Reverse Lesion Research Articles

Risk Factors for Intra-articular Bone and Cartilage Lesions in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Posterior Instability

Background: Patients with posterior shoulder instability may have bone and cartilage lesions (BCLs) in addition to capsulolabral injuries, although the risk factors for these intra-articular lesions are unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients with posterior instability who had a greater number of instability events would have a higher rate of BCLs compared with patients who had fewer instability episodes. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Group instability patient cohort were analyzed. Patients aged 12 to 99 years undergoing primary surgical treatment for shoulder instability were included. The glenohumeral joint was evaluated by the treating surgeon at the time of surgery, and patients were classified as having a BCL if they had any grade 3 or 4 glenoid or humeral cartilage lesion, reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, bony Bankart lesion, or glenoid bone loss. The effects of the number of instability events on the presence of BCLs was investigated by use of Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression modeling was performed to investigate the independent contributions of demographic variables and injury-specific variables to the likelihood of having a BCL. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: We identified 271 patients (223 male) for analysis. Bone and cartilage lesions were identified in 54 patients (19.9%) at the time of surgical treatment. A glenoid cartilage injury was most common and was identified in 28 patients (10.3%). A significant difference was noted between the number of instability events and the presence of BCLs (P = .025), with the highest rate observed in patients with 2 to 5 instability events (32.3%). Multivariate logistic regression modeling indicated that increasing age (P = .019) and 2 to 5 reported instability events (P = .001) were significant independent predictors of the presence of BCLs. For bone lesions alone, the number of instability events was the only significant independent predictor; increased risk of bone lesion was present for patients with 1 instability event (OR, 6.1; P = .012), patients with 2 to 5 instability events (OR, 4.2; P = .033), and patients with more than 5 instability events (OR, 6.0; P = .011). Conclusion: Bone and cartilage lesions are seen significantly more frequently with increasing patient age and in patients with 2 to 5 instability events. Early surgical stabilization for posterior instability may be considered to potentially limit the extent of associated intra-articular injury. The group of patients with more than 5 instability events may represent a different pathological condition, as this group showed a decrease in the likelihood of cartilage injury, although not bony injury.

Treatment strategy of traumatic posterior dislocation of shoulder joint with concomitant reverse Hill-Sachs lesion of the humeral head

Objective To explore the treatment strategy for traumatic posterior dislocation of shoulder joint with concomitant reverse Hill-Sachs lesion on the humeral head. Methods Data of 8 consecutive traumatic posterior shoulder dislocations with concomitant compression on anteromedial portion of the affected humeral heads (reverse Hill-Sachs lesion), which resulted from the collision between the posterior rim of the glenoid and anterior portion of the humeral head, who had undergone treatment in our department since July 2015 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Seven males and 1 female have been included in the case series, with the age between 30-70 years (mean 44.5±12.3 years), 6 on the right shoulder and 2 on the left. 7 were acute injuries and 1 chronic. One patient received closed reduction under brachial plexus block anesthesia, and the rest cases underwent open surgeries. Modified Judet approach was performed in one case due to the concomitant fracture on the postero-inferior glenoid. The other 6 patients received modified delto-pectoral approach. 4 concomitant rotator cuffswere found during the procedures, including1 full thickness tears 3 partial. One patient received McLaughlin surgery, allograft and anchor suture fixation. 2 underwent cannulated screw fixation. Allograft and PHILOS fixation was placed on 4 cases. All 8 patients were required maintaining in mild abduction and external rotation the affected arms, with the protection of the casts. All patients were followed up for 20.6±8.4 months (range, 9-36 months). Constant-Murley scores and visual analogue score (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at the latest follow-up. Results Infection occurred in 1 case, the humeral head has been resected subsequently and antibiotic cement spacer was inserted for further arthroplasty. Necrosis of the humeral head has been observed in one CT follow up 9 months after surgery, with no limitation of the range of motion of the shoulder. Stage 1 wound closure and bony union were witnessed on the rest 6 patients. No neuromuscular injures or re-dislocations on the affected shoulders was found. The range of motion of the affected shoulder has been recorded at the latest follow-up: 123.8°±30.1° (90°-180°) in flexion, 124.4°±34.2° (80°-180°) in abduction, 36.9°±20.9° (0°-70°) in external (neutral position), 58.8°±10.9° (50°-80°) in internal rotation (neutral position) and 83.5±12.1 (70-95) in Constant-Murley score. Among the 8 patients, 7 patients were at the rank of VAS 0-3, and 1 of 4-6. Conclusion Optimal treatment options should be chosen based on the humeral head defect status, in case of traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. Closed reduction can be tried on < 20% humeral head defect with the help of anesthesia, and surgical option is the optimal one for the defect between 20%-40%. Key words: Shoulder joint; Shoulder dislocation; Wounds and injuries

PERSPECTIVES OF THE USE OF SULFORAPHANE IN ANIMAL MODEL OF COLORECTAL CARCINOGENESIS IN BRAZIL

Colon cancer is a growing health problem in Brazil. According to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), colon cancer is among the top ten causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. Besides, the disease has a significant economic impact on the Brazilian public health system. Over the past five years, there has been an increased interest in use, isolation, characterization and determination of the biological actions of compounds such as broccoli. Experimental studies with genetically modified (GMOs) rats, mice, and rats using Sulforaphane have demonstrated their ability to prevent, delay and reverse pre-neoplastic lesions, improved survival, as well as acting on neoplastic cells with therapeutic action. Sulforaphane through activation of Nrf2 increases the activity of phase II enzymes such as glutathione S transferase (GST), which is involved in the elimination of xenobiotic compounds. Aberrant crypts are induced, in Wistar rats and mice, by genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemical compounds. Colon carcinogenesis is generally induced in rats and mice by two substances, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) and azoxymethane (AOM). Azoxymethane is often used concerning DMH because it is more potent and requires few reactions for its activation. It is possible to conclude that Sulforaphane, through its various biological actions, presents efficiency in the prevention of colon cancer and significant potential for use in future experimental studies with genetically modified rats, mice, and rats.

Arthroscopic McLaughlin Procedure for Treatment of Posterior Instability of the Shoulder With an Engaging Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion

Posterior shoulder dislocation is associated with an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion (i.e., involving >25% of the articular surface of the humeral head) in 28% of cases, leading to posterior instability. Isolated capsulolabral fixation usually performed to treat posterior instability is not effective at stabilizing the shoulder when there is such a bony lesion. The original McLaughlin procedure, first described in 1952, consists of detaching the subscapularis tendon from the lesser tuberosity and transferring it to the bony defect by an open approach. Several open and arthroscopic modifications of this technique have been described since this description. This article describes a truly arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure. Arthroscopy allows complete visualization of the glenohumeral joint and allows associated posterior and anterior soft-tissue lesions to be addressed at the same time. Moreover, the morbidity of open procedures is avoided. Although this procedure is known to be effective at stabilizing the shoulder, further long-term studies are required to assess the functional outcomes.

All-Arthroscopic McLaughlin's Procedure in Patients with Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion Caused by Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation.

Purpose This study aims to investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of the all-arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in a clinical series of patients suffering by neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation. Methods A retrospective clinical study based on prospectively collected data was conducted in a single center regarding 10 patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation and concomitant reverse Hill–Sachs lesion, who were treated with the all-arthroscopic Mclaughlin procedure. The average humeral bone defect was 39 ± 7% according to the preoperative computed tomography evaluation. The mean time of follow-up was 77 ± 16 months (range, 63–104 months). Results No patient had suffered a new dislocation, whereas all of them were satisfied with the surgical outcome and returned to their previous activities of daily living. External rotation was restored to every patient studied from 0 degrees at the baseline. At the last follow-up, the median external rotation beside the body was 90 degrees (range, 50–90 degrees; p < 0.01) and the respective measurement at 90 degrees of abduction was 90 degrees (range, 80–90 degrees; p < 0.01). The active forward flexion was increased ( p < 0.01), from 60 degrees (range, 30–180 degrees) at the baseline to 180 degrees (range, 160–180 degrees) at the last follow-up and the internal rotation was gained ( p < 0.01) from the level of buttock (range, lateral thigh–T12) at the baseline to the T11 level (range, T7–L3) at the last follow-up. The median UCLA score was increased from 8 (range, 4–22) to 35 (range, 33–35; p < 0.01) and the Oxford instability score from 5 (range, 3–16) to 46 (range, 43–48; p < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion The arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in substantial reverse Hills–Sachs lesion caused by locked posterior dislocation leads to excellent clinical and functional results in the long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic study, case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

The dual subscapularis procedure: a modified Hawkins' technique for neglected posterior fracture/dislocation of the shoulder.

Posterior fracture/dislocation of the shoulder is a rare injury that is frequently missed on initial assessment. It is frequently associated with reverse Hill-Sachs impression fracture. Several orthopaedics procedures have been described on the literature for reconstructable reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. The McLaughlin's procedure and its modifications, anatomic bone grafting procedures, rotational osteotomies, and the remplissage technique were reported by many authors. We advocated a new "dual subscapularis procedure" that consists of the Hawkins lesser tuberosity transfer with addition of filling the remainder of the defect with a part of subscapularis tendon. In the period between January 2013 to December 2017, 12 patients (13 shoulders) suffering from a delayed managed posterior fracture dislocation were managed. Our inclusion criteria were adult patients less than 60years presented with reverse Hill-Sachs impression defects from 20 to 50% with or without fractures. For all patients, the dual subscapularis procedure was done. UCLA score was used for postoperative functional assessment. After a minimum follow-up of 6months, the results of UCLA score were excellent/good in eight patients and fair/poor in five patients. All patients were found stable after open reduction ± internal fixation with no reported complications. There was a significant correlation of the UCLA score and non-abuse or lower doses of tramadol and the shorter interval between trauma and procedure. Twelve patients were satisfied after the operation. Reconstructing the reverse Hill-Sachs defect with the dual subscapularis technique provides adequate stability, pain relief, and function in patients with locked chronic posterior shoulder fracture/dislocation. The used technique has the merit of versatility with different fracture patterns, improved fixation of the tendon and increasing the tendon's footprint that ensures extra-articular location of the defect. II.

The Veil of Obscuration: Additional Radiographic Sign of Posterior Shoulder Dislocation.

To describe a new radiographic sign, "veil of obscuration", associated with posterior glenohumeral joint (shoulder) dislocations and determine its incidence and validity compared to other known classic radiographic signs. Four-year retrospective study identified 30 acute posterior shoulder dislocation patients. Radiographs reviewed in consensus by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists for the "veil of obscuration", seen on AP shoulder radiographs and representing a comminuted fracture of the lesser tuberosity projecting over the humeral head or glenohumeral joint. Incidence of this radiographic sign of posterior glenohumeral joint dislocation in addition to other previously described classic radiographic signs, and association with other fractures, surgery, and mechanism of injury were evaluated. Continuous data was analyzed with student t-test and categorical data with Chi-Square test. There were 20 right and 10 left posterior shoulder dislocations. Majority of injuries resulted from vehicle crash (44%). In most cases, reverse Hill-Sachs lesion (83%) and fixed internal rotation of the humeral head (76%) were present, followed by trough line (43%) and "veil of obscuration" (40%). Trough line was seen in significantly more major trauma and vehicle crashes (78% and 46%; P=0.015), while "veil of obscuration" was seen in more seizures (86%; P=0.037) and in all surgical patients. No significant difference in presence of other classic radiographic signs in regards to surgery. The newly described radiographic sign of posterior shoulder dislocations named the "veil of obscuration" has comparable incidence as other classic radiographic signs and may be useful in the recognition and diagnosis of these injuries.

Critical Glenoid Bone Loss in Posterior Shoulder Instability

Background:There is currently no consensus regarding the amount of posterior glenoid bone loss that is considered critical. Critical bone loss is defined as the amount of bone loss that occurs in which an isolated labral repair will not sufficiently restore stability.Purpose:The purpose is to identify the critical size of the posterior defect.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Eleven cadaveric shoulders were tested. With the use of a custom robot device, a 50-N compressive force was applied to the glenohumeral joint, and the peak force that was required to translate the humeral head posteriorly and the lateral displacement that occurred with translation were measured. The defect size was measured as a percentage of the glenoid width. Testing was performed in 11 conditions: (1) intact glenoid and labrum, (2) simulated reverse Bankart lesion, (3) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (4) a 10% defect, (5) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (6) a 20% defect, (7) the reverse Bankart lesion repa...

Effect of Posterior Glenoid Labral Tears at the NFL Combine on Future NFL Performance.

Background:Posterior labral injuries have been recognized as a particularly significant clinical problem in collision and contact athletes.Purpose:To evaluate the effect that posterior labral tears have on early National Football League (NFL) performance based on position, associated injuries, and operative versus nonoperative management.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A retrospective review of all participants in the NFL Combine from 2009 to 2015 was performed using medical and imaging reports documented at the combine. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed for tear location, associated injuries, and evidence of previous surgical interventions. Each player’s NFL draft position, as well as number of games played, number of games started, and snap percentage in his first 2 NFL seasons were collected for performance analysis and were compared with a control group of uninjured counterparts.Results:Players with posterior labral tears were selected significantly later in the draft than those in the control group (draft position, 171.6 vs 156.1, respectively; P = .017). Although no single individual position was significantly affected by posterior labral tears, linemen (both offensive and defensive) with posterior labral tears were drafted significantly later than those without tears (draft position, 164.0 vs 137.7, respectively; P = .018) and had a significantly lower percentage of snaps in their first NFL season (23.8% vs 27.7%, respectively; P = .014). Players who underwent surgical management before the combine had a significantly higher percentage of snaps in their second NFL season than those who were managed conservatively (31.4% vs 22.3%, respectively; P = .022). None of the concomitant injuries recorded (superior labral anterior-posterior tears, glenoid bone loss, reverse Hill-Sachs lesions, rotator cuff tears, reverse humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament, and posterior labral tears combined with anterior tears) significantly affected the draft position, number of games played, number of games started, or snap percentage for the cohort as a whole or any specific position.Conclusion:Posterior labral tears did negatively and significantly affect early NFL outcomes for collegiate football players across several different metrics, especially among linemen. While operative management did not produce significantly superior performance in most outcome measures, it may allow for better longevity of the shoulder and warrants further investigation. Concomitant shoulder injuries did not significantly affect early NFL outcomes in this cohort.

Arthroscopic Management of Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocations

Locked posterior shoulder dislocations occur relatively uncommonly but pose aunique array of challenges for the treating surgeon. Posterior labral detachments and capsular damage along with reverse Hill-Sachs lesions are commonly present in these patients and must often be addressed at the time of surgical intervention. Multiple open and arthroscopic procedures that address these pathologic lesions have been described. Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for patients with locked posterior shoulder dislocations for whom significant posterior instability and subluxation persist following closed reduction is described. A specific patient who underwent both arthroscopic posterior stabilization and supplemental advancement of the subscapularis into the reverse Hill-Sachs defect serves as a case example of this technique.

Comparison of a Distal Tibial Allograft and Scapular Spinal Autograft for Posterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss.

Background:Posterior glenoid bone deficiency can occur with recurrent glenohumeral instability. Glenoid reconstruction with a distal tibial allograft (DTA) has been reported to successfully restore contact pressures that occur during posterior glenohumeral translation. However, there are concerns regarding the risk of allograft resorption, availability, and costs. Extracapsular reconstruction using a scapular spinal autograft (SSA) has been reported as an alternative technique secondary to its anatomic location relative to the posterior shoulder and preferable autograft properties. There are no known prior biomechanical studies evaluating the scapular spine as an effective extracapsular graft choice.Purpose:To compare the efficacy of a DTA and SSA in restoring the stability of a glenoid with a large posterior bone defect compared with the intact native glenoid.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Ten cadaveric shoulders were tested. With the use of a custom KUKA robot, a 50-N compressive force was applied to the glenohumeral joint. The peak force required to translate the humeral head beyond the glenoid lip posteriorly as well as the lateral displacement that occurred during posterior translation were measured. Testing was performed in 5 conditions: (1) intact glenoid and labrum, (2) simulated reverse Bankart lesion, (3) 12-mm posterior glenoid defect, (4) glenoid defect reconstructed with a fresh DTA, and (5) glenoid defect reconstructed with an SSA.Results:The mean glenoid width was 30 mm. The mean peak force and lateral displacement decreased significantly with a glenoid defect (0.99 ± 2.3 N and 0.06 ± 0.09 mm, respectively; P < .0001) compared with the intact glenoid (23.00 ± 9.7 N and 1.83 ± 0.70 mm, respectively; P = .0001). There was no significant difference between the peak force after reconstruction of the defect with a DTA (23.00 ± 7.4 N) and SSA (23.00 ± 7.7 N) when compared with the intact glenoid (P = .9999). There were no significant differences in the peak force between the 2 grafts (P = .9999). Additionally, both the DTA (1.04 ± 1.09 mm) and the SSA (1.02 ± 1.17 mm) demonstrated no differences in lateral displacement when compared with the intact glenoid (P = .2336 and .2043, respectively). There was no difference in lateral displacement that occurred between the DTA and SSA (P = .9999).Conclusion:Reconstruction of a large posterior glenoid defect with either a DTA or an SSA can effectively restore glenohumeral stability.Clinical Relevance:This study supports the use of a DTA or SSA in posterior glenoid defect reconstruction. Clinical studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of utilizing such grafts.

A case of posterior instability shoulder with Reverse Bankart lesion treated with arthroscopic repair

Glenohumeral instability is a relatively common condition affected in 2% of population, with posterior instability is very uncommon. Glenohumeral instability is usually anterior instability. Posterior instability usually seen in electric shock, seizures, psychosomatic disorders. Redislocation and persistent pain is the main indication for repair of posterior instability due to posterior labral tear. Normally done as open technique by posterior approach, we procede to manage by Arthroscopic stabilization. The posterior capsule, posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament, and posterior labrum provide the greatest support posteriorly. An isolated lesion in any one of these posterior structures often results in unidirectional posterior instability. Arthroscopic repair of posterior labrum has shown good results. The main difficulty with the procedure is gaining appropriate acess to posterioinferior quadrant of glenoid. Additional posterolateral portal which is steep enough angle acces to glenoid is required to avoid multiple accessory portals.

Critical Glenoid Bone Loss in Posterior Shoulder Instability

Background: There is currently no consensus regarding the amount of posterior glenoid bone loss that is considered critical. Critical bone loss is defined as the amount of bone loss that occurs in which an isolated labral repair will not sufficiently restore stability. Purpose: The purpose is to identify the critical size of the posterior defect. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eleven cadaveric shoulders were tested. With the use of a custom robot device, a 50-N compressive force was applied to the glenohumeral joint, and the peak force that was required to translate the humeral head posteriorly and the lateral displacement that occurred with translation were measured. The defect size was measured as a percentage of the glenoid width. Testing was performed in 11 conditions: (1) intact glenoid and labrum, (2) simulated reverse Bankart lesion, (3) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (4) a 10% defect, (5) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (6) a 20% defect, (7) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (8) a 30% defect, (9) the reverse Bankart lesion repaired, (10) a 40% defect, and (11) the reverse Bankart repaired. Results: Force and displacement decreased as the size of the osseous defect increased. The mean peak force that occurred with posterior displacement in specimens with a glenoid defect ≥20% and a reverse Bankart repair (13 ± 9 N) was significantly lower than the peak force that occurred in specimens with an isolated reverse Bankart repair (22 ± 10 N) (P = .0451). In addition, the mean lateral displacement was significantly less in the specimens with a 20% glenoid defect and a reverse Bankart repair (0.61 ± 0.57 mm) compared with the lateral displacement that occurred in specimens with an isolated reverse Bankart repair (1.6 ± 0.78 mm) (P = .0058). Conclusion: An osseous defect that is ≥20% of the posterior glenoid width remains unstable after isolated reverse Bankart repair. Clinical Relevance: A bony restoration procedure of the glenoid may be necessary in shoulders with a posterior glenoid defect that is ≥20% of the glenoid width.

畲药龙斑汤联合内镜干预逆转胃癌前病变的临床应用

畲药龙斑汤联合内镜干预逆转胃癌前病变的临床应用

Posterior shoulder dislocation with associated reverse Hill-Sachs lesion: treatment options and functional outcome after a 5-year follow up

BackgroundThe current study describes several surgical techniques for the treatment of the reverse Hill - Sachs lesion after posterior shoulder dislocation; we also aimed to present long term results followed for a minimum of five years.MethodsThis study is a prospective case series of 17 patients who were treated in our clinic between 2008 and 2011. Patients with a defect size smaller than 25% of the articular surface were treated conservatively. An endoprosthesis of the glenohumeral joint was implanted in patients with a defect size bigger than 40%. All remaining patients were treated by a variety of operative techniques, depending on the quality of the bone and size of the defect.ResultsTwelve of seventeen patients had a defect size of the humeral articular surface between 25% and 40% with a mean age of 39 years. Depending on the defect size these patients were treated with retrograde chondral elevation, antegrade cylindrical graft or a graft of the iliac bone crest with an open approach. All the procedures showed fair results, e.g. the open approach with a graft of the iliac bone crest (2010: Dash 3.89, Constant 90.33, Rowe 86.67; 2015: Dash 2.22, Constant 92.00, Rowe 93.33).ConclusionThe open approach is not a disadvantage for the functional outcome. The treatment algorithm should involve the superficial size of the defect as well as the depth of the defect and the time interval between the dislocation and the surgical treatment.Trial registration223/2012BO2, 02 August 2010.

Diagnostics and treatment of posterior shoulder instability

Posterior shoulder instability has amarkedly lower incidence than anterior shoulder instability. It has awide spectrum of clinical symptom manifestations and the overwhelming number of patients lack atraumatic primary dislocation. In addition to a detailed medical history, aspecific clinical examination with the help of standardized provocation tests is essential for the diagnostics. For the detection of structural posterior capsule and labral lesions in cases of chronic courses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be used with an intra-articular contrast agent. Relevant bony defects of the humeral head (reverse Sachs-Hill lesion) are frequent, whereas critical posterior defects of glenoid cavity are relatively rare. Both lesions should be quantified using 3D computed tomography. The choice of therapeutic procedure should be based on the underlying pathology of the defect. Conservative therapy is useful in patients with scapular dyskinesis, voluntary dislocation and pathological muscle patterning. In isolated soft tissue pathologies, arthroscopic labrum fixation and capsule plication are the standard treatment. In the case of insufficient soft tissue relations or critical posterior glenoid defects, bony stabilization of the glenoid using an iliac crest bone graft is the recommended therapy.

Partial Resurfacing for Humeral Head Defects Associated With Recurrent Shoulder Instability.

Recurrent traumatic shoulder instability is a complex clinical entity that commonly affects young, active patients. Humeral head defects are frequently associated with this condition, but specific treatment to stabilize the shoulder is rarely needed. Management options for defects of the humeral head that do necessitate treatment carry various risks and disadvantages, including the need for bone or soft tissue healing, complications related to hardware, and loss of motion. Partial prosthetic resurfacing has been reported as a treatment option. The current study retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with recurrent or locked anterior and posterior instability who underwent partial prosthetic humeral head resurfacing for significant Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions. At an average of 36.4 months after the index procedure, 16 patients were contacted by mail and telephone. Of the study group, 13 patients underwent partial resurfacing for anterior instability and 3 patients underwent partial re-surfacing for posterior instability. No patient had a repeat dislocation. In addition, 77% of patients in the anterior instability cohort and all of the patients in the posterior instability cohort returned to their full preinjury activity level. For the anterior instability cohort, significant improvements from preoperatively to final follow-up occurred for mean Musculoskeletal Review of System score (4.54, P<.0001) and Short Form-12 physical component score (9.52, P=.002). For the combined cohort, the Penn Shoulder Score improved by 36.4 points (P=.059). This study showed the effectiveness of partial humeral head resurfacing for preventing redislocation for patients with significant Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e996-e1003.].

Arthroscopic Transfer of the Subscapularis Tendon for Treatment of a Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion

Posterior shoulder instability occurs less often than anterior shoulder instability but is increasingly recognized as a relatively common condition. The reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is present in some patients with posterior instability and is best described as an impaction fracture of the anterior humeral head. These reverse Hill-Sachs lesions can predispose the patient to recurrent instability events and may need to be addressed directly at the time of surgery. Multiple open and arthroscopic procedures have been described to transfer bone or soft tissue structures into this reverse Hill-Sachs defect. An arthroscopic technique for the transfer of the subscapularis tendon into the defect using a standard 30° arthroscope, standard portals, and suture anchors is described.

EXPERIENCE IN USE OF MODIFIED MCLAUGHLIN PROCEDURE FOR NEGLECTED LOCKED POSTERIOR SUBLUXATION OF THE HUMERAL HEAD

Treatment results for 7 patients who were operated on for neglected locked posterior subluxation of the humeral head with reverse Hill-Sachs lesion during 2013-2016 are presented. Surgical intervention included the open reduction of subluxation and transposition of thelesser tubercle of the humerusto a defect zone. Mean followup period was 14±3 months. Range of motion in shoulder joint and its function were restored almost completely with only small restriction in external rotation. No recurrence of subluxation was observed. All patients returned to professional and day-to-day activity.

Experience in Use of Modified McLaughlin Procedure for Neglected Locked Posterior Subluxation of the Humeral Head

Treatment results for 7 patients who were operated on for neglected locked posterior subluxation of the humeral head with reverse Hill-Sachs lesion during 2013-2016 are presented. Surgical intervention included the open reduction of subluxation and transposition of thelesser tubercle of the humerusto a defect zone. Mean followup period was 14±3 months. Range of motion in shoulder joint and its function were restored almost completely with only small restriction in external rotation. No recurrence of subluxation was observed. All patients returned to professional and day-to-day activity.