 15 min, prolonged dialysis duration, acute rejection, delayed graft function, and HLA mismatch ≥4 HLA loci.

Impact of targeted hypothermia in expanded-criteria organ donors on recipient kidney-graft function: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (HYPOREME)

IntroductionExpanded-criteria donors (ECDs) are used to reduce the shortage of kidneys for transplantation. However, kidneys from ECDs are associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), a risk...

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Opportunistic Infections after Kidney Allograft Transplantation in the Era of Modern Immunosuppression: A Monocentric Cohort Study.

Epidemiology of opportunistic infections (OI) after kidney allograft transplantation in the modern era of immunosuppression and the use of OI prevention strategies are poorly described. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort on kidney allograft adult recipients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2013. The control group included all kidney recipients transplanted in the same period, but with no OI. We analyzed 538 kidney transplantations (538 patients). The proportion of OI was 15% (80 and 72 patients). OI occurred 12.8 (6.0–31.2) months after transplantation. Viruses were the leading cause (n = 54, (10%)), followed by fungal (n = 15 (3%)), parasitic (n = 6 (1%)), and bacterial (n = 5 (0.9%)) infections. Independent risk factors for OI were extended criteria donor (2.53 (1.48–4.31), p = 0.0007) and BK viremia (6.38 (3.62–11.23), p < 0.0001). High blood lymphocyte count at the time of transplantation was an independent protective factor (0.60 (0.38–0.94), p = 0.026). OI was an independent risk factor for allograft loss (2.53 (1.29–4.95), p = 0.007) but not for patient survival. Post-kidney transplantation OIs were mostly viral and occurred beyond one year after transplantation. Pre-transplantation lymphopenia and extended criteria donor are independent risk factors for OI, unlike induction therapy, hence the need to adjust immunosuppressive regimens to such transplant candidates.

Glomerular Parietal Epithelial Cells Infection Is Associated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV infection of glomerular parietal epithelial cells (GPECs) on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). A total of 152 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyVAN were divided into 31 with (GPEC-positive group) and 121 without (GPEC-negative group) BKPyV-infected GPECs. Clinicopathological characteristics and allograft survival were compared between the groups. The GPEC-positive group had more patients with advanced-stage BKPyVAN than the GPEC-negative group (P < .001). At the last follow-up, the GPEC-positive group had a significantly higher serum creatinine level than the GPEC-negative group. The graft loss rate in the GPEC-positive group was higher than that in the GPEC-negative group (32.3% vs 12.4%; P = .008). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the GPEC-positive group was lower than that in the GPEC-negative group (log-rank test, P = .004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that BKPyV infection of GPECs was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-8.76; P = .006). GPEC infection in patients with BKPyVAN indicates more-severe pathological damage and a rapid decline in renal function. BKPyV infection of GPECs is an independent risk factor for allograft loss.

Characteristics of Recipients With 10 or More Years of Allograft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundThe development of immunosuppressants improved the short-term outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), but the long-term survival rate was not improved. MethodsThe study included 127 patients who received first-time kidneys from deceased donors at Keimyung University Dongsan hospital between October 1994 and June 2007. We analyzed the clinical features of recipients with long-term allograft survival. ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 163 months. Among the 127 recipients, 53 (41.7%) maintained allograft survival for more than 10 years (AS group), 58 (45.7%) lost allograft function (AL group), and 16 (12.6%) were lost to follow-up. The 5- and 10-year allograft survival rates were 84.7% and 65.5%. The 5- and 10-year patient survival rates were 95.9% and 92.5%. The patient survival rate was significantly higher in the AS group than in the AL group. In the AS group, the use of basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were significantly higher, and the number of HLA-DR mismatches and the incidence of rejection and infection were significantly lower. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, the use of MMF reduced the risk of allograft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 0.361; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.172–0.757; P = .007). On the other hand, the incidence of rejection, hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis (HBV-LC), and viral infection were independent risk factors for allograft loss (HR, 5.327; 95% CI, 2.813–10.090; P < .001; HR, 5.862; 95% CI, 1.891–18.168; P = .002; HR, 2.614; 95% CI, 1.355–5.043; P = .004, respectively). ConclusionFor long-term survival of allograft kidney in DDKT, it is important to use appropriate immunosuppressants including MMF and prevent complications such as rejection, HBV-LC, and viral infection.

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis: Suggestion for a CT grading system and management algorithm.

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis (PAT) remains the leading cause of nonimmunologic graft failure. Here, we propose a new computed tomography (CT) grading system of PAT to identify risk factors for allograft loss and outline a management algorithm by retrospective review of consecutive pancreatic transplantations between 2009 and 2014. Triple‐phase CT scans were graded independently by 2 radiologists as grade 0, no thrombosis; grade 1, peripheral thrombosis; grade 2, intermediate non‐occlusive thrombosis; and grade 3, central occlusive thrombosis. Twenty‐four (23.3%) of 103 recipients were diagnosed with PAT (including grade 1). Three (2.9%) grafts were lost due to portal vein thrombosis. On multivariate analysis, pancreas after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation/solitary pancreatic transplantation, acute rejection, and CT findings of peripancreatic edema and/or inflammatory change were significant risk factors for PAT. Retrospective review of CT scans revealed more grade 1 and 2 thromboses than were initially reported. There was no significant difference in graft or patient survival, postoperative stay, or morbidity of recipients with grade 1 or 2 thrombosis who were or were not anticoagulated. Our data suggest that therapeutic anticoagulation is not necessary for grade 1 and 2 arterial and grade 1 venous thrombosis. The proposed grading system can assist clinicians in decision‐making and provide standardized reporting for future studies.

Kidney Transplantation in Korean Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Aged 65 and Older: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundThe mean age of patients starting dialysis in Korea has increased to older than 60 years and the proportion of patients aged 65 and older exceeded 40% in 2014. Although the number of elderly dialysis patients is increasing rapidly, percentages of elderly patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) are very low. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent KT at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center between 1982 and 2016. Elderly patients (≥65 years old) were compared with the control group of patients in their early sixties (60–64 years old). ResultsAmong a total of 1209 KT patients, those in their early sixties totaled 34 (2.8%) and the elderly totaled only 18 (1.5%). Patient and allograft survival rate showed no significant differences between the elderly and those in their early sixties. Death with a functioning graft accounted for 50% in both groups. However, occurrences of bacterial infection and tuberculosis were higher in the elderly (P = .011 and .047, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, longer duration of renal replacement therapy before KT and the occurrence of malignancy were independent risk factors for patient death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.027; P = .014; HR, 31.934; P = .016, respectively). Also, albuminuria at 6 months after KT was an independent risk factor for allograft loss (HR, 51.155; P = .016). ConclusionThe overall survival rate of the elderly was not significantly lower than those in their early sixties. Even in the elderly, KT should not be delayed. In addition, careful surveillance for malignancy and measures to decrease the risk of infection are necessary.

Hypertension in the Kidney Transplant Recipient: Overview of Pathogenesis, Clinical Assessment, and Treatment.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with chronic renal disease and the most common cause of death and allograft loss among kidney transplant recipients. Transplant patients often have multiple cardiovascular risk factors antedating transplantation. Among the most prominent is hypertension (HTN), which affects at least 90% of transplant patients. Uncontrolled HTN is an independent risk factor for allograft loss. The etiology of HTN in transplant recipients is complex and multifactorial, including the use of essential immunosuppressive medications. Post-transplant HTN management requires a systematic and individualized approach with nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies. There is no single ideal agent or treatment algorithm. Patients should regularly monitor and record their blood pressure at home. Often, multiple antihypertensive drugs are needed to achieve a goal blood pressure of 120-140/70-90 mm Hg. As transplant recipients commonly must take 8 to 12 different medications daily, adherence must be continually encouraged and monitored. Special attention must be paid to potential drug side effects and drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications.

The diffuse extent of peritubular capillaritis in renal allograft rejection is an independent risk factor for graft loss

By the Banff classification, the score of peritubular capillaritis, its extent, and its cellular composition should normally be reported in renal allograft pathology. While the score represents an important diagnostic and prognostic variable, the clinical value of capillaritis extent or composition has yet to be resolved. In a retrospective study of 749 renal transplant recipients subjected to 1322 indication biopsies, we found that prevalence scores of 1, 2, or 3 in the biopsy specimens were 10.7, 11.6, and 2.6%, respectively. Focal and diffuse peritubular capillaritis (inflammation over 50% of cortical peritubular capillaries) was diagnosed in 10.5 or 14.4% of cases, respectively. Mononuclear, granulocytic, and mixed peritubular capillaritis was present in 13.1, 3.3, and 8.5%, respectively. While peritubular capillaritis without further subclassification was not related to higher allograft loss rates, a score of 3 (hazard ratio 2.57 (CI: 1.25-5.28)) and diffuse peritubular capillaritis (1.67 (1.1-2.54)) were significant impartial risk factors for allograft loss. Diffuse peritubular capillaritis was independently associated with features of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and greater eGFR decline after 3 years. In contrast, detailed report of leukocytic composition in peritubular capillaritis did not confer additional prognostic information. Thus, in contrast to typing the infiltrating inflammatory cells, the score and extent of peritubular capillaritis in kidney allograft pathology is essential to assess transplant prognosis.

Clinical Outcomes in Asian Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BackgroundThe kidney transplantation rate in elderly patients is increasing rapidly. However, the clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation in elderly patients have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. MethodsThis multicenter cohort study included adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) admitted to five major tertiary hospitals in Korea between 1997 and 2012. A total of 3,565 adult participants were enrolled. Patient survival, allograft survival, and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) of 242 elderly recipients (≥60 years) were assessed and compared with those of a younger population. ResultsPatients were divided into five groups according to age at time of transplantation. The proportion of elderly patients was 6.7 % (mean age, 63.1 ± 2.7 years; n = 242). The numbers of male patients (69.4%), those with diabetes mellitus history (36.3%), and those with pretransplantation ischemic heart disease history (17.7%) were significantly higher in the elderly group than in the younger age groups. Elderly patients were more likely to receive a cadaveric kidney, and overall mortality rates were significantly higher in the elderly patients (1-year survival 93.3%, 5-year survival 91.3%). However, death-censored allograft survival rate and BPAR were not affected by patient age (P = .104 and .501, respectively). Among the elderly, BPAR and female donors were independent risk factors for allograft loss. ConclusionThe overall survival rate of the elderly KTRs was significantly lower than that of younger KTRs. However, the death-censored allograft survival rate did not differ between groups. Kidney transplantation should not be stagnated especially in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease.

Renal Allograft Rejection

Renal Allograft Rejection

Early hospital readmissions after kidney transplantation

A new study reports that 30.5% of kidney transplant recipients have an early hospital readmission (EHR; defined as within 30 days of discharge). As EHR is a strong independent risk factor for allograft loss and mortality, efforts should be made to implement and improve systems to minimize risk of EHR in these patients.

Maintaining calcineurin inhibition after the diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder improves renal graft survival

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an uncontrolled proliferation of transformed lymphocytes fostered by immunosuppression. In addition to chemotherapy, treatment of PTLD includes a reduction of maintenance immunosuppression. Patients with PTLD have an increased risk of graft loss, suggesting that reduced immunosuppression strategy needs to be optimized with regard to graft outcome. Here we retrospectively reviewed 101 cases involving PTLD to identify the risks associated with graft loss. During a median follow-up of 70 months, 39 patients died and 21 lost their graft. Multivariate analysis found that an eGFR under 30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at PTLD diagnosis, a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode following reduction of immunosuppression, and the absence of calcineurin inhibition in maintenance immunosuppression are independent risk factors for allograft loss. Neither the type of PTLD nor the chemotherapy regimen was predictive of allograft failure. Histological analysis of graft biopsies showed that maintaining calcineurin inhibition after the diagnosis of PTLD reduced the risk of developing de novo anti-HLA antibodies and humoral rejection. Remarkably, calcineurin inhibitor maintenance was neither associated with higher mortality nor with worse progression-free survival. Thus, maintaining calcineurin inhibition at a reduced dose after the diagnosis of PTLD seems safe and may improve renal graft outcome, possibly through better control of the recipient's humoral immune response.

Uma proposta para graduar a gravidade de disfunção precoce do enxerto após o transplante de fígado

ABSTRACTObjective:To propose a grading system for early hepatic graft dysfunction.Methods:A retrospective study from a single transplant center. Recipients of liver transplants from deceased donors, transplanted under the MELD system were included. Early graft dysfunction was defined by Olthoff criteria. Multiple cut-off points of post-transplant laboratory tests were used to create a grading system for early graft dysfunction. The primary outcome was 6-months grafts survival.Results:The peak of aminotransferases during the first postoperative week correlated with graft loss. The recipients were divided into mild (aminotransferase peak >2,000IU/mL, but <3,000IU/mL); moderate (aminotransferase peak >3,000IU/mL); and severe (aminotransferase peak >3,000IU/mL + International Normalized Ratio ≥1.6 and/or bilirubin ≥ 10mg/dL in the 7th postoperative day) early allograft dysfunction. Moderate and severe early dysfunctions were independent risk factors for graft loss. Patients with mild early dysfunction presented with graft and patient survival comparable to those without graft dysfunction. However, those with moderate early graft dysfunction showed worse graft survival than those who had no graft dysfunction. Patients with severe early dysfunction had graft and patient survival rates worse than those of any other groups.Conclusion:Early graft dysfunction can be graded by a simple and reliable criteria based on the peak of aminotransferases during the first postoperative week. The severity of the early graft dysfunction is an independent risk factor for allograft loss. Patients with moderate early dysfunction showed worsening of graft survival. Recipients with severe dysfunction had a significantly worse prognosis for graft and patient survival.

The Relationship of Early Allograft Dysfunction with Complications and Resource Consumption after Liver Transplantation

Introduction: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) have been described as a risk factor for allograft loss. However, few attempts have been made to relate EAD with post-transplant complications and costs. We studied whether there is a relationship among EAD, post-transplant complications and resource consumption. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study. Included are primary isolated full liver grafts transplanted under the MELD system (n=281) from July 1st, 2005 through June 30th, 2010. Patients with primary non-function PNF and vascular complications leading to immediate transplantation were excluded from the study. EAD was defined as: peak of aminotransferases at the first week>2000 IU/mL, and/or INR≥1.6 at day 7, and/or BIL≥10 mg/dl at day 7. Patients were divided in groups according to the severity of EAD: no EAD (control), mild (aminotransferases>2000 and < 3000), moderate (aminotransferases>3000) and severe EAD (aminotransferases>3000IU/ml and INR>1.6 or Bilirubin>10). Main endpoint were post-transplant complications and resource consumption. Results: We found no differences in the donor and recipient characteristics among the groups. Patients with severe (10%) and moderate EAD (3.7%) had more vascular complications than those in the mild (0%) and no EAD groups (0%), P=0.03. There no differences in the rate of biliary and infectious complications among the groups. Patients with severe (80%) had more renal complications than those in the moderate EAD (48%), mild (55%) and no EAD groups (40%), P< 0.0001. Patients with severe EAD had longer transplant admissions (33.2 days) compared to those with moderade (19.6 days), mild (20,3 days) and no EAD (16.4 days), p=0.03. However, EAD did not impact re-admission rate and the number of re-admission days. EAD had also an impact on blood bank consumption. Those with severe and moderate EAD consumed more platelets, FFP and cryoprecipitate than patients with mild EAD or without EAD (p< 0.01). Conclusion: There is a relationship between EAD post-transplant complications and resource consumption. Patients with severe and moderate EAD had more vascular and renal and complications, stayed longer in the hospital and consume more blood bank resources.