Rheumatoid Arthritis In Germany Research Articles

Identification of Motivational Determinants for Telemedicine Use Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Germany: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Previous studies have demonstrated telemedicine to be an effective tool to complement rheumatology care and address workforce shortage. With the COVID-19 outbreak, telemedicine experienced a massive upswing. An earlier analysis revealed that the motivation of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases to use telemedicine is closely connected to their disease. It remains unclear which factors are associated with patients' motivation to use telemedicine in certain rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases groups, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aims to identify factors that determine the willingness to try telemedicine among patients diagnosed with RA. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a German nationwide cross-sectional survey among patients with RA. Bayesian univariate logistic regression analysis was applied to the data to determine which factors were associated with willingness to try telemedicine. Predictor variables (covariates) studied individually included sociodemographic factors (eg, age, sex) and health characteristics (eg, health status). All the variables positively and negatively associated with willingness to try telemedicine in the univariate analyses were then considered for Bayesian model averaging analysis after a selection based on the variance inflation factor (≤ 2.5) to identify determinants of willingness to try telemedicine. Among 438 surveyed patients in the initial study, 210 were diagnosed with RA (47.9%). Among them, 146 (69.5%) answered either yes or no regarding willingness to try telemedicine and were included in the analysis. A total of 22 variables (22/55, 40%) were associated with willingness to try telemedicine (region of practical equivalence %≤5). A total of 9 determinant factors were identified using Bayesian model averaging analysis. Positive determinants included desiring telemedicine services provided by a rheumatologist (odds ratio [OR] 13.7, 95% CI 5.55-38.3), having prior knowledge of telemedicine (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.46-6.28), residing in a town (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.21-7.79) or city (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.23-1.27), and perceiving one's health status as moderate (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.94-3.63). Negative determinants included the lack of an electronic device (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-0.62), absence of home internet access (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.02-0.39), self-assessment of health status as bad (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.89) or very bad (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.06-2.06), and being aged between 60 and 69 years (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-1.04) or older than 70 years (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.85). The results suggest that some patients with RA will not have access to telemedicine without further support. Older patients, those not living in towns, those without adequate internet access, reporting a bad health status, and those not owning electronic devices might be excluded from the digital transformation in rheumatology and might not have access to adequate RA care. These patient groups certainly require support for the use of digital rheumatology care.

Real-world experience with filgotinib for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany : Aretrospective chart review.

Real-world data for filgotinib, aJanus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor, are limited in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To explore real-world filgotinib use in patients with RA in Germany. This retrospective chart review included patients aged ≥ 18years with confirmed moderate to severe RA who initiated filgotinib before December1, 2021, with ≥ 6months of medical records available prior to filgotinib initiation or after initial diagnosis. Patient characteristics, prior treatments, reasons for initiating/discontinuing filgotinib, disease activity, dose adjustments and concomitant treatments were recorded. In total, 301 patients from 20 German rheumatology outpatient units were included. One-third were aged ≥ 65years and almost half had ≥ 1 cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. Most patients initiated filgotinib as monotherapy (83.7%; 12.7% of whom with glucocorticoids) and at the 200 mg dose (84.7%); higher proportions of those initiating the 100 versus 200 mg dose were aged ≥ 65years and had renal impairment or ≥ 1 CV risk factor. Oral administration (78.4%), fast onset of action (66.8%) and administration as monotherapy (65.4%) were the most common reasons for initiating filgotinib. At 12months, 41 (18.4%) patients had discontinued filgotinib, most commonly due to lack of effectiveness. After 6‑months of follow-up, 36.8% of patients had achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission and 45.6% had achieved CDAI low disease activity. In clinical practice in Germany, reasons for initiating filgotinib in patients with RA were related to dosing flexibility and general JAK inhibitor attributes. Filgotinib was used predominantly as monotherapy and was effective and generally well tolerated; however, longer-term data in larger, prospective cohorts are needed.

Population-based epidemiological projections of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany until 2040

Objectives Our aim was to conduct a population-based projection to estimate the number of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases in Germany until 2040. Method Data obtained from a report published in 2017 (doi:10.20364/VA-17.08) were used for future prediction analysis. The data were originally collected by the German Central Institute for Statutory Health Insurance. We used the illness–death model to estimate future numbers of RA cases, considering nine possible scenarios based on different incidence and mortality rates. Results In the baseline scenario, the number of women with RA is projected to increase by 417 000 cases and men by 179 000 cases by 2040, compared with 2015. Peak numbers of cases are concentrated in the 70–80-year-old age group, particularly among women. In the most favourable scenario (scenario 2), assuming a decreasing incidence, the total number of RA cases is projected to rise by 284 000 by 2040, reflecting a 38% relative increase from 2015 to 2040. The least favourable scenario (scenario 9), assuming an increasing incidence, projects a significant burden on the healthcare system. The total number of RA cases is expected to rise by 1.16 million by 2040, marking a substantial 158% relative increase from 2015 to 2040. Conclusions Our research emphasizes a discernible trend: with an ageing society, improving treatment effectiveness, and declining all-cause mortality, we anticipate a rise in the absolute numbers of RA cases in Germany in the coming years. Our models robustly support this viewpoint, underscoring impending challenges for healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges demands multifaceted interventions.

Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany

Despite aqualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask agroup of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and asystematic literature search were used as the basis for development. Atotal of 8QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

PBI7 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adalimumab Biosimilar Compared to Delayed Biologic Treatment Initiation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Germany

The progression of moderate and severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is controlled for many patients by biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). However, once patients become eligible for these therapies, they often face a delay in starting treatment, largely due to cost concerns. This analysis aimed to evaluate the economic impact of these delays in biologic treatment, adapting a published cost-effectiveness framework to a German societal perspective.

What is certain in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most important chronic inflammatory joint disease with a prevalence of 1%. When untreated the disease leads to joint destruction and therefore to functional restrictions of the patients and also to increased rates of cardiovascular and malignant diseases. After the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis was better understood, in the last 20years biologics could be developed, which are directed against targets involved in the inflammatory process in RA. Since then the remission rates of RA have substantially increased. In 2017 Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were additionally approved for the treatment of RA in Germany. They further broaden the therapeutic options and, in contrast to biologics, are administered orally. The response rates to therapy are better the earlier the disease is diagnosed and treated. Patients in whom RA is suspected due to anew onset of polyarthritis, should therefore be promptly referred to arheumatologist.

Glukokortikoid-Therapie bei rheumatoider Arthritis – Contra

Corticosteroids have a pleiotropic mechanism of action and influence a great number of cellular functions. This does not only result in a broad therapeutic effect, but in a large number of adverse events as well. It has been shown that about 60 % of all patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Germany are receiving corticosteroids and about every fifth of them more than the equivalence of 7.5 mg prednisone per day. Already small doses increase the risk f. e. for osteoporosis or cataract, as well as for severe infections. The benefit of a treatment with low dose corticosteroids in inhibiting the radiological erosivity of the disease is low and does not outweigh the risks.

Depression risk in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.

The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of depression and its risk factors in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated in German primary care practices. Longitudinal data from general practices (n=1072) throughout Germany were analyzed. Individuals initially diagnosed with RA (2009-2013) were identified, and 7301 patients were included and matched (1:1) to 7301 controls. The primary outcome measure was the initial diagnosis of depression within 5years after the index date in patients with and without RA. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for confounders. The mean age was 72.2years (SD: 7.6years). A total of 34.9% of patients were men. Depression diagnoses were present in 22.0% of the RA group and 14.3% of the control group after a 5-year follow-up period (p<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, RA was a strong risk factor for the development of depression (HR: 1.55, p<0.001). There was significant interaction of RA and diagnosed inflammatory polyarthropathies (IP) (RA*IP interaction: p<0.001). Furthermore, dementia, cancer, osteoporosis, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with a higher risk of developing depression (p values <0.001). The risk of depression is significantly higher in patients with late-onset RA than in patients without RA for subjects treated in primary care practices in Germany. RA patients should be screened routinely for depression in order to ensure improved treatment and management.

Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.

BackgroundIn Germany, the clinical use of TNF-α inhibitors in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) grew from 2 % of treated patients in 2000 to 20 % in 2008. In 2012, adalimumab was the bestselling drug in the statutory health insurance system with net expenditure of € 581 mio.ObjectivesWe aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of RA in Germany.MethodsWe set up an individual patient sampling lifetime model to simulate 10,000 hypothetical patients. The patients’ functional status improves according to American College of Rheumatology response criteria. In each 6‑month cycle, treatment might be discontinued due to loss of efficacy or adverse events.ResultsIn the base case, patients gain 7.07 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with conventional synthetic therapy and 9.92 QALYs if adalimumab combination therapy is added to the treatment algorithm. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) is € 24,492 based on German list prices. After deducting mandatory rebates and taxes, the ICUR is € 17,277, comparing favorably to analyses in other countries. Adalimumab combination therapy lowers indirect costs from € 162,698 to € 134,363. The ICUR based on total costs is € 14,550 (€ 7,335 after deducting taxes and rebates). Sensitivity analysis shows that adalimumab combination therapy becomes a dominant treatment option for younger baseline populations, i. e. adalimumab is both more effective and less expensive for baseline age 30 due to savings in indirect costs.ConclusionsOur complex probabilistic model shows that estimation of cost-effectiveness for RA relies on the incorporation of indirect costs and a sufficiently long simulation horizon to capture the complete range of possible outcomes and the associated long-term benefits of biological treatment.

PRM206 - Non-Adherence and Non-Persistence Should be Analyzed Separately: The Example of Methotrexate (Mtx) Therapy in the Therapy of Newly Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis in Germany

PRM206 - Non-Adherence and Non-Persistence Should be Analyzed Separately: The Example of Methotrexate (Mtx) Therapy in the Therapy of Newly Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis in Germany

OP0137-PC Decreasing incidence of disability pensions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in germany

BackgroundDuring the past two decades, the overall incidence of disability pensions (DP) in Germany has decreased tremendously, mainly due to changes in the labour market and in the practice of...

THU0137 Effectiveness and tolerance infiltration intraarticular corticosteroid according to dose

BackgroundThe optimal dose of corticosteroid to be used in intraarticular injection is not well established.ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and tolerance in the medium-term between...

Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany in 1997-98 and 2002: cost drivers and cost savings

Comparison of overall RA-related costs and of relative contribution of single-cost domains before and after the introduction of TNF-blocking agents in Germany. Two cohorts of RA outpatients (ACR '87 criteria) with long-standing disease are assessed in terms of disease-related costs and cost composition (n = 106 patients in 1997-98 and n = 180 patients in 2002 with similar patient characteristics). Full-cost analyses are performed including direct disease-related costs (medical and non-medical) and productivity costs as collected by patient questionnaires. Absolute costs (€/patient/year) are compared and the impact of single-cost domains on overall costing in RA is estimated (relative proportions of cost components within samples). Overall costs are comparable (1997-98: €4280; 2002: €3830; not significant). Differences can be observed in medication (1997-98: €550; 2002: €1580; P < 0.001) and hospitalization costs (1997-98: €1240; 2002: €500; P < 0.001). Productivity costs are significantly lower (€1480 vs €850; P < 0.05) in 2002. The impact of medication costs is outstanding in the 2002 sample (42 vs 12%), the proportion of hospitalization costs is substantially lower (29 vs 13%). Costs for DMARDs in 2002 are mostly driven by TNF blockers (37%). The number of DMARDs per patient is higher in 2002 as are costs for osteoporosis medication and gastroprotective treatment. Although overall costs before and after the introduction of TNF blockers are comparable, the decrease in hospitalization and productivity costs is promising in terms of future long-term cost savings. The development of these aspects and of the increasing medication costs will have to be evaluated with longer time frames.

Trends in treatment and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany 1997–2007: results from the National Database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres

BackgroundNew strategies and options for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have evolved during the past decade. A study was undertaken to investigate to what extent this influenced daily rheumatological...

Effects of Early Rituximab Retreatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with an Inadequate Response After the First Cycle: Retrospective Arthritis Cohort Study

To the Editor: The therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been significantly improved by the introduction of novel biological agents1. In this context the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) was approved for treatment of active and resistant RA in Germany in 2006. RTX was shown to represent a safe and effective treatment option over several courses leading to selective and transient depletion of the CD20+ B cell population2–4. However, to date the optimal timepoint for retreatment has not been defined exactly, and longterm treatment strategies using RTX have not been established. Our observational cohort study was performed to compare different treatment strategies using RTX and especially the effects of early retreatment within 4 to 6 months after first drug administration with a retreatment interval of more than 6 months in patients with RA (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics of the 39 RA patients are shown in Table 1. The respective comorbidities included overlapping chronic … Address correspondence to H. Bastian, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: hans.bastian{at}charite.de

Current use of glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Germany

To describe the current use of glucocorticoids in German patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analyzed clinical and patient-derived data from 10,068 outpatients with RA from the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres for the year 2001 collected by more than 80 rheumatologists in hospitals and private practices. Systemic glucocorticoid therapy was prescribed for 60% of all patients with RA in rheumatologic care. The proportion of patients receiving systemic glucocorticoids in addition to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy ranged from 53% to 81% of the patients for the various DMARDs. Glucocorticoid therapy was administered more often in combination with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (81%), cyclosporin A (80%), or leflunomide (77%) than with more traditional DMARDs such as methotrexate (63%) or sulfasalazine (55%). Regarding the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 63% of patients taking systemic glucocorticoids were also receiving some type of osteoporosis therapy, as opposed to only 26% of those not taking glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids play a pivotal role in the management of RA. This is reflected in the extensive use of low-dose glucocorticoids by German rheumatologists. Even if highly effective DMARDs are prescribed, they are accompanied by glucocorticoids, at least in the initial phase. High-dose glucocorticoids are prescribed for only a small proportion of the patients. There is increasing awareness of the risk of osteoporosis in long-term glucocorticoid treatment, demonstrated by the fact that osteoporosis medication is prescribed for a large proportion of patients taking glucocorticoids.

Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany

To quantify direct costs of medication and cost of illness (according to functional capacity) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, allowing further use in a health economic evaluation of sequential therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in specialised, i.e. rheumatological, care in Germany. The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective in Germany using a modelling approach, which was based on secondary analysis of existing data and on data from a sample of 583 patients from the German rheumatological database of 1998. Functional capacity was defined by the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (HFAQ) scores. Costs were calculated from resources utilised and patients' work capacity. Direct costs consisted of outpatient medical services, inpatient treatment, long-term care and rehabilitation treatment. Indirect costs incurred by sick leave and premature retirement were quantified according to the human-capital approach. Average total direct costs (year 1998-2001 values) per patient per year for continuous treatment with the selected DMARDs comprising costs for drugs, monitoring and treatment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were highest for intramuscular gold (sodium aurothiomalate) [euro 2106 (euro 1 approximately equal to $US 0.91; average of the period from 2000 through 2001)] followed by leflunomide (euro 2010), azathioprine (euro 1878), sulfasalazine (euro 1190), oral methotrexate (euro 708), and lowest for the antimalarials chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (euro 684). There were additional yearly costs for RA-related non-DMARD medication of euro 554 per patient, including management of ADRs. Mean cost of illness (year 1998 values) excluding medication cost amounted to euro 17,868 per RA patient per year. Annual costs increased with increasing disability, i.e. decreasing functional capacity, of RA patients from euro 6029 per patient with more than 94% of functional capacity to euro 28,509 per patient with <20% of functional capacity. In general, there was a predominance of indirect costs in each of the categories of functional capacity, ranging between 74% and 87% of total (direct and indirect) annual costs per RA patient. Annual direct costs increased from euro 811 to euro 7438 per patient with increasing disability. Inpatient treatment was the predominant component of direct costs. Patients in the worst category (<20%) of function experienced hospital costs that were 6.5 times higher than those of patients in the best category (>94%). On the basis of the data presented it can be concluded that the results of this investigation are typical for patients in rheumatological care in Germany and can therefore be used in a health economic analysis of different DMARD sequences aimed at changing disease progression over time.

Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany

To estimate the 3-year incremental cost effectiveness and cost utility of introducing leflunomide into sequential therapy, consisting of the most frequently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in specialised, i.e. rheumatological, care in Germany. The analysis was conducted from the societal perspective in Germany using an existing 3-year simulation model, which was adapted to the German healthcare system after secondary analysis of relevant publications and data. DMARD sequences including leflunomide were compared with those excluding leflunomide. Costs comprised direct costs incurred by treatment and indirect costs incurred by loss of productivity (sick leave and premature retirement) of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Effectiveness parameters were given by response years gained (RYGs) according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for 20%, 50% and 70% improvement (ACR20/50/70RYGs) and by QALYs gained (QALYGs). Costs, effects and QALYs were discounted by 5% per annum. In the base-case analysis, average values of costs, response years and QALYs were applied. Costs were in 1998-2001 values (euro 1 approximately equal to $US 0.91, average of the period from the year 2000 through 2001). After 3 years, adding leflunomide was less costly and more effective than the strategy excluding leflunomide when total (direct and indirect) costs were considered. There were savings of euro 271,777 and 8.1, 4.3, 5.1 and 4.9 ACR20RYGs, ACR50RYGs, ACR70RYGs and QALYGs per 100 patients, respectively, obtained through adding leflunomide. Focusing on direct costs, adding leflunomide was more costly and more effective compared with excluding leflunomide, with an incremental cost effectiveness of euro 5004 per ACR20RYG, euro 9535 per ACR50RYG, euro 7996 per ACR70RYG, and an incremental cost utility of euro8301 per QALYG, after 3 years. The robustness of the results was shown in comprehensive sensitivity analyses. In the analysis of extremes, different combinations of the limits of cost, effectiveness and utility parameters were investigated. Adding leflunomide to sequential DMARD therapy remained dominant in 79% of the possible cases, i.e. was less costly and more effective than the strategy excluding leflunomide. Focusing on direct costs, adding leflunomide became dominant in 29% and remained more costly and more effective in 50% of possible cases. Our analysis suggests, with its underlying data and assumptions, that having leflunomide as an additional option in a DMARD treatment sequence extends the time patients benefit from DMARD therapy at reasonable additional direct costs. Adding leflunomide may even be cost saving when total (direct and indirect) costs are considered. As data on DMARD effectiveness were extracted from the results of clinical trials, real-world data from observational studies would be needed to corroborate the findings of the present analysis.