Rhythm Control Strategy Research Articles

Retraction of: "Ablation, rate or rhythm control strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation: how do they affect mid-term clinical outcomes?"

The paper entitled "Ablation, rate or rhythm control strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation: how do they affect mid-term clinical outcomes?" by Renato De Vecchis et al., which was published in Minerva Cardioangiologica 2019 August;67(4):272-9, has been retracted by the Publisher due to self-plagiarism.

An economic evaluation of first-line cryoballoon ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from a U.S. Medicare perspective.

Three recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that, as an initial rhythm control strategy, first-line cryoballoon ablation (cryoablation) reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line cryoablation compared with first-line AADs for treating symptomatic PAF from a U.S. Medicare payer perspective. Individual patient-level data from 703 participants with PAF enrolled into the Cryo-FIRST (NCT01803438), STOP AF First (NCT03118518), and EARLY-AF (NCT02825979) trials were used to derive parameters for the cost-effectiveness model. The cost-effectiveness model used a hybrid decision tree and Markov structure. The decision tree had a 1-year time horizon and was used to inform the initial health state allocation in the first cycleof the Markov model. The Markov model used a 40-year time horizon (3-month cycle length). Health benefits were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per year. Cryoablation was estimated to yield higher QALYs (+0.17) and higher costs (+$4274) per patient over a 40-year time horizon than AADs. Ultimately, this produced an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $24,637 per QALY gained. Independent of initial treatment, individuals were expected to receive ∼1.2 ablations over a lifetime. There was a 45% relative reduction in time spent in atrial fibrillation health states for those initially treated with cryoablation compared with AADs. Initial rhythm control with first-line cryoballoon ablation is highly cost-effective compared with first-line AADs from a U.S. Medicare payer perspective.

Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: practical considerations.

The choice between rhythm and rate control strategy represents one of the most intriguing dilemmas in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the advantage of rhythm over rate control in terms of outcome has not been equivocally proven, the initial management of patients with symptomatic episodes of AF frequently involves an attempt of early cardioversion. As electrical cardioversion (EC) is challenging in terms of fasting status and involvement of anesthesiology team, pharmacological cardioversion (PC) is usually selected as the first step towards rhythm conversion. Proper qualification for PC or EC is similar and should comprise assessment of hemodynamic status, estimation of duration of arrhythmic episode, evaluation of anticoagulation regimen, exclusion of other supraventricular arrhythmias and assessment of the chance of rhythm conversion and persistence of sinus rhythm. Finally, the choice of adequate antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) depends on the presence of structural heart disease and local experience. In patients without structural heart disease, complications occur rarely, hence traditional (propafenone, flecainide) or nonclassical Vaughan-Williams class I (antazoline) or class III (vernakalant, ibutilide or dofetilide) drugs are preferred. The presence of structural heart disease consistent with any left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, myocardial ischemia or valvular heart disease confines the choice of AAD to amiodarone. Given the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia of AAD, safety should always prevail over the enticing possibility of rhythm conversion. The present review aims to provide a comprehensible summary of proper qualification for PC, selection of suitable AAD and state-of-the-art periprocedural management of patients with recent-onset AF.

Catheter ablation and lower risk of incident dementia and mortality in older adults with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has consistently been associated with a higher risk of incident dementia. Observational evidence has suggested catheter ablation may be associated with a lower risk of dementia in patients with AF, but further research is needed. The objectives of this study were to use a global health research network to examine associations between catheter ablation, incident dementia and mortality in older adults with AF, and amongst subgroups by age, sex, co-morbidity status, and oral anticoagulant use. The research network primarily included healthcare organizations in the United States. This network was searched on 28th September 2022 for patients aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of AF received at least 5 years prior to the search date. Cox proportional hazard models were run on propensity-score matched cohorts. After propensity score matching, 20,746 participants (mean age 68 years; 59% male) were included in each cohort with and without catheter ablation. The cohorts were well balanced for age, sex, ethnicity, co-morbidities, and cardiovascular medications received. The risk of dementia was significantly lower in the catheter ablation cohort (Hazard Ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.61). The catheter ablation cohort also had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.61). These associations remained in subgroup analyses in individuals aged 65-79 years, ≥80 years, males, females, participants who received OACs during follow-up, participants with paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF, and participants with and without hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic stroke, chronic kidney disease and heart failure, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The observed lower risk of dementia and mortality with catheter ablation could be an important consideration when determining appropriate patient-centered rhythm control strategies for patients with AF. Further studies including data on the success of ablation are required.

Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Stroke, Quality of Life, All-Cause Mortality, Sinus Rhythm Maintenance, and Hospitalization Rates as Compared to Medical Therapy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of heart failure (HF) accounts for a significant proportion of mortality. AF can be managedeither with rate control or rhythm control strategies. Rate control involves the use of beta blockers or calcium channel blockers. Rhythm control methods use antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation (CA) to abolish the rhythm. Articles from PubMed and Google Scholar were chosen for review. The literature was reviewed for data from the last 10 years to be chosen for interpretation.Clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic analysis were included in this study. Various health parameters such as all-cause mortality, hospitalization rates, sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance, quality of life improvement, stroke risk, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, and healthcare costs were analyzed. We demonstrated that CA was superior to medical therapy in reducing all-cause mortality and hospitalization. It leads to significant improvement in LVEF as SR was maintained consistently. Overall, quality of life improved in those who underwent ablation as compared to those who did not. Stroke risk reduction was seen in observational studies only. We recommend CA as first-line therapy for treating patients with AF in the setting of HF. More clinical trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of ablation in reducing stroke risk.

Validating the predictive ability of the 2MACE score for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF registry

The 2MACE score was specifically developed as a risk-stratification tool in atrial fibrillation (AF) to predict cardiovascular outcomes. We evaluated the predictive ability of the 2MACE score in the GLORIA-AF registry. All eligible patients from phase II/III of the prospective global GLORIA-AF registry were included. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards were used to examine the relationship between the 2MACE score and study outcomes. Predictive capability of the 2MACE score was investigated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. A total of 25,696 patients were included (mean age 71 years, female 44.9%). Over 3 years, 1583 MACEs were recorded. Patients who had MACE were older, with more cardiovascular risk factors and were less likely to be managed using a rhythm-control strategy. The median 2MACE score in the MACE and non-MACE groups were 2 (IQR 1–3) and 1 (IQR 0–2), respectively (p < 0.001). The 2MACE score was positively associated with an increase in the risk of MACE, with a score of ≥ 2 providing the best combination of sensitivity (69.6%) and specificity (51.6%), HR 2.47 (95% CI, 2.21–2.77). The 2MACE score had modest predictive performance for MACE in patients with AF (AUC 0.655 (95% CI, 0.641–0.669)). Our analysis in this prospective global registry demonstrates that the 2MACE score can adequately predict the risk of MACE (defined as myocardial infarction, CV death and stroke) in patients with AF. Clinical trial registration:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007 and NCT01937377

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation: Is atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure pointless or mandatory?

A vast amount of now well-established clinical and epidemiological data indicates a close, interdependent, and symbiotic association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). Both AF and HF, when co-exist in a patient, have serious treatment and prognostic implications. Based on the prevailing knowledge of the topic, various societies have issued a number of guidelines regarding the management of patients with AF and HF. Overall, it is the rhythm control strategy that has shown beneficial effect over the rate control strategy with improvement in symptoms of AF and HF. While antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA) may be utilized as rhythm control strategy for AF, both AADs and CA have limitations of their own. Furthermore, with the progress made in various pharmacotherapeutic agents in HF, one could question the utility of CA in HF(i.e., whether ablation is mandatory or pointless in patients who have HF). The purpose of this review is to discuss this very point, focusing on the beneficial, neutral, or detrimental outcome of CA based on the category and class of HF.

Abstract P2194: Investigating The Role Of Angiotensin II In The Pathogenesis Of Atrial Fibrillation In Covid-19 Patients Through Blocking The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

Background: COVID-19 was found to be associated with a greater risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF). It is thought that COVID-19 enters cells using its surface spike protein, which binds to the ACE-2 receptor and downregulates it. One of the functions of ACE-2 is converting the pro-inflammatory, anti-fibrinolytic angiotensin II (Ang II) to angiotensin I (Ang I). Therefore, when ACE-2 is downregulated, more Ang II is available to trigger its downstream detrimental effects. Thus, we hypothesized that blocking the effects of Ang II using ACE inhibitors (ACEis) or ARBs would confer a protective effect against the risk of AF. Objective: The purpose of this project was to conduct a retrospective cohort study to determine whether treatment with an ACEi/ARB would prevent the development of AF in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. This would help us better understand the pathogenesis of AF in COVID-19 patients. It would also help us decide whether prophylactic treatment with ACEi/ARB would help reduce the risk. Methods: We reviewed the records of all patients admitted for at least seven days for COVID-19 between January 2021 and June 2021. Of 5430 charts, 188 met the inclusion criteria. Results: Approximately 4.8% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 developed AF. About 6.74% of patients that were not on an ACEi/ARB at any point during their hospitalization developed AF, whereas none of the patients on an ACEi/ARB developed AF, making the relative risk (RR) 0.1871 (95% CI 0.0108 to 3.2377, p-value 0.2492), and the number needed to treat 14.8. Interestingly, in the patients with a previous diagnosis of AF, there was also no statistically significant difference in the need to escalate rate or rhythm control strategy between patients on an ACEi/ARB compared to those who were not (6.67% vs 14.29%, respectively), with a RR of 0.4667 (95% CI: 0.0546 - 4.0629, p-value 0.4900). Conclusion: Our data to date show that the use of an ACEi/ARB is not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of AF in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, which suggests that there may be another cellular mechanism by which COVID-19 causes AF. Therefore, prophylactically treating patients with an ACEi/ARB or holding them on admission may have no influence on the risk of AF.

The af virtual ward, right care, right time and right team

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. AF related hospital admissions are rising, with significant cost and capacity implications. Virtual wards are novel pathways designed to support patients remotely, whilst maintaining safe high quality patient care, changing the landscape of care provision. Purpose The standard pathway for patients presenting acutely with AF or Atrial flutter (AFL), is to remain in hospital between 2-5 days, attached to a heart monitor until achieving rate or rhythm control. We developed an AF Virtual ward run by a specialist multi-disciplinary team; to provide remote out-of-hospital care for patients with AF or AFL and rapid ventricular response whilst focusing on improving patients’ care pathway and experience. Methods Patients presenting acutely with AF or AFL who met the criteria for our virtual ward, were on-boarded from an acute hospital admission area or outpatient department. Patients were given access to electronic platform (Dignio) via their smartphone or tablet. They were provided with instruction on how to use a blood pressure machine, single lead ECG device (Kardia) and a pulse oximeter. Once discharged they submitted readings, at least twice a day. Patients who didn’t have access to smart phones were provided with electronic tablets to ensure digital inclusion. Patients’readings, current medication and co-morbidities were assessed by Advanced Clinical Practitioners, Cardiology Registrars and Consultants on "virtual ward rounds". They were supported via messaging through the platform, telephone or video consultations. Health education, lifestyle advice, medication adjustments, and clinical decisions were undertaken remotely by the clinical team. Results A retrospective analysis of the first 50 virtual ward admissions from January - August 2022 was undertaken. Initial hospital admissions were completely avoided in 24 patients due to on-boarding from the outpatient department. Medical interventions by the specialist team prevented 25 readmissions, saving a total of 49 hospitalisations and between 98 - 245 bed days. A rhythm control strategy was pursued in 82% and sinus rhythm was achieved in 36% on discharge. A total of 28% patients were referred for direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and 30% for catheter ablation. The prompt development of a treatment plan avoided attendance in a specialist Cardiology outpatient clinic whose waiting time for an appointment is approximately 6 months. The NHS friends &amp; family test was completed by 90% of the patients with 100% positive responses. Feedback themes revolved around empowerment, feeling safe, actively participating in their care, and avoiding hospital stay. Conclusion The innovative changes to create the AF Virtual ward has facilitated bed efficiencies allowing "hospital-at-home" remote care through prompt care by a specialist multidisciplinary team, with 100% patient satisfaction.

Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. The estimated lifetime risk of developing AF is higher in men; however, due to differences in life expectancy, the overall prevalence is higher among women, particularly in the older age group. Sex differences play an important role in the pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical outcomes of AF. Awareness of these differences minimizes the potential for disparities in AF management. Our review summarizes the current literature on sex differences in AF, including the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical symptomatology, mechanisms, treatment, and outcomes. We also explore the implications of these differences for clinical practice and future research. Women are more likely to present with atypical symptoms, have a higher stroke risk, and have a worse quality of life with AF when compared to men. Despite this, they are less likely to receive rhythm control strategies and anticoagulants. The sex-based differences in AF pathology and management might be a combination of inherent biological and hormonal differences, and implicit bias of the research entities and treating clinicians. Our review stresses the need for further sex-specific research in the pathophysiology of AF and opens a dialogue on personalized medicine, where management strategies can be tailored to individual patient characteristics, including sex.

Total Atrial Conduction Time as a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive value of total atrial conduction time (TACT) assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography (PA-TDI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients following a rhythm-control strategy. A systematic approach following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines was applied in electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science), supplemented by scanning through studies' references. TACT was compared using a random-effects model and presented as a difference in means (MD). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Seven publications were included in this systematic review. The mean age of the patients ranged from 55 years to 72 years. Prolonged TACT was associated with AF recurrence [MD, 23.12 msec; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.54-34.71; I2 = 95%]. Subgroup analysis showed that prolonged TACT was strongly associated with AF recurrence in persistent AF cohorts undergoing electrical cardioversion (MD, 26.56; 95% CI, 15.51-37.6; I2 = 86%), while in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) undergoing catheter ablation, the results were not statistically significant (MD, 11.48; 95% CI, -1.19 to 24.14; I2 = 90%). The summary area under the curve (sAUC) using a random-effects model was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99). TACT is a valuable echocardiographic parameter that can predict AF recurrence in patients following a rhythm-control strategy. Protocol registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022353018.

Incidence and Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Latinos: What's New Since the Study in Latinos (SOL)?

To assess contemporary epidemiological trends in AF incidence and prevalence in the LatinX population after the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most abnormal heart rhythm condition globally and disproportionately impacts morbidity and mortality of communities that have been historically disadvantaged. The incidence and prevalence of AF is lower in the LatinX population compared to White individuals despite a higher burden of classic risk factors associated with AF. Since the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos study on AF, recent data continues to demonstrate a similar lower burden of AF in the LatinX population compared to White individuals. However, the rates of incident AF may be accelerating faster in the LatinX population compared to their White counterparts. Furthermore, studies have found environmental and genetic risk factors that are associated with the development of AF within LatinX individuals, which may help explain the rising development of AF among the LatinX community. Recent research continues to show that LatinX populations are less likely to be treated with stroke reduction and rhythm control strategies and have a disproportionately higher burden of poor outcomes associated with AF compared to White patients. Our review illuminates that further inclusion of LatinX individuals in AF randomized control trials and observational studies is imperative to understand the incidence and prevalence of AF in the LatinX community and improve overall morbidity and mortality.

Strategies for rate and rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in the ED.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common dysrhythmias managed in the ED and accounts for more than half a million visits a year in the United States. More than 6 out of 10 of these visits result in admissions. As the prevalence of AF has continued to increase in recent years, so has the presentation of patients with AF to the ED. For these reasons, clinicians in emergency settings must be knowledgeable of evidence-based rate and rhythm control strategies for stabilizing patients and preventing complications. This article discusses options, indications, contraindications, and safe implementation of rate and rhythm control strategies for ED clinicians. Recent studies have suggested that early rhythm control may benefit newly diagnosed patients, reducing stroke risk, cardiovascular deaths, and disease progression.

Five-Year Experience of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation from a Tertiary Cardiac Care Center of Pakistan: A Retrospective Chart Review

Objectives: The study aimed at assessing the outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using second-generation cryoballoon, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic (CB-Adv) as a rhythm control strategy for drug-resistant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in a cardiac tertiary care center of Pakistan. Methodology: Fifty patients had PVI with CB-Adv for symptomatic drug-resistant PAF at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan, during 2017-2022. Patients were followed-up in the clinic on the 1st, 3rd, and 6th month after the ablation. Twenty-four hours of Holter monitoring of electrocardiogram was obtained on each visit. We conducted a retrospective chart review after approval from the ethical review committee. We collected all the patients' demographic and clinical data, procedural results, and reports of Holter monitoring. The primary outcome was successful PVI and freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (Ata) on a 6-month follow-up. Results: We enrolled all 50 patients (34 male, 68%; mean age 55.14 ± 7.94 years) treated with PVI using CB-Adv. The mean duration of symptoms was 30.28 ± 13.48 months. PVI with CB-Adv was found to be curative in 49 patients (98%). Following the procedure, pericardial effusion was found in one patient (2%), whereas one patient (2%) had a retroperitoneal hematoma. On a six-month follow-up, only one patient (2%) had a recurrence of Ata, which was PAF. Conclusion: Our experience of PVI with CB-Adv has shown a high success rate of the procedure for rhythm control in patients who have PAF, which is resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs).

The effect of treatment strategy on long-term follow-up results in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Turkey: AFTER-2 subgroup analysis.

We performed a subanalysis of the data from the AFTER-2 registry. In our study, we aimed to compare the long-term follow-up results of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in Turkey according to their treatment strategies. All consecutive patients older than 18years of age who presented to cardiology outpatient clinics, had at least one AF attack and did not have rheumatic mitral valve stenosis or prosthetic heart valve disease were included in our prospective study. The patients were divided into two groups as rhythm control and rate control. Stroke, hospitalization and death rates were compared between the groups. A total of 2592 patients from 35 centers were included in the study. Of these patients, 628 (24.2%) were in the rhythm control group and 1964 (75.8%) in the rate control group. New-onset ischemic cerebrovascular disease or transient ischemic attack (CVD/TIA) was detected at a lower rate in the rhythm control group (3.2% vs. 6.2% p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in one-year and five-year mortality rates (9.6% versus 9.0%, p = 0.682 and 31.8% versus 28.6%, p = 0.116, respectively). Hospitalization were found to be significantly higher in patients with rhythm control group (18% vs. 13%, p = 0.002). It was found that rhythm control strategy is preferred in AF patients in Turkey. We found a lower rate of ischemic CVD/TIA in patients in the rhythm control group. Although no difference was observed in mortality rates, we found a higher rate of hospitalization in the rhythm control group.

Digitally enabled acute care for atrial fibrillation: conception, feasibility and early outcomes of an AF virtual ward

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) represents a growing healthcare challenge, mainly driven by acute hospitalisations. Virtual wards could be the way forward to manage acute AF patients through remote monitoring, especially with...

Left Atrial Volume Quantified by MSCT Predicts Emergency Hospitalizations for AF and Arrhythmia Recurrence after Catheter Ablation

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to investigate the correlation between multislice computed tomography (MSCT)-derived parameters characterizing atrial enlargement and the frequency of emergency hospitalizations after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods The study included 52 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, who presented criteria for interventional rhythm control strategies and underwent MSCT evaluation prior to ablation. Results The majority of emergency hospital admissions were due to heart failure caused by high-frequency arrhythmia (90.33%), or by cardioembolic complications, causing acute stroke (9.67%). The number of emergency referrals was significantly increased in cases of moderately enlarged left atrial volume (69.23%), and re-admission was necessary for over three quarters of the patients with highly enlarged left atrial volume (76.92%, p = 0.02). The average recurrence rate of AF following ablation therapy was 28.84% during the one-year follow-up, being 0% for volumes &lt;71.33 mL, 32% for volumes between 71.33 mL and 109.5 mL, and 53.84% for volumes &gt;109.5 mL (p = 0.01). Conclusion A large volume of the left atrium, determined by MSCT, is associated with a higher risk of emergency rehospitalizations following catheter ablation of AF.

Long term outcome in patients who refused radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Rhythm control is a therapeutic approach to restore sinus rhythm from atrial fibrillation (AF). Current studies have demonstrated efficacy of rhythm control with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for survival, however there is lack of data regarding the long term outcome of patients who refused RFCA. Purpose This study was aimed to compare outcomes, consist of death and stroke, in patients who refused RFCA. Method Patients with AF who had been proposed for RFCA but refused and also any rhythm control strategy were enrolled. The primary outcome was all cause death and incidence of stroke, compared with patients with AF who had been treated with RFCA. Results A total 174 patients who refused AF, 175 patients treated with RFCA were enrolled. Median follow up duration was 1125.1 ± 799.0 days. Of refused AF group, 39 (22.3%) were paroxysmal AF at the time of diagnosis. During follow-up, 9 patients in refused RFCA and 11 patients treated with RFCA group had died (4.1% vs 6.1%, p=0.3 by log rank test). Incidence of stroke was significantly higher in patients who refused RFCA, compared with RFCA group (12.0% vs 1.1% , p =0.001 by log-rank test). Cox Regression model showed refusing RFCA was an independent risk factor for the incidence of stroke (Hazard ratio 6.7, 95% Confidence Interval 1.48 – 30.3, p=0.013). Conclusion In AF patient who had refused rhythm control, incidence of stroke was significantly higher in patients who refused RFCA and rhythm control, compared with who had been treated with RFCA. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between two groups.

Mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with atrial fibrillation on sotalol

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Karolinska Institue at Stockholm South hospital. Background In atrial fibrillation (AF), anti-arrhythmic drugs are an option for rhythm control. Guidelines regarding treatment with sotalol varies worldwide. The risk of serious adverse events in AF patients on sotalol is estimated from small studies, with short follow-up, not designed for mortality analysis. Purpose To evaluate mortality in patients with a rhythm control strategy for AF. Methods In Swedish registries, 7473 sotalol-treated and 107255 patients on betablockers underwent cardioversion or were diagnosed with paroxysmal AF between 2006 and 2017. Mortality and ventricular arrhythmias were estimated in unadjusted, and propensity score matched cohorts. Results Mean follow up was 474 (SD 599) and 481 (SD 515) days in sotalol/betablocker respectively. Crude all-cause mortality was lower in the sotalol group (HR 0.3 CI 0.3-0.4), also in multi-adjusted analysis (HR 0.6 CI 0.5-0.6). In the propensity-matched comparison, HR remained lower on sotalol (0.6 CI 0.5-0.7). Ventricular arrhythmias were more common among patients on sotalol (1.5 vs 1,0%, p&amp;lt;0,001. 1,1% vs 0,8%/100 personyears). There were no significant differences in CPR or sudden cardiac death. Conclusions This real-world data did not show increased mortality in sotalol-treated patients. Ventricular arrhythmias were relatively rare. Careful patient selection and follow-up probably reduce the proarrhythmic risk during sotalol-treatment.

Safety and effectiveness of very-high-power, short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Preliminary results

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is at the forefront of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) catheter was designed to improve the effectiveness of AF ablation within a shorter procedure time. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PVI ablation between this vHPSD ablation mode (90W/4s) and conventional index-guided ablation (up to 40W/indexed). Methods This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 148 patients with AF, referred for catheter ablation between December 16, 2019 and July 29, 2022. In 77 procedures (mean age: 59.7±12.0 years; 61.0% male; 74.0% paroxysmal), a vHPSD catheter was used (vHPSD-group), and 71 patients (mean age: 58.1±11.6 years; 70.4% male; 67.6% paroxysmal) were treated with a ablation index catheter (AI-group). The study assessed the recurrence of AF at 3- and 6-months after ablation. The outcomes also included the amount of opioids administered during the procedure and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Additionally, procedural factors, such as total procedure time, fluoroscopy time and radiofrequency application time were compared between the groups. Results At 3 months, AF was found to recur in 14.29% (11/77) of patients in the vHPSD-group and in 30.99% (22/71) of patients in the AI-group (p=0.02). At 6 months, 18.31% (13/71) patients reported AF recurrence in the vHPSD-group and 32.73 % (18/55) in the AI-group (p=0.09). There was no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups (3.9% vs. 2.8%; p=1.00). One severe adverse event (a cerebral vascular accident) was observed in the vHPSD-group. The mean dose of remifentanil was reported to be lower during vHPSD-based PVI (p&amp;lt;0.0001). The vHPSD-based PVI was associated with shorter radiofrequency application time (p&amp;lt;0.0001), fluoroscopy time (p&amp;lt;0.0001), and total procedure time (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions This study suggests that the vHPSD-quided PVI is equally effective and safe with reference to short-term clinical observation as conventional ablation. Also, the vHPSD ablation may allow to reduce the dosage of analgesics during significantly shorter procedures.