Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment Research Articles

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Comparison of Risk Category Predictions of Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation Score-2 and 4 Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment Tools Among People Living with Human Immunodefficiency Virus in Türkiye.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality among people living with HIV (PLWH). We aimed to assess the prevalence of diagnosed CVD and the risk of CVD among PLWH using 5 different tools. This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in 20 tertiary centers in Türkiye between October 2021 and March 2022, among 1425 PLWH aged 40-75 years. About 82.7% were male, with a median age of 51. Web-based tools for each score were used for CVD risk calculations. Of 1425 PLWH enrolled, 10.8% had confirmed CVD, and 1132 had their risk scores evaluated. Of those participants, 42.8% had a higher risk of CVD (10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD risk score (ASCVD) above 7.5%), and according to the European Society of Cardiology systemic coronary risk evaluation 2 (SCORE2), 71.7% had a high- to very high-risk rate. The agreement between various CVD risk tools varied, with Framingham heart study risk score (FRS), modified FRS, data collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs (DAD), and SCORE2 for high-risk countries showing overall agreement rates of 82%, 94%, 91%, and 36%, respectively, compared to ASCVD. According to the 2021 European and 2019 American Cardiology guidelines, 75.3% and 47.1% of PLWH would be eligible for lipid-lowering agents, respectively. The diagnosed CVD prevalence highlighted the importance of monitoring cardiovascular health and comorbidities in this population. SCORE2 identified a greater number of individuals at high/very high risk compared to other prediction tools. The implementation of CVD prevention through lipid-lowering therapy was far from desired levels in our cohort.

Assessing the relative importance of vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular health.

Previous research has suggested a potential link between vitamin D (VD) deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, although the findings have been inconsistent. This study investigates the association between VD deficiency and cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the context of established CVD risk factors. We utilized a Random Forest model to predict both CVD and VD deficiency risks, using a dataset of 1,078 observations from a rural Chinese population. Feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to discern the impact of various risk factors on the model's output. The results showed that the model for CVD prediction achieved a high accuracy of 87%, demonstrating robust performance across precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Conversely, the VD deficiency prediction model exhibited suboptimal performance, with an accuracy of 52% and lower precision, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance analysis indicated that traditional risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio significantly influenced CVD risk, collectively contributing to 70% of the model's predictive power. Although VD deficiency was associated with an increased risk of CVD, its importance in predicting CVD risk was notably low. Similarly, for VD deficiency prediction, CVD risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, glucose levels, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index emerged as influential features. However, the overall predictive performance of the VD deficiency prediction model was weak (52%), indicating the absence of VD deficiency-related risk factors. Ablation experiments confirmed the relatively lower importance of VD deficiency in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, the SHAP partial dependence plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between VD levels and CVD risk. In conclusion, while VD deficiency appears directly or indirectly associated with increased CVD risk, its relative importance within predictive models is considerably lower when compared to other risk factors. These findings suggest that VD deficiency may not warrant primary focus in CVD risk assessment and prevention strategies, however, further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between VD deficiency and CVD risk.

Calling for Action: The Need of Large-Scale Cohorts to Uncover the Cardiovascular Risk in Non-Sleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Since randomized clinical trials currently do not support continuous positive airway pressure treatment of asymptomatic obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) we proposed the Obesity, Symptoms, and CARdiovascular assessment (OSCAR) algorithm to aid clinicians in the management of asymptomatic low-risk moderate-severe OSA, focusing on weight loss, symptoms and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Exploiting the data of the Sleep Heart Health Study we selected subjects with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 Kg/m2, no history of CVD or sleepiness and compared 552 patients with moderate-severe OSA (OSCAR(-)) to 916 individuals without OSA (No-OSA). After adjusting for age, gender, and BMI, there was no significant difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between OSCAR(-) and No-OSA (1.05; 95%CI 0.81-1.37). The study suggests that low-risk moderate-severe OSA patients may not have a greater risk of MACE compared to those without OSA and highlights the need for further research on this topic.

Neutrophil-to-High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio (NHR) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as prognostic biomarkers for incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A comparison study

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain a leading cause of global mortality, with atherosclerosis and inflammation playing pivotal roles in their development. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (NHR) have emerged as potential biomarkers for assessing CVD risk. In this community-based cohort study conducted in Taiwan, involving 3278 participants, we investigated the associations between NHR, NLR, and the risks of CVD and all-cause mortality. Our findings revealed that both NHR and NLR were effective in identifying individuals at high risk for CVD. However, when assessing their joint effect, NHR alone demonstrated a stronger predictive value for CVD prognosis than NLR or the combination of both markers. Furthermore, NLR alone showed potential as a predictor of all-cause mortality when compared with NHR alone or in combination with NLR and NHR. These findings underscore the complex interplay between inflammation and lipid metabolism in the pathogenesis of CVD. While NHR shows promise as a cost-effective tool for CVD risk assessment, NLR emerges potential as a prognostic marker for mortality. Further research is warranted to explore the dynamic changes in these markers and their implications for clinical practice.

Aortic-Femoral Stiffness Gradient and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults.

The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient, calculated as the ratio of lower-limb pulse-wave velocity (PWV) to central (aortic) PWV, is a promising tool for assessing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but whether it predicts incident CVD is unknown. We examined the association of the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient measures carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by carotid-femoral PWV) and the heart-femoral stiffness gradient (femoral-ankle PWV divided by heart-femoral PWV), as well as PWV, with incident CVD (coronary disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality among 3109 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort (age, 75±5 years; carotid-femoral PWV, 11.5±3.0 m/s), free of CVD. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs. Over a median 7.4-year follow-up, there were 322 cases of incident CVD and 410 deaths. In fully adjusted models, only top quartiles of carotid-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.03-1.97]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.08-2.05]) and heart-femoral stiffness gradient (quartile 4: HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.27-2.48]; and quartile 3: HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.00-2.00]) were significantly associated with a greater risk of incident CVD. Only high aortic stiffness in combination with low lower-limb stiffness was significantly associated with incident CVD (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.06-2.02]) compared with the referent low aortic stiffness and high lower-limb stiffness. No PWVs were significantly associated with incident CVD. No exposures were associated with all-cause mortality. The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may enhance CVD risk assessment in older adults in whom the predictive capacity of traditional risk factors and PWV are attenuated.

A-001 The Postprandial Levels of the Metabolites in the Metaorganismal Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Pathway are Altered in A Diet-, Microbe-, and Sex-Specific Manner

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in developed countries. Elevated levels of the gut-microbe-associated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) have been associated with increased risk for CVD mortality in many large independent studies. In fact, large laboratory corporations such as Labcorp and Quest Diagnostic now offer TMAO diagnostic tests for the assessment of CVD risk and as a marker for disease-associated dysbiosis, using samples obtained from fasting patients. Although the strong association between TMAO levels and CVD risk has been established in fasting blood samples, here we are investigating the potential for a single meal to dynamically alter TMAO-related metabolites based on sex, diverse dietary substrates, and microbial influences. Methods 35 healthy participants were randomized to one of four study groups with approximately 8-9 subjects in each arm. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive a three-day broad spectrum antibiotic regimen (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and vancomycin) while the others received no antibiotics. These two groups were further subdivided into a group consuming a highly processed meal (originating from local fast food restaurants) or alternatively a whole food meal (containing a variety of fruits, vegetables, and healthy fiber). Blood samples were taken at baseline (after an overnight fast), and then postprandially at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours after meal ingestion. Targeted plasma metabolites were quantified using a stable isotope dilution, liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method Results While plasma TMAO levels between food groups did not change significantly within the total cohort, there were clear individualized responses to either highly processed or whole food meals. Separation based on sex showed that TMAO levels were significantly reduced in females at 6 hours but remained steady in males for both food groups. Particularly, in the processed food group, TMAO levels were significantly lower in females than males at the 6-hour time point. Neither of these observations held true for TMAO precursors choline, carnitine, or betaine. However, plasma levels of a dietary precursor for TMAO, γ-butyrobetaine, showed clear diet-microbe-host interactions. For males in the processed food group, plasma γ-butyrobetaine levels were significantly increased in subjects on broad spectrum antibiotics. Conclusions Our results show the postprandial levels of TMAO, and its nutrient precursors dynamically change in a diet-, microbe-, and sex-dependent manner. These findings provide new insights into the postprandial levels of TMAO-related metabolites and may inform precision nutritional approaches in those who could benefit from TMAO-lowering strategies.

A-223 Direct LDL or not Direct-LDL, that is the question

Abstract Background Management of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk is dependent on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels; therefore LDL-C serves as the marker for the assessment of CVD risk and the focus of lipid lowering treatment. The gold standard reference method for measurement of LDL-C is beta-quantification. We compared calculated LDL-C with Friedewald (F-LDL-C), Martin-Hopkins (M-LDL-C) and Sampson (S-LDL-C) equations versus LDL-C directly measured (D-LDL-C). In CVD management also cholesterol ratios are evaluated. TC/HDL is associated with morbidity and mortality in the general population. Furthermore, several studies have stated that high triglycerides (TG) levels and low HDL-C (TG/HDL ratio) could function as an atherogenic index. Methods 11399 samples were analyzed on Siemens Atellica Solution® for the lipid profile determination measuring Total Cholesterol (TC), D-LDL-C, HDL-C and TG. In the absence of additional clinical parameters, based on desirable levels for LDL-C recommended by guidelines, CVD risk was evaluated by assigning to LDL-C a cut-off of 100 mg/dL. In presence of misclassifications, we used two other parameters to assess LDL-C results: TG/HDL-C ratio and CT/HDL-C. Results Patients cohort had a mean age of 57.7 (±16.8) years of which 53% (age=58.6, ±15.9) were males and 47% (age=56.5, ±17.8 years) were females. Of these, the 57.7% were outpatients and 42.3% inpatients (42.1% of infectious diseases - 24.4% of the cardiovascular department). Data about LDL-C misclassification and ratio data parameters are shown in table 1. Discordant patients for D-LDL-C vs F-LDL-C are 8.5%, that of D-LDL-C vs M-LDL-C are 7.7% and D-LDL-C vs S-LDL-C are 7.2%. Conclusions Is known that LDL plays a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Accurate estimation of LDL-C is a fundamental point for the stratification of CVD risk and the achievement of the therapeutic goal; however, we are still uncertain about the best and accurate way to measure it.

A-224 Non HDL Cholesterol: could be e new cardiovascular disease risk stratification factor?

Abstract Background A worldwide study demonstrated that among all modifiable risk factors of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) to the abnormal cholesterol levels is attributable the highest risk of events. LDL-C is considered the most important lipoprotein risk factor. Some recent epidemiologic studies have suggested that non-HDL cholesterol (N-HDL-C) may be superior to LDL-C for identifying CVD risk. N-HDL-C is easily calculated from a lipid profile and represents all apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins. Recent guidelines recommend LDL-C as a primary indicator and non-HDL-C as secondary. Moreover, cholesterol ratios are useful to stratification; the TC/HDL-C is associated with morbidity and mortality in the general population; in addition, several studies have stated that high triglycerides (TG) levels and low HDL-C are associated with increased risk and could function as atherogenic index. Methods 11399 samples were analyzed on Atellica Solution for the determination of Total Cholesterol (TC), D-LDL-C, HDL-C and TG. In the absence of clinical parameters, based on the desirable levels recommended by the guidelines, CVD risk was evaluated by assigning a cut-off of 100 and 130 mg/dL for D-LDL-C and N-HDL-C respectively Results Patients cohort mean (±SD) for CT, D-LDL, HDL, TG and N-HDL-C are 180 mg/dL (±43.2), 113 mg/dL (± 38.5), 51.7 mg/dL (±15.6), 116 mg/dL (±73.8), 128 mg/dL (±39.5) respectively. Of the examined patients, the 57.7% were outpatients, 21.8% of infectious diseases and 12.6% of the cardiovascular department. Data about D-LDL-C and N-HDL-C comparison, evaluated on discordant patients, are shown in table 1. Conclusions The data obtained from evaluation would seem to confirm hypothesis according to which non-HDL cholesterol would have a greater power in the identification of CVD risk because of cholesterol ratios are suggestive of increased risk for patients with an LDL-C&amp;lt;100 and N-LDL-C&amp;gt;130 mg/dL. Further studies assessing CVD risk, not only through laboratory data, are necessary to confirm this supposition.

External Validation of the American Heart Association PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease Risk Equations

The American Heart Association's Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) equations were developed to extend and improve on previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessments for the purpose of treatment initiation and patient-clinician communication. To assess prognostic capabilities, calibration, and discrimination of the PREVENT equations in a study sample representative of the noninstitutionalized, US general population. This prognostic study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999 to 2010 data cycles. Participants included adults for whom 10-year follow-up data were available. Data curation and analyses took place from December 2023 through May 2024. Primary measures were risk estimated by the PREVENT equations, as well as risk estimates from the previous Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs). The primary outcome was composite CVD-related mortality at 10 years of follow-up. Additional analyses compared the PREVENT equations against the PCEs. Model discrimination was assessed with receiver-operator characteristic curves and Harrell C statistic from proportional hazard regression; model calibration was determined as the slope of predicted versus observed risk. The study cohort, accounting for NHANES complex survey design, consisted of 172.9 million participants (mean age, 45.0 years [95% CI, 44.6-45.4 years]; 52.1% women [95% CI, 51.5%-52.6%]). In analyses adjusted for the NHANES survey design, a 1% increase in PREVENT risk estimates was statistically significantly associated with increased CVD mortality risk (hazard ratio, 1.090; 95% CI, 1.087-1.094). PREVENT risk scores demonstrated excellent discrimination (C statistic, 0.890; 95% CI, 0.881-0.898) but moderate underfitting of the model (calibration slope, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21). PREVENT risk models performed statistically significantly better than the PCEs, as assessed by the net reclassification index (0.093; 95% CI, 0.073-0.115). In this prognostic study of the PREVENT equations, PREVENT risk estimates demonstrated excellent discrimination and only modest discrepancies in calibration. These findings provided evidence supporting utilization of the PREVENT equations for application in the intended population as suggested by the American Heart Association.

Association Between Family Income, Subclinical Myocardial Injury, and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population.

Both low family income and subclinical myocardial injury (SCMI) are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. However, the impact of their joint association on CVD mortality is unclear. This analysis from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included 6805 participants (age 59.1 ± 13.4 years, 52.3% women, and 49.8% White) free of CVD at baseline. Family income was assessed using the poverty-income ratio (PIR) and categorized into low (PIR < 1), middle (PIR = 1-4), and high (PIR > 4) income. A validated ECG-based cardiac infarction injury score (CIIS) ≥ 10 was considered positive for SCMI. CVD mortality was determined using the National Death Index. Cox-proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the associations of family income and SCMI, separately and jointly, with CVD mortality. A total of 1782 (26.2%) participants had SCMI at baseline. During a median follow-up of 18.2 years, 856 (12.6%) events of CVD mortality occurred. In separate multivariable Cox models, SCMI (vs. no SCMI) and middle- and low-income (vs. high-income) were each associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 1.34 [1.16-1.54], 1.44 [1.16-1.78], and 1.59 [1.22-2.07], respectively). Compared to high-income participants without SCMI, those with low-income and SCMI had an increased risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 2.17 [1.53-3.08]). The multiplicative interaction between PIR and SCMI was not significant (p = 0.054). Lower family income and SCMI are associated with CVD mortality, and their concomitant presence is associated with the highest risk. Family income and SCMI may help in the individualized assessment of CVD risk.

Blood-based HYAL2 methylation as a potential marker for the preclinical detection of coronary heart disease and stroke

BackgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke have become the leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity worldwide. Therefore, sensitive and accurate biomarkers for early detection of CHD and stroke are urgently needed for effective prevention and treatment. We aim to investigate the association between blood-based HYAL2 methylation and the risk of CHD and stroke in Chinese population.MethodsIn a prospective nested case–control study comprising 171 CHD cases, 139 stroke cases, who developed the diseases after recruitment and 356 controls who remained healthy during the 2.5 years of follow-up time, the methylation level of HYAL2 in the peripheral blood was quantified using mass spectrometry, and the association was calculated by logistic regression adjusted for covariant.ResultsSignificant association between HYAL2 methylation in the peripheral blood and increased risk of preclinical CHD and stroke were identified [odds ratios (ORs) per − 10% methylation: 1.35–1.64, p ≤ 0.045 for HYAL2_CpG_1, HYAL2_CpG_2 and HYAL2_CpG_3 in CHD; ORs per − 10% methylation: 0.76–1.64, p ≤ 0.033 for HYAL2_CpG_2 and HYAL2_CpG_4 in stroke]. The association in CHD was further enhanced by female gender, younger age (< 70 years old), without the history of hypertension and cancer. The combination of four HYAL2 methylation sites showed an effective discrimination of CHD and stroke cases without hypertension from controls [area under curve (AUC) = 0.78 and 0.75, respectively].ConclusionsThis study presents a strong association of altered HYAL2 methylation in peripheral blood with preclinical CHD and stroke, providing a novel biomarker for risk assessment and early detection of cardiovascular diseases.

Elevated remnant cholesterol as a potential predictor for cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains inadequately defined. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the predictive value of remnant cholesterol (RC) for assessing CVD risk in RA patients. Plasma RC levels were measured in 114 RA patients and 41 healthy controls, calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL-C and LDL-C. These levels were further analyzed using 1H-NMR lipid/metabolomics. Meanwhile, the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) assessed RA activity. RC levels were significantly elevated in RA patients (19.0 mg/dl, p < 0.001) compared to healthy controls (14.5 mg/dl). Furthermore, RC levels were significantly elevated at 37.4 mg/dl in patients who experienced cardiovascular event (CVE) compared to 17.4 mg/dl in those without CVE (p < 0.001). To enhance the precision and reliability of RC measurements, RC concentrations were further validated using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between RC levels and DAS28. Multivariate analysis identified RC as a significant predictor of CVE (odds ratio = 1.82, p = 0.013). ROC curve analysis revealed superior predictive capability of RC for CVE (AUC = 0.919, p < 0.001) compared to LDL-C (AUC = 0.669, p = 0.018), with a high sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 82.1%. Elevated RC levels demonstrate greater accuracy in predicting CVE occurrence in RA patients compared to traditional measures such as LDL-C. These findings suggest that elevated RC levels may serve as a novel predictor for occurrence of CVE in RA patients, facilitating early intervention strategies based on the risk stratification.

General practitioner support needs to implement cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management guidelines: Qualitative interviews.

Previous research identified numerous barriers to general practitioner (GP) use of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk guidelines, and it is unclear whether these issues have been resolved. This study explored recent GP experiences. Interviews with 18 GPs in an Australian state with relatively few COVID-19 cases in 2021 were transcribed and coded using a framework analysis approach, with data mapped to five previously identified CVD risk assessment strategies: absolute risk focused, absolute risk adjusted, clinical judgement, passive disregard and active disregard. GPs used various CVD risk calculators to inform clinical decision making, but there were concerns about accuracy, the role of extra risk factors and less 'personalised' assessment. GPs addressed these concerns by requesting additional tests, subjectively adjusting the CVD risk assessment to account for extra risk factors and focusing on individual risk factors. Many barriers to CVD risk assessment guidelines remain. GP support is needed to implement revised guidelines.

O84 BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT VIA IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY: AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED PROOF-OF-CONCEPT

Objective: Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is crucial for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment decision-making, and monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. Unfortunately, the gold-standard, cuff-based BP measurement suffer from inaccuracies and discomfort. As a result, continuous, cuff-less, and non-invasive BP assessment methods are merging as promising alternatives. This study is the first to comprehensively assess impedance cardiography (ICG) for Machine Learning enabled BP measurement. Methods: We analysed ICG data from 71 young and healthy adults. Nine different Machine Learning algorithms were evaluated for their BP estimation performance. Accuracy measures comprised mean difference, standard deviation, Limits of Agreement, mean absolute error, and root mean squared error. Additionally, the B-Score was calculated to evaluate the “true”, relative performance of the best-performing model. Results: The Multi-Linear Regression model showed the highest performance (mean difference = -0.01, r = 0.82) for systolic BP. The Support Vector Regressor model achieved the best results (mean difference = 0.15, r = 0.51) for diastolic BP. Both models exhibited positive B-Scores, indicative of their predictive capability. All tested models’ estimations correlated with both systolic and diastolic reference BP (r &gt; 0.72 / r &gt; 0.34, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: The study highlights the potential of ICG based Machine Learning algorithms for accurately estimating arterial BP. Such algorithms can provide accurate and continuous BP data. This offers the possibility of enhancing patient care, timely diagnostics, and treatment decision-making. Our approach is especially promising for post-surgical and intensive care environments.

Novel Metabolic Indicators and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Hypertension: A Primary-care Cohort Study

Background and AimsData are limited on whether several easily measured indices serve as effective tools for Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment in hypertensive patients. This study aimed to assess the associations of metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and visceral adiposity index (VAI) with CVD risk in hypertensive patients. Methods and ResultsOur data were drawn from the medical records of primary-care institutions in China. The present study included 306,680 individuals with hypertension attending primary healthcare centers. Cox regression analyses were applied to assess the associations of novel metabolic indicators with the risk of CVD. During a median follow-up of 1.98 years, 5820 participants developed CVD. When comparing with the lowest quartile of the indices, the highest quartile of METS-IR, LAP, and VAI was associated with 1.25-fold (95% CI: 1.16-1.35), 1.15-fold (95% CI: 1.05-1.25), and 1.19-fold (95% CI: 1.10-1.28) risk of CVD after adjusting for potential confounders. ConclusionThis study provided additional evidence that novel metabolic indicators like METS-IR, LAP, and VAI were associated with the risk of CVD. These results suggest that proactive assessment of visceral adiposity and insulin resistance could be helpful for the effective clinical management of the hypertensive population.

Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Considerations on Assessment and Management.

In the context of holistic therapeutic practices, the cardiovascular risk of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) needs to be addressed as a major factor of compromised disease prognosis and increased mortality. The elevated prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by more than twofold in RA has been attributed, inter alia, to chronic inflammation exacerbating arterial stiffness, increased onset of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus, sedentary lifestyle, and antirheumatic drug complications. CVD risk in RA can be currently assessed by practitioners through accessible adapted calculators, but it remains problematic as their diagnostic accuracy is not superior to calculators designed for the general population. Implementation of guideline-oriented personalised interventions remains the cornerstone for cardiovascular risk management in RA. Remarkably, there is lack of a consortium that brings together different health care providers engaged in the care of patients with RA (e.g., rheumatologists, cardiologists, general practitioners, etc), to guide cardiovascular risk assessment and management. This narrative review aims at providing an overview of current CVD risk assessment and management options, highlighting their pivotal role in the comprehensive treatment of RA patients.

P187 CO-DESIGNING AN INTERVENTION FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT AFTER HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY

Background and objective: Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are at two-to-fourfold increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) within 10 years post-pregnancy. Despite clinical practice guidelines recommending general practitioners (GPs) for ongoing CVD preventative care, no intervention strategies exist within primary care aimed at improving risk assessment or management for women after HDP. This study aimed to co-design an intervention to enhance the implementation of CVD risk assessment and management following HDP for primary care settings in Australia. Methods: Researchers used the Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) framework and conducted five co-design meetings with the investigative team and end-users. Meetings were informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework for intervention development and incorporated research findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis, surveys, and an online discussion. Data from activities and audio recordings following each meeting were analysed iteratively to inform ongoing intervention development. Results: The 18 end-users included women with lived HDP experience (n=8), obstetricians (n=2), midwives (n=5), and GPs (n=3). The target priorities were to improve communication between hospital staff and GPs following HDP occurrence and increase knowledge of GPs and women regarding CVD prevention post-HDP. Part 1 of the intervention is delivered within the hospital setting via physical resources to address communication gaps between hospital and primary care providers for women after post-HDP. Part 2 is delivered via an update to existing GP education platforms and resources for use within GP consultations to provide education for women and GPs on CVD prevention post-HDP. Conclusions: The IKT and BCW frameworks played a crucial role in development of a tailored intervention aimed at bridging gaps in current primary care practice and enhancing implementation of CVD risk assessment and management for women following HDP. This an important step in addressing CVD risk in women of childbearing age.

Absolute cardiovascular risk assessment using ‘real world’ clinic blood pressures compared to standardized unobserved and ambulatory methods: an observational study

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is recommended for absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. However, in ‘real-world’ settings, clinic BP measurement is unstandardised and less reliable compared to more rigorous methods but the impact for absolute CVD risk assessment is unknown. This study aimed to determine the difference in absolute CVD risk assessment using real-world clinic BP compared to standardised BP methods. Participants were patients (n = 226, 59 ± 15 years; 58% female) with hypertension referred to a BP clinic for assessment. ‘Real-world’ clinic BP was provided by the referring doctor. All participants had unobserved automated office BP (AOBP) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) measured at the clinic. Absolute CVD risk was calculated (Framingham) using systolic BP from the referring doctor (clinic BP), AOBP and ABPM, with agreement assessed by Kappa statistic. Clinic systolic BP was 18 mmHg than AOBP and daytime ABPM and 22 mmHg higher than 24-h ABPM (p < 0.001). Subsequently, absolute CVD risk scores using clinic BP were higher compared to AOBP, daytime ABPM and 24-h ABPM (10.4 ± 8.1%, 7.8 ± 6.4%, 7.8 ± 6.3%, and 7.3 ± 6.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). As a result, more participants were classified as high CVD risk using clinic BP (n = 89, 40%) compared with AOBP (n = 44, 20%) daytime ABPM (n = 38, 17%) and 24-h ABPM (n = 38, 17%) (p < 0.001) with weak agreement in risk classification (κ = 0.57[0.45–0.69], κ = 0.52[0.41–0.64] and κ = 0.55[0.43–0.66], respectively). Real-world clinic BP was higher and classified twice as many participants at high CVD risk compared to AOBP or ABPM. Given the challenges to high-quality BP measurement in clinic, more rigorous BP measurement methods are needed for absolute CVD risk assessment.

Low prevalence of testing for apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein (a) in the real world

ObjectiveApolipoprotein B (ApoB) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) are predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; therefore, current recommendations for CVD risk assessment and management advocate that patients receive testing for ApoB and Lp(a) in addition to the standard lipid panel. However, US guidelines around ApoB and Lp(a) testing have evolved over time and vary slightly by expert committee. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the number of insured individuals in the USA who received any component of a lipid test, or ApoB and/or Lp(a) testing, during 2019. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis to estimate the prevalence of any component of a lipid test, ApoB, and/or Lp(a) in the USA using four different claim data sources (including Medicaid, Medicare, and commercially insured enrollees). Prevalence estimates were age-, sex-, payor-, and region-standardized to the 2019 US Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey. We also described the clinical profile of patients who received lipid testing between 2019 and 2021 (cohort analysis) in Optum claims database. Enrollees were grouped into four non-mutually exclusive cohorts based on their completion of any component of the lipid panel, ApoB, Lp(a), or ApoB and Lp(a). ResultsIn the prevalence cohort, over a third (38 %) of insured adults in the USA underwent testing for any component of a lipid panel in 2019. This proportion was higher for individuals aged ≥65 years compared to younger adults (62% vs 31 %). The proportion of ApoB and Lp(a) testing represented only <1 % of testing for any component of a lipid panel. In the cohort analysis, we found that lipid testing increased with age and comorbidities. ConclusionThese data should be considered by guideline-issuing agencies and organizations to develop education campaigns encouraging more frequent use of tests beyond the standard lipid panel.

Integrating cardiovascular risk assessment into mobile low-dose CT lung screenings in rural Appalachia: A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between lung cancer risk, coronary artery calcium burden, and cardiovascular risk reduction strategies

ObjectiveMobile low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung screenings are part of an outreach program in rural Appalachia to detect early lung cancer. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on LDCT can identify calcium deposits in coronary arteries and can prompt consideration of risk modification for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. It is not known if Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS) scoring correlates with CAC scores. There is no clear guidance for patients undergoing LDCT screenings to receive follow-up regarding CAC or prevention of associated CVD risk. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of mobile LDCT LCS in adults with no known history of CVD. CT images were obtained at 100 kVp with a slice thickness of 3 mm. Agatston CAC scoring was performed retroactively. Lung-RADS scores were categorized as: Negative (1), Benign (2), Probably Benign (3), and Suspicious (4). CAC scoring was grouped as 0, 1–100, 101–399, and ≥400. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were utilized. ResultsA total of 526 LDCT screenings were included. Over 54 % of patients had coronary calcification on LDCT LCS. 161 patients (30.6 %) had a CAC score of ≥100 and 75 patients (14.3 %) had a CAC score ≥400. Of patients with a CAC score ≥100, 7.5 % received referrals for follow-up after the LDCT screen and 9.3 % had additional cardiac testing. Of those with a CAC score ≥100 not already on a statin (45.3 %) and not already on aspirin (63.3 %), few were started within 3 months of LDCT for prevention (8.2 % and 5.9 % respectively). Among patients with a Lung-RADS score of 4, 17 % had a CAC score >400, whereas only 12 % with a Lung-RADS score of 1 fell into the same CAC category. Higher Lung-RADS scores correlated with fewer patients with CAC of 0. A significant correlation was observed between higher Lung-RADS scores and elevated CAC scores (p = 0.02). ConclusionIn patients with no CVD history, coronary artery calcification was frequently identified on mobile LDCT lung screenings in rural communities. Patients with higher probabilities of malignant lung nodules may also be at increased risk for significant coronary artery disease. Calcium scoring from LDCT screenings allowed for simultaneous assessment of lung cancer and CVD risk. Unfortunately, few referrals or CVD prevention medications were initiated. Awareness of CAC score utility, follow-up for identified coronary calcifications, and consideration of primary prevention medications when indicated, would be beneficial in patients undergoing LDCT lung screenings, especially in rural areas with limited healthcare access.