Abstract Background The role of right-ventricular (RV) function in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) is poorly understood. Although cardiac computed tomography (CCT) provides elaborate three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the entire anatomy of the RV and theoretically allows to assess the global RV systolic function. Nevertheless, the utility of the functional assessments of the RV using CCT remains unclear in patients undergoing TTVI. Purpose This study investigated the association of right-ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) assessed by CCT with clinical outcome in patients undergoing TTVI. Methods We retrospectively assessed 3D-RVEF by using pre-procedural CCT images in patients undergoing TTVI with either edge-to-edge repair or annuloplasty device. RV dysfunction (RVD) was defined as a CT-RVEF <45%. The primary outcome was a composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure, within one year after TTVI. Results Of 157 patients, 58 (36.9%) presented with CT-RVEF <45%. Patients with CT-RVEF <45% were more likely to be male, to have a previous history of coronary artery disease, and had higher EuroSCORE II and a lower LVEF compared to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%, while the severity of TR was comparable between the groups. Among the patients with CT-RVEF <45%, acute procedural success was achieved in 93.1%, and in-hospital mortality was 1.7%, which were comparable to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%. Patients with CT-RVEF <45% had an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class at follow-up compared to baseline; however, CT-RVEF <45% was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.52–6.88; p=0.002) (Figure 1). Furthermore, CT-RVEF had an additional value to stratify the risk of the composite outcome beyond two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) assessments (Figure 2). In addition, patients with CT-RVEF <45% exhibited an attenuated association between a reduction in TR to <3+ and a lower incidence of the composite outcome after TTVI compared to those with CT-RVEF ≥45%. Conclusions TTVI is safe and feasible regardless of baseline RV function, while RVD, defined as 3D-RVEF <45%, is associated with a higher risk of the composite outcomes within one year after TTVI. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the prognostic benefits of TR reduction might be attenuated in patients with RVD. Given the additional prognostic value of CT-RVEF to the conventional echocardiographic assessments, the assessments of 3D-RVEF with CCT may refine the patient selection for TTVI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Read full abstract