AbstractThis research investigates the effects of different extraction processes on the extractability and quality of rice bran oil. The extraction processes included hexane extraction (HE) as Control 1, cold press extraction (CE) as Control 2, ultrasonic pre‐treatment combined with cold press extraction (UCE), and thermal cooking combined with cold press extraction (CCE). The results showed that oil extractability was positively correlated to ultrasonic power and duration; and to thermal cooking time. Meanwhile, the oil quality and ultrasonic intensity and thermal cooking period were inversely correlated. Specifically, the oxidative stability, and unsaturated fatty acids of short‐period CCE oil were significantly higher than those of long‐period CCE oil and higher‐power and longer‐duration UCE oil. Similar to HE and CE oils, oleic, linoleic, and palmitic acids were the dominant fatty acids in short‐period CCE oil. Essentially, short‐period CCE is optimal for rice bran oil extraction due to improved oil extractability and quality.Practical applicationsRice bran oil is an excellent source of unsaturated fatty acids and natural antioxidants. It also has many proven health benefits. There are two conventional production methods of rice bran oil: pressing and solvent extraction. While the pressing method achieves low oil extractability, solvent extraction could deteriorate the oil quality. This research, thus, proposes two chemical‐free extraction techniques for rice bran oil that improves the oil extractability and preserves the oil quality: ultrasonic pretreatment combined with cold press extraction (UCE) and thermal cooking pretreatment combined with cold press extraction (CCE). The findings are expected to offer a possible solution to the extractability‐quality challenges associated with the conventional extraction methods.
Read full abstract