RhD-positive Fetuses Research Articles

Antibody feedback regulation.

Antibodies are able to up- or downregulate antibody responses to the antigen they bind. Two major mechanisms can be distinguished. Suppression is most likely caused by epitope masking and can be induced by all isotypes tested (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM, and IgE). Enhancement is often caused by the redistribution of antigen in a favorable way, either for presentation to B cells via follicular dendritic cells (IgM and IgG3) or to CD4+ T cells via dendritic cells (IgE, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b). IgM and IgG3 complexes activate complement and are transported from the marginal zone to follicles by marginal zone Bcells expressing complement receptors. IgE-antigen complexes are captured by CD23+ B cells in the blood and transported to follicles, delivered to CD8α+ conventional dendritic cells, and presented to CD4+ T cells. Enhancement of antibody responses by IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b in complex with proteins requires activating FcγRs. These immune complexes are captured by dendritic cells and presented to CD4+ T cells, subsequently helping cognate B cells. Endogenous feedback regulation influences the response to booster doses of vaccines and passive administration of anti-RhD antibodies is used to prevent alloimmunization of RhD-negative women carrying RhD-positive fetuses.

Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping

Introduction: Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns. Methods: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017–2020 are reported. Results: Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%. Conclusion: Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.

Prenatal screening service for fetal RHD genotyping to guide prophylaxis: the two-year experience of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region in Italy.

Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide anti-D prophylaxis: the knowledge of fetal RhD type can direct and restrict the use of prenatal anti-D immunoglobulin exclusively to RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-positive fetus. Since November 2019 in the region of Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy) a prenatal screening service has been offered to RhD-negative women at 22-24 weeks of gestation. The cff-DNA is extracted from a simple peripheral maternal blood sample to analyze the fetal RHD gene: the results are interpreted as RHD-positive fetus, RHD-negative fetus, or Inconclusive. The service is shared with all regional hospitals and tests are provided free of charge by the National Health System. Overall, 142 RhD-negative pregnant women were recruited in nearly 2 years. Fetal RHD genotyping was negative in 53 pregnancies and positive in 89 pregnancies. Thus, unnecessary treatment of pregnant women and exposure to a scarce plasma-derived medicinal product was avoided, by the use of a single blood sample, in 37.8% of cases, representing 100% of the RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-negative fetus in our cohort. The first Italian region-wide screening service for fetal RHD genotyping has been implemented for 2 years, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to obtain the predicted fetal RhD phenotype before the 28th week of gestation, during which prenatal prophylaxis is usually administered. Giving prenatal anti-D immunoglobulin exclusively to RhD-negative women carrying a RhD-positive fetus reduces the overall use of anti-D immunoglobulin, which is becoming an ever more limited resource. The high sensitivity of the procedure provides evidence that the implementation of a diagnostic test in a reference laboratory guarantees the quality of the results, the concordance of reports and the sustainability of costs, representing an excellent guide to targeted use of prophylaxis.

Evaluation of an automated platform for non-invasive single-exon fetal RHD genotyping early in pregnancy.

RhD immunization is still the major cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Fetal RHD genotyping during pregnancy followed by tailored anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant RhD-negative women carrying an RHD-positive fetus to prevent RhD immunization is a well-established practice in many countries. This study aimed to validate a platform for high-throughput, non-invasive, single-exon, fetal RHD genotyping consisting of automated DNA extraction and PCR set-up, and a novel system for electronic data transfer to the real-time PCR instrument. We also investigated the effect of storage conditions of fresh or frozen samples on the outcome of the assay. Blood samples from 261 RhD-negative pregnant women collected in Gothenburg, Sweden, between November 2018 and April 2020 during gestation week 10-14 were either tested as fresh after storage for 0-7 days at room temperature or as thawed plasma samples previously separated and stored for up to 13 months at -80°C. Extraction of cell-free fetal DNA and PCR set-up were performed in a closed automated system. Fetal RHD genotyping was determined by real-time PCR amplification of the RHD gene exon 4. The outcome of RHD genotyping was compared with either the results obtained with serological RhD typing of newborns or with the results of RHD genotyping performed by other laboratories. No difference was observed in genotyping results when using fresh or frozen plasma during short- and long-term storage, revealing high stability of cell-free fetal DNA. The assay has shown high sensitivity (99.37%), specificity (100%), and accuracy (99.62%). These data confirm that the proposed platform for non-invasive, single-exon, RHD genotyping early in pregnancy is accurate and robust. Importantly, we demonstrated the stability of cell-free fetal DNA in fresh and frozen samples after short- and long-term storage.

Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery.

In September 2016, a nationwide targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis program was implemented in Norway. The prophylaxis (anti-D immunoglobulin) aims to cover the whole third trimester and is administered in gestational week 28 to RhD-negative women who carry RhD-positive fetuses. However, in many women, antibody screening at delivery does not detect anti-D immunoglobulin. The goal of this study was to investigate the presumable role of dose and timing of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin administration in non-detectable prophylaxis at the time of delivery. In this retrospective observational study, RhD-negative pregnant women who gave birth at Oslo University Hospital and Akershus University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed. Women who received antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin (1500IU at Oslo University Hospital and 1250IU at Akershus University Hospital) when fetal RHD genotyping at gestational week 24 predicted an RhD-positive fetus were included if an antibody screen at delivery was available. Data from the blood bank, maternity information systems, and electronic patient records were used. Analysis of the 984 RhD-negative women at the two hospitals revealed that 45.4% had non-detectable anti-D at delivery. A significant difference between the two hospitals was observed: 40.5% at Oslo University Hospital (n=509) and 50.7% at Akershus University Hospital (n=475) (p=0.001). The proportion with non-detectable anti-D increased to 56.0 and 75.3%, respectively (p=0.008) in the group of women who gave birth 12 weeks after routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Significantly fewer women had detectable anti-D at delivery when the lower anti-D immunoglobulin dose (1250IU) was administered antenatally. Multiple logistic regression indicated that the time interval between routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and delivery, in addition to anti-D dose, were significantly associated with detectable anti-D at delivery (p<0.001). We do not know which RhD-negative pregnant women, despite antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, are at risk of RhD alloimmunization, when antibody screening is negative at delivery. Administration of antenatal prophylaxis should probably be moved closer to delivery, since the risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage is higher during the last weeks of the third trimester.

Fetal RhD Genotyping using Cell Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma in RhD Negative Women in Pakistan

Background: The Rhesus (Rh) blood group system is one of the most hemogenic and polymorphic system in the body. RhD negative pregnant women carrying RhD positive fetus are always at the risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Prenatal fetal RhD genotyping leads to appropriate management and targeted anti-D immunoprophylaxis in RhD-positive pregnancies only. Objective: To determine the accuracy and diagnostic feasibility of non-invasive fetal RhD genotyping by analysis of cell free fetal DNA based on real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Materials and Methods: A total of 100 EDTA-blood samples from pregnant women between 10-32 weeks of gestation were collected. The cell free fetal DNA was extracted from maternal plasma followed by PCR analysis for SRY, RhD (exons 5,7,10) and RASSF1A genes using specific primers. Fetus was considered as RhD-positive when amplification of all targeted RhD exons were observed and in case, where no amplification for RhD exons was detected but Beta-globin gene and SRY gene was amplified, fetus were characterized as RhD-negative. When one or two RhD exons were amplified, the results were predicted to be inconclusive and RT-PCR assay with new extracted DNA samples was repeated. Results: Out of 100 pregnancies, none of the sample was found to be inconclusive for fetal RhD status. No false- positive and falsenegative results were registered. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic concordance was predicted to be 100%. Conclusion: The protocol we applied was highly accurate for non-invasive fetal RhD determination. We therefore recommend implementation of non-invasive RhD genotyping in prenatal screening. Keywords: Cff DNA; Fetal RhD genotyping; Maternal plasma

Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status

PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies.MethodsThe FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn’s serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results.ResultsSince 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn’s serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61–99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86–99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies.ConclusionNIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

The Norwegian experience with nationwide implementation of fetal RHD genotyping and targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis.

To reduce the risk of RhD alloimmunization during the last trimester of pregnancy, a targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) programme was implemented in Norway in 2016. Here, we present and discuss our experience with the nationwide implementation of the programme, and report sample uptake and preliminary data of de novo anti-D in pregnancy. The targeted RAADP was advised by the academic community and evaluated by the health authorities. A National Working Group has conducted the implementation in the transfusion services and contributed to organise the administration of the antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Fetal RhD type is determined by non-invasive prenatal testing at gestational week 24, and anti-D prophylaxis is administrated at gestational week 28 only to women with RhD positive fetuses. We describe the implementation process of targeted RAADP in Norway. The sample uptake is calculated by comparing the number of fetal RHD screens with the expected number of samples. The sample uptake shows regional variations: 88%-100% after 3 years. Promising decrease in de novo anti-D detected during pregnancy is observed. Nationwide targeted RAADP is implemented and included in the Norwegian maternity care programme. Compliance to sample uptake should further improve in some regions. A remaining issue to fulfil is the documentation of the accuracy of the fetal RHD-typing at all sites. Post-natal prophylaxis will then be guided by the fetal RHD result. Dedicated registries will ensure data to evaluate the expected reduction in pregnancy-related RhD immunisations, which is the final success criterion of the programme.

Altered strategy of prophylactic anti-D administration in pregnancy to cover term and post-term - a pilot study.

Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to RhD-negative women is most often administered in gestational age (GA) 28-30weeks with the next anti-D dose administered postpartum. The aim of this study was to analyse the proportion of RhD-negative women where RAADP is not detectable at term and in a pilot study to investigate whether RAADP administered in GA 28 and 38 results in detectable levels at term, post-term and post-delivery. In a retrospective analysis, 4280 RhD-negative women carrying an RHD positive fetus were included and the proportion with a negative antibody screen at delivery was determined. In the second part, 39 pregnancies were included prospectively, a second dose of RAADP was administered in GA 38weeks, and anti-D was quantified before the second dose and then weekly for 5weeks. In the retrospective analysis, 20·5% (856/4280) with RAADP administered in GA 28 were negative in routine antibody screening at delivery. In the small prospective study, 18% (7/39) had a negative antibody screen and 26% (10/39) had levels below 0·005IU/ml, in the quantification assay, in GA 38. Anti-D prophylaxis administered in GA 38 showed detectable levels of anti-D up to 30days post-delivery, with concentration at delivery 0·060±0·034IU/ml (mean±SD). Approximately 20% of the RhD-negative women show non-detectable levels of anti-D at term. A second dose of RAADP at GA 38 results in stable concentrations of anti-D at term, post-term and post-delivery, but with large interindividual variation.

Clinical practices and outcomes of RhD immunoglobulin prophylaxis following large-volume fetomaternal haemorrhage in Queensland, Australia.

Guidelines for laboratory assessment of fetomaternal haemorrhage (FMH) was published by the Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion (ANZSBT) in 2002. However, data on adherence by practitioners and clinical outcomes are lacking. The primary objective is to examine the follow-up testing and dosing of additional RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative women who experienced large-volume FMH for whom additional intravenous RhD immunoglobulin was requested in Queensland, Australia. The secondary objectives are to examine the rate and risk factors of RhD alloimmunisation in these women. RhD negative women with FMH >6mL for whom additional dose(s) of intravenous RhD immunoglobulin was requested through Australian Red Cross Lifeblood from February 2007 to February 2018 were identified. For each patient, the volume of FMH, methods and timing of FMH quantitation, dose of RhD immunoglobulin, maternal and cord blood groups were analysed against the corresponding antibody screen and identification. Following FMH >6mL, only 15% and 11.5% of cases adhered to current ANZSBT guideline on follow-up testing and supplemental RhD immunoglobulin dosing respectively. Despite the provision of single supplemental RhD immunoglobulin at a ratio of 100IU to 1mL fetal red cells, the rate of RhD alloimmunisation in RhD negative women with RhD positive fetus or fetus of unknown RhD status following FMH >6mL is at least 4%. Poor compliance with guidelines for follow-up and management of large-volume FMH may contribute to increased risk of RhD alloimmunisation. Further analysis of data is warranted.

Anti-RhD antibody therapy modulates human natural killer cell function

Anti-RhD antibodies are widely used in clinical practice to prevent immunization against RhD, principally in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Intriguingly, this disease is induced by production of the very same antibodies when an RhD negative woman is pregnant with an RhD positive fetus. Despite over five decades of use, the mechanism of this treatment is, surprisingly, still unclear. Here we show that anti-RhD antibodies induce human natural killer (NK) cell degranulation. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that NK cell degranulation is mediated by binding of the Fc segment of anti-RhD antibodies to CD16, the main Fcγ receptor expressed on NK cells. We found that this CD16 activation is dependent upon glycosylation of the anti-RhD antibodies. Furthermore, we show that anti-RhD antibodies induce NK cell degranulation in vivo in patients who receive this treatment prophylactically. Finally, we demonstrate that the anti-RhD drug KamRho enhances the killing of dendritic cells. We suggest that this killing leads to reduced activation of adaptive immunity and may therefore affect the production of anti-RhD antibodies

Do chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC) induce RhD immunisation? An evaluation of a large Danish cohort with no routine administration of anti-D after invasive prenatal testing.

To evaluate the risk of inducing RhD immunisation in pregnancies of RhD-negative mothers with an RhD-positive fetus undergoing chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC). Registry-based study in a Danish cohort which has not been given rhesus prophylaxis. Data were retrieved from the Department of Clinical Immunology at Rigshospitalet. All RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus with screen test results from weeks 8-12 and weeks 25-29 were linked to data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Data were divided into cases where no invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure was performed, cases that had AC performed, and cases that had CVS performed. A comparison of the proportion of women who developed RhD immunisation between the two screen tests. The cohort consisted of 10085 women: 9353 had no invasive procedures performed, 189 had AC and 543 had CVS performed. No women were immunised spontaneously or due to the procedure between the first and second screen test in the group with no procedure performed, or in the AC group. One woman was immunised in the CVS group. When comparing the proportion of women who was immunised in the CVS group with the no invasive test group a non-significant difference was found (P=0.055). The RhD immunisation rate before gestational weeks 25-29 in RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus is very low, even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing without rhesus prophylaxis. The RhD immunisation rate during pregnancy is very low even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing.

Fetomaternal hemorrhage among pregnant women in Accra, Ghana.

To determine the occurrence of and risk factors for fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) among pregnant women at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. A prospective study of FMH among pregnant women without hemoglobinopathies in the second trimester attending prenatal care between October 2015 and May 2016 performed using the Kleihauer-Betke test. Volume of FMH was estimated; ABO and Rh blood groups of participants were determined. A data extraction form and structured questionnaire were used to collect demographic and clinical information, and data on risk factors. Of 151 participants, 32 (21.2%) had FMH. Almost 18% (n=27) had FMH at baseline (16-24weeks), 10% (10/100) at 28-32weeks, and 11.1% (11/99) at 34-37weeks of pregnancy. Volume of FMH was less than 30mL in 30 (19.9%) women, whereas it was greater than 30mL in 2 (1.3%) women. No identifiable patient-specific factors were associated with occurrence of FMH. FMH is common among pregnant women in Ghana and can occur as early as 16weeks, without identifiable risk factors. RhD negative women who may be pregnant with RhD positive fetuses should be screened early in pregnancy, not only at delivery, for occurrence of FMH.

IgG-mediated immune suppression in mice is epitope specific except during high epitope density conditions

Specific IgG antibodies, passively administered together with erythrocytes, suppress antibody responses against the erythrocytes. Although used to prevent alloimmunization in Rhesus (Rh)D-negative women carrying RhD-positive fetuses, the mechanism behind is not understood. In mice, IgG suppresses efficiently in the absence of Fcγ-receptors and complement, suggesting an Fc-independent mechanism. In line with this, suppression is frequently restricted to the epitopes to which IgG binds. However, suppression of responses against epitopes not recognized by IgG has also been observed thus arguing against Fc-independence. Here, we explored the possibility that non-epitope specific suppression can be explained by steric hindrance when the suppressive IgG binds to an epitope present at high density. Mice were transfused with IgG anti-4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl (NP) together with NP-conjugated sheep red blood cells (SRBC) with high, intermediate, or low NP-density. Antibody titers and the number of single antibody-forming cells were determined. As a rule, IgG suppressed NP- but not SRBC-specific responses (epitope specific suppression). However, there was one exception: suppression of both IgM anti-SRBC and IgM anti-NP responses occurred when high density SRBC-NP was administered (non-epitope specific suppression). These findings answer a longstanding question in antibody feedback regulation and are compatible with the hypothesis that epitope masking explains IgG-mediated immune suppression.

Determination of fetal RHD type in plasma of RhD negative pregnant women

Alloimmunization against the RhD antigen is the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in addition to postnatal anti-D prophylaxis reduces the number of RhD-immunizations compared to only postnatal administration. Cell-free fetal DNA released from the apoptotic trophoblastic placental cells into the maternal circulation can be used to determine the fetal RHD type in a blood sample from an RhD negative mother. Based on this typing, antenatal anti-D prophylaxis can be recommended only to RhD negative women carrying an RhD positive fetus, since only these women are at risk of developing anti-D. The objective was to establish and validate a method for non-invasive fetal RHD typing. The fetal RHD genotype was studied in 373 samples from RhD negative pregnant women (median gestational week 24). DNA extracted from plasma was analyzed for the presence/absence of RHD exon 7 and 10 in a real-time PCR. The RHD genotype of the fetus was compared with the serological RhD type of the newborn. In 234 samples, the fetal RHD test was positive and in 127 samples negative. There was one false positive and no false negative results. In 12 samples, the fetal RHD type could not be determined, in all of them due to a maternal RHD gene. This method gives a reliable detection of fetal RHD positivity in plasma from RhD negative pregnant women. Antenatal anti-D prophylaxis based on the predicted fetal RhD type will avoid unnecessary treatment of pregnant women carrying an RhD negative fetus.

Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis program for RhD-negative pregnant women - outcome of the first two years of a national program in Finland.

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the non-invasive fetal RHD test at 24-26 weeks of gestation as part of the national antenatal screening program to target routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) at 28-30 weeks at women carrying an RhD-positive fetus. A prospective cohort study involving all maternity care centers and delivery hospitals in Finland between February 2014 and January 2016. Fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma was performed with real-time polymerase chain reaction in a centralized setting. The results were systematically compared with the serological newborn RhD typing. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of the fetal RHD assay; the secondary variable was compliance with the newly introduced RAADP program. Fetal RHD was screened from 10 814 women. For the detection of fetal RHD, sensitivity was 99.99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 99.92-99.99] and specificity 99.81% (95% CI 99.60-99.92). One false-negative and seven false-positive results were reported by the delivery hospitals in two years. The negative predictive value of the test was 99.97% (95% CI 99.81-99.99). At the end of the study period, over 98% of the RhD-negative women participated in the new screening program. The targeted RAAPD program was implemented effectively in the national maternity care program in Finland. An accurate fetal RHD screening test allows discontinuation of newborn testing without risking the postnatal prophylaxis program. In the future, the main area to investigate will be the clinical effect of RAADP on subsequent pregnancies.

No. 343-Routine Non-invasive Prenatal Prediction of Fetal RHD Genotype in Canada: The Time is Here.

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Sensitivity of Fetal RhD Screening for Safe Guidance of Targeted Anti–D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis: Prospective Cohort Study of a Nationwide Programme in the Netherlands

(Abstracted from BMJ 2016;355:i5789) The risk of maternal alloimmunization due to RhD incompatibility has decreased with use of antenatal and postnatal anti–D immunoglobulin prophylaxis. The discovery of cell-free fetal (cff) DNA in maternal plasma during pregnancy and the feasibility of fetal RhD testing using this source of DNA make it possible to determine fetal RhD type and to restrict the use of antenatal anti–D immunoglobulin to only those RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus.

Circulating Cell-Free DNA to Determine the Fetal RHD Status in All Three Trimesters of Pregnancy.

To estimate the accuracy of a new assay to determine the fetal RHD status using circulating cell-free DNA. This was a prospective, observational study. Maternal blood samples were collected in each trimester of pregnancy in 520 nonalloimmunized RhD-negative patients. Plasma samples were analyzed for circulating cell-free DNA using the SensiGENE RHD test, which used primers for exons 4 and 7 as previously described and incorporated a new primer design for exon 5 of the RHD gene. Neonatal serology for RhD typing using cord blood at birth was undertaken and results were stored in a separate clinical database. After unblinding the data, results of the DNA analysis were compared with the neonatal serology. Inconclusive results secondary to the presence of the RHD pseudogene or an RHD variant were noted in 5.6%, 5.7%, and 6.1% of the first-, second-, and third-trimester samples, respectively. The incidence of false-positive rates for RhD (an RhD-negative fetus with an RHD-positive result) was 1.54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-5.44%), 1.53% (CI 0.42-5.40%), and 0.82% (CI 0.04-4.50%), respectively. There was only one false-negative diagnosis (an RhD-positive fetus with an RHD-negative result), which occurred in the first trimester (0.32%; 95% CI 0.08-1.78%). Genotyping for mismatches across repeated samples revealed that this error was related to mislabeling of samples from two patients collected on the same day at one of the collection sites. Overall test results were in agreement across all three trimesters (P>.99). Circulating cell-free DNA can accurately predict the fetal RhD status in all three trimesters of pregnancy.

Fetal RHD Genotyping Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Pregnancy of RhD Negative Women in South of Iran.

Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant alloimmunization cases. The routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Recently, fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative pregnant women has been suggested for appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatal prophylaxis and decrease unnecessary prenatal interventions. In this prospective cohort study, in order to develop a reliable and non-invasive method for fetal RHD genotyping, cell free fetal DNA (cffD- NA) was extracted from maternal plasma. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detection of RHD exons 7, 5, 10 and intron 4 was performed and the results were compared to the serological results of cord blood cells as the gold standard method. SRY gene and hypermethylated Ras-association domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) gene were used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in male and female fetuses, respectively. Out of 48 fetuses between 8 and 32 weeks (wks) of gestational age (GA), we correctly diagnosed 45 cases (93.75%) of RHD positive fetuses and 2 cases (4.16%) of the RHD negative one. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample, while three other RHD gene sequences were not detected; the sample was classified as inconclusive, and the RhD serology result after birth showed that the fetus was RhD-negative. Our results showed high accuracy of the qPCR method using cffDNA for fetal RHD genotyping and implicate on the efficiency of this technique to predict the competence of anti-D immunoglobulin administration.