Residency Training Experience Research Articles

“I Want Them to Still Trust Me with Their Child’s Care”: A Longitudinal Study of Pediatric Residents’ Reactions to and Communication with Parents about Medical Uncertainty across Residency

ABSTRACT Physicians in residency training experience high levels of medical uncertainty, yet they are often hesitant to discuss uncertainty with parents. Guided by the theory of motivated information management and a multiple goals perspective, this mixed-methods longitudinal study examines associations among residents’ tolerance of and reactions to uncertainty, efficacy communicating about uncertainty, and perceptions of parents’ trust in them as physicians. To contextualize these associations, we also examined residents’ task, identity, and relational goals when communicating about uncertainty with parents. We surveyed 47 pediatric residents at the beginning of each year of their residency program. As they progressed through their training, residents’ uncertainty-related anxiety and reluctance to communicate uncertainty to parents decreased, and their efficacy communicating uncertainty with parents increased. Residents’ concerns about bad outcomes remained unchanged. Residents pursued multiple, often conflicting, conversational goals when communicating uncertainty with parents. Results reveal important considerations for addressing how residents can manage their uncertainty in productive ways.

Downward Trend in Resident Myringotomy and Tympanostomy Tube Experience.

Historically, myringotomy, and the insertion of tympanostomy tubes has served as one of the initial surgical training experiences for residents. Resident experience with this procedure since the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines has not been well described in the literature. The objective of this study was to identify trends in resident training experience with chronic otitis media-related surgeries, such as myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement. While multiple factors influence resident experience, we hypothesize that resident experience has decreased since the introduction of the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13). In a retrospective review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) National Data Reports, mean number of myringotomy and tympanostomy tube cases logged in the Resident Case Log System from 2006 to 2019 were collated and plotted against years to identify monotonic trends. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare pre-PCV13 era and post-PCV13 era data. Since the introduction of PCV13, there is a national decreasing trend in the myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement by otolaryngology residents (P = .001). Otologic surgeries are an important part of resident education and historically have served as one of the initial surgical training experiences for residents. There has been a significant reduction in the number of myringotomy and tympanostomy procedures performed by otolaryngology residents in the past decade. While multiple factors influence resident experience, it is possible that introduction of PCV13 has impacted resident exposure to myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement. Resident proficiency with this procedure has likely not been affected by introduction of PCV13. Data should be reassessed in 5 years to determine if an impact of the PCV13 vaccine on resident training is evident.

Untold stories: Emergency medicine residents' experiences caring for diverse patient populations.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expects specialties to teach and assess proficiency in culturally competent care. However, little guidance has emerged to achieve these goals. Clinical training within socioeconomically disparate settings may provide an experiential learning opportunity. We sought to qualitatively explore resident experiences working in the generic clinical learning environments (i.e., exposure to socioeconomically diverse patients across different training sites) and how it shapes cultural competency-related skill development. Residents were recruited from emergency medicine (EM) programs. We used purposeful sampling across all postgraduate years and elicited experiences related to working at the different sites related to cultural identity, frustrating patient encounters, vulnerable populations, and development of health disparities/social determinants of health knowledge. Individual structured interviews were conducted via phone between May and December 2016. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using systematic and iterative coding methods. Twenty-four interviews revealed three main themes. EM residents' experiences caring for patients across sites shaped their understanding of: (1) potential patient attributes that affected the clinical encounter, (2) difficulties in building rapport had adverse effect on the clinical evaluation, and (3) residency program and training experiences shaped their clinical preparedness and willingness to work in underserved areas. Assessing the impact disparate clinical setting exposures have on trainees' preparedness to care for socioeconomically diverse patients can provide valuable insight for medical educators into barriers and facilitators to delivering optimal learning and patient care. Participants provided a breadth of stories illuminating their real-world consciousness and competency with meeting the needs of diverse populations and their access to varied educational outlets to grapple with the disparities they observed. More research is needed to uncover effective strategies to help residents thrive and feel more prepared to care for diverse populations.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Experience.

INTRODUCTIONThe rapid spread of the COVID-19 virus led to dramatic changes in graduate medical education and surgical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orthopaedic Surgery residency education in the United States.METHODSA survey sent to all residents of the 201 ACGME-accredited Orthopaedic Surgery programs in the United States.RESULTSA total of 309 Orthopaedic surgery residents responded to our survey. A subset of 283 (91.6%) residents surveyed reported decreased Orthopaedic-related clinical duty hours due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 300/309 (97.1%) reported a decrease in surgical case volume. 298 (96.4%) residents reported that their program had scheduled activities or made changes to supplement their education, most common being virtual and video conferences 296/309 (95.5%), required practice questions 132/309 (42.7%), required reading or pre-recorded lectures 122/309 (39.5%), in-person small group meetings or lectures 24/309 (7.77%), and surgical simulation activities 17/309 (5.50%). Almost half (152/309 (48.9%)) of respondents reported their overall resident education was somewhat or much worse due to the impact of COVID-19. Over a quarter (81 (26.2%)) of residents reported their well-being was negatively impacted by residency-related changes due to COVID-19.CONCLUSIONSBased on these results, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought about significant changes to the training experience of Orthopaedic surgery residents in the United States. Although the majority of residents in this sample had favorable opinions of the educational changes their programs have instituted in light of the pandemic, clinical duty hours and case volume were reported to have substantially decreased, with a large portion of residents viewing their overall resident education as worsened and reporting negative impacts on their overall well-being.

Transplant Surgery Pipeline: A Report from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Pipeline Taskforce

Transplant surgery fellowship has evolved over the years and today there are 66 accredited training programs in the US and Canada. There is growing concern, however, about the number of US-trained general surgery residents pursuing transplant surgery. In this study, we examined the transplant surgery pipeline, comparing it with other surgical subspecialty fellowships, and characterized the resident transplantation experience. Datasets were compiled and analyzed from surgical fellowship match data obtained from the National Resident Matching Program and ACGME reports and relative fellowship competitiveness was assessed. The surgical resident training experience in transplantation was evaluated. From 2006 to 2018, a total of 1,094 applicants have applied for 946 transplant surgery fellowship positions; 299 (27.3%) were US graduates. During this period, there was a 0.8% decrease per year in US-trained surgical residents matching into transplant surgery (p= 0.042). In addition, transplant surgery was one of the least competitive fellowships compared with other National Resident Matching Program surgical subspeciality fellowships, as measured by the number of US applicants per available fellowship position, average number of fellowship programs listed on each applicant's rank list, and proportion of unfilled fellowship positions (each, p < 0.05). Finally, from 2015 to 2017, there were 57 general surgery residency programs that produced 77 transplant surgery fellows, but nearly one-half of the fellows (n= 36 [46.8%]) came from 16 (28.1%) programs. Transplant surgery is one of the least competitive and sought after surgical fellowships for US-trained residents. These findings highlight the need for dedicated efforts to increase exposure, mentorship, and interest in transplantation to recruit strong US graduates.

Comparison of Maternity Care Training in Family Medicine Residencies 2013 and 2019: A CERA Program Directors Study.

Maternity care training is a standard requirement for all family medicine residents, and family physicians play a critical role in the US maternity care workforce. In 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated the required obstetrical experience during family medicine residency training from a volume-based to a competency-based requirement of 200 hours (2 months rotation). This study aimed to determine if family medicine resident maternity care training experience differed after this change in requirements. A nationwide survey of family medicine program directors was conducted as part of the 2019 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey, replicating a 2013 CERA survey to determine if there was a change in family medicine resident maternity care experience after the ACGME requirements update. The priority programs place on residents' continuity deliveries and family medicine faculty attending deliveries decreased between 2013 and 2019. The reported number of continuity deliveries and vaginal deliveries performed by residents also decreased significantly between 2013 and 2019, yet the program directors' estimate of the number of graduates going on to provide obstetric deliveries or pursue a maternity care fellowship did not change significantly. Programs reporting more than 25% of graduates continuing to conduct vaginal deliveries have reported similar numbers of vaginal deliveries per resident as in 2013. The majority of family medicine residents are graduating with less delivery experience, and residency programs are placing less priority on continuity deliveries and modeling by family physician faculty following the 2014 ACGME Family Medicine Requirements update. This trend may have major implications on the comprehensive nature of our specialty and further widen gaps in the maternity care workforce. Further studies are needed to determine the impact on the competency of graduating family medicine residents in providing maternity care and for the long-term effects on the maternity care workforce.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training and research experience of the Canadian anesthesia residents

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training and research experience of the Canadian anesthesia residents

Objective Test Scores Throughout Orthopedic Surgery Residency Suggest Disparities in Training Experience

Diversifying clinical residencies, particularly in fields that are historically dominated by majority male (M/M) cohorts, is critical to improve both the training experiences of residents and the overall physician workforce. Orthopedic surgery in particular has low numbers of females and under-represented minorities (F/URM) at all levels of training and practice. Despite efforts to increase its diversity, this field has become more homogeneous in recent years. To highlight potential barriers and disparate training environments that may contribute to this dynamic, we present 25 years' worth of institutional data on standardized exam performance throughout residency. We report that despite starting residency with standardized exam scores that were comparable to their M/M peers, F/URM orthopedic surgery residents performed progressively worse on Orthopaedic In-service Training Exams throughout residency and had lower first pass rates on the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part 1. Given these findings, we propose that disparate performance on standardized test scores throughout residency could identify trainees that may have different experiences that negatively impact their exam performance. Shedding light on these underlying disparities provides opportunities to find meaningful and sustained ways to develop a culture of diversity and inclusion. It may also allow for other programs to identify similar patterns within their training programs. Overall, we propose monitoring test performance on standardized exams throughout orthopedic surgery residency to identify potential disparities in training experience; further, we acknowledge that interventions to mitigate these disparities require a broad, systems wide approach and a firm institutional commitment to reducing bias and working toward sustainable change.

Anesthesiology Residents' Experiences and Perspectives of Residency Training.

Anesthesiology residents' experiences and perspectives about their programs may be helpful in improving training. The goals of this repeated cross-sectional survey study are to determine: (1) the most important factors residents consider in choosing an anesthesiology residency, (2) the aspects of the clinical base year that best prepare residents for anesthesia clinical training, and what could be improved, (3) whether residents are satisfied with their anesthesiology residency and what their primary struggles are, and (4) whether residents believe their residency prepares them for proficiency in the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies and for independent practice. Anesthesiologists beginning their US residency training from 2013 to 2016 were invited to participate in anonymous, confidential, and voluntary self-administered online surveys. Resident cohort was defined by clinical anesthesia year 1, such that 9 survey administrations were included in this study-3 surveys for the 2013 and 2014 cohorts (clinical anesthesia years 1-3), 2 surveys for the 2015 cohort (clinical anesthesia years 1-2), and 1 survey for the 2016 cohort (clinical anesthesia year 1). The overall response rate was 36% (4707 responses to 12,929 invitations). On a 5-point Likert scale with 1 as "very unimportant" and 5 as "very important," quality of clinical experience (4.7-4.8 among the cohorts) and departmental commitment to education (4.3-4.5) were rated as the most important factors in anesthesiologists' choice of residency. Approximately 70% of first- and second-year residents agreed that their clinical base year prepared them well for anesthesiology residency, particularly clinical training experiences in critical care rotations, anesthesiology rotations, and surgery rotations/perioperative procedure management. Overall, residents were satisfied with their choice of anesthesiology specialty (4.4-4.5 on a 5-point scale among cohort-training levels) and their residency programs (4.0-4.1). The residency training experiences mostly met their expectations (3.8-4.0). Senior residents who reported any struggles highlighted academic more than interpersonal or technical difficulties. Senior residents generally agreed that the residency adequately prepared them for independent practice (4.1-4.4). Of the 6 ACGME Core Competencies, residents had the highest confidence in professionalism (4.7-4.9) and interpersonal and communication skills (4.6-4.8). Areas in residency that could be improved include the provision of an appropriate balance between education and service and allowance for sufficient time off to search and interview for a postresidency position. Anesthesiology residents in the United States indicated they most value quality of clinical training experiences and are generally satisfied with their choice of specialty and residency program.

Anesthesia Resident Training Experience Minimally Impacts Emergence Time, Making Correlation of Resident Competency With This Operational Metric Difficult.

Anesthesia residents are deemed competent based on subjective and objective metrics. Knowledge acquisition and procedural skill is often difficult to accurately measure. Inspecting tangible metrics of perioperative efficiency may provide a source for reliable evaluation. Retrospective case-log database review yielded 3072 surgical cases involving residents over 5 years. Primary variable investigated was the time from surgery completion to exit from operating room. Other variables recorded included day of week, attending anesthesiologist name, attending surgeon name, patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification, and inpatient versus day surgery status. After controlling for procedure duration time, inpatient status, ASA PS, surgeon, and attending anesthesiologist, resident training time had high statistical significance. In the fully adjusted model, 1 year of resident training was associated with a reduction in emergence time by 28 seconds. A 1-hour increase in procedure time was associated with an increase in emergence time of 34 seconds. Although a statistically significant correlation between anesthesia resident training time and emergence time was demonstrated, the clinical significance is likely low given the relatively small amount of actual time saved. We caution the value of using perioperative metrics (e.g., emergence time) for evaluating anesthesia resident competency, until such metrics have undergone significant validation.

Anesthesia Resident Training Experience Minimally Impacts Emergence Time, Making Correlation of Resident Competency With This Operational Metric Difficult

Anesthesia Resident Training Experience Minimally Impacts Emergence Time, Making Correlation of Resident Competency With This Operational Metric Difficult

9. UNDERSTANDING BURNOUT THROUGH THE LENS OF THE PEDIATRIC RESIDENCY TRAINING ENVIRONMENT

Background Despite interventions, burnout continues to increase among trainees. In a recent study of pediatric residents, the burnout rate was found to be > 50%. Though burnout is a major issue, there is limited data on effective interventions which begs the question, what are we missing? An organizational context for burnout titled Areas of Worklife, identified 6 areas that can affect burnout in the workplace: control, values, reward, fairness, workload, and community. Understanding how residents perceive these areas and their effect on burnout is invaluable as it provides a unique insight into the problem that could inform future interventions. Objectives: This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of resident perspectives related to the six Areas of Worklife and their significance in the context of residency. Methods Using qualitative methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 15 residents and focused on resident's perspective of the Worklife areas. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was conducted concurrent with data collection using a constant comparison method; we used ATLAS.ti to manage the data for coding and the principal investigator and 2 co-investigators created themes. Results Themes identified based on Worklife areas are listed in Table 1. Overall, patient care was a lens through which residents understood the areas of control, reward, values, and workload. The themes identified in these leading areas focused on the resident's ability to interact with and learn from patients. Conclusions Resident definitions of the Worklife areas highlight the importance of patient involvement in the residency training experience, which is consistent with the literature that shows patient care is a means for residents to find meaning in their work. Understanding residents perspectives on Worklife areas is essential when developing potential interventions for burnout in residency.

Intersectionality of Gender and Visible Minority Status Among General Surgery Residents in Canada

Within medical specialties, surgical disciplines disproportionately and routinely demonstrate the greatest underrepresentation of women and individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups. Understanding the role that diversity plays in surgical resident training may identify strategies that foster resident resiliency, optimize surgical training, and improve patient outcomes. To examine the implication of gender and visible minority (VM [ie, nonaboriginal people who are not White individuals]) status for resiliency and training experiences of general surgery residents in Canada. In this survey study, a 129-item questionnaire was emailed from May 2018 to July 2018 to all residents enrolled in all Canadian general surgery training programs during the 2017-2018 training year. Survey responses were extracted and categorized into 5 major themes. The survey was designed by the Resident Committee and reviewed by the Governing Board of the Canadian Association of General Surgeons. French and English versions of the survey were created, distributed, and administered using Google Forms. Survey questions were formulated to characterize resident diversity and training experience. Self-perceptions of diversity, mentorship, and training experience were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 for strongly disagree, 2 for disagree, 3 for neither agree or disagree, 4 for agree, and 5 for strongly agree) and open-ended responses. The frequency of perceived unprofessional workplace encounters was evaluated using a 5-point scale (1 for daily, 2 for weekly, 3 for monthly, 4 for annually, and 5 for never). Of the 510 general surgery residents invited, a total of 210 residents (40.5%) completed the survey. Most respondents were younger than 30 years (119 [56.7%]), were women (112 [53.3%]), reported English as their first language (133 [63.3%]), did not identify as a VM (147 [70.0%]), had no dependents (184 [87.6%]), and were Canadian medical graduates (178 [84.8%]). Women residents who identified as VM compared with male residents who did not identify as a VM were less likely to agree or strongly agree that they had a collegial relationship with staff, (21 [63.6%] vs 61 [89.7%]; P = .01), to feel like they fit in with their training programs (21 [63.6%] vs 56 [82.3%]; P = .003), and to feel valued at work (15 [45.4%] vs 47 [69.1%]; P = .03). Both female residents and female residents who identified as VM described significant concerns about receiving fewer training opportunities because of their gender vs their male peers (54 [48.2%] vs 3 [3.0%]; P < .001). Ninety-one of 112 female residents (81.2%) reported feeling that their medical expertise was dismissed because of their gender at least once annually, with 37 women (33.0%) experiencing dismissal of their expertise at least once every week (P < .001). In contrast, 98% of male residents reported never experiencing dismissal of their medical expertise because of their gender. Similarly, residents with VM status vs those without VM status reported at least monthly dismissal of their expertise because of their race/ethnicity (9 of 63 [14.3%] vs 1 of 147 [0.7%]; P < .001). In this study, female sex and VM status appeared to be associated with adverse implications for the training experience of general surgery residents. These findings suggest that new strategies focused on the intersectionality of gender and race/ethnicity are needed to improve the training experience of at-risk residents.

Stress and the Surgical Resident in the COVID-19 Pandemic

ObjectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has drastically transformed the healthcare community and medical education across the United States. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the surgical resident training experience, assess possible sources of stress or anxiety among surgery residents, and examine how patterns of anxiety vary by resident rank.DesignWe developed and disseminated a survey, which included the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), to all general and integrated plastic surgery residents in their clinical years of training at the University of California, San Francisco. Statistical analysis of the survey responses was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Post-hoc analysis was performed using the Bonferroni-corrected Dunn test. Survey data were combined with aggregated duty hour information and operative case numbers from select hospitals for March and April of 2019 (historical baseline) and 2020.ResultsThe overall survey response rate was 73.7% (n = 73). With an estimated operative volume reduction of 63.3% for general surgery cases, over 90% of residents expressed concern about the decline in operative exposure. While the senior residents tended to work more shifts, they were not more likely to have higher risk perception scores for contracting COVID-19 nor higher anxiety levels about the possibility of contracting COVID-19. They were, however, significantly more likely to have high GAD-7 scores (≥ 10) when compared to interns (z = −2.82, p-adj = 0.014). Overall, residents were more concerned about the general health of loved ones than about their own risk of contracting COVID-19 (U = 3897.5, p < 0.01).ConclusionsWhile the work-related experiences of residents varied across a number of factors during the pandemic, residents tended to report similar sources of anxiety. Moving forward, surgical residency training programs will need to develop ways to optimize available surgical experiences and address the unique resident anxieties that an infectious pandemic presents.

Cadaveric Laboratory Simulation Training of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment Improves Trainee Knowledge and Confidence

OBJECTIVETo assess whether a focused, simulation training course can improve trainee surgical knowledge and confidence in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODSUrology residents participated in a prosthetic education course as part of the 2018 SUPS and SMSNA annual meeting. The course included didactic lectures and a hands-on cadaveric laboratory. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the lab (2 weeks and 6 months) to assess procedural knowledge and confidence. Analysis of lab responses was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs. RESULTSThirty-two residents (median age 29, range 27-34) participated in the course. The majority were postgraduate year 4 (63%) or postgraduate year 5 (20%). Most participants reported minimal AUS or sling experience with 50% and 94% reporting less than 5 cases, respectively. Overall score from the knowledge assessment improved significantly between the pre-lab versus 2-week post-lab (P = .02) and pre-lab versus 6-month post-lab (P = .01). Similarly, procedural confidence improved between pre-lab vs 2-week post-lab (P < .001) and pre-lab versus 6-month post-lab (P < .001). Knowledge and confidence assessments were not different between year of residency training or pre-lab experience. CONCLUSIONSSimulation training improves knowledge and confidence in prosthetic surgery for male stress incontinence. In the current climate of reduced exposure and limited availability of prosthetic educators, simulation courses can provide much needed educational value.

To Serve Those Who Served: Advances in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery During War and Peace.

The industrialization of modern warfare dating back to WWI led to an increase in combat-related injuries with unprecedented levels of severity. The necessity of addressing the clinical challenges that ensued led to the emergence of modern reconstructive surgery and subsequently a robust healthcare initiative for veterans in the form of the Department of Veterans Affairs. In the following article, a literature review was conducted to examine the interplay between combat injuries, veterans' care, and reconstructive surgery. We found that the relationship between military trauma and reconstructive surgery has led to an increase in survival rates and advances in mass casualty response while allowing the survivors to maintain a high quality of life. The relationship between the Veterans Affairs hospitals and plastic surgery has only strengthened over time as these hospitals play a major role in training the next generation of plastic surgeons throughout the nation. It is imperative to maintain this cooperative relationship to ensure a high level of care for our veterans and a comprehensive training experience for plastic surgery residents.

Aile Hekimliği Uzmanlık Eğitiminde ‘Eğitim Aile Sağlığı Merkezleri’ Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Deneyimi

Aile Hekimliği Uzmanlık Eğitiminde ‘Eğitim Aile Sağlığı Merkezleri’ Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Deneyimi

Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundGeneral surgery is the fastest growing field in the adoption of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Here, we present the results of one institution’s experience in training surgical residents in robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs. MethodsData were prospectively collected on patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with residents. Data points included patient age, gender, complications, hernia difficulty, resident technical competency as measured by GEARS, Zwisch scores, operative time, and the number of robotic console cases reported by residents as primary surgeon. ResultsResidents who performed >30 robotic cases had significantly higher mean modified GEARS scores (p ≤ .002). Residents who completed 10 or fewer robotic cases achieved significantly lower mean modified GEARS and Zwisch scores than those who completed 11 or more (p < .001). ConclusionsResident competency and autonomy improve with increasing total robotic case load. Attending surgeons grant more autonomy to residents with higher competency scores.

Association Between Resident Physician Training Experience and Program-Level Performance on Board Examinations

This study examines the associations of program characteristics with pass rates on the qualifying examination and certifying examination of the American Board of Surgery.

Describing the pediatric resident experience in caring for dying patients.

51 Background: Cancer remains the leading cause of childhood death beyond infancy. Though growing subspecialty palliative care provides expertise in caring for dying children, all pediatricians encounter dying patients and should feel adequately prepared to participate in their care. Clinicians who feel insufficiently trained in communication or end-of-life care are more likely to distance themselves from seriously ill patients and report higher levels of distress and burnout. Pediatric residents are often responsible for the frontline care of dying children in the hospital and yet, most pediatric residencies lack a formal end-of-life curriculum. Here, we aim to understand the experience of pediatric residents caring for dying patients. Methods: A thirty-four item survey instrument was administered to residents in a large pediatric residency program at a tertiary care center at Rising Junior Orientation and Rising Senior Orientation in spring 2018. All residents present completed the survey. Results: Seventy-six residents completed surveys including 46 rising juniors and 30 rising seniors. Only 19 residents (25%) reported receiving any training in caring for dying children; most of which was by noon/morning conferences or informal teaching. Nearly all (70/74; 95%) residents felt that their training in caring for dying children was not sufficient. A majority of residents reported minimal to no comfort with discussion of goals of care (73%) or resuscitation status (69%), managing pain (76%), anxiety (79%), and dyspnea (80%) at the end-of-life, performing a death exam (81%), and reaching out to families after the death of a child (85%). A majority of residents anticipate continuing to care for dying children after residency (50/76; 66%). Conclusions: Pediatric residents are uncomfortable with caring for dying patients and receive minimal training, suggesting that end-of-life care is a large gap in the pediatric residency training experience.