Rise Of CA125 Research Articles

Use of CA-125 in clinical trial evaluation of new therapeutic drugs for ovarian cancer.

##### Ovarian Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Ovarian cancer is the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in women and accounts for the highest mortality rate of all of the gynecological cancers [(1)][1] . Despite aggressive treatment via radical surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy,

2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-[formula omitted]-glucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Objective. Theaim of the study was to investigate the role of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.Methods. One hundred six FDG PET scans performed in 54 patients in the follow-up after cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy of ovarian cancer were reevaluated. Fifty-eight scans were performed in patients with suspected recurrence and 48 scans in patients who were clinically disease free. Thirty-seven PET scans were validated by histology and 66 studies by a median follow-up of 22 months in disease-free patients or 12 months in patients with recurrent disease. Three scans were validated by concordant positive findings of tumor marker CA125, computed tomography, and FDG PET.Results. FDG PET correctly identified recurrent disease in 73/88 cases. PET ruled out recurrent disease in 15/18 cases. The sensitivity and specificity for PET were 83 and 83%, respectively. In patients with suspected disease, sensitivity was 94% compared to 65% in patients judged clinically disease free. The sensitivity of PET was 96% if suspicion of recurrence was based on a rise of CA125 alone. PET preceded the conventional diagnosis by a median of 6 months in patients judged clinically free of disease. The median relapse-free interval after a negative PET scan was 20 months.Conclusion. FDG PET provides the chance to detect recurrent ovarian cancer at an earlier stage during follow-up. Patients with a negative PET scan have a longer relapse-free interval than patients with a positive PET scan.

Tumor Marker Trends in Asymptomatic Women at Risk for Ovarian Cancer: Relevance for Ovarian Cancer Screening

The purpose of our study was to examine single and serial determinations of five biomarkers in asymptomatic women at risk for epithelial ovarian cancer to define median values and trends in a cancer-free cohort. Women were enrolled in the Gilda Radner Ovarian Cancer Detection program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California from July 1, 1991, to July 1, 1993. Biomarkers studied include CA-125, LASA, DM-70K, UGP, and HER-2. Biomarker values that were analyzed included those obtained on the first patient visit and in a subset of values evaluated at 6-month follow-ups. A total of 590 women were included in the study; 425 were premenopausal and 165 were postmenopausal. No one in this study group has developed ovarian cancer within a 12-month follow-up period. Postmenopausal women had significantly lower values for CA-125 (12 vs 19 U/ml, P = 0.0001) and higher values of LASA (16.6 vs 15.4 mg/dl, P = 0.0001), DM/70K (11 vs 0 U/ml, P < 0.001), UGP (3.3 vs 0.3 U/ml, P < 0.001), and HER-2 (12 vs 11 U/ml, P = 0.009) than premenopausal women. Less than 5% of the women had elevated tumor marker values on both screens except for CA-125, where 15% of women studied had two consecutive visits with elevated values (> 35 U/ml). Two women demonstrated an exponential rise in CA-125 between visits. Premenopausal women differ in median biomarker values compared to postmenopausal women. Elevations in single tumor markers, combinations of markers, and exponential increases of markers have all produced false-positive results for ovarian cancer within the 12-month follow-up period. Exponential increases produced the smallest false positive rate (n = 2), but further study and follow-up are needed to determine the efficacy of these tests in ovarian cancer screening.

The effect of surgery on the serum concentration of CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

The tumour-associated antigen CA125 provides an adequate tumour marker when measured in the serum of women with advanced adenocarcinoma of the ovary, having a sensitivity of around 850/0. The specificity of the test is in excessof 990/0 in healthy control subjects.' Serial CA125 concentrations are often used to assess the effect of therapy in patients with such tumours. There is increasing evidence that a rise in CA125 levels may be due not only to progressive tumour growth but also as a result of interference with mesothelial cells from non-malignant stimuli.? In patients with ovarian adenocarcinoma we have often seen a small, but significant, transient rise in CA125 concentration following abdominopelvic surgery. This rise, occurring within the first few days after surgery, seems to be unrelated to tumour progression and appears to occur as a result of disturbance to the peritoneum itself. Such post-operative rises may clearly interfere with the clinical usefulness of the assay. We have investigated this problem by measuring the serum levels of this marker in a series of women undergoing primary cyto-reductive surgery for epithelial ovarian adenocarcinoma. In the six patients studied a laparotomy and tumour debulking was performed. In two of these patients surgery involved extensive retro-peritoneal dissection. CA125 concentrations were assayed using the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) from CIS (UK) Ltd (High Wycombe, UK). Serum CA125 was measured at the commencement of surgery, daily in the immediate post-operative period and weekly following discharge from hospital. In each case a rise in CA125 was observed in the early post-operative period and reached a peak within 48 h following surgery before falling again. A

Correlation between peripheral CA-125 levels and ovarian activity

Serum CA-125 concentrations were measured at three different times in normal cycles, pill-suppressed cycles, and cycles stimulated for intrauterine insemination (IUI) or oocyte retrieval, i.e., (1) during the first half of the cycle, (2) at midcycle or at the moment of oocyte retrieval, and (3) the second half of the cycle. Significant variations of serum CA-125 concentrations were not seen during the cycle in normally cycling women or in women taking oral contraceptives: mean +/- SD 28.9 +/- 13.3 U/mL and 26.9 +/- 11.3 U/mL, respectively. In patients stimulated for in vitro fertilization, luteal phase CA-125 levels (60.6 +/- 38 U/mL) were significantly higher than during stimulation (21.5 +/- 5.9 U/mL) or at oocyte retrieval (19.6 +/- 6.4 U/mL). In stimulated cycles for IUI, without laparoscopy or follicular puncture, a comparable rise of CA-125 was observed in the luteal phase (49.6 +/- 37.8 U/mL). However, in patients undergoing laparoscopic sterilization, serum CA-125 concentrations before and after laparoscopy were not significantly different (22.8 +/- 6.3 U/mL and 25 +/- 4.2 U/mL, respectively).