Resident Learning Research Articles

Is boarding compromising our residents' education? A national survey of emergency medicine program directors.

Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described. We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses. A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting "a little," "a moderate amount," "a lot," and "a great deal," respectively, and 5% noting "no effect at all." Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a "somewhat positive" effect. Most noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a "somewhat" or "extremely positive" effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing. Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.

128 Resident training in research fundamentals using an online, asynchronous course

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Scholarly activity is a key component of most residency programs. To establish fundamental research skills and fill gaps within training curricula, we developed an online, asynchronous set of modules to introduce trainees to various topics that are germane to the conduct of research and evaluated its effectiveness in resident research education. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Research 101 was utilized by residents at the Brookdale Hospital Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY. Resident knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-module surveys with 5-point Likert scaled questions, open-ended text responses, and a final quiz. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Pre-module survey results indicated that residents were most confident with the Aligning expectations, Introduction to research, and Study design and data analysis basics modules and least confident with the Submitting an Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol at UC and Presenting your summer research modules. Post-module survey responses increased significantly compared to pre-module results for all modules and learning objectives (p&lt;0.0001). “This module met my needs” was endorsed 91.4% of the time. A final quiz of 25 multiple choice questions resulted in a median score of 23. Content analysis of open-ended post-module survey responses identified multiple strengths and opportunities for improvement in course content and instructional methods. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These data demonstratethat residents can benefit from completion of Research 101, as post-module survey scores were significantly higher than pre-module survey scores for all modules and questions, and final quiz scores were high and highlighted opportunities for additional resident learning.

How Do I Find the Answer? Resident Learning Simulation of the Master Adaptive Learner Planning Phase

How Do I Find the Answer? Resident Learning Simulation of the Master Adaptive Learner Planning Phase

Development and Evaluation of An In-House Lumbar Puncture Simulator for First-Year Resident Lumbar Puncture Procedure Learning.

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common invasive technique considered an essential learning milestone for anesthesiologists due to its application in spinalanesthesia. We aimed to develop an in-house LP simulator, test its effectiveness in learning the steps to perform anLP and analyze its impact on the first-year residents' self-confidence at our hospital. We used 3D printing and silicone casting to create an LP simulator based on a lumbar spinecomputed tomography (CT). We divided 12 first-year anesthesiology residents into control and experimental groups. The control group received traditional training, while the experimental group practiced with the simulator for three months. We used a procedure checklist anda Likert scalesurvey to evaluate their procedural knowledge and self-confidence at baseline, three, and six months. Eighteen months later, we evaluated their LP performance skills. Both groups showed a significant improvement in their knowledge scores over time.After three months, the experimental group had a higher median knowledge score (10 (10 - 10) median (min-max)) than the control group (9 (8 - 9.5) median (min-max)) (p = 0.03). While there were no apparent differences in median self-confidence scores between the groups at any time point, the experimental group had a significant increase in their self-confidence for performing an unassisted LP, with a median score of 1/5 (1 - 2.3) at baseline and 5/5 (4.8 - 5) after six months (p = 0.006). In contrast, the control group's self-confidence scores decreased from 4/5 (3 - 4) after three months to 3/5 (2 - 5) after six months. The evaluation of performance skills did not yield statistically significant results. Our study demonstrates that an in-house LP simulator is an effective and practical approach for first-year anesthesiology residents to learn the LP procedure. This approach could be particularly useful in settings with limited resources and a lack of sufficient patients to practice on, as it provides an opportunity for faster learning and increased self-confidence.

Simulating empathy: A qualitative experiential study of embedded resident learners in an empathy curriculum.

Physician empathy and communication skills are crucial parts of a successful emergency department (ED) interaction. This study aimed to evaluate whether these skills can be improved through a novel curriculum where interns act as patients for their senior residents during simulated ED cases. Twenty-five residents participated in the curriculum. Prior to the cases, participants filled out the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). They then completed three simulated cases, with the 11 interns portraying the patients and the 14 seniors (postgraduate year [PGY]-2 and PGY-3 residents) in the physician role. Following the cases, the residents participated in a recorded, structured focus group. At the conclusion of the session participants again filled out the TEQ and answered a Likert questionnaire on their thoughts about the curriculum. Qualitative analysis was used to determine themes from the debriefs. Twenty-two residents completed all components of the study. The mean (±SD) TEQ scores pre- and postcurriculum for all residents were 46.2 (±4.64) pre and 47.9 (±6.03) post (ns). On qualitative analysis, we derived four major themes: empathy, communication, feedback, and physician experience. The most common subthemes discussed were empathy for the patient situation and the importance of communicating visit expectations. On a 5-point Likert survey related to the simulated cases, respondents rated comfort providing feedback to their peers (mean ± SD 4.41 ± 0.95) and gaining insight into the patient experience (mean ± SD 4.27 ± 0.83). The embedded intern exercise was rated well by resident participants, with no observed change in empathy scores. Qualitative analysis identified empathy and communication as major themes. Residents enjoyed this style of simulation and found it realistic.

De-escalation of the Agitated Pediatric Patient: A Standardized Patient Case for Pediatric Residents.

Over the past 5 years, pediatric mental health emergencies requiring emergency safety evaluations and inpatient boarding of pediatric patients requiring psychiatric admission have increased. Pediatric trainees must learn to effectively and safely de-escalate a patient with agitated or aggressive behavior, as mental health patients take up a larger proportion of their patient population. This standardized patient case addresses gaps in knowledge and skills to ameliorate the care of children and adolescents with behavioral crises in the hospital. Resident learners were presented with a teenage patient admitted to the hospital and awaiting inpatient psychiatric placement for suicidal ideation who became acutely agitated with aggressive behaviors. Learners were expected to attempt to verbally de-escalate the patient and select an appropriate pharmacologic agent for decreasing agitation in the patient. A standardized debrief was conducted with the assistance of child and adolescent mental health experts. Twenty-two learners participated in this activity. Residents' confidence in their management skills of the acutely agitated pediatric patient significantly increased after completion of the activity. Seventy-three percent of learners felt confident or very confident in their de-escalation skills at the end of the case, and 86% agreed that the case improved their confidence in managing acute agitation scenarios on the inpatient wards. This case led to overall increased self-efficacy in caring for the acutely agitated pediatric patient. Future iterations may include multidisciplinary learners of various skill levels and evaluating changes in patient-centered outcomes, such as restraint use, after implementation of the case.

Foundations of Emergency Medicine: Impact of a Standardized, Open-access, Core Content Curriculum on In-Training Exam Scores.

Learners frequently benefit from modalities such as small-group, case-based teaching and interactive didactic experiences rather than passive learning methods. These contemporary techniques are features of Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) curricula, and particularly the Foundations I (F1) course, which targets first-year resident (PGY-1) learners. The American Board of Emergency Medicine administers the in-training exam (ITE) that provides an annual assessment of EM-specific medical knowledge. We sought to assess the effect of F1 implementation on ITE scores. We retrospectively analyzed data from interns at four EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. We collected data in 2021. Participating sites were geographically diverse and included three- and four-year training formats. We collected data from interns two years before (control group) and two years after (intervention group) implementation of F1 at each site. Year of F1 implementation ranged from 2015-2018 at participating sites. We abstracted data using a standard form including program, ITE raw score, year of ITE administration, US Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 score, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score, and gender. We performed univariable and multivariable linear regression to explore differences between intervention and control groups. We collected data for 180 PGY-1s. Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores were significant predictors of ITE in univariable analyses (both with P < 0.001). After accounting for Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, we did not find F1 implementation to be a significant predictor of ITE score, P = 0.83. Implementation of F1 curricula did not show significant changes in performance on the ITE after controlling for important variables.

Case study and pilot results: Stepwise approach to teach a resident tube shunt surgery

PurposeTo illustrate the utility of a previously published stepwise rubric for evaluating a resident's progress learning aqueous tube shunt surgery. MethodUsing a stepwise rubric, a single PGY3 ophthalmology resident and attending glaucoma surgeon evaluated the resident's performance after each aqueous tube shunt surgery. The rubric subdivides the surgery into 12 consecutive steps and scores the resident's proficiency in each step with either a 0 (observation), 2 (novice), 3 (beginner), 4 (advanced beginner), or 5 (competent). ResultsThe resident's cumulative score increased significantly throughout the 17 surgeries performed, with the resident's self-evaluated score and attending's score increasing from 12 to 27 and 14 to 27 from the first to last surgery, respectively. Scores were consistent between the resident and attending; for any given surgery, the resident's own score never deviated from the attending's score by more than 1 point. The resident completed at least 50% of the steps in 11 of the 17 cases. While some surgical steps were mastered earlier on (“tube tying” and “suture implantation”), other steps were more challenging to master (“tunnel in sclera and enter the AC” and “close conjunctiva”, as demonstrated by fewer overall attempts or never attaining a score of ‘5’ despite multiple attempts. Conclusions and ImportanceThis study demonstrates the utility of the stepwise rubric in tracking resident surgical scores chronologically via self and attending assessment. The ability to compare their own scores to that of an attending allows the resident to learn how to effectively evaluate their own performance. Most importantly, statistics obtained for each step provides the resident with personalized and real-time feedback for learning specific surgical steps. In conclusion, the stepwise rubric is a useful add-on to a resident's aqueous tube shunt surgery education.

Competency-based postgraduate training: Mentoring and monitoring using entrustable professional activities with descriptive rubrics for objectivity- A step beyond Dreyfus.

Background At Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, a competency-based learning and training (CoBaLT©) model for postgraduate (PG) curriculum, within the regulatory norms, was implemented in 2016 after adequate faculty development programmes. This focused on well-defined outcomes. Methods A review of the outcomes was undertaken in 2018 as part of internal quality assurance receiving feedback from all stakeholders, viz. students, alumni and faculty. Recent publications were also reviewed. A major problem identified was lack of clarity in definition of levels leading to subjectivity in assessment while grading. It was also noted that the process needed to be aligned with the programme outcomes. Further refinements were, therefore, made to align and objectivize formative assessment using entrustable professional activities (EPA) with the aid of descriptive rubrics of sub-competencies and milestones. Addition of detailed rubrics for objectivity takes assessment a step beyond the Dreyfus model, aligning overall to the programme outcomes. Results Achievement of appropriate grades in EPAs by individual candidates ensures entrustability in professional activities by the time of completion of the PG programme. The modification was found more transparent and objective with reference to grading by the teachers and more conducive to reflections by the residents on their performance and how to improve it. Conclusions The use of descriptive rubrics along with EPAs brings transparency and plays a key role as an objective assessment tool, which can lend direction to individual resident learning and entrustability. This is an important component of outcome-based education.

Measuring Chief Resident Skill and Entrustment Progression in An Operative Coaching Program: Four Years’ Experience

Operative coaching (OC) may facilitate improvement of surgery residents' competencies by optimizing learning and teaching. We investigated how residents' operative skills and prospective entrustment (PE) progress throughout the chief year in our OC program, how OC is perceived by participants, and how OC may facilitate learning and teaching. This is a mixed-methods study conducted within the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center General Surgery residency. Validated performance evaluations with procedural-specific skill, general skill (GS), step-specific guidance required (SSG) (an autonomy measure), and PE measures completed by chiefs, faculty coaches, and attending surgeons from 7/2018 to 6/2022 were reviewed. We also interviewed OC participants to understand their experience. Descriptive statistical and qualitative content analysis were applied. 441 evaluations from 147 OC cases completed by 22 chiefs, 5 faculty coaches, and 24 attendings were included. Overall, resident GS (p = 0.036), SSG (p = 0.023), and PE (p = 0.002) significantly improved throughout the year. PE significantly correlated (all p < 0.0001) with SSG (r = 0.73), followed by procedural-specific skill (r = 0.59), then GS (r = 0.57). On average, chiefs underestimated their surgical skills while attendings overestimated autonomy they permitted to residents. Chiefs, coaches, and attendings reached consensus on chiefs' PE upon graduation. Five graduated chiefs and 5 attendings were interviewed. Chiefs described OC as effective in improving their self-regulated learning and particularly valued 3 OC elements: neutral authentic feedback, third-party real-time observation, and actionable feedback. Attendings noted OC promoted their engagement in skills assessment and teaching. Our findings suggest chief residents' skills, autonomy, and PE progress steadily along their OC journey. Despite differences in residents', coaches', and attendings' perceptions of skill, measures of autonomy reliably correlate with entrustment. OC promotes resident learning, faculty teaching, and assessment of resident skills, autonomy, and PE in the OR.

Residency Education Practices in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Background There has been increased interest in how residents train in the subspecialty of skull base surgery. Examining which training methods are popular and effective to optimize residency learning is necessary, especially with new training adjuncts available to the modern trainee. In this study, we survey North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) members to analyze endoscopic skull base surgery education methods. Methods The NASBS membership was surveyed regarding endoscopic skull base surgery teaching and feedback methods using a Likert scale via an anonymized REDCap form over 4 months. Results With a response rate of 10.1%, we found that informal teaching methods and verbal qualitative feedback were rated significantly more effective than other teaching and feedback methods ( p < 0.01). When comparing the opinions of otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists were less likely to believe feedback is most effective with a shared grading scale ( p < 0.01). Physicians with more than 10 years of experience posttraining felt model- and rubric-based teaching were used more frequently ( p < 0.01). Respondents indicated that standardization and use of simulation, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality should be at the forefront of educational practices used in the field in the coming 5 to 10 years. Conclusion Despite the current emphasis on informal training, respondents pointed to standardization and simulation as methods of endoscopic skull base surgery education that should be used more in the future. These results indicate an unmet need in skull base education. Future multi-institutional initiatives with NASBS membership participation are warranted.

Differences in emergency medicine resident procedural reporting by race and ethnicity.

The recruitment, retention, and training of physicians from groups underrepresented in medicine (UiM) is critically important to the practice of emergency medicine (EM). Studies across specialties have demonstrated disparities in operative experiences among UiM resident learners who are UiM; however, there are limited data on procedural disparities in EM. We sought to quantify the association between racial and ethnic identities that are UiM and the number of procedures reported among EM residents. We conducted a retrospective review of procedural differences by UiM status (using self-identified race and ethnicity) among graduating EM residents at nine training programs over a 10-year period. Sites were selected to ensure diversity of program length, program type, and geography. Data from residents in combined training programs, those who did not complete their full training at that institution, and those with missing data or electing not to report race/ethnicity were excluded. We calculated median and interquartile ranges for each procedure by UiM status. We conducted multivariable regression analyses accounting for UiM status, gender, and site as well as a sensitivity analysis excluding values >3 standard deviations from the mean for each procedure. We collected data from 988 total residents, with 718 (73%) being non-UiM, 204 (21%) being UiM, 48 (5%) electing not to specific race/ethnicity, and 18 (2%) missing race/ethnicity data. While unadjusted data demonstrated a difference between UiM and non-UiM resident numbers across several procedures, there were no significant differences in procedures reported after accounting for gender and site in the primary or sensitivity analyses. We did not identify a statistically significant difference in reported procedures between UiM and non-UiM residents in EM. Future work should include qualitative investigations of UiM resident experience surrounding procedures as well as mixed-methods studies to examine how these data interact.

Resident Involvement in Curricular and Clinical Practice Change and Satisfaction With Training According to Length of Training in Family Medicine.

Most research in residency training has focused on quality improvement within a single program. We explored resident involvement in curricular and clinical practice change, the learning environment, and resident satisfaction in 3-year family medicine residencies compared to matched 4-year residencies. We used two surveys to capture data. One was for program directors, which assessed the level of resident involvement in curricular and practice transformation. The second was a resident survey, which asked residents to rate their involvement in curricular change and practice transformation, the learning environment, and satisfaction with training. Both were administered annually between 2013 and 2019. Response rates ranged from 84.6% to 100%. Findings revealed no overall difference in resident involvement in curricular change, but the program director survey findings indicated that a higher proportion of residents in 4-year programs were using a broader diversity of approaches to working on quality improvement (QI) projects compared to those in 3-year programs. We also found statistical differences in the number of QI projects completed per year, with 34.1% completing three or more in 4-year programs compared to 13.3% in 3-year programs (P&lt;.001). We found a positive correlation between resident involvement, learning environment, and satisfaction with training for both 3-year (range 0.489-0.666; P=.001) and 4-year residents (range 0.441-0.529; P=.001). Four-year residents were involved in a greater number of quality improvement projects and had a more diverse profile of involvement than those in 3-year residency programs. Involvement in practice and curricular change and the learning environment were associated with greater levels of resident satisfaction with training in both 3-year and 4-year programs.

It Takes a Village: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Preparing Internal Medicine Residents to Care for Patients at the Intersection of Women's Health, Gender-Affirming Care, and Health Disparities.

Objective: To create an interdisciplinary curriculum to teach key topics at the intersection of women's health, gender-affirming care, and health disparities to internal medicine (IM) residents. Materials and Methods: A core team of faculty from IM, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Surgery partnered with faculty and fellows from other disciplines and with community experts to design and deliver the curriculum. The resulting curriculum consisted of themed half-day modules, each consisting of three to four inter-related topics, updated and repeated on an ∼3-year cycle. Health equity was a focus of all topics. Module delivery used diverse interactive learning strategies. Modules have been presented to ∼175 residents annually, beginning in 2015. To assess the curriculum, we used formative evaluation methods, using primarily anonymous, electronic surveys, and collected quantitative and qualitative data. Most surveys assessed resident learning by quantifying residents' self-reported comfort with skills taught in the module pre- and postsession. Results: Of 131 residents who completed an evaluation in 2022/23, 121 (90%) "somewhat" or "strongly" agreed with their readiness to perform a range of skills taught in the module. In all previous years where pre- and postsurveys were used to evaluate modules, we observed a consistent meaningful increase in the proportion of residents reporting high levels of comfort with the material. Residents particularly valued interactive teaching methods, and direct learning from community members and peers. Conclusion: Our interdisciplinary curriculum was feasible, valued by trainees, and increased resident learning. The curriculum provides a template to address equity issues across a spectrum of women's and gender-affirming care conditions that can be used by other institutions in implementing similar curricula.

Improving Resident Physician Participation in Reporting Patient Safety and Quality Concerns.

Background: Reporting medical errors, near misses, and adverse events is an important component of improving patient safety and resident learning. Studies have revealed that event reporting rates can be low for physicians, resident physicians, and fellows. The objective of this quality improvement project was to improve resident reporting of patient safety and quality events and engage residents in the analysis of events at a community-based teaching hospital in the United States. Methods: We developed a program to engage 122 residents from 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs using a multifaceted approach that included instructing residents how to use the hospital's adverse event reporting system; requiring first-year residents to submit at least 1 report; reviewing all resident reports during a monthly multidisciplinary meeting; and ensuring that each resident who submitted a report received feedback on how the concern was being addressed. Results: The program resulted in a 41.8% (95% CI 31%-53%) absolute increase in the number of residents reporting a concern, and resident submissions led to several documented improvements in patient care. A survey was administered to the residents who submitted reports, and the majority (76.0% response rate) expressed satisfaction with both the reporting system and the feedback about how their submission was being addressed. The responding residents agreed that they were more likely to submit reports because of their experience with the program and that they felt the program would improve safety and the quality of care at the institution. Conclusion: This quality improvement project successfully increased resident event reporting and engaged residents in the review of submitted events. The program can serve as a model for other teaching hospitals.

Impact of general practice/family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:reflective writing analysis using text mining.

We previously reported the impact of general practice/family medicine training on postgraduate training in Japan using evaluation criteria standardized nationwide. However, there is a possibility that new insights may be gained by analyzing the reflective reports written by these residents. Junior residents who participated in one-month general practice/family medicine training at one of five medical institutions with full-time family medicine specialists between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. They were assigned to submit a reflective report on their experiences and thoughts every day during the training. We analyzed these reflective writings using text mining and created a co-occurrence network map to see the relationship between the most frequently used words. Ninety junior residents participated in the study. The words that appeared most frequently in the sentences referring to clinical ability included "symptoms," "medical examination," "consultation," "treatment," and "examination." The words of "family" and "(patient) oneself" showed strong association in the co-occurrence network map. It was suggested that general practice/family medicine training greatly contributes to the acquisition of clinical abilities and deepens the learning of junior residents not only about patient care but also about family-oriented care.

STFM Offers Support and Resources to New and Transitioning Residency Learning Networks.

STFM Offers Support and Resources to New and Transitioning Residency Learning Networks.

Online, asynchronous training in research for residents

Abstract Scholarly activity is a key component of most residency programmes. To establish fundamental research skills and fill gaps within training curricula, we developed an online, asynchronous set of modules called Research 101 to introduce trainees to various topics that are germane to the conduct of research and evaluated its effectiveness in resident research education. Research 101 was utilised by residents at One Brooklyn Health in Brooklyn, NY. Resident knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-module surveys with 5-point Likert scaled questions, open-ended text responses, and a multiple-choice quiz. Pre-module survey results indicated that residents were most confident with the Aligning expectations, Introduction to research, and Study design and data analysis basics modules and least confident with the Submitting an Institutional Review Board protocol and Presenting your summer research modules. Post-module survey responses demonstrated increased learning compared to pre-module results for all modules and learning objectives (p &lt; 0.0001). “This module met my needs” was endorsed 91.4% of the time. The median score for the final quiz that consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions was 23. Thematic analysis of open-ended post-module survey responses identified multiple strengths and opportunities for improvement in course content and instructional methods. These data demonstrate that residents benefit from completion of Research 101, as post-module survey scores were significantly higher than pre-module survey scores for all modules and questions, final quiz scores were high, and open-ended responses highlighted opportunities for additional resident learning.

Surgical residents' perceptions of the operating theatre educational environment at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College: A cross-sectional survey

BackgroundThe educational environment refers to the “climate” that influences all aspects of learning in an educational context and the experience in the operating room is particularly crucial in surgical residents learning. Hence, this study aimed to assess surgical residents' perceptions of the operating theatre educational environment and associated factors in the surgical department at St. Paul's Hospital. MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2022 among surgical residents at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College to assess their perceptions of the operating room educational environment using the OREEM questionnaire. Descriptive statistics (mean, median, SD) were used to summarize demographic data and OREEM scores. The student t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing followed by posthoc tests were used for comparison of quantitative data, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant. ResultsOf the participants, 103 (79.8%) were male and 26 (20.2%) were female with a mean age of 28 years. The overall mean score was 69% with subscale scores for teaching and training at 47.9/65.0 (73.7%), learning opportunities at 34.5/55.0 (62.7%), the atmosphere at 28.9/40.00 (72.4%) and workload/supervision/ support at 27.5/40.0 (68.7%). Male and female residents differed significantly in perceptions of “atmosphere” (t127 = 3.35, p < 0.001) and in junior versus senior residents' perceptions of the “learning opportunities” and “atmosphere” at p-values of 0.023 and 0.028 respectively. However, age, marital status, and specific surgical training programs did not have a significant effect on the scores. ConclusionOverall, residents had positive perceptions of their training and teaching, learning opportunities, the atmosphere in the operation theatre, and the supervision they received in the operation theatre. The operating room's “teaching and training” component received the highest score, while the operating room's “learning opportunities” component received the lowest. This indicates the importance of establishing a positive learning environment with sufficient “hands-on” experience, especially during emergencies. In addition, preoperative planning, case discussions, and feedback after the surgery should be routine.

An observer tool to enhance learning of incoming anesthesia residents’ skills during simulation training of central venous catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCentral venous catheter (CVC) insertion using simulation is an essential skill for anesthesiologists. Simulation training is an effective mean to master this skill. Given the large number of residents and the limited duration of training sessions, the active practice time is limited and residents remain observers of their colleagues for much of the session. To improve learning during observation periods, the use of an observer tool (OT) has been advocated but its educational effectiveness is not well defined.MethodsIncoming anesthesia residents were randomized to use an OT (i.e. procedural skill-based checklist) (OT+) or not (OT-) when observing other residents during a simulation bootcamp. The primary outcome was a composite score (total 60 points) evaluating CVC procedural skills rated immediately after the training. This score covers theoretical knowledge explored by multiple choice questions (MCQs) (/20), perceived improvement in knowledge and skills (/20), perceived impact on future professional life (/10) and satisfaction (/10). Measurements were repeated 1 month later. Residents in each group recorded the number of CVCs placed and their clinical outcomes (attempts, complications) during the first month of their clinical rotation using a logbook.ResultsImmediately after training, the composite score was similar between the two groups: 45.3 ± 4.2 (OT+, n = 49) and 44.4 ± 4.8 (OT-, n = 42) (p = 0.323). Analysis of sub-items also showed no difference. Results at 1 month were not different between groups.Analysis of the logbook showed no difference between groups. No serious complications were reported.ConclusionsThe use of a procedural task-based OT by incoming anesthesia residents and used during CVC insertion simulation training was not associated with better learning outcomes, neither immediately after the session nor when re-evaluated 1 month later. The training at least once on simulator of all residents could limit the impact of OT. Further studies are necessary to define the place of OT in simulation training.