2 experiments were carried out to investigate proactive inhibition (PI) and retroactive inhibition (RI) in the paradigm involving identical stimuli and meaningfully similar responses on the 2 lists learned. In Experiment I, significant PI was found 48 hr. after learning, but was of equal magnitude for groups receiving 5, 10, or 20 trials of first-list learning. The data of Experiment II made it possible to compare RI and PI in Immediate and 48-hr, tests, when combined with Experiment I and an earlier study. RI appeared rather than retroactive facilitation, and did not appear to vary as a function of time. PI increases over a 48-hr, interval. Considering both recall and error data, current theories of RI and PI do not provide a wholly convincing explanation of these results. In verbal learning studies using the A-B,A-B' paradigm (in which two successive lists have identical stimuli and similar responses), no statistically significant evidence of forgetting due to proactive inhibition (PI) has been found, although in each case retention for A-B.A-B' conditions was numerically inferior to that of an appropriate A-B control group (Dallett, 1962; Morgan & Underwood, 1950; Young, 1955). The failure to find significant PI in this paradigm can be easily reconciled with current views of interference and forgetting (Postman, 1961). The position summarized by Postman is that in the A-B.A-C paradigm, A-C learning involves the unlearning of A-B connections, with PI eventually resulting from the spontaneous recovery of the A-B associations. In the A-B, A-B' paradigm, on the other hand, A-B' learning is mediated by the previously learned A-B associations, which do not get un
Read full abstract