Transparency and uniformity of registration of land use restrictions are interdependent and complementary aspects critical for ensuring effective management of land resources. The interaction of transparency and uniformity creates conditions for accessibility, comprehensibility, and better perception of data. The study analyses land use restrictions identification during their registration in the State Land and Urban Planning Cadastres to determine the uniformity of the registration. The analysis mainly focuses on the main attributes of the land use restrictions, such as code and name. Based on the research results, we established that the classification of land use restrictions for registration in various state cadastral systems, particularly State Land and Urban Planning Cadastres, is mostly not identical and requires coordination. There is an unjustified duplication of some land use restrictions and ambiguity in assigning them to specific categories. A particular problem is coding land use restrictions as registration objects without considering the hierarchical spatial organisation of restriction zones and the principle of logical construction. There is also an inexplicable duplication of some categories of land use restrictions, as in: the protected archaeological territory (codes 06.06.3 and 16.04), the historic and cultural protected territory (codes 06.06.5 and 16.03), the historical and cultural reserve (codes 06.06.4 and 16.02), the historical area of the inhabited place (codes 06.06.2 and 16.07). In addition, there are minor differences in the names. It is worth noting that correctly identifying land use restrictions is essential for developing local urban planning documents due to the requirements of integrating information from various sources and updating them regularly. Transparency and uniformity of registration of land use restrictions in the State Land Cadastre and Urban Planning Cadastre are the main factors contributing to the effective management of land resources, ensuring legal certainty, attracting investments, and protecting the rights of land owners. They also contribute to reducing corruption, increasing trust in public authorities, and protecting the environment. Keywords: restrictions, code, state land cadastre, urban planning cadastre.
Read full abstract