The article examines the essence of the category of «risk» in the context of grant-making in martial law. The author analyses the specific threats faced by grantees in the context of armed conflict, including political instability, economic crisis, humanitarian disaster, and logistical problems. Particular attention is paid to assessing the likelihood of these risks, their impact on project implementation, and developing strategies to mitigate the negative consequences. The aim of the study is to develop practical recommendations for grantees and grantors that will facilitate more efficient use of grant funds and establish close cooperation between all stakeholders. The document emphasizes the importance of collective efforts to overcome the challenges of martial law and achieve common goals. The study delves into the multifaceted nature of risks in wartime grantmaking, taking an interdisciplinary approach. It draws on knowledge from different fields such as management, sociology and political science to develop a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities. This interdisciplinary approach allows us to find innovative solutions and develop more robust risk management strategies. The study highlights the importance of proactive risk management and contingency planning. By anticipating potential risks and developing strategies to mitigate their impact, grantees can increase the likelihood of project success. The paper emphasizes the need for flexible and adaptive approaches that can respond to rapidly changing circumstances. It also highlights the importance of collaboration between grantees, donors and other stakeholders to share knowledge, resources and best practices. By developing strong partnerships, complex problems can be addressed and the resilience of conflict-affected communities can be strengthened. The findings of this study have important implications for policy makers, practitioners and researchers. By providing a deeper understanding of the risks and challenges associated with grantmaking in wartime, this research can contribute to the development of more effective grantmaking policies and practices. In addition, the recommendations presented in the paper can help grantees and donors make more informed decisions and allocate resources more effectively.
Read full abstract