Respect Of Crimes Research Articles

Robb v. United States

Jurisdiction — In general — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Civilian employee of United States Navy — Violation of the general orders of the military assistance command in Vietnam — Whether subject to court martial jurisdiction — Whether conflict in Vietnam a “war” — The law of the United States652War and neutrality — War in general — Definition and technical meaning of war — Conflict in Vietnam — Whether a war for the purposes of jurisdiction of court martial over civilian — The law of the United States

Williamson v. Alldridge

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Territorial limits of jurisdiction — Whether United States Constitution extends to United States citizens in foreign countries tried by courts of the United States — Waiver of jurisdiction over servicemen in foreign countries — Ryukyu Islands — Treaty of Peace with Japan 1951 — The law of the United StatesJurisdiction — In general — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — United States forces in the Ryukyu Islands — Conditions of trial for non-service-connected offence — Waiver of jurisdiction over servicemen in foreign countries Treaty of Peace with Japan 1951 — The law of the United States

United States v. Reagan

Jurisdiction — In general — Territorial — Over ports and national waters — Crime committed by United States national on board vessel registered in United States while in harbour belonging to Federal Republic of Germany — Jurisdiction of flag State and territorial sovereign — The law of the United StatesJurisdiction — In general — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Manslaughter committed by United States citizen on board United States vessel in territorial waters of Federal Republic of Germany — Whether certain proceedings before Federal Republic's courts constituted an assertion of jurisdiction by the territorial sovereign so as to oust jurisdiction of flag State — The law of the United States

Reg. v. Governor of Brixton Prison ex parte Rush

The individual in intemational law — Extradition — Conditions of extradition — Principle of double criminality — Requirement that courts of surrendering State must have had jurisdiction if acts had taken place in surrendering State — Conspiracy to defraud persons resident abroad — Fraud completed abroad — The law of EnglandJurisdiction — In general — Territorial and personal — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Agreement within State to defraud persons outside State — Fraud completed outside State — Jurisdiction of courts within State to try defendants for conspiracy — The law of England

Lipato v. Republic

Jurisdiction — In general — Personal jurisdiction — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — National in government service — Charged with crime committed abroad — Whether Courts have jurisdiction to try the matter — Whether jurisdiction a matter of procedure — The law of Malawi

Public Prosecutor v. Li Te-Hua

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — The law of the Republic of China.

R. v. Cox.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Conspiracy to commit crime abroad — No agreement to commit criminal act in England — Allegation that goods obtained abroad to be sold in England but nothing to show that sale of such goods was criminal offence in England — The law of England.

Cox v. Army Council.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Legislation applying criminal law to acts committed by members of armed forces abroad — Whether whole of criminal law can be so applied — Relevance of local conditions — Road traffic offences — The law of England.

United States v. Cadenhead et al.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Status of Forces Agreement, 1960 — Rules against double jeopardy — Primary jurisdiction over crimes committed by military personnel — The law of the United States of America.192Treaties — Interpretation of — Principles and rules of — Status of forces agreements — Double jeopardy under — Whether proceeding held in Japanese Family Court bars later trial by United States court martial — Primary right to exercise criminal jurisdiction — Status of Forces Agreement between Japan and United States, 1960 (Article XVII) — The law of the United States of America.

Public Prosecutor v. Antoni.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Exterritorial application of Traffic Law and its penal sanction — The law of Sweden.

Public Prosecutor of the Canton of Neuchâtel v. Challandes.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Non-extraditable offence punishable only in State where committed — The law of Switzerland.

Gout v. Motte and Consorts.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Act at once a crime and a civil wrong — Criminal jurisdiction under treaty over members of armed forces stationed abroad — Convention concerning Rights and Obligations of Foreign Armed Forces in Federal Republic of Germany, 1954 — Interpretation of “criminal jurisdiction” — Whether covering civil action joined to criminal proceedings — Meaning given to terms by national law — The law of Belgium.

Satwant Singh v. State of Punjab.

270Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Location of offence of cheating — Cheque mailed to accused from outside State — Whether affects location of offence — The law of India.

Public Prosecutor v. Nai Prasit.

272Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Whether court has jurisdiction — The law of Malaya.

In re Roquain.

Jurisdiction — Personal — Over nationals in respect of crimes committed abroad — Offence committed by national against national — Adultery — The law of Belgium.

Re Sorrentino.

Holy See — Position of — Lateran Treaty of February 11, 1929 — Interpretation of — Italian Jurisdiction in Respect of Crimes Committed in the Vatican City — The Law of Italy.

Austrian Extradition (No. 2) Case.

Extradition — Conditions of — Principle of Reciprocity — Identity of Extradition and Prosecution — Extradition Limited to Crimes — Exclusion of Misdemeanours — Extradition Granted in respect of Crime — Accused Subsequently Convicted of Misdemeanour.

Re Azzoli and Another.

Holy See — Position of — Lateran Treaty of February 11, 1929 — Interpretation of — Italian Jurisdiction in Respect of Crimes Committed in the Vatican City.

In re Dalla Torre.

Jurisdiction — Crime Committed Abroad — Vatican City — Jurisdiction of Italian Courts in respect of Crimes Committed there.

The Crown v. Yerizano.

Jurisdiction — Over Foreigners in respect of Crimes Committed outside the Realm — International Basis of Jurisdiction.