Introduction In France, a national study about drowning is conducted every three years to register all cases of drowning leading to a hospitalization or death, from June 1st until September 15th. In 2015, 596 drowning occurred on seashore, including 38 drowning implying 7 deaths on beaches of Gironde, Southwestern France. Gironde's oceanic coast is a 126-km-long sand beach; the main touristic areas are watched during summer, but bathing season can begin in April and last till mid-October. Most drowning are related to rip currents, shown by Castelle et al. to be controlled by wave conditions, tide levels and local topography. To orient prevention and surveillance strategies, our study aimed to create a risk prediction model of drowning along Gironde's coast, based on weather and marine forecasts. Methods Retrospective derivation cohort data were collected from the emergency call centre of Gironde, and meteorological data came from MeteoFrance, the national weather forecaster. The study period was April, 1st till October, 31st, from 2011 till 2013. Prospective validation cohort data and forecasts up to three days were collected from the same sources, for the same months in 2015 and 2016. We used a logistic regression and a zero-inflated Poisson model to quantify drowning risk. Variables selection was done on the retrospective cohort, and we assigned for each model a threshold to stratify the risk of drowning (“low” and “high”). We finally tested the prediction model by comparing prediction and lifeguard assessment of the drowning risk for each day during the summer 2017. As a pilot study, only one lifeguard post, from Le Porge, participated. We calculated Cohen's Kappa initially with the binary model then with a 5-stage scale using the zero-inflated model. Results The retrospective sample included 117 days with at least one drowning event (272 events reported), within a total of 546 days without unavailable data. Air and water temperatures, wave factor, wave direction, nebulosity and holidays were positively associated with drowning probability. Prospective validation was performed on 405 days without missing data, covering 181 drowning reported during 80 different days. The regression logistic model had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval: [0.79 − 0.87]). With 22 events missed in 13 days, the predictive positive value (PPV) was 40%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) 94%. The zero-inflated Poisson model had an AUC of 0.85 ([0.83 − 0.91], PPV: 37%, NPV: 97%) and missed 14 drowning events in 7 days. Within those 14 events, 5 occurred during extreme wave conditions, 1 was consecutive to seizure, 1 was a 4-year-old and 1 was a body-boarder. The model missed a day with 5 people rescued in the same rip current, without any injury. There were no statistical differences between the 1-, 2- and 3-day forecasts. The test phase has lasted 86 days, with 62 (72%) without missing data. The binary model was tested during 48 days, with a Cohen's kappa at 0.57 (moderate agreement). It was found inappropriate by lifeguarders as they needed intermediate risk stage. The 5-stage scale was then tested during the last 14 days, with a Cohen's kappa at 0.77 (strong agreement). Conclusion Our models show that environmental conditions are good predictors of drowning risk along the Gironde's oceanic coast. They could help prevent drowning by broadcasting warning messages up to three days before a day at risk. Lifeguards confirmed the relevance of the models at a local scale, and we introduced a 5-stage risk scale. Further study is needed to collect significant data. A more detailed study is conducted to predict the risk depending on the hours of the days and the tide level, which could be more informative for beach patrols.
Read full abstract