Resection Of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Research Articles

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America

BackgroundThe addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort.MethodsPatients in the National Cancer Database (2004–2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test.ResultsOf 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07).ConclusionIn the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Vascular Resection.

This meta-analysis examines the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with vascular resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic literature search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) guidelines was conducted, identifying five comparative retrospective cohort studies published from 2015 to 2021, with a total of 1,417 patients (180 in the vascular resection (VR)group and 1,237 in the control (no VR) group). The meta-analysis found that 30-day morbidity rates, as classified by Clavien-Dindo classification > 3, were higher in the VR group compared to the no VR group (46% versus 25%, odds ratio (OR): 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-8.69, p=0.44). Local recurrence rates during the follow-up period were similar between the two groups (30% versus 30%, OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.50-4.25, p=0.49). However, distant recurrence was more frequent in the VR group (32% versus 8.5%, OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.05-6.13, p=0.04). In conclusion, although oncovascular procedures are feasible for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes appear to be worse when compared to procedures that do not involve vessel resections.

Data Dissemination of the Role of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A CTOS and CSSO Survey.

Consensus guidelines call for complete resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma with consideration of neoadjuvant radiation for curative-intent treatment. The 15-month delay from the initial presentation of an abstract to the final publication of the STRASS trial results assessing the impact of neoadjuvant radiation led to a dilemma of how patients should be managed in the interim. This study aims to (1) understand perspectives regarding neoadjuvant radiation for RPS during this period; and (2) assess the process of integrating data into practice. A survey was distributed to international organizations including all specialties treating RPS. Eighty clinicians responded, including surgical (60.5%), radiation (21.0%) and medical oncologists (18.5%). Low kappa correlation coefficients on a series of clinical scenarios querying individual recommendations before and after initial presentation as an abstract indicate considerable change. Over 62% of respondents identified a practice change; however, most also noted discomfort in adopting changes without a manuscript available. Of the 45 respondents indicating discomfort with practice changes without a full manuscript, 28 (62%) indicated that their practice changed in response to the abstract. There was substantial variability in recommendations for neoadjuvant radiation between the presentation of the abstract and the publication of trial results. The difference in the proportion of clinicians describing comfort with changing practice based on the presentation of the abstract versus those that had done so shows that indications for proper integration of data into practice are not clear. Endeavors to resolve this ambiguity and expedite availability of practice-changing data are warranted.

Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Involving the Inferior Vena Cava With the Use of Veno-Veno Extracorporeal Perfusion: A Review of the First 20 Cases Performed at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, West Australia

Prolonged inferior vena cava (IVC) clamping during retroperitoneal sarcoma resection presents specific challenges requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Veno-veno bypass (VVB) drains blood from the IVC and returns it into the right atrium, allowing excellent surgical exposure. This institution has routinely used VVB for sarcoma resections involving the IVC since 2018. This review describes outcomes of the first 20 cases.

ASO Visual Abstract: SignificantPredictorsof Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a TertiaryCenter.

ASO Visual Abstract: SignificantPredictorsof Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a TertiaryCenter.

Significant Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a Tertiary Center.

The safety of multivisceral resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma is an issue. Previous reports have investigated its associations with the pattern of resection and factors recognized mostly per operatively. All consecutive RPS resections from May 2015 to April 2022 were studied retrospectively with respect to adverse events. Two univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between severe adverse events and factors recognized pre- and per operatively. Associations of adverse events with overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR) were investigated. A total of 265 surgical interventions corresponding to 251 patients were recorded(38 RPS surgeries/year). Severe postoperative adverse events (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 50 patients (18.9%), 15 (5.6%) patients underwent an iterative laparotomy, and 6 patients (2.3%) died within 90 days. On multivariate analysis including all parameters known preoperatively, male sex, performance status, dedifferentiated liposarcoma histology, and low serum albumin level were found to be significant predictors of major complications, whereas the timing of surgery and preoperative treatment were not. On univariate analysis including all per operative parameters, transfusion requirement, operative time, number of digestive anastomoses, and pancreas and/or major arterial resection were found to entail higher operative risk. On multivariate analysis, only transfusion requirement was significant. There was no impact of postoperative adverse events on OS or LR. The recognition of preoperative parameters that impact safety could mitigate the extent of the surgery, specifically the resection of adherent organs not overtly invaded. For the best decision, this surgery should be performed in referral centers.

Complex Vascular Resections for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are locally aggressive tumors that can compromise major vessels of the retroperitoneum including the inferior vena cava, aorta, or main tributary vessels. Vascular involvement can be secondary to the tumor's infiltrating growth pattern or primary vascular origin. Surgery is still the mainstay for curing this disease, and resection of RPSs may include major vascular resections to secure adequate oncologic results. Our improved knowledge in the tumor biology of RPSs, in conjunction with the growing surgical expertise in both sarcoma and vascular surgical techniques, has allowed for major vascular reconstructions within multi-visceral resections for RPSs with good perioperative results. This complex surgical approach may include the combined work of various surgical subspecialties.

The Use of Extracorporeal Circulation to Facilitate the Resection of a Large Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Major Vessel Involvement: A Single-Center Review of 20 Cases

To describe the introduction of extracorporeal corporeal oxygenation (ECMO) to facilitate the surgical resection of large retroperitoneal sarcomas involving major vessels and to report preliminary outcomes. A case series. At a tertiary university hospital and state sarcoma center. Patients undergoing retroperitoneal sarcoma resection requiring inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction between June 2018 and March 2022. ECMO for retroperitoneal tumor resection requiring IVC reconstruction. A total of 20 patients underwent ECMO-assisted retroperitoneal sarcoma resection and IVC reconstruction. The median age was 60.5 years (IQR 48-69); 15 women and 5 men. The median procedure and ECMO durations were 10.8 hours (IQR 8.5-12.4 hours) and 2.2 hours (IQR 62-218 minutes), respectively. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 4 days (IQR 3-5 days) and 21 days (IQR 14-31 days), respectively. All 20 patients received packed cell transfusions (median 8 per patient [IQR 4-14]); 11 patients required fresh frozen plasma, 6 required platelets, and 11 required fibrinogen supplementation. One patient required recombinant activated factor VII. Sixteen patients experienced acute kidney injury, with 12 patients progressing to chronic kidney disease. Three patients were required to return to the operating room within 7 days, with no returns within the first 24 hours. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Survival at 3 years was 84%. ECMO for resecting large retroperitoneal tumor resection was introduced successfully and facilitated satisfactory outcomes for many patients who might otherwise have been considered too high risk.

Delayed gastric emptying after aggressive surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma - Incidence, characteristics, and risk factors.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after aggressive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) has rarely been described. This study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of DGE after surgery for RPS and explore its potential risk factors. Patients with RPS who had undergone surgery between January 2010 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. DGE was defined and graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and classified as primary or secondary to other complications. Patients with clinically relevant DGE (crDGE, grade B+C) were compared to those with no or mild DGE (grade A). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinicopathological and surgical parameters was performed to identify risk factors for crDGE. Of the 239 patients studied, 69 (28.9%) had experienced DGE and 54 (22.6%) had experienced crDGE. Patients with primary and secondary DGE accounted approximately half and half. The most common concurrent complications included abdominal infection, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and abdominal bleeding. Patients with crDGE were more likely to have multifocal tumors and the liposarcoma subtype, with a larger tumor size, longer operating time, more resected organs, and a history of combined resection of the stomach, pancreas, small intestine, and/or colon. In multivariate analysis, the tumor size, operating time, and combined pancreatic resection were independent risk factors for crDGE. In conclusion, the current results indicated that approximately one-fourth of patients experienced DGE after aggressive surgery for RPS and that DGE was primary or secondary to other underlying conditions. A large tumor involving long, difficult surgery and combined pancreatic resection highly predicted the incidence of crDGE. The prevention and management of DGE remain challenging.

Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Recurrence after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma is common and varies by histological subtype. Pattern of recurrence is similarly affected by histology (e.g., well-differentiated liposarcoma is more likely to recur locoregionally, whereas leiomyosarcoma is more likely to develop distant metastases). Radiotherapy may provide effective locoregional control in limited circumstances and the data on the impact of chemotherapy are scant. Surgery for locally recurrent disease is associated with the greatest survival benefit; however, data are retrospective and from a highly selected subgroup of patients. Limited retrospective data have also suggested a survival association with the resection of limited distant metastases. Given the complexity of these patients, multidisciplinary evaluation at a high-volume sarcoma center is critical.

Replantation of solitary kidney in a patient with giant primary retroperitoneal sarcoma

Background. Surgery for non-organ malignant retroperitoneal tumors poses a serious challenge. Long-term asymptomatic course of the disease leads to a delayed diagnosis, when tumors can reach massive size with potential involvement of adjacent organs and critical structures. In most cases, nephrectomy is often required during resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Recently, there has been growing interest in nephronsaving surgery for large retroperitoneal tumors.Description of the clinical case. A 70-year-old patient was admitted to Irkutsk Regional Cancer Center with right-sided giant primary retroperitoneal tumor and grade 1 hydronephrosis of solitary right kidney. The patient underwent extended resection of primary retroperitoneal tumor with right-sided hemicolectomy and nephradrenalectomy. Extracorporeal resection of the solitary kidney was then performed. After obtaining negative kidney smears (imprints), the kidney was replanted in the pool of right iliac vessels. No complications were observed in the postoperative period. Histopathology examination revealed was welldifferentiated liposarcoma. On follow-up examination 38 months after surgery, there were no signs of local tumor recurrence, and renal function was satisfactory.Conclusion. Extracorporeal resection of the kidney with heterotopic replantation is an effective nephron-saving method in surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas. The patient’s solitary kidney with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma is an absolute indication for kidney’s saving, including the use of transplant technologies.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma: a meta-analysis

BackgroundNeoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) for resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) has been shown to be systematically feasible. Whether NRT has equivalent or better clinical effects compared to surgery alone for RPS patients remains controversial.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ASCO s, and Cochrane library databases for studies in humans with defined search terms. Articles were independently assessed by 2 reviewers, and only randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence (LR) were extracted from included studies. Heterogeneity among study-specific HRs was assessed by the Q statistic and I2 statistic. Overall HR was assessed by random-effects or fixed-effects models. Publication bias was tested by Begg’s tests, and the quality of each study was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.ResultsA total of 12 eligible studies with 7778 resectable RPS patients were finally included in this study. The pooled analysis revealed the distinct advantages of NRT as compared to surgery alone, including longer OS (HR = 0.81, P < 0.001), longer RFS (HR = 0.58, P = 0.04), and lower LR (HR = 0.70, P = 0.03). No evidence of publication bias was observed.ConclusionNRT is likely to be beneficial for resectable RPS patients in terms of OS and RFS. However, more multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Short- and long-term surgical outcomes of pancreatic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A long-term single-center experience of 90 cases.

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) en bloc with pancreas is challenging and controversial. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the impact of pancreatic resection (PR) and its different types on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RPS. Data from 242 consecutive patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were analyzed. Out of these, 90 patients underwent PR, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 31 and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 59. Patients in the PR group had a higher major morbidity (37.8% vs. 14.5%) and mortality (8.9% vs. 1.3%) than those in the non-PR group, with a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (46.9% vs. 53.6%). Patients in the PD and DP groups had a slight difference in major morbidity (48.4% vs. 32.2%), mortality (6.4% vs. 10.2%), and 5-year OS rates (43.3% vs. 49.3%). The PR type was not an independent risk factor for major morbidity or OS. PR in RPS resection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality with minimal influence on survival. Patients with RPS undergoing PD and DP showed slight differences in terms of safety and OS.

Prognostic factors in patients receiving surgery and radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A machine-learning analysis

BackgroundThe addition of radiation therapy to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains controversial. Improved patient selection may help identify optimal candidates for multimodality treatment. The aim of this analysis was to define prognostic factors among patients who receive radiation therapy and surgery to aid in patient selection for multimodal therapy. MethodsPatients who received radiation therapy and underwent curative-intent resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma between 2004 and 2016 were identified from a national cohort in the United States (National Cancer Database). A machine-based classification and regression tree model was used to generate similar groups of patients relative to overall survival based on preoperative factors. ResultsA total of 1,443 patients received radiation therapy in addition to surgery. Median age was 61 years old and 55.0% were female. Most patients (66%) received care at an academic or integrated network cancer program. With a median follow-up of 84 months, receipt of radiation therapy was not associated with improved overall survival (P = .81). Classification and regression tree analysis revealed a significant association between overall survival and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, age, tumor histology, and Charlson comorbidity score. Application of these parameters via machine learning stratified patients into 5 cohorts with distinct survival outcomes. In the most favorable cohort (Cohort 1: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group ≤II, age ≤61, histology including fibrosarcoma, well differentiated liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma), the 5-year overall survival was 81.7% and median overall survival was not reached; in the least favorable cohort (Cohort 6: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group >II, age >68) where the 5-year survival was 41.3% and median overall survival was 45.2 months (P < .001 versus Cohort 1). ConclusionIn the absence of a defined survival benefit, patients with advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, older age, and medical comorbidities have relatively unfavorable overall survival after combined modality therapy and therefore stand the least to gain from the addition of radiation therapy to surgery. In contrast, younger patients with good performance status and retroperitoneal sarcoma histologies with a higher propensity for local recurrence may have the greatest opportunity to benefit from radiation therapy.

Feasibility of Preoperative Dose-Painting Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Borderline-Resectable Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

The role of radiation therapy (RT) in resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial; however, preoperative RT may play an important role in borderline-resectable (at risk of R2 resection) disease. We evaluated the outcome of such patients treated with preoperative dose-painting IMRT followed by planned resection. Between January 2001 and December 2017, 30 patients with borderline-resectable primary nonmetastatic RPS (after multidisciplinary review) received preoperative dose-painting IMRT in this retrospective cohort study. Median follow-up for all patients was 32 months. Median dose to the whole tumor/high-risk margin was 50.4 Gy/60.2 Gy. Sixteen patients were female, 24 were >50 years. Median tumor size was 9.2 cm. After RT, 6 did not have surgery. Of the 24 who were explored, 20 underwent complete gross resection. During RT, 7 of 30 patients developed acute grade 2+ toxicities: 5 fatigue, 1 nausea and vomiting, and 1 cystitis. RT was completed in 29 of 30 patients. Postoperatively, 12 of 20 patients developed grade 2+ complications: 2 gastropathy, 5 intraabdominal collections requiring drainage, 1 retroperitoneal bleed, and 3 delayed wound healing. Late grade 2+ toxicity was observed in 3 of 20 patients: 1 lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis, 1 chronic diarrhea, 1 gastrointestinal bleeding from anastomosis requiring transfusions, and 2 renal insufficiency. In those who underwent complete gross resection (n = 20, median follow-up 47 months), the 5-year local control was 57%, and overall survival was 46%. Preoperative dose-painting IMRT given to borderline-resectable RPS rendered 67% of patients resectable, provided a 5-year local control rate of 57%, which is similar to those with resectable disease, and had an acceptable morbidity profile.

Impact of time to first relapse on long-term outcome in adult retroperitoneal sarcoma patients after radical resection

BackgroundLocal recurrence of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is one of the major causes of treatment failure and death. We attempted to assess the effects of time to local recurrence (TLR) on the survival after recurrence (SAR) and overall survival (OS) of RPS.MethodsIncluded in this study were 224 patients who underwent R0 resection for primary RPS at our institution between January 2000 and December 2020, 118 of whom had local recurrence. Based on the median TLR (19.8 months), patients were divided into two groups: early local recurrence (ELR < 20 months) and late local recurrence (LLR > 20 months). The Kaplan–Meier method was employed to calculate the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), SAR and OS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the prognostic value of TLR.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 60.5 months for the entire cohort and 58.5 months for the recurrence cohort. There were 60 (50.8%) patients in the ELR group and 58 (49.2%) in the LLR group. The ELR group exhibited a worse SAR (29.2 months vs. 73.4 months, P < 0.001), OS (41.8 months vs. 120.9 months, P < 0.001), and a lower 5-year OS rate (35.9% vs. 73.2%, P = 0.004) than the LLR group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that TLR was an independent prognostic indicator for SAR (P = 0.014) and OS (P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with RPS, ELR after R0 resection presents adverse effects on OS and SAR than those with LLR, and TLR could serve as a promising predictor for OS and SAR.

Unplanned reoperation after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: experience based on a high-volume sarcoma center

BackgroundMost retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) operations require combined multi-organ resection, and the proportion of unplanned reoperation is high. However, there are no relevant studies on reoperation for RPS.MethodsPatients who underwent at least once unplanned reoperation at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, China, from August 2009 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline characteristics, primary surgery, and reoperation information, postoperative complications, and survival were analyzed.ResultsA total of 51 patients were included. Among them, 21 (41.2%) were male and 30 (58.8%) were female. The median age was 51 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-63) years. Most (88.3%) had a history of abdominal surgery. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others accounted for 50.9%, 21.6%, 15.7%, and 11.8%, respectively. The conditions of the primary operation were as follows: 35 (68.6%) patients achieved complete surgical resection, 48 patients had combined organ resection, and a median of 3 (IQR, 2–4) organs was removed, of which 5 (9.9%) were combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was 330 (IQR, 245–440) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 1500 (IQR, 500–2600) ml. The median postoperative hospital stay was 42 (IQR, 23–82) days. For reoperation, the most common reasons were bleeding (31.3%), complications related to intestinal anastomosis (27.4%), and intestinal perforation (19.9%). The mortality rate after reoperation was 39.2% (20/51). Twelve (23.5%) patients underwent reoperation at least twice.ConclusionsUnplanned reoperation among retroperitoneal sarcoma correlates with established measures of surgical quality.

The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection - A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundRetroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection.MethodsAll patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001).ConclusionsResection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Resectable Retroperitoneal Sarcomas-Looking Forward.

Simple SummaryThis review summarizes the current evidence around neoadjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). While surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for these tumors, data from prospective studies, retrospective studies, early phase trials, and—most recently—our first phase III randomized trial for RPS suggest there are clinical scenarios in which neoadjuvant therapy may provide benefit. This review evaluates the STRASS results in the setting of other recent studies, identifies active trials of interest, and suggests future directions of study in this field. The intersection of STRASS and STRASS2 is considered and a summary of current acceptable approaches to neoadjuvant therapy for RPS is provided. The cornerstone of therapy for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) is complete surgical resection, best achieved by resecting the tumor en bloc with adherent structures even if not overtly infiltrated. Until recently, trials designed to elucidate the role of neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for RPS have been unable to achieve sufficient enrollment. The completion of the STRASS trial, which explored neoadjuvant radiotherapy for primary resectable RPS, is a major milestone in RPS research, but has prompted further questions about histology-driven treatment paradigms for RPS. Though it was ultimately a negative trial with respect to its primary endpoint of abdominal recurrence-free survival, STRASS produced a signal that suggested improved abdominal recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with liposarcoma (LPS). No effect was seen for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or high-grade dedifferentiated (DD) LPS, consistent with recent literature suggesting LMS and high-grade DD-LPS have a predominant pattern of distant rather than local failure. These results, along with those from other recent studies conducted at the bench and the bedside, emphasize the importance of a histology-specific approach to RPS research. Recent evidence for patterns of distant failure in LMS and high-grade DD-LPS has prompted the initiation of STRASS2, a study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for these histologies. As this study unfolds, evidence may emerge for novel systemic therapy options in specific sarcoma histotypes given the explosion in targeted and immunotherapeutic applications over the last decade. This article reviews current and recent evidence around neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy as well as avenues for future study to optimize these treatment approaches.

Delayed Gastric Emptying After Multivisceral Resection for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication in surgery, but incidence and relevance following multivisceral resection are unknown. Data from 100 consecutive patients treated for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) were analyzed from our institutional prospectively maintained database from January 2019 to April 2020. DGE severity was graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery and classified as primary or secondary to other complications. The primary outcome was incidence and grade of clinically relevant DGE (grades B-C). Secondary outcomes were correlation with patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and non-DGE morbidity [Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3]. Forty-two patients developed DGE and 28 had clinically relevant DGE. DGE was primary in 10 patients and secondary in 18 patients; the most common associated complications were: infections (11/18, 61.1%), pancreatic leak (7/18, 38.9%), bleeding (6/18, 33.3%), and bowel leak (6/18, 33.3%). DGE was related to longer length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), ICU admission (P = 0.004), ICU length of stay (P = 0.001), postoperative complications (CD [Formula: see text] 3 in 14/28 in DGE patients vs 11/72 in no-DGE; P = 0.04), and re-operation (P = 0.03). With multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for DGE were patient comorbidities (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.1; P = 0.04) and tumor size (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.0-1.1; P = 0.02). Following multivisceral resection, DGE is a clinically relevant event that can be caused by an underlying complication. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of both DGE and any underlying complications led to full recovery in all cases.