Revision Total Hip Research Articles

Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Reported Legal Claims in the U.S. in the Past 20 Years

IntroductionThe increasing incidence of primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty has been accompanied by a subsequent rise in revision surgeries. Revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with major litigation risk, primarily due to procedural and post-surgical errors. However, the understanding of the causes and outcomes of revision TJA malpractice cases remains unstudied. This study aimed to analyze litigated malpractice claims against orthopaedic surgeons performing revision TJA using a national legal database. MethodsA database was queried for a nationwide analysis of medical malpractice litigation in revision TJA from 2000 to 2023. Data on the time, duration, and locations of the litigations, allegations of surgical negligence, the damages cited, the outcomes of the trials, and indemnities were collected. ResultsOf 110 TJA malpractice cases identified over two decades, 32 cases involving revision THA and TKA surgeries were included in the final analysis. The cases were equally divided between THA and TKA, spanning 16 states, with the highest proportions in New York, Connecticut, and Louisiana. “Procedural error” (28%; n = 9) was the most frequently cited negligence, followed by “post-surgical error” (25%; n = 8) and “failure to treat” (19%; n = 6). The most common damages were “continued pain/mobility limitations” (28%; n = 9) and “infections” (19%; n = 6). Most cases resulted in a verdict for the defense (63%; n = 20). The average indemnity was $5,713,635, with considerable variability. ConclusionThis study presents the leading causes of litigated malpractice claims over the past two decades in the United States in revision TJA as perceived procedural and post-surgical errors, with the most common damages reported being “persistent pain/mobility limitations” and “infections.” Given the rising incidence of revision TJA, orthopaedic surgeons may utilize these trends to better inform patients about the potential risks and outcomes of surgery and mitigate litigation risks.

Suction drain usage has no benefit following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

The use of drains after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has shown little benefit. Few studies have investigated drain usage after revision TJA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilizing suction drains is beneficial for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. We performed a comprehensive literature review utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria of this review were all original articles written in English investigating the efficacy and safety of closed suction drainage in revision TKA or THA, reporting at least one of the following outcome measures: (1) estimated blood loss (EBL), (2) perioperative hemoglobin change, (3) needs for transfusion, (4) postoperative infection, and (5) wound complications. Articles were excluded if they are not available in English or they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, or animal studies prior to July 22, 2023. A total of six studies met inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had a drain while 1765 patients did not have a drain after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included for meta-analysis included estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion. Other data extracted includes postoperative infections, and wound complications. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had drains, while 1765 patients did not after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. The average age of the patients was 66.1+/- 3.4 years, and the average BMI was 30.3 +/-0.8. There was no difference in postoperative infections (p = 0.14), wound complications (p = 0.621) or need for transfusion (p = 0.521) between the two groups. There was also no difference in EBL (Hedges' g CI[-3.52, 2.77]) or postoperative Hb (Hedges' g CI[-1.65, 2.41]) between patients with and without drains. Our results do not show any benefit from drain placement after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. With the increased cost, time and need for drain removal, this is likely an unnecessary intervention. Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cement loaded with high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin does not reduce the risk of subsequent infection after aseptic total hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a preliminary study

PurposeThe aim of this study was to quantify the prophylactic effect of high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) during revision total hip (rTHA) or knee (rTKA) arthroplasty for aseptic reasons. The hypothesis was that the raw surgical site infection (SSI) rate is lower when this particular cement is used in comparison with cement loaded with standard-dose gentamicin during rTHA or rTKA for aseptic reasons.MethodsThis retrospective study included 290 consecutive patients undergoing aseptic rTHA or rTKA. Two consecutive cohorts were defined: the first (control group) involved 145 patients where ALBC with gentamicin only was used; the second (study group) involved 145 patients where ALBC with high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin was used. The primary endpoint was the raw SSI rate after 24 months.ResultsThe raw SSI rate was 8/145 (6%) in the control group and 13/145 (9%) in the study group (odds ratio 0.62, p = 0.26). There was a significant impact of the presence of any risk factor on the SSI rate (15/100 versus 6/169, odds ratio = 4.25, p = 0.002), but no significant impact of any individual risk factor. No complication or side effect related to ALBC was observed in either group.ConclusionThese results do not support the routine use of gentamicin and clindamycin ALBC for fixation of revision implants after rTHA and rTKA for aseptic reasons.

Socioeconomic area deprivation index is not associated with postoperative complications following revision total hip and knee joint arthroplasty

IntroductionRevision hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) carries a high burden of postoperative complications, including surgical site infections (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), reoperation, and readmission, which negatively affect postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. Socioeconomic area-level composite indices such as the area deprivation index (ADI) are increasingly important measures of social determinants of health (SDoH). This study aims to determine the potential association between ADI and SSI, VTE, reoperation, and readmission occurrence 90 days following revision TJA. Methods1047 consecutive revision TJA patients were retrospectively reviewed. Complications, including SSI, VTE, reoperation, and readmission, were combined into one dependent variable. ADI rankings were extracted using residential zip codes and categorized into quartiles. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to analyze the association of ADI as an independent factor for complication following revision TJA. ResultsDepression (p = 0.034) and high ASA score (p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of a combined complication postoperatively on univariate logistic regression. ADI was not associated with the occurrence of any of the complications recorded following surgery (p = 0.092). ASA remained an independent risk factor for developing postoperative complications on multivariate analysis. ConclusionAn ASA score of 3 or higher was significantly associated with higher odds of developing postoperative complications. Our findings suggest that ADI alone may not be a sufficient tool for predicting postoperative outcomes following revision TJA, and other area-level indices should be further investigated as potential markers of social determinants of health.

The role of BioFire Joint Infection Panel in diagnosing periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections in patients with unclear conventional microbiological results.

This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool. Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures. The JI panel detected microorganisms in 7/48 (14.5%) and 15/67 (22.4%) cases related to UNCs and SPCs, respectively, but not in cases of UPCs. The correlation between JI panel detection and infection classification criteria for early/late acute and chronic PJI was 46.6%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Overall, the JI panel identified 12.6% additional microorganisms and three new species. The JI panel pathogen identification showed a sensitivity and specificity of 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7 to 49.5) and 91.1% (95% CI 84.7 to 94.9), respectively. In total, 19/195 (9.7%) could have been managed differently and more accurately upon JI panel evaluation. Despite its microbial limitation, JI panel demonstrated clinical usefulness by complementing the traditional methods based on multiple cultures, particularly in PJI with unclear microbiological results.

Synovial calprotectin in prosthetic joint infection. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Calprotectin is a protein endowed with antimicrobial properties, rendering it a distinctive marker for infection. Two methods are currently available for the assay of calprotectin: the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the lateral flow test (LFT). We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid calprotectin and to compare the accuracy of the laboratory-based test and the qualitative assessment for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infection. We searched (from inception to November 2023) MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies on calprotectin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio were analyzed. The receiver-operating curve for each method was calculated. We included 14 articles in our meta-analysis, including 902 patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasties revision; 331 (37%) had a joint infection according to MSIS, MSIS-modified criteria, ICM 2018 and EBJIS 2021. Considering the false-positive result rate of 6% and false-negative result rate of 7%, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.93 (0.91-0.95), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.94). No statistical differences in terms of sensitivity and specificity were found between ELISA and LFT. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the two calprotectin assessment methods were: LFT 0.90 (95% CI 0.869-0.935) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.894-0.941), respectively; ELISA 0.96 (95% CI 0.914-0.986) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.934-0.988), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio of the ELISA was superior to that of the LFT (906.6667, 95% CI 271.2686-3030.3712 versus 113.8886, 95% CI 70.4001-184.2414; p < 0.001). The AUC for ELISA and LFT was 0.968 (95% CI 0.944-0.984) and 0.915 (95% CI 0.895-0.933), respectively. Detection of synovial calprotectin is an accurate test for diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infections. The diagnostic accuracy of the two calprotectin assessment methods is almost comparable. The LFT is a valid, rapid, and more available diagnostic tool, particularly to rule out PJI.

Are social determinants of health associated with an increased length of hospitalization after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty? A comparison study of social deprivation indices.

Length of stay (LOS) has been extensively assessed as a marker for healthcare utilization, functional outcomes, and cost of care for patients undergoing arthroplasty. The notable patient-to-patient variation in LOS following revision hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA) suggests a potential opportunity to reduce preventable discharge delays. Previous studies investigated the impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on orthopaedic conditions and outcomes using deprivation indices with inconsistent findings. The aim of the study is to compare the association of three publicly available national indices of social deprivation with prolonged LOS in revision TJA patients. 1,047 consecutive patients who underwent a revision TJA were included in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and behavioral characteristics were extracted. Area deprivation index (ADI), social deprivation index (SDI), and social vulnerability index (SVI) were recorded for each patient, following which univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between deprivation measures and prolonged LOS (greater than five days postoperatively). 193 patients had a prolonged LOS following surgery. Categorical ADI was significantly associated with prolonged LOS following surgery (OR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.30-3.54; p = 0.003). No association with LOS was found using SDI and SVI. When accounting for other covariates, only ASA scores (ORrange=3.43-3.45; p < 0.001) and age (ORrange=1.00-1.03; prange=0.025-0.049) were independently associated with prolonged LOS. The varying relationship observed between the length of stay and socioeconomic markers in this study indicates that the selection of a deprivation index could significantly impact the outcomes when investigating the association between socioeconomic deprivation and clinical outcomes. These results suggest that ADI is a potential metric of social determinants of health that is applicable both clinically and in future policies related to hospital stays including bundled payment plan following revision TJA.

Prevalence and Impact of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Total Hip or Knee Revision Surgery

BackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPICs) on the outcome of presumed aseptic total knee and hip revision surgery. MethodsData regarding patients who underwent elective total hip or knee revision surgery from January 2003 to July 2017 due to preoperatively presumed aseptic reasons was retrospectively reviewed. Partial revisions and patients who had follow-ups below 60 months were excluded from the study. In all surgeries, at least 3 intraoperative samples were taken for microbial culture. Failure was defined as the need for rerevision due to any cause at 5 years and/or the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy. Overall, 123 total hip and 431 total knee revisions were eligible for the study. All cases had at least a 5 years follow-up. ResultsThere were 420 cases (75.8%) that had all cultures negative, 108 (19.5%) had a single UPIC, and 26 (4.7%) had either ≥2 UPICs for the same microorganism or 1 UPIC for a virulent microorganism. This latter group was not associated with a significantly higher failure rate (2 of 26, 7.7%) compared to those in the aseptic group (54 of 528, 10.2%). Revisions performed within the first 24 months after primary implantation had a higher 5-years rerevision rate (19.3 versus 8.4%, P = .01), mainly attributable to aseptic causes. ConclusionsTotal hip and knee revisions with UPICs were not significantly associated with a higher rerevision risk at 5 years. Those revisions performed within the first 24 months after primary arthroplasty had a higher rate of any-cause failure.

Indications, complications and outcomes of modular stems in total hip revision arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

Indications, complications and outcomes of modular stems in total hip revision arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Machine Learning Algorithms Outperform CARDE-B, 5-Item, and 6-Item Modified Frailty Index Risk Scores

BackgroundAlthough risk calculators are used to prognosticate postoperative outcomes following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]), machine learning (ML) based predictive tools have emerged as a promising alternative for improved risk stratification. This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of ML models for 30-day mortality following revision TJA to that of traditional risk-assessment indices such as the CARDE-B score (congestive heart failure, albumin (< 3.5 mg/dL), renal failure on dialysis, dependence for daily living, elderly (> 65 years of age), and body mass index (BMI) of < 25 kg/m2), 5-item modified frailty index (5MFI), and 6MFI. MethodsAdult patients undergoing revision TJA between 2013 and 2020 were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and randomly split 80:20 to compose the training and validation cohorts. There were 3 ML models - extreme gradient boosting, random forest, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression (NEPLR) - that were developed and evaluated using discrimination, calibration metrics, and accuracy. The discrimination of CARDE-B, 5MFI, and 6MFI scores was assessed individually and compared to that of ML models. ResultsAll models were equally accurate (Brier score = 0.005) and demonstrated outstanding discrimination with similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs, extreme gradient boosting = 0.94, random forest = NEPLR = 0.93). The NEPLR was the best-calibrated model overall (slope = 0.54, intercept = −0.004). The CARDE-B had the highest discrimination among the scores (AUC = 0.89), followed by 6MFI (AUC = 0.80), and 5MFI (AUC = 0.68). Albumin < 3.5 mg/dL and BMI (< 30.15) were the most important predictors of 30-day mortality following revision TJA. ConclusionsThe ML models outperform traditional risk-assessment indices in predicting postoperative 30-day mortality after revision TJA. Our findings highlight the utility of ML for risk stratification in a clinical setting. The identification of hypoalbuminemia and BMI as prognostic markers may allow patient-specific perioperative optimization strategies to improve outcomes following revision TJA.

Is there sufficient evidence to support the use of antibiotic holiday just before the second stage of an infected total hip or knee arthroplasty revision surgery?

The practice of implementing an antibiotic holiday before the second stage of hip or knee arthroplasty is currently controversial due to limited evidence for this approach, as per the International Consensus Meeting 2018 on Musculoskeletal Infection. A greater understanding of this issue could augment the quality of Alrayes and Sukeik's mini-review (2023) on diagnosing, managing, and treating periprosthetic knee infections. However, a significant lack of literature exists concerning the optimal duration for the antibiotic holiday, calling for more research before establishing any clinical guidelines.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages associated with prolonged length of stay and non-home discharge following revision total hip and knee joint arthroplasty

BackgroundDischarge disposition and length of stay (LOS) are widely recognized markers of healthcare utilization patterns of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty (TJA). These markers are commonly associated with increased postoperative complications, patient dissatisfaction, and higher costs. Area deprivation index (ADI) has been validated as a composite metric of neighborhood-level disadvantage. This study aims to determine the potential association between ADI and discharge disposition or extended LOS following revision TJA. MethodsThis study conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of revision hip and knee TJA patients from a single tertiary institution. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the association between ADI and discharge disposition or LOS, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results1047 consecutive revision TJA patients were identified across 463 different neighborhoods. 193 (18.4 %) had an extended LOS, and 334 (31.9 %) were discharged to non-home facilities. Compared with Q1 (least deprived cohort), Q2 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; p = 0.030) and Q4 (most deprived cohort: OR = 2.04; p = 0.002) cohorts demonstrated higher odds of non-home discharge. Patients in the highest ADI quartile (most deprived cohort) were associated with increased odds of prolonged LOS following revision TJA compared to those in the lowest ADI quartile (OR = 2.63; p < 0.001). ConclusionThis study suggests that higher levels of neighborhood-level disadvantage may be associated with higher odds of non-home discharge and prolonged LOS following revision TJA. Development of interventions based on the area deprivation index may improve discharge planning and reduce unnecessary non-home discharges in patients living in areas of socioeconomic deprivation.

Personalized digital simulation‑assisted acetabular component implantation in revision hip arthroplasty.

The number of artificial total hip revision arthroplasties is increasing yearly in China, and >50% of these cases have acetabular defects. Accurately locating and quantifying the bone defect is one of the current challenges of this surgery. Thus, the objective of the present study was to simulate acetabular implantation with the aid of Mimics 17.0 software (Materialise NV) in patients with loosened acetabular prosthesis, to evaluate the 'ideal acetabular center' and the 'actual acetabular center' to guide the choice of prosthesis and surgical method. From January 2017 to June 2021, the present study included 10 hips from 10 patients [seven men (seven hips) and three women (three hips)]. In all patients, the Mimics software was applied to simulate the dislocation of the femoral prosthesis and acetabular prosthesis implantation before surgery; calculate the height difference between the 'ideal acetabular center' and the 'actual acetabular center' to assess the bone defect; confirm the size of the acetabular prosthesis, abduction angle, anteversion angle and bone coverage of the acetabular cup; and measure the intraoperative bleeding and postoperative follow-up Harris score of the hip joint. After statistical analysis, the present study revealed that digital simulation assistance could improve the accuracy of hip revision acetabular prosthesis implantation, reduce postoperative shortening of the affected limb, especially for surgeons with relatively little experience in hip revision surgery, and greatly reduce the occurrence of complications such as hip dislocation because of poor postoperative prosthesis position.

Microsporidia (Encephalitozoon cuniculi) in Patients with Degenerative Hip and Knee Disease, Czech Republic.

Total joint arthroplasty is a commonly used surgical procedure in orthopedics. Revision surgeries are required in >10% of patients mainly because of prosthetic joint infection caused by bacteria or aseptic implant loosening caused by chronic inflammation. Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a microsporidium, an obligate intracellular parasite, capable of exploiting migrating proinflammatory immune cells for dissemination within the host. We used molecular detection methods to evaluate the incidence of E. cuniculi among patients who had total hip or knee arthroplasty revision. Out of 49 patients, E. cuniculi genotypes I, II, or III were confirmed in joint samples from 3 men and 2 women who had implant loosening. Understanding the risks associated with the presence of microsporidia in periprosthetic joint infections is essential for proper management of arthroplasty. Furthermore, E. cuniculi should be considered a potential contributing cause of joint inflammation and arthrosis.

Femoral bone defect classifications in revision total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive review and proposal of a new algorithm of management.

The number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and revisions is expected to steadily grow in the future. The femoral revision surgery can be technically demanding whether severe bone defects need to be addressed. The femoral revision aims to obtain a proper primary stability of the stem with a more proximal fixation as possible. Several authors previously proposed classification systems to describe the morphology of the bony femoral defect and to drive accordingly the surgeon in the revision procedure. The previous classifications mainly considered cortical and medullary bone at the level of the defect of poor quality by definition. Therefore, the surgical strategies aimed to achieve a distal fixation bypassing the defect or to fill the defect with bone impaction grafting or structured bone grafts up to the replacement of the proximal femur with megaprosthesis. The consensus on a comprehensive and reliable classification system and management algorithm is still lacking. A new classification system should be developed taking into account the bone quality. The rationale of a new classification is that 'functional' residual bone stock could be present at the level of the defect. Therefore, it can be used to achieve a primary (mechanical) and secondary (biological) stability of the implants with a femoral fixation more proximal as possible.

No Difference in Acute Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Fix and Replace Versus Fixation Alone in the Treatment of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

To compare acute outcomes between patients undergoing fix and replace (FaR) versus open-reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures. Retrospective Cohort Study. Single Level 2 Trauma Center. Consecutive acetabular fracture patients ≥ 55 years of age treated by two orthopaedic trauma surgeons at one tertiary care center from January 2017 to April 2022 with FaR versus ORIF were identified. Included were those with complete datasets within the 180-day global period. Excluded were patients with previous ORIF of the acetabulum or femur, or revision total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative weight-bearing status, postoperative disposition, time to postoperative mobilization, and 90-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes compared included demographic information, injury mechanism, surgical time, complications, revisions, and preoperative and postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr.) scores. These were compared between FaR and ORIF groups. Seventeen FaR patients (average age 74.5 ± 9.0 years) and 11 ORIF patients (average age 69.4 ± 9.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range: 6-75.6 months). More FaR group patients were ordered immediate weight-bearing as tolerated or partial weight-bearing compared with ORIF alone (70% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.03). More patients in the FaR group had pre-existing hip osteoarthritis compared with ORIF alone (71% vs. 27%, P = 0.05). Fracture classification ( P = 0.03) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = 0.02) differed between the 2 groups. There were no other differences in demographics, LOS ( P = 0.99), postoperative disposition ( P = 0.54), time to postoperative mobilization ( P = 0.38), 90-day readmission rates ( P = 0.51), operative time ( P = 0.06), radiographic union ( P = 0.35), time to union ( P = 0.63), pre- ( P = 0.32) or postoperative HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.80), delta HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.28), or reoperation rates between groups ( P = 0.15). FaR and ORIF seem to be sound treatment options in the management of geriatric acetabular fractures. Patients in the FaR group achieved immediate or partial weight-bearing earlier than the ORIF group; however, time to postoperative mobilization did not differ between the two groups. The remainder of acute postoperative outcomes (LOS, postoperative disposition, and 90-day readmission rates) did not differ between the two groups. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Survival Analysis and Failure Modes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cemented Semi-Retentive Acetabular Cup.

To reduce the incidence of total hip revisions, there have been continuous efforts to enhance prosthetic materials and designs to optimize implant survival. A primary implant with a constrained acetabular component is often used to minimize the risk of dislocations even though this approach has some drawbacks as reported in the literature. To address these concerns, this study aimed to assess the survivorship and dislocation rate of a semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup when used as a primary implant. The specific cemented cup that we studied was not present in any study that we consulted, so to fill this gap, we conducted a retrospective examination of 527 cemented hip prostheses that utilized the semi-retentive cup between the years 2005 and 2012. We employed Cox multiple regression models for our statistical analysis. The revision due to dislocation occurred in 12.8% of all cases, with a lower incidence of 5% (14 cases) in age groups >70 years than in age groups <70 years (14%-32 cases) (p < 0.001). The survival rates of the semi-retentive cemented acetabular cup were 98.6% (520 cases) at 5 years and 92.2% (487 cases) at 10 years. The survival rates were significantly lower in women than men, with 1.9% (7 cases) toward 0% at 5 years and 8.1% (30 cases) toward 5% (7 cases) at 10 years (p = 0.002). The difference in failure rates between age groups over 70 years (2.3%-10 cases) and age groups under 70 years (11.5%-34 cases) was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). Our study indicates that the semi-constrained design may cause frequent damage to the polyethylene liner due to impingement and wear, which are the primary factors for failure. Also, this implant has a similar risk of revision due to dislocation as reported in studies and may be beneficial as a primary implant in elderly patients with low-demanding lifestyles, muscular insufficiency, and low compliance regarding hip prosthetic behavior, without a major effect on survivorship.

Factors Associated With Length of Stay for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A 20-Year Single-Province Population-Based Analysis of Longitudinal Temporal Trends

BackgroundWith notable benefits in reducing length of stay (LOS), this study aimed to quantify the temporal trend and the factors contributing to increased LOS for primary and revision total hip (THA and rTHA) and knee (TKA and rTKA) arthroplasty. The study was carried out for a large population-based cohort over a 20-year period. MethodsThis was a retrospective population-based study assessing the LOS for all primary and revision THA and TKA procedures between 2003 and 2022. The primary outcome of interest was LOS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associated variables. ResultsFor the entire dataset, there were 16,677 primary THAs, 13,018 primary TKAs, 3276 (aseptic) rTHAs, 1445 (aseptic) rTKAs, 820 (septic) rTHAs, and 667 (septic) rTKAs. The median LOS over the 20-year period between 2003 and 2022 demonstrated a steady and continuous decline from a median of 5 days (interquartile range 3-7) in 2003 to 1 day (interquartile range 1-2) in 2022. On multivariate analysis, there were a number of factors associated with increasing LOS: year of procedure (P < .0001), procedure type (P < .0001), age (P < .0001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, body mass index was not associated with increased LOS (P = .5631). ConclusionsThere was a downward trend in LOS for all types of primary and revision THA and TKA. The factors contributing most to a reduction in LOS include the year the procedure was performed, primary THA procedures, aseptic (vs periprosthetic joint infection) revision procedures, younger age, and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists classes.

Statistical fragility analysis of reported outcomes associated with surgical management of acetabular labral pathology.

The purpose of this study was to analyse the robustness of comparative research that evaluated arthroscopic labral reconstruction versus other surgical management of labral pathology. Key measures of statistical fragility include the fragility index and fragility quotient.ß. 12 comparative studies that evaluated the use of arthroscopic labral reconstruction were included in this study. Particular attention was placed on evaluating trends, either statistically significant or not, of functional improvement, complication rates, need for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and revision rates with associated p-values. The analysis involved in this study was the Fragility Index, which is the median number of events required to change the statistical significance of a particular outcome, thus changing the study conclusions. Fragility quotient was calculated for each study as the fragility index divided by sample size. Of the 12 studies that were included for analysis, there were a total of 25 reported outcomes, 8 of which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The statistical fragility for the significant outcomes were 2.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5-3.5), whereas the median statistical fragility for insignificant results was 6 (IQR 4-9). The overall fragility index was 4 (IQR 3-7). The median of fragility quotients was 0.04 (IQR 0.01-0.07). This study demonstrated that comparative research regarding arthroscopic techniques of labral reconstruction may not be as statistically stable as previously hoped. In many of the reported outcomes, particularly the ones that were statistically significant, only a small percentage of event changes was required to change the significance of the study conclusions. This fragility is worrisome, since clinical decisions that rely on these reported outcomes may have a significant impact on long-term patient outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to optimise patient outcomes by incorporating past literature and reported outcomes.

Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review

BackgroundExtensive bone loss on femur and acetabulum posed a big challenge to orthopedists in total hip revision surgeries. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) as a valuable bone preservation technique could effectively address this problem. Either IBG revision on the femoral or acetabular side was well studied, while its use on both sides in one operation was not. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes of IBG on both femoral and acetabular sides at first-time hip revision. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (mean follow-up of 5.8 years) undergoing first-time revision with IBG on both acetabular and femoral sides at our institution. The Paprosky classification system was used to classify bone defects. Freeze-dried allografts and cemented prostheses were used in all patients. Postoperative complications and rerevision rates were reported. ResultsFive patients presented a Paprosky type IIC acetabular defect, 3 with a type IIIB, IIIA, and IIC defect, respectively. Three patients presented with a type IV femoral defect, 3 with a type IIIB defect, and 2 with a type II defect. Two patients developed complications, while one had an intraoperative femoral fracture and one had delayed wound healing. At the latest follow-up, no patient had rerevisions or operations related to the prosthesis. ConclusionsIBG in combination with cemented prosthesis is a profitable biological reconstruction revision technique that could provide satisfying midterm outcomes. We first propose the use of blood clots mixed with bone grafts for potential bone incorporation enhancement, while its specific effects need to be verified in further studies.