Dear Editor, Erosive osteoarthritis (EOA) is generally considered an uncommon subset of osteoarthritis (OA), targeting interphalangeal (IP) joints and characterized by an abrupt onset, marked pain, functional impairment, inflammatory symptoms and signs, including stiffness, soft tissue swelling, erythema, paraesthesiae and a worse clinical outcome than non-erosive OA of the hand (HOA).1 Laboratory tests are usually negative, despite clinical findings of inflammation, even though a slight increase of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), although at low degree, are noticeable.2 Furthermore, in a previous study, we showed the absence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), in blood samples of a group of EOA patients.3 Erosive osteoarthritis is defined radiographically by subchondral erosion, cortical destruction and subsequent reparative change, which may include bony ankylosis.1,4 Moreover, in the early stages of this disease, the differential diagnosis between EOA and other arthritis types, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), may pose a challenge.5,6 Rheumatoid factor (RF) is a family of autoantibodies that recognizes the Fc part of IgG molecules and exists as IgA, IgG and IgM isotypes.7 The present study is aimed at detecting for the first time the prevalence of sera IgA, IgG and IgM RF in patients affected by EOA, compared to patients with nodal osteoarthritis (NOA), RA and healthy subjects. HOA diagnosis was made according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for HOA.8 EOA and NOA were defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations.1 RA is defined by the ACR criteria.9 Thirty-two consecutive patients with EOA (five men and 27 women, median age 59.2 years, range 49–75), attending the outpatient Rheumatology Unit of Siena Hospital, were enrolled in the study. Each patient showed the common EOA radiographic findings.1,4 The control group included 30 patients affected by NOA,1 32 RA patients and 30 healthy subjects, sex- and age-matched. For all the studied subjects, co-morbidities such as infections, cancer, renal and liver diseases, cryoglobulinemia, scleroderma, Sjogren syndrome, autoimmune thyroiditis, PsA, undifferentiated spondyloarthropathies, gout and pseudogout, were excluded. After informed consent was obtained, serum samples were stored at −20°C until tested to anti-CCP antibodies and IgA, IgG and IgM RF. Anti-CCP antibodies were tested by FEIA technique, by using EliA system (Phadia Diagnostics, Freiburg, Germany); IgA, IgG and IgM RF were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) commercial kits (Orgentec Diagnostica, Mainz, Germany). We considered positive every IgA, IgG and IgM RF > 20 U/mL. All EOA patients, NOA patients and healthy controls were negative for anti-CCP, IgA-RF, IgG-RF and IgM-RF. In the RA group, 77% of the patients were found to be positive for anti-CCP, 35% for IgM and IgG RF and 52% for IgA RF. Although a relationship between EOA and RA was first suggested by Ehrlich,10 there have been few studies concerning the serological tests for RF in EOA. In our study the detection and quantitative measurement of RF in various immunoglobulin classes (IgA, IgG and IgM) was performed using ELISA, for its specificity and sensitivity. Using this technique, in the literature we found that the majority (up to 70–80%) of RA patients presented an increase of two or three RF isotypes.11 Our study suggests that the combined detection of the three isotypes of RF and of anti-CCP antibodies may be helpful in the differential diagnosis between EOA and RA, especially in equivocal cases. The absence of the three isotypes of RF and of anti-CCP antibodies in the serum of the EOA patients shows that EOA represents a subtype of HOA and not a specific inflammatory disease.