Risk Classifier For Endometrial Cancer Research Articles

Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series

BackgroundWe have previously developed and confirmed a pragmatic molecular classifier for endometrial cancers; ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Inspired by the Cancer Genome Atlas, ProMisE identifies four prognostically distinct molecular subtypes and can be applied to diagnostic specimens (biopsy/curettings) enabling earlier informed decision-making. We have strictly adhered to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for the development of genomic biomarkers, and herein present the final validation step of a locked-down classifier before clinical application. Patients and methodsWe assessed a retrospective cohort of women from the Tübingen University Women’s Hospital treated for endometrial carcinoma between 2003 and 2013. Primary outcomes of overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival were evaluated for clinical, pathological, and molecular features. ResultsComplete clinical and molecular data were evaluable from 452 women. Patient age ranged from 29 to 93 (median 65) years, and 87.8% cases were endometrioid histotype. Grade distribution included 282 (62.4%) G1, 75 (16.6%) G2, and 95 (21.0%) G3 tumors. 276 (61.1%) patients had stage IA disease, with the remaining stage IB [89 (19.7%)], stage II [26 (5.8%)], and stage III/IV [61 (13.5%)]. ProMisE molecular classification yielded 127 (28.1%) MMR-D, 42 (9.3%) POLE, 55 (12.2%) p53abn, and 228 (50.4%) p53wt. ProMisE was a prognostic marker for progression-free (P=0.001) and disease-specific (P=0.03) survival even after adjusting for known risk factors. Concordance between diagnostic and surgical specimens was highly favorable; accuracy 0.91, κ 0.88. DiscussionWe have developed, confirmed, and now validated a pragmatic molecular classification tool (ProMisE) that provides consistent categorization of tumors and identifies four distinct prognostic molecular subtypes. ProMisE can be applied to diagnostic samples and thus could be used to inform surgical procedure(s) and/or need for adjuvant therapy. Based on the IOM guidelines this classifier is now ready for clinical evaluation through prospective clinical trials.

Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma prognostic immunohistochemistry markers in the context of molecular classification.

Molecular subclassification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) with Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) identifies four subtypes [DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutant, mismatch repair‐deficient, p53 wild‐type (wt), and p53 abnormal]. The aim of this study was to evaluate additional EC biomarkers in the context of these subtypes. Tissue microarrays encompassing 460 previously characterized ECs were assessed for L1‐cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM), progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, stathmin, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Associations with clinicopathological parameters, molecular subtype, and outcomes were determined. About 413 ECs (75% endometrioid, >15% serous) had complete data. L1CAM overexpression was found in 16%, associated with older age, lower body mass index (BMI), advanced stage, grade 3 (97%), non‐endometrioid histology (84%), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and ER‐negative, PR‐negative status. Tumours overexpressing L1CAM were associated with poor outcomes {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 3.35 [2.10–5.23] for disease‐specific survival [DSS], p < 0.0001}. PR positivity was associated with younger women, higher BMI, early stage (77% stage I), low grade (61%), endometrioid histology (90%) without LVSI or nodal disease, ER positivity (90%), p53wt tumours (55%), and favourable outcomes [HR (CI) 0.39 (0.25–0.62) for DSS, p < 0.0001]. ER positive tumours were early stage (73%), low grade, endometrioid histology, with improved DSS. Stathmin and PTEN IHC were not associated with outcomes. There was minimal agreement between IHC and mutation status for PTEN. L1CAM overexpression was significantly associated with the p53 abnormal molecular subtype, which accounted for more than 70% of the tumours overexpressing L1CAM. PR expression also correlated with molecular subtype, with most PR negative tumours being p53 abnormal. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that only ProMisE subtype [overall survival (OS), DSS, and progression‐free survival] and age (OS only) maintained an association with outcomes. The prognostic significance of the single biomarkers tested could be explained based on their being covariable with the ProMisE molecular subtype.

Assessment of DNA Ploidy in the ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer

ObjectiveWe sought to determine whether DNA ploidy correlates with the four molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma (EC) as determined using ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Methods90 cases of EC previously characterized by clinicopathological parameters, outcomes, and ProMisE molecular subgroup (POLE EDM, MMR-D, p53 wt or p53 abn) were assessed for DNA ploidy using image cytometry. Associations of ploidy with traditional clinicopathological parameters were also tested. ResultsAbnormal DNA ploidy status differed amongst the ProMisE groups (p<0.001) and was found in 80.9% (17/21) of p53 abn, 37.0% (10/27) of p53 wt, 28.6% (4/14) of POLE EDM and 14.3% (4/28) of MMR-D. Abnormal DNA content was significantly associated with lower BMI (p=0.034) and grade 3 tumors (p=0.001). In the entire cohort, abnormal DNA content was significantly associated with worse progression free survival (p=0.0094) but not disease specific survival (p=0.249) or overall survival (p=0.187). When examining ploidy within each of the ProMisE groups, abnormal DNA content correlated with worse overall survival (p=0.041) and progression free survival (p=0.011) in the MMR-D group. No statistically significant relationship was seen in the remaining 3 groups. ConclusionAbnormal DNA ploidy status did correlate with the molecular subgroups of EC; abnormal DNA content was seen in the large majority of p53 abn cases. Abnormal ploidy however was also seen in smaller numbers in the p53 wt, POLE EDM and MMR-D groups; therefore abnormal DNA content was not a specific marker for any one molecular group. The addition of ploidy to the ProMisE molecular categories conferred additional prognostic value within the MMR-D group, which merits further study.

Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer

Classification of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) by morphologic features is irreproducible and imperfectly reflects tumor biology. The authors developed the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE), a molecular classification system based on The Cancer Genome Atlas genomic subgroups, and sought to confirm both feasibility and prognostic ability in a new, large cohort of ECs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the presence or absence of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (to identify MMR deficiency [MMR-D]), sequencing for polymerase-ɛ (POLE) exonuclease domain mutations (POLE EDMs), and IHC for tumor protein 53 (p53) (wild type vs null/missense mutations; p53 wt and p53 abn, respectively) were performed on 319 new EC samples. Subgroups were characterized and assessed relative to outcomes. The prognostic ability of ProMisE was compared with that of current risk-stratification systems (European Society of Medical Oncology [ESMO]). ProMisE decision-tree classification achieved categorization of all cases and identified 4 prognostic subgroups with distinct overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival (P < .001). Tumors with POLE EDMs had the most favorable prognosis, and those with p53 abn the worst prognosis, and separation of the 2 middle survival curves (p53 wt and MMR-D) was observed. There were no significant differences in survival between the ESMO low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. ProMisE improved the ability to discriminate outcomes compared with ESMO risk stratification. There was substantial overlap (89%) between the p53 abn and high-risk ESMO subgroups; but, otherwise, there were no predictable associations between molecular and ESMO risk groups. Molecular classification of ECs can be achieved using clinically applicable methods and provides independent prognostic information beyond established clinicopathologic risk factors available at diagnosis. Consistent, biologically relevant categorization enables stratification for clinical trials and/or targeted therapy, identification of women who are at increased risk of having Lynch syndrome, and may guide clinical management. Cancer 2017;123:802-13. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Investigation of calcium transport and regulation system in human placenta

The Cancer Genome Atlas–based molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has the potential to better identify those patients whose disease is likely to behave differently than predicted when using traditional risk stratification; however, the optimal approach to molecular subtype assignment in routine practice remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two different widely available approaches to diagnosis the EC molecular subtype. EC specimens from 60 patients were molecularly subclassified using two different methods, by using the FoundationOne CDx next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel and using the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) classifier and performing immunostaining for mismatch repair proteins and p53. POLE mutation status was derived from FoundationOne results in both settings. Molecular classification based on ProMisE was successful for all 60 tumors. Microsatellite instability status could be determined based on the NGS panel results in 53 of 60 tumors, so ProMisE and NGS molecular subtype assignment could be directly compared for these 53 tumors. Molecular subtype diagnosis based on NGS and ProMisE was in agreement for 52 of 53 tumors. One tumor was microsatellite stable but showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression. Molecular subtype diagnosis of EC based on the NGS panel of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ECs and based primarily on immunostaining (ProMisE) yields identical results in 98.1% (52/53, kappa = 0.97) of cases. Although results obtained using these two approaches are comparable, each has advantages and disadvantages that will influence the choice of the method to be used in clinical practice.