Results Of Implementation Research Articles

Implementation of a Nurse-Initiated Antibiotic Time-Out (NATO) in Childhood Cancer Patients in Central America

Abstract Background Children with cancer are at high risk for infection and frequently require antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions can mitigate toxicity and development of antibiotic resistance yet the pharmacy and infectious diseases specialists who usually perform AMS are often absent in global settings. We report our experience testing a novel intervention to shift the antibiotic timeout to nurses in six pediatric oncology units in Central America. Methods The Nurse-initiated Antibiotic Timeout (NATO) is a scripted conversation between nurses and physicians to reevaluate antibiotic appropriateness after 48 to 72 hours of empiric use for febrile neutropenia. First, we performed a baseline assessment of AMS capacity using the WHO Practical Toolkit for AMS Programmes checklist. Based on these results, sites tailored a generic implementation plan emphasizing educational and documentation tools and iterative PDSA (Plan-Do, Study-Act) cycles to improve implementation and effectiveness outcomes. Results All sites collected antimicrobial use data for a minimum of two months. Four sites then piloted NATO, producing change ideas, including changes to documentation tools, antimicrobial decision categories, communication processes, and times. From August 2022 – October 2023, NATO was performed in 53.4% of febrile neutropenia episodes in the three sites reporting data. Sites had substantial NATO performance rate variation from month to month. Sites reported changes in antimicrobial therapy in 47% of episodes after a 6-month period (Figure 1). Conclusion The difference in performance rate of NATO underscores the importance of real-time reporting to adjust AMS implementation strategies. The change ideas developed by each site differed, however, core tools emerged, which will support AMS in other global settings. Next steps include comparing antimicrobial use pre- and post-intervention and determining a sustainability and scalability plan. Figure 1. Incidence of change in antibiotic therapy over time.

The impact of cultural practices on the outcome of IT risk management implementation

PurposeThe objectives of this research are two-fold. The first is to explore, describe and explain the relevance of the concept of Information Technology risk management (ITRM) implementation processes. In this regard, we were required to understand the interaction between contextual issues, the ITRM framework itself, IT individual interpretations toward them and their effect on implementation. The second objective is to develop a theoretical model for use in guiding the design and analysis of the proposed empirical work. The study introduces a fresh perspective to an established research area. It is argued that without more emphasis on the dynamic nature of the implementation process, an incomplete understanding of the problem will result.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopts an interpretive methodology to a multiple case study design gathering and analysing qualitative evidence. A series of three case studies was designed around 22 semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted to investigate IT individuals’ role in facilitating a successful ITRM implementation.FindingsThe findings provide new insights in relation to ITRM implementation by considering IT individual culture. The research develops a substantive theory involving a schematic model involving a set of theoretical propositions. These findings suggest a dynamic approach to implementing IT risk management framework — one that considers the interaction over time of intentions, context, process and action around risk management frameworks.Research limitations/implicationsThis study makes important theoretical contributions to the understanding of organizational implementations by taking a dynamic view of implementation, identifying different individual IT culture archetypes, emphasizing the role of social aspects and developing a set of key factors and contextual conditions.Practical implicationsThis model offers managers an understanding of how IT individual culture and the factors and contextual conditional work together over time to ensure a successful ITRM implementation. Meanwhile, it sheds some light on how managers treat IT individuals with different levels of experience differently.Originality/valueWe theorize IT individual culture and the factors and contextual conditional and show their effects on ITRM implementation success, thus making an essential contribution to the information systems and implementation research and practice. Moreover, we provide a novel methodology to conceptualize ITRM implementation as a cultural process through which IT people socially construct the meanings and purposes of their work activities. This research answers scholars’ call to construct more accurate explanations of innovation outcomes in an increasingly IS implementation world.

Perineal massage and warm compresses–Implementation study of a complex intervention in health

ObjectivesTo determine the effect of using tailored and multifaceted strategies on the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and adoption of a perineal massage and warm compress intervention by midwives in a maternity ward of a tertiary hospital in Portugal. MethodsThe complex intervention in health was developed based on the Medical Research Council framework and guided by the Theory of Change. Tailored and multifaceted strategies, including dissemination, integration and implementing process strategies, were applied. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, with a combination of qualitative (semi-open interviews) and quantitative (surveys, audits and electronic health records) methods. Surveys were applied to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the intervention. In order to evaluate adoption of the intervention, data from interviews were introduced into NVivo Version 10 to perform thematic analysis, and each audit checklist criterion was analysed using McNemar's exact test to determine differences in paired proportion. ResultsThis study found high acceptability (mean±standard deviation 4.28±0.45), high appropriateness (4.32±0.47) and high feasibility (4.26±0.43) of the intervention by midwives. Differences were reported for most topics between interviews conducted before and after implementation of the intervention. Pre-intervention, the midwives reported that the main factor affecting the application of perineal protection techniques was the lack of continuous presence of the midwife. The birth position was the alternative birth position (hands and knees, side-lying, squatting and semi-sitting), avoiding the lithotomy position. Techniques used for perineal protection were warm compresses, hands-on techniques, hands-off techniques and spontaneous pushing; and the reasons given for performing an episiotomy were large (high-birthweight) baby, Kristeller manoeuvre, tense perineum and previous obstetric sphincter injury. Post-intervention, the midwives reported that the presence of a second person increases the safety of professionals and women and improves working relations. The technique used for perineal protection was autonomy to adapt the intervention with perineal massage and warm compresses. A comfortable birth position for woman was used, and the rate of episiotomy reduced (only performed in the case of fetal distress). Regarding audits, significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for all audit criteria (pre- and post-intervention), which means that midwives adopted the intervention into their clinical practice. ConclusionAcceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and adoption of the intervention by midwives were high. Thus, tailored and multifaceted strategies were effective to achieve the implementation outcomes.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Intervention to Improve the Sexual Health of Adolescent and Young Adult Male Emergency Department Patients

PurposeTo assess implementation outcomes and potential efficacy of a user-informed, theory-based digital health intervention developed to improve adolescent and young adult (AYA) male sexual health. MethodsWe conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of sexually active male emergency department (ED) patients aged 14–21 years. Participants were randomized to the intervention (Dr. Eric, Emergency Room Interventions to improve Care) or usual care. Dr. Eric consists of an ED-based sexual health app followed by 3 months of interactive text messages. We assessed the feasibility, adoption, and fidelity among users. Condom use, defined as the number of sexual encounters with condoms divided by the total number of sexual encounters over the past 4 weeks, was the primary efficacy outcome. ResultsWe enrolled 119 patients; mean age was 17.9 years, 87% were Hispanic, and half used condoms at last intercourse. Dr. Eric demonstrated feasibility, with high rates of consent (86.2%) and follow-up (81.5%). Intervention participants found Dr. Eric acceptable, liking (86.2%) and recommending (87.9%) the program. 98% of intervention participants interacted with all five app modules; one-quarter opted out of text messaging. At 6-week follow-up, the intervention group more often used a condom compared to the control group [OR 3.57, 95% confidence interval (1.93, 6.60)], p < .001]; however, this significant difference did not sustain at 13 weeks. DiscussionDr. Eric was feasible to deliver and acceptable to male AYA patients. To our knowledge, Dr. Eric is the first intervention to demonstrate evidence of short-term efficacy for improving condom use among male AYA in the ED.

The implementation of a "safety officer" program: an innovative approach to improve infection prevention and control practices in Ethiopia.

Effective infection prevention and control (IPC) was central to keeping healthcare workers (HCWs) safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, as the pandemic continued, the maintenance of high-quality IPC practices waned, placing HCWs at increased risk of infection. A COVID-19 Safety Officer (SO) program was piloted by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded Reaching Impact, Saturation and Epidemic Control (RISE) project across two health facilities in Ethiopia, which trained clinical and non-clinical HCWs on IPC protocols to promote safe practices in patient care areas. We sought to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the SO program in improving IPC practices within the clinical setting. This is a post-implementation evaluation of the SO program, implemented in two hospitals in Ethiopia between May 2022 and December 2022. Participants completed a 4-day course on COVID-19 epidemiology, IPC, safety communication, and learning theory as a part of the Training of Trainers component (n = 23), and were posted in clinical wards to provide staff training and support to maintain IPC protocols. The program was evaluated at 6 months using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Effectiveness was measured using direct observation of IPC practices across intervention sites. Implementation outcomes were measured using surveys and qualitative interviews to capture training cascade, knowledge, comfort, acceptability, and maintenance. Participants were able to cascade training to an additional 167 clinical (67.6%) and 80 non-clinical (32.3%) staff across both sites. Direct observation of clinical staff at 6 months showed that 95% (59/62) wore at least a surgical mask with patients and were compliant with masking and/or distancing protocol. Clinical interviews revealed that SOs contributed to increased perceived comfort with screening and isolation procedures and environmental cleaning procedures. The SO training program was widely adopted, and effective in improving the implementation and comfort of maintaining IPC practices in clinical settings.

Transition Guide Dissemination to Foster Patient-Care Team Conversations: A Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance Transition Learning Collaborative Pilot Implementation Study.

Uptake of evidence-informed health care transition processes among pediatric rheumatologists is low despite poor outcomes of transition from pediatric to adult care. We piloted a learning collaborative model to implement transition guides. We dually assessed implementation outcomes and changes in reported patient-care team discussions about transition. This was a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study of transition guide dissemination to patients at least 14 years old with rheumatic conditions across nine pediatric rheumatology centers in the Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance Transition Learning Collaborative. We evaluated implementation outcomes (feasibility, adaptations, and fidelity) and the proportion of patients surveyed that reported having discussions with their care team regarding transfer planning. Six sites were retained through the COVID-19 pandemic (below 70% target). Five out of six sites contributed outcome data (met 80% target) but with substantial heterogeneity in how transition guides were shared (eg, in-person, electronic messages, and posted flyers), and data were collected. The pooled proportion of respondents having discussed transfer planning with their care team was 39% preimplementation (n = 239; 95% confidence interval [CI] 32%-46%) and 55% postimplementation (n = 864; 95% CI 36%-73%). After implementation, there were significant increases in the likelihood of respondents recalling receiving a transition guide (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% CI 1.35-4.92) and discussing transfer planning (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.30-3.52), adjusted for age and site of care. Transition guide dissemination is a simple intervention associated with increased awareness among young people with rheumatic conditions and discussions with their care team about transition preparation. The learning collaborative model facilitated identification of several dissemination strategies adaptable to site-specific resources.

Evaluating the World Health Organization's HEARTS Model for Hypertension and Diabetes Management: A Pilot Implementation Study in Guatemala.

The World Health Organization HEARTS Technical Package is a widely implemented global initiative to improve the primary care management of cardiovascular disease risk factors. The study's objective is to report outcomes from a pilot implementation trial of integrated hypertension and diabetes management based on the HEARTS model in Guatemala. We conducted a single-arm pilot implementation trial over 6 months from October 2023 to May 2024 in 11 Guatemalan Ministry of Health primary care facilities in two districts. The pilot evaluated a package of five HEARTS-aligned implementation strategies to improve the pharmacological treatment of hypertension and diabetes. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability, measured through 20 structured interviews with Ministry of Health employees and by examining enrollment and retention. Secondary outcomes included a suite of implementation and clinical outcomes, including treatment rate. The study enrolled 964 patients, of whom 58.8% had hypertension only, 30.4% had diabetes only, and 10.8% had both conditions. Surveys on feasibility and acceptability among Ministry of Health staff had a median score of 5.0 (IQR: 5.0 to 5.0) and 5.0 (IQR range: 4.8 to 5.0), respectively, exceeding the prespecified benchmark of ≥3.5. Both districts achieved the prespecified benchmark of enrolling ≥25 hypertension patients and ≥25 diabetes patients. Only 36% of patients attended a follow-up visit within three months, lower than the prespecified benchmark of ≥75%. M treatment rates during the pilot increased by 22.3 (95% CI: 16.2 to 28.4; P<0.001) and 3.5 (95% CI: -1.6 to 8.7; P=0.17) patients per month for hypertension and diabetes, respectively. Implementation of an integrated hypertension and diabetes model based on HEARTS was generally feasible and acceptable in the Ministry of Health in Guatemala. Findings can refine national scale-up in Guatemala and inform HEARTS implementation projects in other settings.

Evaluating the effectiveness of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare, an integrated intervention, among families at risk for secondhand smoke exposure and child maltreatment in the United States: a study protocol for a hybrid type 1 trial

BackgroundSecondhand smoke exposure (SHS) and child maltreatment (CM) are preventable yet have negative lifelong impacts on health. When considered together, the risk for negative health outcomes may be compounded, especially for people living in low-resource settings. Evidence-based interventions exist for preventing CM and reducing SHS among families with low resources; however, no programs jointly target SHS exposure and maltreatment risk.MethodsThis study is a hybrid type 1 trial to examine the effectiveness of a systematically braided intervention to target CM risk and SHS in the home. Fifty SafeCare Providers will be randomized to deliver either standard SafeCare (i.e., the SafeCare model alone; active treatment control; n = 25) or Smoke-Free Home SafeCare (SFHSC; treatment condition; n = 25), the braided intervention that includes both SafeCare and the Smoke-Free Homes: Some Things are Better Outside intervention to N = 500 families. Aim 2 is to assess family-level outcomes. The primary outcome is a full home smoking ban, validated by air nicotine monitors; secondary outcomes include parenting and smoking outcomes. Aim 3 is to evaluate process and implementation outcomes, including cost–benefit. We will use multilevel models and ROC analyses to evaluate and validate the primary outcome. We will use tests of non-inferiority to evaluate secondary outcomes. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be used to assess cost–benefit of SFHSC.DiscussionThis study will be the first to document the outcomes of a multi-component intervention to address cumulative risk factors that impact cancer risk among children whose parents are at risk or involved in child-protective services. Integrating an evidence-based intervention that targets SHS exposure in the home with a broadly disseminated CM prevention intervention may be a sustainable way to help reduce the compounded effects of SHS in the home and CM.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05000632. Registered on August 11, 2021.

Development and testing of a resuscitation-specific measure of organizational culture for resuscitation teams

BackgroundThe organizational culture (shared beliefs, perceptions, and values) of teams informs their behaviours and practices. Little is known about organizational culture for resuscitation teams. Our objective was to develop a reliable and valid resuscitation-specific organizational culture instrument (ROCI) with the goal of improving team performance. MethodsUsing Neonatal Resuscitation Program principles, literature review, and discussion of existing culture measures with experts, we identified organizational culture components for resuscitation and adapted existing measures to resuscitation. We developed a ROCI with five subscales (role clarity, shared-mental models, closed-loop communication, team adaptability, and psychological safety) and administered it to neonatal resuscitation team members across a hospital network. Survey psychometric assessment included reliability analyses (Cronbach’s α, Pearson correlation coefficients) and validity testing (confirmatory factor analysis [CFA] and regression models examining the association of culture with implementation outcomes: climate and perceived success). ResultsAcross 11 hospitals there were 318 complete responses (41 % response rate). Of the 22-items tested, 18 were retained after iterative psychometric assessment. The ROCI had excellent overall reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.994) and very good subscale reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.789–0.867). The CFA goodness-of-fit statistics confirmed five constructs (subscales). At the individual-level, the ROCI and all subscales were associated with both implementation outcomes. At the hospital-level, the ROCI overall and three subscales were associated with perceived success. ConclusionThe ROCI is a reliable and valid measure of the organizational culture of resuscitation teams. Future ROCI assessments may provide a foundation to inform culture change initiatives to improve resuscitation quality and outcomes across populations and contexts.

Digital communication between mothers and community health workers to support neonatal health (CHV-NEO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundProvision of essential newborn care at home, rapid identification of illness, and care-seeking by caregivers can prevent neonatal mortality. Mobile technology can connect caregivers with information and healthcare worker advice more rapidly and frequently than healthcare visits. Community health workers (CHWs) are well-suited to deliver such interventions. We developed an interactive short message service (SMS) intervention for neonatal health in Kenya, named CHV-NEO. CHV-NEO sends automated, theory-based, actionable, messages throughout the peripartum period that guide mothers to evaluate maternal and neonatal danger signs and facilitate real-time dialogue with a CHW via SMS. We integrated this intervention into Kenya’s national electronic community health information system (eCHIS), which is currently used at scale to support CHW workflow.MethodsThe effect of CHV-NEO on clinical and implementation outcomes will be evaluated through a non-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial. Twenty sites across Kisumu County in Western Kenya were randomized 1:1 to provide either the national eCHIS with integrated CHV-NEO messaging (intervention) or standard of care using eCHIS without CHV-NEO (control). We will compare neonatal mortality between arms based on abstracted eCHIS data from 7200 pregnant women. Secondary outcomes include self-reported provision of essential newborn care (appropriate cord care, thermal care, and timely initiation of breastfeeding), knowledge of neonatal danger signs, and care-seeking for neonatal illness, compared between arms based on questionnaires with a subgroup of 2000 women attending study visits at enrollment in pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum. We will also determine CHV-NEO’s effect on CHW workflows and evaluate determinants of intervention acceptability, adoption, and fidelity of use through questionnaires, individual interviews, and messaging data.DiscussionWe hypothesize that the CHV-NEO direct-to-client communication strategy can be successfully integrated within existing CHW workflows and infrastructure, improve the provision of at-home essential newborn care, increase timely referral of neonatal illness to facilities, and reduce neonatal mortality. The intervention’s integration into the national eCHIS tool will facilitate rapid scale-up if it is clinically effective and successfully implemented.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05187897. The CHV-NEO study was registered on January 12, 2022.

Evaluating a volunteer 'Health Champions' intervention supporting people with severe mental illness to manage their physical health: feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial.

People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population. There is evidence that support from volunteers can help the mental health of people with SMI, but little evidence regarding the support they can give for physical health. To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention where volunteer 'Health Champions' support people with SMI in managing their physical health. A feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial conducted in mental health teams with people with SMI. Volunteers delivered the Health Champions intervention. We collected data on the feasibility of delivering the intervention, and clinical and cost-effectiveness. Participants were randomised by a statistician independent of the research team, to either having a Health Champion or treatment as usual. Blinding was not done. We recruited 48 participants: 27 to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Data were analysed for 34 participants. No changes were found in clinical effectiveness for either group. Implementation outcomes measures showed high acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, but with low response rates. No adverse events were identified in either group. Interviews with participants found they identified changes they had made to their physical health. The cost of implementing the intervention was £312 per participant. The Health Champion intervention was feasible to implement, but the implementation of the study measures was problematic. Participants found the intervention acceptable, feasible and appropriate, and it led them to make changes in their physical health. A larger trial is recommended, with tailored implementation outcome measures.

Digital Official Letter Management Using E-Buddy Sidoarjo Application

Background: The rise of digital technology has revolutionized local governance by enhancing efficiency and transparency. Specific Background: In this context, the E-Buddy application facilitates the digital management of official correspondence, yet its effectiveness has not been thoroughly examined. Knowledge Gap: Current literature lacks a detailed analysis of the communication dynamics and bureaucratic structures affecting the success of such digital systems. Aims: This study investigates the implementation of the E-Buddy application, emphasizing communication, resource allocation, executor disposition, and bureaucratic structure. Results: Findings reveal that the application's effectiveness is undermined by limited feature utilization and insufficient adherence to standard operating procedures (SOPs), resulting in miscommunication and inefficiencies. Novelty: The research underscores the importance of effective communication and structured SOPs in optimizing digital systems in governance. Implications: The study recommends enhancing training and establishing clear SOPs to improve implementation outcomes and contribute to more effective governance. Highlights : Effective communication is crucial for successful implementation. Insufficient adherence to SOPs hampers operational efficiency. Training and support enhance user engagement and application effectiveness. Keywords: Digital Governance, E-Buddy Application, Implementation, Communication, Bureaucratic Structure

Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the written exposure therapy training program in the Veterans Health Administration.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has rolled out evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); however, reach has remained low, and there is a need for briefer interventions. The National Center for PTSD conducted a facilitated learning collaborative to train clinicians and support VHA PTSD teams in their adoption of an emerging best practice, written exposure therapy (WET). Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework, the present study utilized longitudinal data from 178 clinicians and 556 patients across seven training cohorts to evaluate key clinical and implementation outcomes and whether clinic (i.e., implementation climate) or clinician factors (i.e., treatment attitudes) were associated with effectiveness and implementation. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated WET was effective in reducing PTSD (d = 0.54) and depression symptoms (d = 0.39). Data indicated that 87.60% of clinicians reported using WET 6 months postconsultation. Clinic-wide reach was modest after training (14.53% of individuals with PTSD); however, WET-trained clinicians continued to offer WET to an average of 87.38% of their patients. Fidelity remained high after training, with essential session elements most often being offered "always" (M = 6.65 on a scale from 1 to 7). More positive postconsultation clinician treatment attitudes predicted higher posttraining rates of having patients engaged in WET. Clinician treatment attitudes and implementation climate did not predict any other implementation or effectiveness outcomes examined. Results suggest that WET implementation is advancing in VHA, with good clinical outcomes. Data provide evidence that a facilitated learning collaborative can be used to support and scale EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Analysis of BUMDes Business Development Program Implementation for Village Prosperity

The general background implementation of village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) is essential for promoting village prosperity through sustainable business development. The specific background this study specifically examines the operational effectiveness of BUMDes Sinar Mitra Gemilang within a local context. The knowledge gap despite the establishment of various business units, limited research evaluates the implementation strategies and outcomes of BUMDes programs, particularly regarding the challenges encountered during execution. The aims the aim of this study is to analyze the implementation of the BUMDes business development program, focusing on the factors influencing its success and the obstacles that hinder optimal performance. The results findings reveal that communication between BUMDes and the community is inadequate, human resources lack quantity despite being qualified, and community participation requires improvement. Additionally, the organizational structure is ineffective due to insufficient human resources. The novelty this study contributes to existing literature by applying Edward III's policy implementation theory and utilizing qualitative methods to provide insights into the practical aspects of BUMDes operations. The implications the implications highlight the need for enhanced communication, increased community engagement, and a stronger organizational framework to improve the overall effectiveness of BUMDes programs, ultimately aiming to enhance community welfare and ensure business sustainability. Highlights: Communication improves program effectiveness. Resource quality and quantity affect operations. Local government support enhances community engagement. Keywords: BUMDes, Implementation, Community Participation, Organizational Structure, Communication

Bridging the Gap in Policy Implementation through a Health Equity Lens: Insights from a 2-Year Study on Measurement Development

Background: Policy implementation measurement lacks an equity focus, which limits understanding of how policies addressing health inequities, such as Universal School Meals (USM) can elicit intended outcomes. We report findings from an equity-focused measurement development study, which had two aims: (1) identify key constructs related to the equitable implementation of school health policies and (2) establish face and content validity of measures assessing key implementation determinants, processes, and outcomes. Methods: To address Aim 1, study participants (i.e., school health policy experts) completed a survey to rate the importance of constructs identified from implementation science and health equity by the research team. To accomplish Aim 2, the research team developed survey instruments to assess the key constructs identified from Aim 1 and conducted cognitive testing of these survey instruments among multiple user groups. The research team iteratively analyzed the data; feedback was categorized into “easy” or “moderate/difficult” to facilitate decision-making. Results: The Aim 1 survey had 122 responses from school health policy experts, including school staff (n = 76), researchers (n = 22), trainees (n = 3), leaders of non-profit organizations (n = 6), and others (n = 15). For Aim 2, cognitive testing feedback from 23 participants was predominantly classified as “easy” revisions (69%) versus “moderate/difficult” revisions (31%). Primary feedback themes comprised (1) comprehension and wording, (2) perceived lack of control over implementation, and (3) unclear descriptions of equity in questions. Conclusions: Through adaptation and careful dissemination, these tools can be shared with implementation researchers and practitioners so they may equitably assess policy implementation in their respective settings.

What Enables Implementation of Pain Management Interventions in Intensive Care Units and Why: A Realist Evaluation to Refine Program Theory.

To uncover perspectives and refine 12 initial program theories concerning the implementation of pain management interventions in intensive care units. Contexts enabling implementation are delineated, and causal mechanisms within these contexts are described. A realist evaluation approach was employed. Fourteen purposively selected Australian nurses of variant roles were virtually and individually interviewed between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with initial program theory, and their perspectives were collated. Data were analysed using an integrated approach of context (C), mechanism (M), outcome (O) categorisation coding, CMO configurations connecting and pattern matching. Pain management interventions work if perceived to be beneficial, precise, comprehensive and fit for purpose. Nurses should be willing to change attitudes and update knowledge. Unit leaders should nurture the development of nurses' professional identity, access to learning, autonomy and self-determination. Organisations should change the infrastructure, provide resources, mitigate barriers, develop shared mental models, update evidence and institute quality assurance. Adherence to interventions is affected by the outcomes of implementation and intrinsic merits of interventions. In these contexts, confidence is boosted; feelings of empowerment, self-efficacy, reflective motivation, trust, awareness and autonomy are developed; and capacity is built. Furthermore, frustration from the variability of practices is reduced, accountability and ownership are augmented, yielding positive implementation outcomes. Findings have implications on nurses, team leaders and organisations concerned with implementation. The findings provided a fortified understanding of conditions favouring successful implementation of pain management interventions. Actions should be undertaken at an individual, unit and organisation level to ensure successful implementation. RAMESES II Reporting Standards for Realist Evaluations informed presentation of study. Intensive care nurses contributed insights to refine the program theory.

Interventions to reduce racial/ethnic disparities across the breast cancer care continuum.

160 Background: In the United States, racial/ethnic disparities in adoption of breast cancer evidence-based practices (EBPs) persist along the cancer care continuum. This scoping review applied an implementation science lens to describe the current evidence base for interventions to reduce disparities, synthesizing evidence on effective interventions while highlighting gaps in the literature. Methods: A formalized search strategy identified USA-based interventional studies aiming to improve adoption of an EBP along the breast cancer care continuum among racially/ethnically minoritized patients. Relevant articles from 1/2010 - 8/2022 (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) were included. For each article, two reviewers screened and extracted data, with a third resolving discrepancies. The PRISMA-ScR checklist and JBO Manual for Evidence Synthesis framework were followed. Results: Our search strategy yielded 45,215 articles. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 59 articles were retained, targeting screening (85%, 50 of 59), treatment (12%, 7 of 59), and survivorship (5%, 3 of 59) (2 targeted multiple areas). No articles targeted end-of-life care. Of these, 49% (29 of 59) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among 24 screening RCTs, the most common interventions—and fraction with statistically significant improved screening uptake—were patient navigation (100%, 11 of 11) and patient education (80%, 4 of 5). Among 4 treatment RCTs, 3 targeted adjuvant chemotherapy uptake. Of these, 1 had significant improvements and used patient navigation. The 2 studies without significant improvements used a patient tracking tool/alert system or patient education. Among 2 survivorship RCTs, one used email interventions, resulting in significantly improved physical activity and dietary health. A second used a nurse-facilitated internet support group, resulting in significantly improved physical/psychological symptoms. Early to mid-stage implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, or fidelity) were commonly measured (81%, 48 of 59). No study measured later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability or costs). Conclusions: In multiple studies, patient navigation and education improved breast cancer screening among racially/ethnically minoritized populations. In one study, patient navigation improved completion of adjuvant treatment. Despite these studies, patient navigation is not reimbursed for cancer screening, and adoption has not been widespread. Future studies should focus on evaluating and improving later stage implementation outcomes (sustainability and costs). Based on these results, insurance reimbursement mechanisms for screening-related navigation may be warranted. Future breast cancer care delivery disparities research should also be expanded to include treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care.

Use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation strategy for an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation

BackgroundElectronic Prospective Surveillance Models (ePSMs) remotely monitor the rehabilitation needs of people with cancer via patient-reported outcomes at pre-defined time points during cancer care and deliver support, including links to self-management education and community programs, and recommendations for further clinical screening and rehabilitation referrals. Previous guidance on implementing ePSMs lacks sufficient detail on approaches to select implementation strategies for these systems. The purpose of this article is to describe how we developed an implementation plan for REACH, an ePSM system designed for breast, colorectal, lymphoma, and head and neck cancers.MethodsImplementation Mapping guided the process of developing the implementation plan. We integrated findings from a scoping review and qualitative study our team conducted to identify determinants to implementation, implementation actors and actions, and relevant outcomes. Determinants were categorized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and the implementation outcomes taxonomy guided the identification of outcomes. Next, determinants were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy of strategies using the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool. The list of strategies produced was refined through discussion amongst our team and feedback from knowledge users considering each strategy’s feasibility and importance rating via the Go-Zone plot, feasibility and applicability to the clinical contexts, and use among other ePSMs reported in our scoping review.ResultsOf the 39 CFIR constructs, 22 were identified as relevant determinants. Clinic managers, information technology teams, and healthcare providers with key roles in patient education were identified as important actors. The CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool resulted in 50 strategies with Level 1 endorsement and 13 strategies with Level 2 endorsement. The final list of strategies included 1) purposefully re-examine the implementation, 2) tailor strategies, 3) change record systems, 4) conduct educational meetings, 5) distribute educational materials, 6) intervene with patients to enhance uptake and adherence, 7) centralize technical assistance, and 8) use advisory boards and workgroups.ConclusionWe present a generalizable method that incorporates steps from Implementation Mapping, engages various knowledge users, and leverages implementation science frameworks to facilitate the development of an implementation strategy. An evaluation of implementation success using the implementation outcomes framework is underway.

Significant reduction in full-thickness pressure injuries through the quality improvement project that implements alternating pressure air mattresses.

To assess a quality improvement project using alternating pressure air mattresses' impact on reducing full-thickness pressure injuries by enhancing setting accuracy and device utilization. We retrospectively evaluated adult acute care unit patients with inclusion criteria (Braden scores ≤12 or existing full-thickness pressure injuries) between May 2020 and August 2023. A wound team attempted to enhance the accuracy, utilization and effectiveness of alternating pressure air mattress implementation. The implementation outcomes were setting accuracy and accurate utilization rates. The clinical outcome was the full-thickness pressure injury proportion. Utilization and allocation gaps were also calculated. The setting accuracy and accurate utilization rates increased (0.59 to 0.88 and 0.15 to 0.37, respectively). The full-thickness pressure injury proportion decreased (0.17 to 0.06), with a strong negative correlation coefficient (-0.789) (p < 0.001) with accurate utilization rates. The full-thickness pressure injury proportion declined faster during the project's complete phase than the partial phase (-0.0046 vs. -0.0016; p < 0.05). The utilization gap narrowed (99 to 60); however, the allocation gap increased (1 to 13), suggesting increased alternating pressure air mattress usage among ineligible patients. Targeting high-risk patients for alternating pressure air mattress utilization and ensuring correct settings, both performed by a dedicated team, substantially reduces the full-thickness pressure injury incidence.

Centering Racial Health Equity in Systematic Reviews Paper 5: A Methodological Overview of methods and interventions

We aim to 1) evaluate the methods used in systematic reviews of interventions focused on racialized populations to improve racial health equity, and 2) examine the types of interventions evaluated for advancing racial health equity in systematic reviews. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane and Campbell databases for reviews evaluating interventions focused on racialized populations to mitigate racial health inequities, published from January 2020 to January 2023. We analyzed 157 reviews on racialized populations. Only 22 (14%) reviews addressed racism's role in driving racial health inequities related to the review question. Eleven percent (7) of reviews considered intersectionality when conceptualizing racial inequities. Two-thirds (105, 67%) provided descriptive summaries of included studies rather than synthesizing them. Among those that quantified effect sizes, 54% (21) used biased synthesis methods like vote counting. The most common method assessed was tailoring interventions to meet the needs of racialized populations. Reviews mainly focused on assessing interventions to reduce racial disparities rather than enhancing structural opportunities for racialized populations. Reviews for racial health equity could be improved by enhancing methodologic quality, defining the role of racism in the question, usingreliable analytical methods, and assessing process and implementation outcomes. More focus is needed on assessing structural interventions to improve opportunities for racialized populations and prioritize these issues in political and social agendas.