Rheumatology Patients Research Articles

Bridging gaps: a qualitative inquiry on improving paediatric rheumatology care among healthcare workers in Kenya

BackgroundDue to the paucity of paediatric rheumatologists in Kenya, it is paramount that we explore strategies to bridge clinical care gaps for paediatric rheumatology patients in order to promote early diagnosis, prompt referral, and optimal management.PurposeTo identify proposed interventions which can improve the ability of non-specialist healthcare workers to care for paediatric rheumatology patients across Kenya.MethodsWe conducted 12 focus group discussions with clinical officers (community physician assistants), nurses, general practitioners and paediatricians across six regions in Kenya. Interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using MAXQDA 2022.2 software.ResultsA total of 68 individuals participated in the study; 11 clinical officers, 12 nurses, 10 general practitioners, 27 paediatricians and eight other healthcare workers. Proposed patient interventions included patient education and psychosocial support. Community interventions were outreach awareness campaigns, mobilising financial support for patients’ care, mobilising patients to access diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Healthcare worker interventions include diagnostic, management, and referral guidelines, as well as research and educational interventions related to symptom identification, therapeutic strategies, and effective patient communication skills. In addition, it was highlighted that healthcare systems should be bolstered to improve insurance coverage and access to integrated multi-disciplinary clinical care.ConclusionsStudy participants were able to identify potential initiatives to improve paediatric rheumatology care in Kenya. Additional efforts are underway to design, implement and monitor the impact of some of these potential interventions,

Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in vasculitis patients.

To identify the factors that impact COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in vaccine-hesitant vasculitis patients, and compare their perceptions with other rheumatology patients, given existence of data suggesting rheumatology patients may have disease-specific factors that influence their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making. This cross-sectional study surveyed adult rheumatology patients from the Kaye Edmonton Clinic Rheumatology Clinic, in Canada, between June and August 2021, using an anonymous online questionnaire. Survey responses were analyzed for statistical differences using chi-square analysis. The COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions Survey had a response rate of 70.9%. Of the total 231 respondents, 103 patients were diagnosed with vasculitis. At the time of the survey, 10.6% of vasculitis patients refused to receive a COVID-19 vaccine compared to 6.3% for other rheumatology patients. Compared to other rheumatology patients, vaccine-hesitant vasculitis patients were significantly more concerned about almost every aspect of available COVID-19 vaccines [e.g., safety (p < 0.001), components (p < 0.001)], and feared that they could contract SARS-CoV-2 from a vaccine (p < 0.001). These vaccine-hesitant patients were also significantly less pleased with the government's pandemic response, less confident in healthcare team-provided information (p < 0.001), and more likely to report that healthcare providers had no role in their COVID-19 vaccine decision-making (p < 0.001). Vaccine-hesitant vasculitis patients may have multiple considerations influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, including vaccine and disease-specific concerns, along with unfavorable perceptions of the healthcare system (government and healthcare providers). Healthcare providers can address some of these concerns by initiating patient-centered discussions around immunizations to help support educated decision-making.

A multidisciplinary dermatology-gastroenterology-rheumatology (DER.RE.GA) unit for the care of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: analysis of the first 5 years from the dermatologist’s perspective

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) constitute a heterogenous group of chronic and highly disabling conditions. The clinical challenges they often pose led to formation of numerous dermo-rheumatological interdisciplinary units around the world, which are reported to benefit their patients in various ways. The present paper describes our experience with a multidisciplinary dermatology-rheumatology-gastroenterology unit DERREGA at the IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo of Pavia over a period of 5 years of its activity (2017–2022). A digital database was created, containing the medical records of 146 patients referred to the dermatology unit only by rheumatologists or gastroenterologists belonging to the multidisciplinary unit DERREGA. Then, aspects such as demographics, initial basis of referral and final diagnosis among the patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified as either gastroenterological or rheumatological, and then categorized according to the specific basis of referral. Most of the gastroenterological patients (97%) were affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Rheumatological patients were divided in three subgroups, including patients referred with vasculitis, arthropathies (undifferentiated arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and other arthritis) and other rheumatological diseases. Then, final diagnoses were evaluated in each group. Almost a third of IBD patients received a diagnosis of paradoxical psoriasis. Dermatological examination allowed diagnosis of minimal psoriasis based on Caspar criteria in over 70% of the patients admitted with undifferentiated arthritis. A multidisciplinary approach is suggested to provide more effective management of IMIDs and, specifically, from a dermatological perspective, allows for the diagnosis of minimal manifestations of psoriasis in patients with a provisional diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis.

Survey on the continued impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised patients in rheumatology.

Survey on the continued impact of COVID-19 on immunocompromised patients in rheumatology.

Comparison of comorbidities and adverse events in dermatology and rheumatology patients prescribed tofacitinib: A retrospective analysis

Comparison of comorbidities and adverse events in dermatology and rheumatology patients prescribed tofacitinib: A retrospective analysis

Rheumatology Patients' Experiences of a Mandatory Nationwide Transition to an Adalimumab Biosimilar.

Transitions to biosimilars are common to reduce the cost burden of biologics. While brand changes can be daunting for patients, few studies have explored patients' experiences with the transitioning process. This study examined rheumatology patients' experiences with a mandatory nationwide brand change to an adalimumab biosimilar. People with rheumatic diseases involved in the adalimumab transition in Aotearoa New Zealand completed a nationwide online survey. Participants (n = 117, 48% with rheumatoid arthritis) reported their satisfaction with the biosimilar, logistics and supply, information and communication, and availability of support. They also reported what did and did not go well during the transition and provided recommendations for future transitions. The mean [SD] satisfaction score with the transition was 6.2 [3.2] on a 0-10 scale, with 10 indicating high satisfaction. Participants were the least satisfied with the support and information from patient support organizations, and training for the device during the transition. Participants were most satisfied with the biosimilar supply, support from pharmacists, and how early they were informed before the transition occurred. After the transition, participants were less satisfied with the device quality, patient support program, biosimilar safety and efficacy, and the provision of alcohol wipes and sharps bins (p < 0.05 for all). Satisfaction with training for the biosimilar device (B = .25, p = .036) predicted overall satisfaction. Participants appreciated less injection pain and the ease of the biosimilar device. The lack of alcohol wipes and loss of the bio-originator support program were viewed negatively. Future biosimilar transitions should ensure the availability of alcohol wipes, sharps bins, and a comparable patient support program. Patient support organizations could be involved in providing information to patients about the change.

Insights into the immunological description of cryoglobulins with regard to detection and characterization in Slovenian rheumatological patients

The detection of cryoglobulins (CG) used to diagnose cryoglobulinemic vasculitis requires strict adherence to protocol, with emphasis on the preanalytical part. Our main objectives were to introduce a more sensitive and specific protocol for the detection of CG and to characterize CG in Slovenian patients diagnosed with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, other vasculitides, connective tissue diseases or non-rheumatic diseases examined at the Department of Rheumatology (University Medical Centre Ljubljana). Samples were routinely analyzed for the presence of CG with the protocol using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. In the newly introduced protocol, the type of CG was determined by immunofixation on visually observed positive samples and the concentration of CG in the cryoprecipitate and rheumatoid factor (RF) activity were measured by nephelometry. RF, C3c and C4 were measured in patients` serum and a decision tree analysis was performed using all results. The agreement between negative and positive results between the two protocols was 86%. Of the 258 patient samples tested, we found 56 patients (21.7%) with positive CG (37.5% - type II, 62.5% - type III). The RF activity was observed in 21.4% of CG positive subjects. The median concentration of type II CG was significantly higher than that of type III CG (67.4 mg/L vs. 45.0 mg/L, p = 0.037). Patients with type II had lower C4 concentrations and higher RF compared to patients with type III CG. In the decision tree, C4 was the strongest predictor of cryoglobulinemia in patients. With the newly implemented protocol, we were able to improve the detection and quantification of CG in the samples of our rheumatology patients and report the results to adequately support clinicians.

Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Rheumatology Outpatients in New York City.

The aim of this study was to measure COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among rheumatology outpatients from an early COVID-19 "hotspot" during the initial period of vaccine availability. In March 2021, a Web-based survey was sent to 7505 adults seen at a Rheumatology Division in New York City. We evaluated characteristics associated with 3 categories of COVID-19 vaccination status: declined, undecided, and willing/already received. We used multinomial logistic regression models to calculate relative risk ratios assessing predictors of vaccination status. Among 2384 (32%) respondents (80% female, 87% White, 59% with systemic rheumatic disease), 2240 (94.0%) were willing/already received COVID-19 vaccination, 88 (3.7%) were undecided, and 56 (2.3%) declined. Compared with those willing/already vaccinated, those declining or undecided were younger, more likely identified as Black or Hispanic/Latinx, and had lower household income and educational attainment. Immunosuppressive medication use did not differ among groups. After multivariable adjustment, every 1-year increase in age was associated with a 0.96 lower relative risk of declining or being undecided versus willing/already vaccinated. Respondents identifying as Black versus White had a higher relative risk ratio of being undecided (4.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.96-9.36]), as did those identifying as Hispanic/Latinx versus non-Hispanic/non-Latinx (2.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-6.09]). Those declining vaccination were least likely to believe in general vaccine importance or the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine. Among rheumatology patients in New York City with and without systemic rheumatic disease, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high after its initial availability. Sociodemographic but not medication-related factors were associated with vaccine hesitancy; these findings can inform future rheumatology vaccination programs.

Abstract 27 — Prevalence and Management Approach of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Rheumatology Patients

Prior to immunosuppression, rheumatology patients are routinely screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA). The management of latent and indeterminate IGRA results varied among institutions and long-term outcome data is lacking. We conducted a retrospective study at Tawam Hospital, United Arab Emirates, to examine the frequency and management of positive and indeterminate IGRA results and tuberculosis infection in rheumatic patients. Methods Laboratory records and hospital electronic medical system were used to obtain information about IGRA results over a 12 years period (April 2010-April 2022). Results In our hospital record over a 12-year period, we found a total of 1012 positive and 223 indeterminate IGRA test results. Within the rheumatology department, 123 positive and 39 indeterminate IGRA results were identified. In the indeterminate IGRA group, the majority were female (n=24, 61.5%), UAE nationals (n=22, 56.4%), and had a mean age of 38.6 years. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was the most prevalent rheumatologic condition (n=21, 53.8%). 33.3% (n=13) were on disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and 66.7% (n=26) were on corticosteroid during IGRA testing. A total of 8 patients (20.5%) received anti-TB medications. In a positive IGRA group, the mean age of 55.7 years and a female-to-male ratio of 3:1. The most common rheumatologic conditions were RA (n=67, 54.4%). Approximately 52.8% (n=65) of patients were on conventional DMARDs, 66.7% (n=26) were on corticosteroids during IGRA testing, and 60% (n=74) received anti-TB medications. Two cases (1.6%) of active TB infections were detected among patients with positive IGRA tests, both of whom were receiving anti-TNFa inhibitor treatment in combination with methotrexate. No cases of active TB infection were observed in the indeterminate IGRA group. Conclusion Tuberculosis risk in positive and indeterminate IGRA results for rheumatological conditions is low. Further multicenter studies are required to analyze patient outcomes and differences in TB-endemic and non-endemic regions.

Nursing Session

The management of pain in inflammatory arthritis can be complicated. Its important to differentiate between different types of pain, explain these to the patient and treat accordingly. Pain can be due to inflammatory disease eg rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis; tissue damage eg osteoarthritis; nerve pain eg shingles, carpal tunnel; or due to increased sensitivity of the pain system eg fibromyalgia. Patients may have a combination of two or more of these which can be challenging not only for the patient but also the clinician. Understanding the signs and symptoms of each is vital for the rheumatology nurse to be able to fully assess and evaluate care. Individualised care is important as everyone’s perception of pain is different. Factors such as sleep, physical health, diet and mental health can also play a role and so a holistic approach is essential. Management of the rheumatology patient involves a combination of pharmacological therapies but, probably more importantly from the rheumatology nurse point of view, non-pharmacological approaches. Of course, the diagnosis will determine the pharmacological treatments but can more be done? With a focus on pain, this presentation will follow a patient who is attending the rheumatology clinic with a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis but their journey is not as simple as it sounds.

Crucial safety issues on Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis might be associated with the lack of LDL-cholesterol management: a reasoned literature analysis.

This point of view explores the safety concerns of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-Is), used in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatologic conditions. Increasing evidence shows that JAK-Is may elevate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. This fact has prompted the European Medicines Agency to advise cautious use of these drugs in patients over 65, smokers, and those at risk of cardiovascular issues or cancer. The paper analyses the evidence on the association between VTE risk and RA and whether different JAK-Is pose different risks. It also probes the link between VTE, lipids, and JAK inhibition, noting that JAK-Is can alter HDL and LDL levels. On the other hand, some evidence indicates that tighter LDL-cholesterol control could mitigate VTE risk, particularly pulmonary embolism. Moreover, data from trials show little attention to treating this main cardiovascular and VTE risk factor in rheumatological patients. Although the lipid paradox theory emphasizes the U-shaped relationship between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients with RA, uncontrolled levels of clinically relevant LDL cholesterol remain closely linked to cardiovascular and VTE risk. In conclusion, high-potency statins could help to manage the increased cardiovascular and VTE risk concomitant to JAK-Is treatment in rheumatologic patients without depriving them of the best therapeutic choice and, in addition, reducing the inherent risk associated with the disease.

The prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in rheumatology.

Polypharmacy is increasingly common in rheumatology due to the complex nature of managing chronic autoimmune diseases. To date there has been limited research into the impact of polypharmacy on rheumatology patients. In this article we reviewed the literature to characterize the prevalence of polypharmacy and its effect on patients. In addition, we have highlighted some key drug-drug interactions to consider involving DMARDs as well as complementary and alternative medicines. There is emerging evidence demonstrating that polypharmacy contributes to adverse outcomes and alters treatment response. This association is best described in RA and is less clear in other patient cohorts. It is also unclear whether polypharmacy is directly harmful or just a surrogate marker for other factors affecting outcomes. Rheumatologists should be aware of the risk of polypharmacy as well as specific drug-drug interactions that can occur in managing chronic autoimmune disease.

Modern Ideas about Vaccination of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: the View of ACR Experts

The review presents the recommendations of the American College of Rheumatology on vaccination of patients with rheumatic diseases. The indications for vaccination against major infections and the tactics of immunization with inactivated vaccines are highlighted. The possibility of safe vaccination with any disease activity and simultaneous administration of several vaccines is emphasized. The conditions of immunization with live attenuated vaccines are considered. The principles of vaccination of children born to mothers treated with biological drugs, as well as recommendations for the contacts of rheumatological patients with vaccinated population are reflected. Emphasis is placed on the need for joint decision-making by the rheumatologist and the patient.

Chronic hepatitis B in hospitalized rheumatologic patients: problems of screening and reactivation of infection

Objective: to evaluate the completeness of screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HBsAg-positive patients admitted to a rheumatology hospital and to follow the history of HBV reactivation/seroversion during antirheumatic therapy. Material and methods. The results of initial and repeated (if applicable) hospitalizations were analyzed in 80 patients with rheumatic diseases (RD), including 55 (69%) women and 25 (31 %) men, with Australian surface antigen (HBsAg), admitted to the V.A. Nasonova Institute of Rheumatology from January 1, 2020 to July 20, 2022 (30 months). Results and discussion. The total number of hospitalizations to the clinic during the observation period, including repeat admissions, was 13,681. The number of hospitalizations in 80 patients with HBV infection during the observation period, including repeat admissions, was 144, of which for systemic vasculitis – 6 (8 %), other systemic connective tissue diseases – 16 (20 %), osteoarthritis and post-traumatic changes of joints – 14 (15 %), inflammatory joint diseases – 42 (54 %). Cases of HBV reactivation/seroverion, both in anamnesis and during observation, were detected in 9 (11 %) patients, and most frequently (n = 5) they were registered during methotrexate therapy. Conclusion. HBV infection in patients with RD leads to significant difficulties in the selection of drug therapy, due to the risk of reactivation of the infection. The results obtained indicate incomplete screening of patients with RD for HBV infection during the preclinical phase. Further investigation is needed to develop clear recommendations for the management of patients with RD infected with HBV.

Dance therapy as a method of rehabilitation in rheumatic diseases

A dance is considered from the perspective of art therapy, psychotherapy and kinesiotherapy as a component of therapeutic exercises. Previous experience with dance therapy in various rheumatic diseases is presented, and a theoretical rationale for adapting new dance styles for the purposes of complex non-drug treatment of rheumatologic patients is provided.

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Rheumatological Patients with Post-Tonsillectomy

Aim: The main aim of the study was to determine whether tonsillectomy improves the quality of life in adults suffering from chronic or recurrent tonsillitis and in rheumatologically treated patients.&#x0D; Materials and methods: This study was conducted on seropositive or seronegative patients (n=50) who were followed up with various rheumatological diagnoses (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, etc.) at the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic of SBU Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Education Research Hospital and who were diagnosed with acute or chronic tonsillitis and who applied to the ENT clinic. It was done to follow the pre- and post-operative conditions. In these patients who were decided to undergo surgical treatment, HAQ (Health assessment questionnaire) quality of life scale and VAS (Visual Analog Scala) were applied to evaluate the perception of pain before and at the 6th month after the operation.&#x0D; Results: In this study of 50 adults, mean age was 28.0 years (SD 7.2 years), 38 adults were followed up in the 1st month of diagnosis, while 12 adults were followed up in the 7th month of diagnosis. All patients experienced significant improvements throughout the treatment process. According to the results of the patients' quality of life scale, it was determined that it increased significantly, primarily due to improvements in general and physical areas. 96% (96/100) of participating patients reported benefiting from tonsillectomy. Patients in the postoperative control group had significantly higher quality of life scores than patients in the preoperative case group (p &lt; 0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion: Adult patients who underwent tonsillectomy due to acute tonsillitis reported improvement in their quality of life 6 months after surgery. Based on this, physical examination of rheumatological patients who have rheumatological diseases and have undergone tonsillectomy and it is likely to improve general health, create a sense of well-being in patients, and improve overall quality of life. The social benefits of tonsillectomy appear to be negligible. The effects are likely to be long-lasting and have a greater impact on younger patients. The presence of chronic rheumatological disease due to tonsillar inflammation and infective symptoms are the main factors affecting the severity of the disease.

Trabecular bone score in rheumatology : Are there benefits in comparison to bone densitometry alone?

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have an increased risk of fractures due to the inflammatory potential of the disease and also because of the treatment with glucocorticoids that is often necessary. According to the current guidelines of the Governing Body on Osteology (DVO), the fracture risk can be assessed using dual energy X‑ray absorptiometry and can also be supplemented by measuring the trabecular bone score (TBS). The assessment of the TBS offers additional advantages, for example in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in patients with osteoproliferative changes of the spine (spondylarthritis) and thus optimizes the fracture risk assessment in the rheumatological patient population.

From conventional to cutting edge imaging in rheumatology

Imaging instruments, such as conventional X‑ray, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are now fully established and highly valued in the care of rheumatology patients. However, the information provided by these imaging modalities in their current form is of limited utility for the prognostic prediction of individual patient outcomes. This article illuminates an important part of the development of imaging and shows that the vision of personalized medicine is becoming increasingly more tangible due to the further development of high-resolution imaging techniques, molecular imaging and artificial intelligence.

COVID-19 and Pediatric Rheumatology: A Comprehensive Study from a Leading Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has emerged as a significant global health concern, impacting millions of individuals worldwide. However, there remains a notable gap in the literature regarding pediatric studies, specifically focusing on children with rheumatic diseases and the potential risk factors associated with COVID-19 contraction in this specific patient population. Patients with rheumatic diseases are often undergoing immunemodulator/immunosuppressant therapies, which can further complicate their immune system response to infections. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital (KASCH), the largest tertiary care children’s hospital in Saudi Arabia. The aim was to investigate the rate, clinical manifestations, risk factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. All rheumatology patients (< 19 years) who presented to the hospital as outpatients, inpatients, and/or ER visits during the period of March 2020 to March 2022 were reviewed for confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Among 482 patients included in this study, 126 (26.1%, 95% CI 21.8–31.1) had COVID-19 infection, and no factors were identified to increase the risk of contracting the virus. Fever (55.6%, n = 70) followed by respiratory symptoms (55.6%, n = 70) were the most common clinical manifestations, and around 30% of the patients were asymptomatic. Though most of the patients recovered without complications (97.6%, n = 123), mortality was reported in 3 patients (2.38%). The risk of hospitalization was almost 6 times higher in males (OR = 5.97), and higher in patients receiving t-DMARDs (OR = 17.53) or glucocorticoids (OR = 6.69). The study also revealed that vaccinated children were at lower risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 than non-vaccinated children. The findings of this study help to identify the risk factors for COVID-19 among children with rheumatic diseases and provide insight into the impact of the pandemic on this group. Overall, while most cases were mild and resolved on their own, unvaccinated patients and those receiving t-DMARDs or glucocorticoids needs vigilant monitoring during the COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, we strongly advocate for the widespread promotion of COVID-19 vaccination among pediatric rheumatology patients as it significantly reduces their risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization.

Resolution of the Council of Experts of May 20, 2023 "Issues of safety in the treatment of a rheumatological patient"

At the meeting of the Expert Council on May 20, the safety of treatment for patients with osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of joint disease, was discussed. The first step in the treatment of OA should be the administration of symptomatic delayed-acting agents (SYSADOA) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, given the current understanding of the pathogenesis of inflammation, as well as the fact that it is an active process involving multiple proinflammatory and pro-resolving mediators, it is reasonable to limit the cyclooxygenase-2 suppressive treatment and to include medications with multipurpose effects that contribute to the resolution of inflammation, in particular Zeel® T and Traumeel® S. Traumeel® S affects all stages of inflammation, mostly on the pro-resolving mediators synthesis, and Zeel® T affects chondrogenesis, inflammation, metabolic processes in cartilage tissue and prevents angiogenesis.It was found that it is advisable to use Traumeel® S when it is not possible to prescribe systemic NSAIDs for pain relief. The combination of the proven therapeutic efficacy of Zeel® T and Traumeel® S with a minimal number of adverse events and the absence of interactions with other drugs allows them to be used as an independent treatment regimen for OA.