The validity of the hypothesis that the Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho was written previous to Dol po pa’s commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra can be evaluated based on the scriptures cited in the two works. This paper thus examines Dol po pa’s commentary. The cited scriptures are divided into three groups: (A) Prajñāpāramitā sūtras and the associated commentary literature including the Abhisamayālaṃkāra; (B) the five works attributed to Maitreya and their commentaries; and (C) others. Among the scriptures belonging to C, the titles that are cited or referred to multiple times are limited, and among them Mañjuśrīkīrti’s Brief Explanation of His Own Opinion and Nāgārjuna’s Dharmadhātustava are taken up. Compared with the quoted portion in the Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho, there were not many references in common between the two, and no definitive facts were found to support the original hypothesis.
Read full abstract