This article, written by Senior Technology Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights of paper IPTC 13863, ’The First Passive Inflow-Control Device That Maximizes Productivity During Every Phase of a Well's Life,’ by Luis A. Garcia, SPE, Martin P. Coronado, SPE, Ronnie D. Russell, Gonzalo A. Garcia, SPE, and Elmer R. Peterson, SPE, Baker Hughes, prepared for the 2009 International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 7-9 December. The paper has not been peer reviewed. In long horizontal wells, production rate typically is higher at the heel than it is at the toe. This imbalanced production profile may cause early water or gas breakthrough into the wellbore. To eliminate this imbalance, inflow-control devices (ICDs) are placed in each screen joint to balance the production-influx profile across the entire lateral length to compensate for permeability variations. Passive ICDs (PICDs) could control the influx without the need for intervention. Introduction The primary purpose of ICDs is balancing well production throughout the operational life of the completion to optimize hydrocarbon recovery. Because a typical well with ICDs can produce for 5 to 20 years or longer, the long-term reliability of such a device is crucial to the well’s overall success. If an ICD cannot maintain a uniform flux rate, increased localized production rates will occur and the well will become unbalanced. Thereby, the ICD becomes ineffective, leading to premature water and/or gas breakthrough and possible loss of sand control. Water can reach the wellbore in certain sections because of formation heterogeneities and/or vertical fractures. Ideally, once breakthrough occurs, flow contribution from these water-producing zones should be less than that of the oil-producing sections. The ICD device should increase the flow restriction at the onset of water production, thus allowing other oil-producing zones to continue flowing effectively. In wells with oil viscosity >10 cp, ICD-type selection becomes more critical because of the large difference in viscosity between the oil and produced water. To maintain an even flow profile across the entire wellbore lateral, the pressure-reduction mechanism in the ICD situation must have the lowest sensitivity to viscosity. A restrictive-type ICD can provide desirable results in this regard with its lower sensitivity to viscosity. However, this type of ICD requires a very small flow area to generate the pressure drop (restriction) required in ICD applications. This small flow area has a greater potential for erosion and a low plugging resistance. Another solution is to enable lower viscosity sensitivity in the restrictive device with the low erosion and high plugging-resistance level of the frictional design. The restrictive-pressure-loss mechanism can be used while limiting the fluid velocity through the device below the critical level, which will minimize erosion potential.
Read full abstract