The concept of compressible inclusion was introduced over two decades ago and earlier studies revealed that providing geofoam compressible inclusion between a retaining structure and backfill significantly reduces lateral pressure. Most studies are either 1-g model or numerical tests, and field tests are necessary to better understand and confirm previous research findings. In the present study, parametric tests are performed on a 6 m high concrete cantilever to check the effectiveness of inclusion on a rigid-yielding wall. The wall is instrumented to measure earth pressure, wall deflection, and geofoam compression during the backfilling. Field tests are performed with EPS15_500 (i.e., geofoam density of 15 kg/m3 and 500 mm thickness), EPS15_1000, EPS20_500, and the results are compared with the control test without inclusion. A developed numerical model is validated with the field results to determine the pressure variation for different cases. EPS15_1000 shows maximum reduction in lateral pressure, wall deflection, and geofoam compression, and can be a suitable compressible inclusion for the wall under investigation. The compressive strains generated in EPS, irrespective of EPS density and thickness, exceed the design strains suggested by previous studies. Majority of strains occurred due to compaction which was not considered by earlier studies.
Read full abstract