Sensitivity to satiety constitutes a necessary requirement for claiming neuronal coding of subjective reward value. In the most natural and interpretable way, specific satiety arises from on-going consumption of individual rewards. Choices between differently sated rewards reveal specific value reductions. However, animals often fail to choose a sated reward over a less sated reward, which precludes precise satiety assessment at choice indifference between single rewards. Choice options with two distinct rewards ('bundles') offer a solution. We used the framework of Revealed Preference Theory that defines the subjective value of composite bundles and studied reward-specific satiety during on-going reward consumption. Monkeys chose between two bundles that each contained one less and one more sated reward with independently set quantity. Despite advancing satiety, the animals kept choosing both bundles and attained choice indifference with psychophysically controlled reward titration. The reward quantities required for choice indifference suggested differential, reward-specific subjective value reduction. Conventional measurement of licking demonstrated mechanistic independence of subjective value change. Neuronal chosen value signals in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) followed closely the choice pattern of subjective value change within recording periods of individual neurons. A neuronal classifier distinguishing the bundles and predicting choice substantiated the subjective value change. Conventional choice between single rewards confirmed the neuronal response change seen with two-reward bundles. These results demonstrate a neuronal substrate for satiety-induced subjective value change as necessary requirement for subjective value coding in OFC.