In the design of assembly workplaces, considerations regarding handedness and ergonomics play a crucial role. The emergence of human-robot collaboration presents an innovative avenue for enhancing the ergonomic aspects of manual assembly tasks. While initial applications have demonstrated improvements in lifting and holding activities, they often overlook the influence of human handedness. This paper advocates for the adoption of adaptive assembly processes, which offer simple and intuitive robot programming options to enhance workflow efficiency and reduce stress. This study is grounded in two investigations conducted at the Bremen Institute for Mechanical Engineering. The first study, a pilot investigation, aimed to identify indicators of the influence of handedness and ergonomics, laying the groundwork for further research. Building upon these findings, the second study delves into the interaction between workers and collaborative robots during assembly operations. Data collected from 50 participants form the basis for statistical analysis, providing insights into performance factors and self-assessment, as well as external evaluations of ergonomics. A notable finding of this study challenges the assumption of mirrored behavior between presumed left-handed and right-handed individuals. Additionally, the study identifies a subgroup of participants with ambiguous handedness, suggesting a lack of training in their natural handedness. Through these investigations, this paper contributes to our understanding of the intricate relationship between handedness, ergonomics, and human-robot collaboration in assembly workplaces. By addressing these factors comprehensively, we can pave the way for the development of more inclusive and efficient assembly processes.
Read full abstract