INTRODUCTION: Elective paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is a relatively safe intervention. Current guidelines recommend an expectant approach toward asymptomatic PEH, but many patients present with acute symptoms requiring emergent surgery. We quantified the longitudinal morbidity and healthcare use after emergent PEHR relative to elective cases nationwide. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing repair for symptomatic PEH with follow-up >6 months were identified using the Nationwide Readmission Database (2010 to 2019). Postoperative complication, mortality, unplanned readmission, reintervention, and cost within 1 year were compared by acuity (emergent vs elective) using risk-adjusted regression modeling. The association of outcomes by approach (minimally invasive [MI-PEHR] vs open-PEHR) was also explored. RESULTS: There were 43,243 PEHR cases: 76.0% emergent and 78.2% MI-PEHR. Most undergoing emergent PEHR were aged >65 years (58.5%), female (71.3%), and underwent operation at high-volume centers (>p75th 60.1%). Risk-adjusted analyses showed increased complication (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14 [1.04 to 1.24]), readmission, (HR 1.14 [1.03 to 1.26]), and cost for emergent PEHR (Ref. elective; all p < 0.05; Table 1). Within risk-adjusted regression models, emergent open-PEHR was associated with increased complication (HR 1.27 [1.2 to 1.36]), mortality (HR 1.25 [1.02 to 1.54]), and costs (Ref. MI-PEHR; (all p < 0.01). Estimated national aggregate cost for index admission and subsequent hospitalization after PEHR was $257 million/y with 81.4% related to emergent cases.Table 1CONCLUSION: Emergent PEHR is associated with increased morbidity and healthcare use due to postoperative complication and readmission, but MI-PEHR is associated with decreased morbidity even in the emergent setting. The need to prevent emergent cases should warrant further work aimed at clarifying the current indications for elective PEHR.