Sound absorption coefficients are among the most important acoustic parameters of building materials. The coefficients are measured in reverberation chambers using the ISO354 measurement procedure. The complex reverberant sound field that builds up in such facilities is closely related to the concept of the diffuse sound field and is difficult to characterize experimentally. Due to the limited quantitative assessment of the sound field, there is no general agreement in the scientific community on how to improve the method of measuring sound absorption coefficients, although significant differences have been reported between the results of different laboratories. To address part of this challenge, we investigate how specific the variations between laboratory results are for a particular material. In our investigation, we evaluated four different sound absorbing materials in five independent acoustics laboratories. Four of the reverberation chambers used suspended diffusers, while the complex shape of one chamber was designed to achieve a diffuse sound field. The results show that the interlaboratory deviations are not very specific to the material tested, while general differences between the facilities can be observed. Furthermore, the meticulous geometric design of the chambers can be seen as an alternative to the use of suspended diffusers.