Retrograde Dissection Research Articles

Nerve dissection technique for excision of parotid tumors: Outcomes controlling for tumor size and location.

We examined operative efficiency, rate of facial nerve paresis, and post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing retrograde (RGD) vs anterograde dissection (AGD) of the facial nerve controlling for tumor location. Single-institution, retrospective analysis of patients with benign parotid tumors undergoing superficial parotidectomy with facial nerve dissection over a six-year period. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed to classify tumor size, location in relation to facial nerve branches, and technique for facial nerve dissection. Chi-square and Student's t-test were used to compare operative time, rates of facial nerve paresis, and post-operative outcomes between groups. Our cohort included 35 patients who underwent RGD and 70 who underwent AGD of the facial nerve. Pleomorphic adenoma was most common in both the RGD (n=25, 71.4%) and AGD (n=69, 98.6%) groups. Both groups were balanced for demographics, tumor size and location in relation to facial nerve branches. Operative times, rate of surgical drain use, and frequency of post-operative admission were significantly reduced in the RGD group. The rate of temporary facial nerve paresis was significantly reduced (n=3, 8.6% vs n=30, 42.9% in the RGD vs AGD groups, respectively, p<0.001) and more frequently limited to single nerve distributions in the RGD group. RGD of the facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid tumors is associated with reduced operative times, post-operative admission rates, and rates of facial nerve paresis compared to AGD even when controlling for tumor location.

Multi-center experience with an off-the-shelf single retrograde thoracic branch endoprosthesis for acute aortic pathology.

The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE®, WL Gore, Flagstaff AZ) offers an off-the-shelf single option for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of aortic arch pathology with sealing in zones 0-2. This study reports the early outcomes of TBE®-TEVAR for acute indications. Clinical data, imaging, and outcomes of patients treated with TBE®-TEVAR at seven institutions were retrospectively reviewed (March 2017- March 2024). Patients treated for complicated aortic dissection, symptomatic aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm (PSA), or blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) by urgent/emergent repair were included. End-points were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs: mortality, myocardial infarction, prolonged intubation, stroke, paraplegia, dialysis, or bowel ischemia), and technical success. Of 356 patients treated by TBE®-TEVAR, 107 (69.0% male, mean 60±15 years-old) underwent repair for acute indications including 70 (65%) dissections, 21 (20%) symptomatic aneurysms/PSA and 16 (15%) BTAIs. Eight (8%) patients had repair immediately after open ascending repair of a Type A dissection. Proximal sealing was in zone 2 in 91 patients (89%) and zone 0-1 in 11 patients (11%) who required cervical debranching. Technical success was achieved in all (99%) except one patient with acute dissection and aneurysmal degeneration requiring staged repair. At 30-days, two (2%) patients died and 19 (18%) developed MAEs, including stroke in 6 (6%) and paraplegia in 6 (6%). Five patients (5%; all Zone 2) had retrograde dissections, all treated for acute or subacute dissection, with no mortality. Mean follow up was 55±171 days and 96 (94%) patients had follow-up imaging. Type IA or III endoleak occurred in seven patients (7%), retrograde branch occlusion in one (1%), and eleven (10%) required re-intervention. Cumulative aortic-related mortality was three (3%) from aortic rupture. Urgent/emergent TEVAR with the Gore TBE® device in acute pathology offers low mortality, stroke and paraplegia risk. Longer follow up is needed to assess effectiveness of the repair.

Physician-Modified and In Situ Fenestrated Stent Grafts in Zone 0 for Aortic Arch Pathology After Ascending Aortic Replacement.

We sought to describe our experience and outcomes of a zone 0 landing physician-modified aortic stent for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies late after open ascending aortic replacement. This study included consecutive patients with aortic arch diseases treated with total endovascular repair using different techniques. The indication for endovascular repair was agreed on in a multidisciplinary discussion. Study end points were technical success, early and late outcomes. From November 2018 to May 2022, 16 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies. Median time for surgery was 4.8 hours (range, 2.6-6.6 hours). All the new-onset aortic arch pathologies were successfully treated. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients had endoleak. The median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (range, 3-6 days). During follow-up, 1 patient underwent reintervention for type II endoleak. There were no conversions to retrograde dissection, aortic rupture and stroke. Our experience of using different total endovascular techniques for selective patients with arch pathologies who may be unfit or too risky for reopen surgery revealed favorable initial results. In addition, these techniques are promising options for urgent arch pathologies without availability of custom-manufactured devices. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up. The use of physician-modified and in situ fenestrated stent grafts in zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies in patients with prior open ascending aortic replacement is effective in endovascular therapy. This innovation enables clinicians to offer an alternative option to high-risk patients, potentially reducing morbidity and mortality. It underscores the feasibility of tailored endovascular therapy in complex aortic diseases, where customized devices may not be available.

Dissection and Re-entry Techniques for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Despite early stagnation in success rates for percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion with the traditional antegrade wiring approach, the introduction of dissection/re-entry techniques and the retrograde approach opened new avenues for operators to tackle more complex occlusions. Dissection/re-entry techniques (both antegrade and retrograde) are commonly used in angiographic scenarios characterised by long, tortuous and calcified occlusions, as well as in those with proximal cap ambiguity. Familiarity and comfort using the extraplaque space (with either an antegrade or retrograde approach) have become fundamental to achieving safe and effective recanalisation of complex chronic total occlusions. This review provides an overview of different contemporary antegrade and retrograde dissection re-entry techniques and their acute and longer-term outcomes.

STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection.

Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD. A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. Rare complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula (1%), and renal failure (1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients. STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.

The results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for high-risk type B aortic dissection

Overview: Evaluating the efficacy of endovascular intervention in treatment of high-risk type B aortic dissection Methods: Review a series case of high-risk type B aortic dissection cases treated with endovascular intervention at Cho Ray Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. Results: The study included a total of 30 patients with high-risk type B aortic dissection who underwent endovascular intervention meeting all sampling criteria. The average age was 53 years (26-73 years), with males accounting for 86.7%. The most common risk factor was hypertension (86.7%). Pain was the primary reason for hospital admission, with chest pain being the most frequent (80%). The most prevalent high-risk factors were false lumen diameter &gt; 22mm (66.7%), followed by aortic diameter &gt; 40mm (36.7%), and entry tear diameter &gt; 10mm (33.3%). Regarding intervention characteristics, the average stent graft length was 207.3mm, with proximal landing zones predominantly in zone 1 (23.3%), zone 2 (40%), and zone 3 (36.7%). Twenty-nine patients were continuously monitored for an average of 4.3 months, with a complication rate of 10% including endoleak type Ia (6.9%) and retrograde dissection (3.4%). Aortic remodeling was evidenced by a significant reduction in false lumen size (p&lt;0.001) Conclusion: Follow-up results show a low rate of complications and a high rate of aortic reconstruction post-intervention.

Proximal sealing in the aortic arch for inner curve disease using the custom Relay scalloped and fenestrated stent graft

ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze early and midterm results of custom-made proximal scallop and fenestrated stent grafts for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a proximal landing zone (PLZ) in the aortic arch. MethodsAll consecutive patients treated with the custom made proximal scalloped and fenestrated Relay stent grafts (Terumo Aortic Bolton Medical Inc.) in 10 Italian centers between January 2014 and December 2022 were included. The primary end points were technical success, incidence of intraoperative major adverse events, deployment accuracy, and rate of early neurological complications, endoleaks (ELs) and retrograde aortic dissection. ResultsDuring the study period, 49 patients received TEVAR with Relay custom-made endograft in Italy were enrolled. The median patient age was 70.1 years (interquartile range, 23-86 years) and 65.3% were male. The indication for treatment was atherosclerotic aneurysms in 59.2% of cases and penetrating aortic ulcer in 22.4%. The endograft configuration was proximal fenestration in 55.1% and scallop in 44.9%. The proximal landing zone was zone 0 in 25 cases (51%), zone 1 in 14 cases (28.6%), and zone 2 in 10 cases (20.4%). The supra-aortic debranching procedures were 38 (77.5%). Technical success was 97.9% (48/49) owing to one case (2.0%) of inaccurate deployment. Intraoperatively, one (2.0%) type Ia and one (2.0%) type III EL were detected. There were no cases of in-hospital mortality, major adverse events, or retrograde dissection. Three minor strokes (6.1%) (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≤4) were observed. At a mean follow-up time of 36.3 ± 21.3 months the rate of types I to III ELs and reintervention was 4.1%, respectively. Four patients (8.2%) died during the follow-up period, one (2.1%) from abdominal aortic rupture and three (6.1%) from nonaortic causes. ConclusionsOur early and midterm outcomes suggest that scalloped and fenestrated TEVAR may provide an acceptable alternative treatment option for aortic arch pathologies. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the long-term durability of this technique.

Urgent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type-B0,D Acute Aortic Dissection

The objective of the present study is to clarify safety and efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), excluding the primary entry in the descending aorta, for type-B0,D acute aortic dissection (TB0,DAAD) (so-called retrograde type-A acute aortic dissection). Forty-six patients with hyperacute-phase (within 2days after the onset) type-A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) and TB0,DAAD underwent urgent (on the admission or next day) intervention (TEVAR or conventional surgical aortic repair [CSAR]) for 2years. Results of TEVAR for TB0,DAAD were compared with those of CSAR for TAAAD. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, aortic reintervention, and major complications (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis). Details of TEVAR were also analyzed. Seven patients with TB0,DAAD and 39 patients with TAAAD underwent respectively urgent TEVAR and CSAR. Aortic reintervention was significantly more frequent in the TEVAR than CSAR group (28.6% vs. 0%, P<0.01). There was no difference in incidence of death and stroke between the TEVAR and CSAR group. All the 7 patients survived and 5 of the 7 (71.4%) patients were relieved of aortic reintervention for 30days following TEVAR. One patient, however, underwent aortic arch replacement on postoperative day (POD) 1 owing to the patent and nonshrinking ascending false lumen (FL). The entry existed in the aortic arch. Another patient underwent ascending and transverse aortic replacement with frozen elephant trunk on POD13 due to proximal stent graft-induced new entry irrespective of the thrombosed and shrinking ascending FL. Because of the patent and nonshrinking ascending FL, 1 patient underwent additional TEVAR for the residual entry in the distal descending thoracic aorta on POD33 and subsequently ascending aortic replacement 4months later. No entry was detected in the ascending or transverse aorta. The ascending FL in the other 4 patients was thrombosed early, shrinking gradually, and disappeared at last following TEVAR. Urgent TEVAR for TB0,DAAD may be alternative to CSAR in selected cases. Accurate diagnosis of the primary entry location on preinterventional computed tomography scans for exclusion of the entry and cautious selection and delivery of a stent graft to prevent stent graft-induced new entry or endoleak are requisite for success of the procedure, remodeling of the FL, and satisfactory prognosis.

The safety and prognostic evaluation of subsequent aortic surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a retrospective cohort study.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a widely employed clinical procedure for treating various aortic pathologies. However, some patients require subsequent surgical interventions post-TEVAR, particularly due to life-threatening complications such as aortic dissection. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and prognosis associated with additional aortic surgeries following TEVAR. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 21 patients who underwent aortic surgery after TEVAR at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between September 2016 and August 2020. By compiling and reviewing perioperative data, we assessed surgical-related complications and survival rates. Among the 21 patients, 95.2% were male, with an average age of 53 years. Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension in 15 individuals, abdominal aortic aneurysm in one patient, and coronary heart disease in two patients. The primary complications of TEVAR were stent leakage and retrograde aortic dissection, with the latter being the predominant type in subsequent aortic surgeries. The mean duration of aortic clamping during surgery was 130.0 minutes, with a deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time of 8.5 minutes. Postoperatively, two patients suffered in-hospital mortality, one developed renal dysfunction, four required re-entry into the operating room for further treatment, and the average length of hospital stay was 20 days. Following discharge, 14.3% of patients experienced complications, with central nervous system symptoms being the most prevalent. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a 5-year survival rate of 85.7%. Aortic surgical intervention following TEVAR is a safe therapeutic approach that can improve patient prognosis. However, meticulous management of the perioperative period is crucial for reducing the risk of complications and improving survival rates. This study provides valuable insights into aortic surgery post-TEVAR, but large-scale research is needed to validate these findings.

Retrograde aortic dissection during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: How to prevent and treat

Retrograde aortic dissection during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: How to prevent and treat

Conservative treatment of retrograde aortic dissection after hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysm.

Conservative treatment of retrograde aortic dissection after hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysm.

Total aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated physician-modified endografts, at least 3-year follow-up

ObjectiveThis study aims to report the efficacy and safety of double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) for total aortic arch repair with at least 3 years of follow-up. MethodsAll consecutive patients with a pathological aortic arch who underwent aortic arch repair combined with a homemade double-fenestrated stent graft from 2017 to 2020 were reviewed. Results74 patients were treated for pathological arch conditions with a double-fenestrated PMEG. Of these, 81% were male, the mean age was 69.9 years, and 59% were classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 3 or 4. Thirty-five percent were treated for a postdissection aneurysm, 36% for a degenerative aneurysm, and 14% for acute type B dissection. Fifteen percent had supra-aortic trunk dissection. Fenestration on the subclavian artery was performed in 96%; if not, a carotid-subclavian bypass was carried out. Technical success was 100%. The proximal landing zone is consistently in zone 0. Early outcomes revealed a 3% occurrence of type 1 endoleak, which was successfully treated by prompt reintervention. One retrograde dissection occurred, and one patient died from hemorrhage on an iliac conduit. A 5% stroke rate was reported. During long-term follow-up (mean time 40.7 months), one type 1 endoleak appeared and was successfully treated; no type 2 or type 3 endoleak requiring intervention occurred. No stent fractures or migrations were reported. Four percent of patients required reintervention, but no surgical conversion to open surgical repair was needed on the aortic arch. No patient died from a cause related to the main procedure. ConclusionsTotal aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated PMEGs is associated with acceptable early and midterm major morbidity and mortality. It is suitable for the main aortic pathologies. Moreover, it is easily available for emergency situations.

Comparison of Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence between Anteroposterior Dissection and Modified Gilling Method in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Few studies have evaluated the usefulness of anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Thus, this study investigated the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after HoLEP and usefulness of anteroposterior dissection HoLEP in preventing postoperative SUI. In total, 288 patients who underwent HoLEP performed by a single experienced surgeon between May 2014 and September 2021 were enrolled. Furthermore, 134 patients underwent retrograde dissection using the modified Gilling method (surgery 1) and 154 patients underwent anteroposterior dissection HoLEP (surgery 2). The risk factors for SUI, as well as the rates of SUI improvement for the two surgical procedures, were evaluated. Postoperative SUI was observed in 58 (20.1%) of 288 patients, of whom, 48 (82.8%) recovered continence within 6 months. Ten patients (17.2%) required more than 6 months to recover continence. SUI incidence 1 month after HoLEP was 29.9% (40/134 patients) for surgery 1 and 11.7% (18/154 patients) for surgery 2; a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.311; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.168-0.575; p < 0.001). In addition, surgery 2 was significantly associated with early recovery from SUI compared with surgery 1 (stratified hazard ratio, 0.782; 95% CI, 0.615------0.995; p < 0.001). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that only surgical procedure (OR, 0.350; 95%CI, 0.168-0.732; p=0.005) was an independent predictor of SUI.- Conclusion: We reaffirmed that anteroposterior dissection HoLEP is a useful procedure for reducing the risk of postoperative SUI and early recovery of urinary continence.

Different techniques for identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy

BackgroundParotidectomy is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Identification of the facial nerve trunk is essential during surgery of the parotid gland to avoid facial nerve injury. A comprehensive knowledge of its anatomy and meticulous dissection are the keys for the identification of the facial nerve trunk and its branches.AimTo compare between the traditional antegrade parotidectomy and retrograde in identification of facial nerve during superficial parotidectomy, determination the best anatomical landmark, the time of exploration of facial nerve, outcomes, facial nerve complication, duration of surgery, patient satisfaction as well as other complications.MethodsTwelve patients who were diagnosed with having parotid gland neoplasms, and had undergone superficial Parotidectomy were recruited and assessed for eligibility at General Surgery Department, Beni-Suef University Hospital. Patients were divided according to the surgical technique into two equal groups, group A (the antegrade dissection group), and group B (the retrograde dissection group), follow-up was 6 months.ResultsThere was no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding pain, paresthesia and pathology postoperation (Pvalue&gt;0.05). Longer mean operation time was observed in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (2.06±0.75 and 1.61±0.31 h, respectively), which was statistically insignificant (Pvalue&gt;0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in facial nerve injury among patients in the antegrade dissection group in comparison with the retrograde dissection group (Pvalue=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference between techniques regarding hospital stay duration and complications three months postoperation (Pvalue&gt;0.05).ConclusionRetrograde facial nerve dissection technique is better than the classical antegrade technique in the superficial parotidectomy within this study.

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic prostatectomy: antegrade versus retrograde technique

BackgroundRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended lymphadenectomy (ePLND) is the gold standard for surgical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Recently, the en-bloc ePLND has been proposed but no studies reported on the standardization of the technique. The aim of the study is to describe different standardized en-bloc ePLND, the antegrade and the retrograde ePLND, and to compare their surgical and oncological outcomes.Materials & MethodsFrom January 2018 to September 2019, all patients subjected to RARP plus ePLND by one single surgeon were enrolled. ePLND was performed in a retrograde fashion by starting laterally to the medial umbilical ligament from the internal inguinal ring proceeding towards the ureter, or in an antegrade way by starting from the ureter at its crossing with the common iliac artery and proceeding towards the femoral canal. Patients’ demographic data, clinical and surgical data were collected. Each en-bloc ePLND was categorized as “efficient” or “inefficient” by the operator, as surrogate of surgeon’s satisfaction.ResultsAntegrade and retrograde ePLND were performed in 41/105 (group A) and 64/105 (group R) patients, respectively. The two groups (A vs R) had similar median (IQR) number of lymph nodes retrieved [20 (16.25–31.5) vs 19 (15–26.25); p = 0.18], ePLND time [33.5 (29.5–38.5) min vs 33.5 (26.5–37.5) min; p = 0.4] and post-operative complications [8/41 (19.5%) vs 9/64 (14.1%); p = 0.61]. In group A, 3/41 (7.3%) clinically significant lymphoceles were reported, while 1/64 (1.6%) in group R (p = 0.3). 33/41 (80.5%) and 28/64 (44%) procedures were scored as efficient 59 in group A and R, respectively (p = 0.01). On multivariate regression, only BMI (B = 0.93; 95% CI 0.29–1.56; p = 0.005) was associated with a longer ePLND time.ConclusionsThe study indicates that antegrade and retrograde en-bloc extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) have comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes, supporting the importance of standardizing the procedure rather than focusing on the direction. Although both techniques aligned with current evidence regarding lymph node invasion and complications, the antegrade approach was subjectively perceived as safer due to early isolation of critical anatomical landmarks. Encouragement for the use of en-bloc ePLND, regardless of direction, is emphasized to improve prostate cancer staging accuracy and procedural standardization.

Short-term results of fenestrated physician-modified endografts for type1a endoleak after conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of physician-modified fenestrated stent grafts (PMEGs) in treating type 1a endoleak after conventional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in aortic arch pathologies. MethodsPatients who developed a type 1a endoleak after conventional TEVAR were included in the study. They underwent treatment with fenestrated PMEGs, which involved single or double fenestration for the supra-aortic trunks. ResultsTwenty patients were treated with PMEGs between October 2018 and November 2023. Among them, 25% received single fenestrated PMEGs and 75% received double fenestrated PMEGs. The technical success rate was 100% for both types. Eighty percent of the PMEGs had a landing zone in zone 0, whereas 20% had a landing zone in zone 2. There were no in-hospital deaths. After 30 days, 1 patient died as the result of an aortic-related cause (retrograde dissection). The mean follow-up time was 16.5 months (range, 0-60 months). No major adverse events such as stroke or spinal ischemia were reported. No type 1 or type 3 endoleaks were observed, and one type 2 endoleaks required peripheral endovascular reintervention. ConclusionsThe treatment of type 1a endoleaks using fenestrated PMEGs after conventional TEVAR for aortic arch pathologies is a viable option. It is associated with acceptable rates of early and midterm major morbidity and mortality.

Midterm Outcomes of Multicenter Castor Single-Branch Stent Graft Use in the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Diseases.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm efficacy and safety of a single-branch Castor stent graft in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. Clinical data of 106 patients with thoracic aortic disease treated with Castor single-branch stent graft at 3 centers were collected between May 2018 and June 2023. The indicators included technical success, stent-related complication, reintervention, retrograde dissection, endoleak, distal stent graft-induced entry (dSINE), branch patency, and mortality. The outcomes of the Castor stent graft for multibranch reconstruction above the arch was also analyzed. The technical success was 98.1% (104/106), while the surgical success was 93.4% (99/106). The reintervention was 2.8% (3/106), consisting of a case of retrograde type A dissection, an endoleak, and a dSINE. The retrograde dissection was 1.9% (2/106), while type I endoleak was 1.9% (2/106). The new dSINE was 2.8% (3/106), and the branch patency rate was 100%. The mortality was 1.9% (2/106). The mean follow-up time was 29.1±17.7 months. The 2-year post-surgery cumulative survival rate was 91.0%±3.1%, while the cumulative branch patency rate was 96.2%±2.2%. In addition, the cumulative freedom from stent-related reintervention rate was 93.2%±2.8%. A comparison showed no significant difference in the stent-related complication, branch patency, endoleak, reintervention, and mortality when the proximal end of the Castor stent graft was anchored to zones 1 or 2 of the aorta. Castor single-branch stent graft showed favorable early and midterm outcomes in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. In addition, it was feasible to combine Castor stent graft with other advanced techniques for multibranch aortic arch reconstruction. The Castor single-branch stent graft was approval by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration in 2017. However, there were few studies on the mid-term outcomes for thoracic aortic disease after launching, which mainly focused on small single-center retrospective study. In the study, we assessed the mid-term outcomes of Castor stent graft through multi-center cases, Castor stent graft combined with other advanced techniques (such as fenestration and hybrid) for multi-branch reconstruction of aortic arch were also conducted. We found Castor single-branch stent graft showed favorable early and mid-term outcomes in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. Additionally, it was feasible to combine Castor stent graft with other advanced technique for multi-branch aortic arch reconstruction. As an off-the-shelf branched stent graft with a wide range of models, it could be also used in most emergent situation. The Castor stent graft was expected to become more widely used in the future.

Volumetric analysis in primary and residual type B aortic dissection treated with stented-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination technique can predict aortic reintervention

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of stented-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination (STABILISE) in patients with aortic dissection with the implementation of volumetric analysis. MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From May 2017 to September 2022, 42 patients underwent STABILISE for acute complicated or subacute high-risk aortic dissection. STABILISE was completed with distal extended endovascular aortic repair in 24 patients. A computed tomography scan was performed at baseline, before hospital discharge, and at 1, 3, and 5 years. Perfused total aortic, true lumen, and false lumen volumes were assessed for thoracic, visceral, and aorto-iliac segment. The ratio between false lumen and total volume was named perfusion dissection index (PDI). Complete remodeling was defined as PDI = 0, and positive remodeling as PDI ≤0.1. ResultsTechnical success was 97.6%. No 30-day deaths, spinal cord injuries, or retrograde dissections were observed. Mean follow-up was 44 ± 19.4 months. Thoracic diameter was lower at last available computed tomography scan (36.7 vs 33.0 mm; P = .01). Aortic growth >5 mm was observed in 9.5% of the patients. Thoracic and visceral aortic complete remodeling were 92.8% and 83.3%, respectively, with no difference between acute and subacute group. Distal extended endovascular aortic repair significantly increased complete remodeling in the aorto-iliac segment, compared with STABILISE alone (69.6% vs 21.4%; P < .001). Freedom from vascular reinterventions at 3 years was 83.1% (95% confidence interval, 71.5%-96.6%). Total PDI ≤0.1 at first postoperative control was a predictor of vascular reinterventions (P < .0001). ConclusionsSTABILISE is a safe and feasible technique associated with high mid-term rates of complete remodeling in the thoracic and visceral aorta. Volumetric analysis allows the quantification of aortic remodeling and represents a predictor of aortic reinterventions.

Initial experience and favorable outcomes on cannulation strategies and surgical platform construction in fully video-assisted thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery offers numerous advantages that patients and surgeons desire. This surgical platform encompasses cannulation strategies for cardiopulmonary bypass, optimal surgical access points, and high-quality visualization techniques. Traditional peripheral cannulation methods, though convenient, possess inherent limitations and carry the potential for complications such as retrograde dissection, stroke, or neurologic sequelae. Conversely, central cannulation may be ideally suited to circumvent the disadvantages above. Fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery represents a state-of-the-art platform, offering surgeons an unparalleled surgical view. This analysis aimed to delineate the efficacy and safety of transthoracic central cannulation strategies and the surgical platform during fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery. Between October 2022 and February 2024, we identified a cohort of 85 consecutive patients with cardiopulmonary bypass undergoing fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery at our institutions. The patients' mean age was 41.09 ± 14.01 years, ranging from 18 to 75 years. The mean weight was 64.34 ± 10.59 kg (ranging from 49 to 103 kg). Congenital heart disease repair accounted for the highest proportion, with 43 cases (50.59%). Mitral valve surgery and left atrium Myxoma resections accounted for 29.41%. Specifically, this included 14 mitral valve repairs, five mitral valve replacements, and six left atrium myxoma resections. Aortic valve replacements constitute 20% of all cases. A total of 85 adult patients underwent fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery. The average CPB time was 83.26 ± 28.26 min, while the aortic cross-clamp time averaged 51.87 ± 23.91 min. The total operation time (skin to skin) averaged 173.8 ± 37.08 min. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 5.58 ± 3.43 h, ICU stay was 20.04 ± 2.83 h (ranging from 15.5 to 34 h), and postoperative hospital stay was 5.55 ± 0.87 days. No patients required conversion to thoracotomy and unplanned reoperations due to various reasons. There were no in-hospital deaths, strokes, myocardial infarctions, aortic dissections, or renal failure. No patient developed wound soft tissue infection. Fully video-assisted thoracoscopy cardiac surgery utilizing central cannulation strategies is a reliable, cost-effective platform with a low risk of complications and a potential solution for patients facing contraindications for peripheral cannulation.

Immediate Interventional Management of Aortocoronary Dissection During PCI: A Case Report

Aortocoronary dissection is a rare and potentially fatal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. It is more common when performing interventions of the right coronary artery or during revascularization of chronic total occlusions. Here, we aimed to provide more data regarding a less common form of this complication. We present the case of an 81-year old woman admitted with an acute infero-lateral myocardial infarction, who was indicated for emergency primary coronary intervention. After revascularization of the left circumflex artery, the left main coronary artery exhibited retrograde dissection into the ascending aorta. This complication was managed with immediate placement of another coronary stent at the left main coronary artery. Further propagation of the dissection was prevented. The patient was discharged in good health with antiagregant and rhythm control therapy for new onset atrial fibrillation. Although retrograde dissection of the left main coronary artery is a very rare complication, it can be successfully managed interventionally.