Faculty Responses Research Articles

Pimping: Valuable Teaching Tool or Mistreatment? Perceptions of Medical Students and Faculty Differ.

ImportanceThe AAMC Graduate Questionnaire has drawn attention to medical student mistreatment. Pimping, a form of Socratic teaching often used in medical education where students are singled out by faculty for questioning, may be considered by some students and faculty as mistreatment. To date, minimal research has been performed on the viewpoints of students and faculty regarding pimping and its relation to mistreatment. ObjectiveThis study aims to formally define pimping and determine if there is a difference in the perception of students and faculty on its role in medical education.Design: Medical students and faculty of Michigan medical schools were surveyed via electronic questionnaire. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were performed.SettingMedical schools within the state of Michigan ParticipantsStudents who had completed their core clerkships and faculty with experience educating medical students in a clinical setting ResultsThe student response rate was 42%; the faculty response rate could not be determined. The majority of students agreed with our operational definition of pimping and 100% had experienced pimping. 54% of students reported a positive experience with pimping, 26% neutral, and 20% reported a negative experience. The majority of students reported it was challenging and educational and should be used regularly. Several differences were found between students and faculty as to why faculty use pimping. Students’ perception of their role on the clinical care team influenced their perception of pimping as mistreatment, and students reported pimping made them feel more a part of the team.Conclusion and relevanceThis study helps to define pimping and sheds more light on the perceptions of pimping from students and faculty and their differences. Most medical students report a benefit from pimping, even though it may be stressful, and suggest it should be used regularly, which is in contrast to faculty opinion. Pimping may make students feel more a part of the clinical care team, but their role on the team may not influence whether they perceive it as mistreatment.  Our data suggest medical schools should educate students and faculty on pimping and not move toward discouraging or banning it.

Defining Successful Practice Within Health Systems Science Among Entering Residents: A Single-Institution Qualitative Study of Graduate Medical Education Faculty Observations.

The American Medical Association's Accelerating Change in Medical Education consortium defined health systems science (HSS) as the study of how health care is delivered, how health care professionals work together to deliver that care, and how the health system can improve patient care and health care delivery. This framework is increasingly being incorporated into medical school curricula. Graduate medical education (GME) had previously elevated systems-based practice (SBP) as a core competency, but expectations are defined by specialty-specific milestones. The lack of a shared competency framework between undergraduate medical education (UME) and GME makes it challenging to ensure that entering residents are prepared to implement HSS/SBP concepts in the workplace. The authors explored GME faculty observations of residents exemplifying successful practice across HSS domains to inform targets for UME training and assessment. Authors performed a single-institution qualitative study using transcribed phone interviews with eligible Vanderbilt residency program directors, associate program directors, and core faculty. Participants described observations of successful residents within each HSS domain. Two researchers independently coded, discussed, and reconciled deidentified transcripts using inductive-deductive approaches to identify themes. Seventeen faculty participated across specialties (17/39, 45%). Faculty responses emphasize precurricular experiences including professional degrees, work experience, extracurriculars, and medical school exposure. Importantly, successful residents exhibit foundational core workforce characteristics including growth mindset, curiosity, and a desire to learn about systems. GME faculty identified HSS domain-specific skills, noting distinctions among learning environments. Outcomes resulting from residents' application of HSS concepts include delivering high-quality, person-centered care and systems improvements. Descriptions of successful practice within HSS domains highlight preparatory experiences and core workforce characteristics and outline entry-level HSS behaviors. Conceptualized in a logic model framework, these findings describe key inputs, learning activities, outputs, and outcomes for systems-prepared entering residents bridging the UME-GME transition.

Gender-based Barriers to the Advancement of Women in Academic Emergency Medicine: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study.

IntroductionLeadership positions occupied by women within academic emergency medicine have remained stagnant despite increasing numbers of women with faculty appointments. We distributed a multi-institutional survey to women faculty and residents to evaluate categorical characteristics contributing to success and differences between the two groups.MethodsAn institutional review board-approved electronic survey was distributed to women faculty and residents at eight institutions and were completed anonymously. We created survey questions to assess multiple categories: determination; resiliency; career support and obstacles; career aspiration; and gender discrimination. Most questions used a Likert five-point scale. Responses for each question and category were averaged and deemed significant if the average was greater than or equal to 4 in the affirmative, or less than or equal to 2 in the negative. We calculated proportions for binary questions.ResultsThe overall response rate was 55.23% (95/172). The faculty response rate was 54.1% (59/109) and residents’ response rate was 57.1% (36/63). Significant levels of resiliency were reported, with a mean score of 4.02. Childbearing and rearing were not significant barriers overall but were more commonly reported as barriers for faculty over residents (P <0.001). Obstacles reported included a lack of confidence during work-related negotiations and insufficient research experience. Notably, 68.4% (65/95) of respondents experienced gender discrimination and 9.5% (9/95) reported at least one encounter of sexual assault by a colleague or supervisor during their career.ConclusionTargeted interventions to promote female leadership in academic emergency medicine include coaching on negotiation skills, improved resources and mentorship to support research, and enforcement of safe work environments. Female emergency physician resiliency is high and not a barrier to career advancement.

The Efficacy of Virtual Subinternships as a Novel Educational Platform for Education and Recruitment.

The Efficacy of Virtual Subinternships as a Novel Educational Platform for Education and Recruitment.

From the Classroom to the Virtual World: Faculty Response to COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced nursing educators to switch face-to-face courses to virtual learning. This article describes how faculty transitioned a face-to-face public health nursing course to remote learning and examines student response to this transition. Data were collected via a 12-question REDCap survey. Using a mixed-methods design, descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative data, and a descriptive qualitative approach was used for qualitative data analysis. Survey response rate was 35% (n = 26). Using a 4-point Likert scale, mean question score was 3.55 (range, 2.65 to 3.85). Themes within the transition facilitator category included emotional support for students, communication, availability, flexibility, and course organization. Themes within the transition challenges category included examinations, course-to-course communication, COVID-19 course content, and technology. It is essential for nursing educators to learn from the emergency transition of spring 2020 to capitalize on successes and mitigate challenges moving forward. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(9):509-512.].

Training Faculty as an Institutional Response to COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching Supported by Data

In March 2020, colleges in the United States rapidly switched in-person courses online because of the COVID-19 pandemic. To chronicle how biology faculty responded to this emergency remote teaching, we surveyed faculty across the United States in August of 2020. Our survey included open-ended questions to identify a memorable moment, difficulties encountered, and unexpected benefits during the first COVID-19 semester. Faculty responses were coded by two researchers, and 21 themes emerged. Seventeen coding themes corresponded to one of four facets of adult personal resilience theory, and we used nonparametric statistical tests to compare resilience between inexperienced and experienced online instructors, as well as trained and untrained instructors. Experienced online instructors were more likely to describe an act of kindness in their memory but were also more likely to include negative student behavior as a difficulty. Untrained faculty were the only instructors who included student engagement as a difficulty and were more likely to describe a negative, discouraging memory. We used conditional forest analysis to identify polarizing themes between faculty with and without previous experience teaching online and between faculty who did and did not receive formal training. Our results underline the importance of training faculty, including experienced instructors, to improve emergency preparedness.

Response of STEM and Social Science Faculty to the COVID-19 Crisis: an Application of Organizational Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic was a crisis that required immediate response from higher education STEM faculty and support units. We analyzed this response using Weick’s stages of sensemaking: enactment, selection, retention. Sensemaking began with rapid response to the initial emergency as faculty and support units enacted immediate responses to instructional, technological, and workload challenges. Early in the selection phase, training and support were identified by faculty as catalysts for immediate success, as well as preexisting relationships both within and outside of the university. Lack of effective communication from the university was cited as a reason for nonsuccess. Thereafter, sensemaking settled into a coping mode and metamorphosized into identification of specific lessons for long-term organizational learning. Notably, these were not always those that had appeared most urgent at the beginning.

Testimonial Injustice and Teacher Education

ABSTRACT This narrative inquiry explores the experiences of LGBTQ+ teacher candidates of color in a teacher education program. Composed of vignettes written by teacher candidates and narrative analysis to frame the significance of and contexts within which the vignettes were written, this study first offers insight into the ways teacher candidates understand their own intersecting identities, with specific attention given to how events within and outside the walls of the teacher education program shaped these understandings. The faculty response to the teacher candidates’ vignettes is then shared, revealing how the perceived credibility of the teacher candidates’ vignettes by teacher education faculty limited or expanded the teacher candidates’ ability to engage their intersecting identities in the work of teaching and learning.

Reflections on Blended Learning in Management Education: A Qualitative Study with a Push-pull Migration Perspective

COVID-19 pandemic is a major disruptor for education today. Its onset has necessitated innovations in design and delivery of teaching and learning environment with extensive technology integration. The present study aims to scan the factors that are bringing about major transformations in management education in current times. The study extends the demographic push-pull (PP) migratory model to explain and analyse the factors that can enable a smooth transit to a technology enabled virtual teaching and learning mode in business schools or B-schools. In the present phenomenological qualitative study, based on the management faculty responses, the major pull and push factors influencing this switching decision are identified. The data is gathered using semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions designed to answer the research questions. The conceptual model has been proposed that portrays the factors influencing switching intentions. This article highlights the need of reforms in the prevailing management educational models. Also, it provides insights into how the necessary changes in Management Education 4.0 that are important to improve the overall learning experience of future business leaders.

Assessment of Answer-Changing Behavior of Nursing Students and Faculty Recommendations.

Existing literature identifies a general positive benefit to students' examination scores when students change their answer on examinations. Current shifts toward computerized examinations and in test anxiety warrant a literature update on test-taking behaviors. This study assessed answer changing on multiple-choice examinations and investigated faculty recommendations related to answer changing. This study used a mixed-methods design using retrospective student data from ExamSoft reports and faculty responses from a national survey of nurse educators. Findings indicated 55% of students improved their examination score, with an average improvement of 3%, and 24% of students lowered their examination score. However, faculty continue to incorrectly recommend that students should not change answers on examinations. The results of this study support prior literature that answer changing benefits students. However, data are lacking on the characteristics of students who improve or lower their examination scores by changing answers.[J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(6):324-328.].

The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Education

BackgroundAt the onset of social distancing, our general surgery residency transitioned its educational curriculum to an entirely virtual format with no gaps in conference offerings. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of our evolution to a virtual format and report program attitudes toward the changes. MethodsOn March 15, 2020, due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) our institution restricted mass gatherings. We immediately transitioned all lectures to a virtual platform. The cancellation of elective surgeries in April 2020 then created the need for augmented resident education opportunities. We responded by creating additional lectures and implementing a daily conference itinerary. To evaluate the success of the changes and inform the development of future curriculum, we surveyed residents and faculty regarding the changes. Classes and faculty answers were compared for perception of value of the online format. ResultsPre-COVID-19, residency-wide educational offerings were concentrated to one half-day per week. Once restrictions were in place, our educational opportunities were expanded to a daily schedule and averaged 16.5 hours/week during April. Overall, 41/63 residents and 25/94 faculty completed the survey. The majority of residents reported an increased ability (56%) or similar ability (34.1%) to attend virtual conferences while 9.9% indicated a decrease. Faculty responses indicated similar effects (64% increased, 32% similar, 4% decreased). PGY-1 residents rated the changes negatively compared to other trainees and faculty. PGY-2 residents reported neutral views and all other trainees and faculty believed the changes positively affected educational value. Comments from PGY1 and 2 residents revealed they could not focus on virtual conferences as it was not “protected time” in a classroom and that they felt responsible for patient care during virtual lectures. A majority of both residents (61%) and faculty (84%) reported they would prefer to continue virtual conferences in the future. ConclusionsThe necessity for adapting our academic offerings during the COVID-19 era has afforded our program the opportunity to recognize the feasibility of virtual platforms and expand our educational offerings. The majority of participants report stable to improved attendance and educational value. Virtual lectures should still be considered protected time in order to maximize the experience for junior residents.

Using visual feedback to support online faculty mentoring

Variances are observed in grading practices between full-time and part-time faculty and these variances may be increased when faculty are teaching online. A project focused on providing visual feedback for part-time faculty on grading practices was implemented in an online nursing program. An electronic survey link was emailed to all faculty teaching an identical course asking them to note the total number of each letter grade recorded as a final grade. Graphically displayed, de-identified data was shared with faculty. Faculty responses were positive. Outcomes fostered open dialogue and mentoring and led to other program improvement activities. The project appeared to be an effective way to support faculty and promote continued professional development. Faculty feedback and unexpected benefits are shared.

Factors influencing the involvement of doctor of pharmacy students in research and scholarship projects

IntroductionThe study objective was to determine factors that stimulate or hinder student pharmacist participation in research and scholarship, to determine factors faculty believe are motivators or barriers for student pharmacist participation, and to compare student and faculty responses. MethodsAn electronic questionnaire was developed and emailed to all students enrolled in the doctor of pharmacy program and to all program faculty. To increase response rate, students were provided class time to complete the survey. Responses were collected anonymously. ResultsA total of 404 students (69% response rate) and 35 faculty (78% response rate) participated. Motivational factors rated highly by both students and faculty were interest in the topic, comfort level in working with faculty, energetic quality of faculty, and becoming more competitive for post-graduate training. Students indicated that projects benefiting the profession/medical community was an important motivator, while faculty believed that pursuing a position that requires research/scholarship was a key motivational factor. The most highly rated barrier was lack of time. ConclusionsStudent pharmacist participation in research and scholarship with faculty is variable in our program and little was known previously about factors that led student pharmacists to engage in research and scholarship. There was general agreement among student and faculty regarding several motivating factors; however, some important differences did exist. Addressing these differences may help increase student involvement in research and scholarship in the future.

Assessing Experiential Learning to Promote Students’ Diversity Engagement

This article describes a faculty response to two challenges of online education: diversity engagement and professional socialization. Reviewing the literature, we develop a rubric to help assess the potential of new assignments for meeting these challenges. Using that rubric, we assess several assignments and projects that students evaluated positively, to better articulate the efficacy of the assignment in meeting our diversity education goals and future barriers to access. We conclude by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of our model for assessing diversity awareness and professional socialization in the LIS curriculum.

A Qualitative Study of Faculty Responses to Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Creating a Culture of Support

This study examines the online teaching and learning experience of twenty-one (21) faculty members at a Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) research university from the initial campus closure of the university in February 2020 in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, through the end of Fall 2020 semester. The methodology entailed one-on-one interviews with instructors, reviews of the course materials in the Learning Management System, and the examination of email and videoconferencing exchanges. Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction and the Quality Matters Rubric guidelines for instructional design framed the methodology. This study finds that faculty benefitted from close connections with colleagues and continuous institutional support during the pivot to emergency remote teaching and into a hybrid learning environment. These two factors – collegial connections and university resources – were crucial in sustaining faculty work during the period of this study.

“Cell Phones Under the Table”: Meeting Students’ Needs to Reduce Off-Task Smartphone Use Through Faculty–Student Collaboration

While technology offers educators many affordances to provide students with rich educational experiences, literature and empirical experience indicates that students’ unstructured cell phone usage may have adverse impacts on student achievement and create a contagious climate of distraction. This research project seeks to understand students’ unstructured cell phone usage, faculty response, and foster improved student–faculty communication to determine concrete interventions to off-task smartphone usage. For the purposes of this study, we surveyed and interviewed faculty and undergraduate students at two small private universities in the United States. Findings suggest that students and faculty recognize the limitations of punitive cell phone policies and desire intervention. Giving students’ movement alternatives and offering faculty more training in using smartphones as educational tools may be acceptable solutions.

Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges

ABSTRACT Online learning has become the new normal in many medical and health science schools worldwide, courtesy of COVID-19. Satisfaction with online learning is a significant aspect of promoting successful educational processes. This study aimed to identify factors affecting student and faculty satisfaction with online learning during the new normal. Online questionnaires were emailed to students (n = 370) and faculty (n = 81) involved in online learning during the pandemic. The questionnaires included closed- and open-ended questions and were organised into two parts: socio-demographic information and satisfaction with online learning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the responses to the satisfaction scales. Students’ and faculty responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using the thematic analysis method. The response rate was 97.8% for students and 86.4% for faculty. Overall satisfaction among students was 41.3% compared to 74.3% for faculty. The highest areas of satisfaction for students were communication and flexibility, whereas 92.9% of faculty were satisfied with students’ enthusiasm for online learning. Technical problems led to reduced student satisfaction, while faculty were hampered by the higher workload and the required time to prepare the teaching and assessment materials. Study-load and workload, enhancing engagement, and technical issues (SWEET) were the themes that emerged from the thematic analysis as affecting student and faculty satisfaction. Adopting a combination synchronous and asynchronous approach, incorporating different applications to engage students, and timely feedback are imperative to increasing student satisfaction, while institutional support and organisational policy could enhance faculty satisfaction.

A pilot study to understand faculty and student needs for undergraduate medical education simulation sequencing in the United Arab Emirates.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction: The use of simulation-based education in undergraduate medical education has many advantages. Purposeful planning of the sequence of simulation sessions within the curriculum is necessary for complex simulation exercises. This requires pre-session completion of prerequisite knowledge. Methods: Two surveys were conducted. An electronic survey was sent to faculty involved in simulation at UAE medical schools (n=29). The faculty survey addressed the simulation sessions planning process, sequencing of simulation topics, and institutional simulation team structure. The second survey was administered via paper to final year medical students from Dubai Medical College (DMC) who received simulation sessions (n=22). The survey addressed completion of prerequisite knowledge, receipt of the session objectives, and psychological safety and overall session ratings. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Responses to open ended questions were analyzed thematically. Results: The faculty response rate was (21/29: 72.4%). Only (7/21: 33.3%) faculty members indicated there was prior planning to ensure proper sequencing within the curriculum. Only (3/21: 14.2%) indicated that simulation topics were chosen based on curriculum gaps. A small percentage (3/21: 14.2%) reported working with other faculty and an instructional designer. Qualitative themes included barriers to planning, structural considerations, and factors for successful simulation integration. The student response rate was 100%. Only (4/22:18.2%) of students completed the required pre-session prerequisite knowledge. Most students (18/22: 81.8%) received the session objectives prior to the simulation session. Qualitative themes included lack of completion of pre-requisite knowledge prior to the session, absence of learning objectives, and technical issues. Conclusion: This study highlights the gap in adequate sequencing of complex simulation scenarios within the curriculum. This is mainly due to the lack of completion of the required prerequisite knowledge prior to the session. Such complex integration requires adequate planning and collaboration of the simulation team with key stakeholders including faculty, the curriculum committee, and instructional designers.

Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic

The authors conducted a worldwide survey to explore the experiences of higher education faculty who converted classes to distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most respondents experienced much higher workloads and stress than in face-to-face classes. Previous experience with Online Distance Learning (ODL) predicted positive faculty response. Less than half used a school-provided LMS, instead using a wide range of other technologies. Respondents said they learned the need for adaptability and good planning, emphasizing doing what it takes to serve their students. There was high variability in most answers, indicating that the experiences of individual teachers ranged widely between positive and negative. The researchers provide recommendations based on the findings, including the need for better ODL instructional design training as part of long-term professional development for faculty and remembering the importance of all student higher education experiences, many of which are beyond the scope of the actual classes.

Facilitating Online Learning via Zoom Breakout Room Technology : A Case of Pair Programming Involving Students with Learning Disabilities

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required many educators to redesign how they deliver their courses. In this study, we develop innovative procedures and pedagogy to teach pair programming via Zoom breakout rooms in a cloud environment. We report six fundamental innovative teaching mechanisms and procedures: 1) strategically planning a course, 2) effectively managing teaching resources, 3) enhancing faculty responsiveness, 4) selecting reliable technology, 5) mandating online educator’s training, and 6) accommodating students with learning disabilities. From teaching pair programming via Zoom breakout rooms, we have gained valuable experience in promoting collaborative, engaging, active, and problem-based learning activities in a cloud environment. Our results enrich our knowledge of delivering online education and contribute to pair programming literature in general.