You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Basic Research I1 Apr 2014MP23-17 BELLINI DUCT CARCINOMAS HAVE A DIFFERENT GENETIC SIGNATURE COMPARED TO UROTHELIAL CARCINOMAS OF THE UPPER URINARY TRACT Volker Jung, Frank Becker, Martin Parr, Arndt Hartmann, Susanne Füssel, Rainer Grobholz, Marieta Toma, Bernd Wullich, Arne Strauss, Carl Ludwig Behnes, Wolfgang Otto, Michael Stöckle, and Kerstin Junker Volker JungVolker Jung More articles by this author , Frank BeckerFrank Becker More articles by this author , Martin ParrMartin Parr More articles by this author , Arndt HartmannArndt Hartmann More articles by this author , Susanne FüsselSusanne Füssel More articles by this author , Rainer GrobholzRainer Grobholz More articles by this author , Marieta TomaMarieta Toma More articles by this author , Bernd WullichBernd Wullich More articles by this author , Arne StraussArne Strauss More articles by this author , Carl Ludwig BehnesCarl Ludwig Behnes More articles by this author , Wolfgang OttoWolfgang Otto More articles by this author , Michael StöckleMichael Stöckle More articles by this author , and Kerstin JunkerKerstin Junker More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.885AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Bellini duct carcinoma or collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare renal neoplasm that is associated with poor prognosis given its highly aggressive course and limited response to immuno- or chemotherapy. Histologically, CDC is defined as a subtype of renal cell carcinomas, but in some cases, it is difficult to differentiate from urothelial carcinomas (UC). Therefore the aim of this study was to determine genetic alterations of CDC in comparison to that of urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UUT-UC) to clarify the histological origin of this rare tumor entity. METHODS Twenty-nine CDC samples were obtained from seven different German centers and compared with twenty-six urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to investigate the genetic composition of patients’ tumors and allowed the detection of losses and gains of DNA copy numbers throughout the entire genome. The clinical data were correlated with CGH results. RESULTS CGH analysis of CDC revealed DNA aberrations in many chromosomes. DNA losses were more frequently observed than gains, while high-level amplifications were not detected. The mean frequency of CDC chromosomal aberrations (4.9/case) was slightly lower than that in UUT-UC (5.4/case). Recurrent CDC DNA losses occurred at 8p (n=9/29), 16p (9/29), 1p (n=7/29) and 9p (n=7/29), and gains occurred in 13q (n=9/29). In contrast to CDC, the most frequently detected UUT-UC DNA aberration was a loss at 9q (n=13/26). DNA losses at 9q, 13q and 8q as well as gains at 8p showed significant variations in UUT-UC compared to CDC. There was no correlation between the patients’ clinical course and the presence or absence of these recurrent genetic alterations. CONCLUSIONS For the first time we have shown that DBCs are characterized by a different genetic pattern compared to UUT urothelial carcinomas. Regarding also the published data on renal cell carcinoma, we conclude that CDC seems to be an unique entity of kidney carcinomas. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e249-e250 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Volker Jung More articles by this author Frank Becker More articles by this author Martin Parr More articles by this author Arndt Hartmann More articles by this author Susanne Füssel More articles by this author Rainer Grobholz More articles by this author Marieta Toma More articles by this author Bernd Wullich More articles by this author Arne Strauss More articles by this author Carl Ludwig Behnes More articles by this author Wolfgang Otto More articles by this author Michael Stöckle More articles by this author Kerstin Junker More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract