The 31P NMR spectra of Pt( en){ d( T 1 A 2 T 3 G 4 G5 G 6 T 7 A 8 C 9 C 10 C 11 A 12 T 13 A 14)} (14-me r) and Pt( en){ d( A 2 T 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 T 7 A 8 C 9 C 10 C 11 A 12 T 13)} (12-mer) (en = ethylenediamine) each contai far downfield ( ca. −2.9 and −2.6 ppm from trimethylphosphate standard), two signals slightly downfield, and at least one signal slightly upfield of the normal range ( ca. −4.0 to −4.4 ppm). This pattern suggested a distorted structure. The unusual 31P signals of the 12-mer were assigned by analogy to signals of the 14-mer previously assigned by 17O-labeling methods. A combination of heteronuclear multiple-quantum coherence, one-dimensional and two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect (1D- and 2D-NOE) and homonuclear shift correlation spectroscopy (COSY) experiments assigned all aromatic 1H signals of the 12-mer except H8 of G 5 or G 6. One of these H8 signals is missing from the spectrum and the nucleotide is labeled G m. The other H8 is the most downfield signal and has a strong NOE to its H1'. Since this strong NOE indicates that this nucleoside exists in a syn conformation, it is labeled G s. A strong NOE was observed between the G s and A 8 H8 signals. Several lines of evidence suggested a hairpin-like structure with a loop region (G 6T 7A 8C 9) and a stem region involving A 2T 3G 4G 5 and C 10C 11A 12T 13. The 31P signals for the stem region are within or slightly outside the normal range, 3 J H3'-Pvalues (3–6 Hz), measured by a 2D- J experiment, of stem nucleotides were characteristic for a DNA duplex. Imino signals for base pairs A 2T 13,T 3A 12, G 4C 11, and probably G 5C 10, and the observation of internucleotide NOE connectivities for these nucleotides (e.g. between an H8 signal and the H1' signal of the 5' nucleotide) suggested a right-handed helical structure. For the loop region, a distorted sugar-phosphate backbone is indicated by far downfield positions of the G 5pG 6 and A 8pC 9 31P signals, the if 3J H3′−P values for C 9p (8.0 Hz) and A 8p (6.8 Hz), and the absence of H3'-P coupling for G 5p. In the loop region, no imino signals or internucleotide NOEs characteristic of a right-handed duplex were observed. However, A 8H8, C 9H6, and C 10H6 each exhibited unusual internucleotide NOEs to the H4' signal of the 5' residue. NOE crosspeaks between T 7 1H signals and signals attributed to sugars of the G s and G m suggested that the T 7 moiety is located within the space encircled by the loop. The few NOE crosspeaks, pH dependence, and Cu 2+ broadening of C 9 1H signals indicate an isolated location accessible to solvent. Selective reverse chemical shift correlation, 1D- and 2D-NOE, and COSY experiments for the 14-mer produced results very similar to those described above for the 12-mer. We evaluated the following four models for the structure of the loop region of the 12-mer and the 14-mer: (1) Model I, in which Pt is bound to G 5G 6; (2) Model II, in which Pt is bound to three bases, G 5, G 6, and A 8; (3) a variation of Model II (Model IIC), in which one of the G bases forms a Pt—C8 bond; and (4) Model III, in which Pt is bound to A 8 and either G 5 or G 6. Model I does not explain the NOE between the A 8 and G s H8 signals nor the missing H8 signal. Two sets of results provide evidence against Model II and Model IIC. First, the 195Pt NMR spectra of the 12-mer and 14-mer have signals (−2645 and −2640 ppm respectively) similar to the reported shift for (Pt(en)(Guo) 2-N7,N7) 2+. Second, the presence of all fifteen signals in the 9–7 ppm region for 12-mer after Pt removal by KCN in D 2O suggested that Pt does not bind at C8. Model III provides the best explanation for our results. A pH dependence study of the 12-mer tentatively assigned G s as G 5. In summary, we believe that Model III, in which Pt binds G 5, is most reasonable and that a bend may occur at the intersection of the loop and stem regions.