Residency Program Directors Research Articles

Best practices for PGY1 letters of intent: Recommendations from a modified Delphi process.

The aim of this study was to provide consensus recommendations from residency program leaders on letters of intent (LOIs) written by postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residency candidates. A 3-round modified Delphi process was used to determine consensus among PGY1 residency program leaders across the country. A screening and demographic survey was utilized to ensure representation of panelists. The initial items for round 1 of the study were developed using existing published literature, with pilot testing by 2 residency program directors. For each round, respondents rated items on a 7-point Likert scale, with opportunities to provide qualitative feedback and modifications for lower-rated items. For future rounds, items were adjusted based on respondent feedback. Only items meeting predefined consensus were included in the final recommendations. A total of 254 pharmacists were invited to participate in the panel, with 41 completing the demographic and study consent survey. There were 35 participants in round 1, 34 of whom remained for rounds 2 and 3. The panel created 18 LOI recommendations for PGY1 residency candidates. Most recommendations were focused on the content of the LOI, while others were related to formatting. The recommendations from this study can be employed by PGY1 pharmacy residency candidates to enhance their likelihood of success in the residency application process.

Characterizing the initial effects of the single accreditation system merge on the ophthalmology residency match

ABSTRACT Introduction In 2020, the American Osteopathic Association merged its residency programs into one system under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The effects of this transition on the ophthalmology match is not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to assess the early impact of the transition to ACGME accreditation on MD, DO, and IMG representation in ophthalmology residency programs. Materials and Methods Information about resident medical degree and resident medical school was gathered from ophthalmology residency program websites from a resident class before and after the Transition. Additionally, the medical degree of residency program directors (PD) was collected to analyze MD vs DO leadership in ophthalmology residency programs and to further stratify resident data to identify any trends in PD preference for different medical graduates. Results Data was obtained for 915 ophthalmology residents in 110 residency programs that met the study’s inclusion criteria. Of these programs, 102 were allopathic with MD leadership, 1 was allopathic with DO leadership, 3 were osteopathic with MD leadership, and 4 were osteopathic with DO leadership. Overall, MD representation increased while DO and IMG representation decreased although not significantly. For both classes analyzed, DO and IMG representation was disproportionately low. Discussion The transition to ACGME accreditation seems to have primarily harmed DO and IMG applicants in the ophthalmology match while benefitting MDs. Various factors such as loss of protected residency positions for DO applicants and the closure of osteopathic ophthalmology residency programs are likely reasons to blame for this decrease in osteopathic representation.

Pediatric Resident and Program Director Views on Climate Change and Health Curricula: A Multi-Institution Study.

The American Academy of Pediatrics emphasized in a 2007 policy statement the importance of educating trainees on the impacts of climate change on children's health, yet few studies have evaluated trainee knowledge and attitudes about climate change-related health effects in children. This multi-institution study assessed pediatric resident and program director (1) knowledge/attitudes on climate change and health, (2) perspectives on the importance of incorporating climate and health content into pediatric graduate medical education, and (3) preferred topics/activities to include in climate and health curricula. This mixed-methods study employed an anonymous cross-sectional survey of pediatric residents and residency program directors from Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD) Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network (LEARN)-affiliated programs. Multivariable regression models and factor analyses were used to examine associations among resident demographics and resident knowledge, attitudes, and interest in a climate change curriculum. A conventional content analysis was conducted for the open-ended responses. Eighteen programs participated in the study with all program directors (100% response rate) and 663 residents (average response rate per program, 53%; overall response rate, 42%) completing respective surveys. Of the program directors, only 3 (17%) felt very or moderately knowledgeable about the association between climate change and health impacts. The majority of residents (n=423, 64%) agreed/strongly agreed that physicians should discuss global warming/climate change and its health effects with patients/families, while only 138 residents (21%) agreed/strongly agreed that they were comfortable talking with patients and families about these issues. Most residents (n=498, 76%) and program directors (n=15, 83%) agreed/strongly agreed that a climate change curriculum should be incorporated into their pediatrics training program. Pediatric residents and program directors support curricula that prepare future pediatricians to address the impact of climate change on children's health; however, few programs currently offer specific training, despite identified needs.

Evaluation of Family Medicine Residency Programs for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Milestones.

In 2020, the Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors (AFMRD) Diversity and Health Equity (DHE) Task Force developed and piloted a framework to measure diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in medical residencies across five domains: curriculum, evaluation, institution, resident pathway, and faculty pathway. The objectives were (1) to measure DEI initiatives across multiple domains in family medicine residencies using the DEI milestones and (2) to obtain current national baseline data providing criteria against which to measure effectiveness of initiatives and create tailored benchmarks. We developed a cross-sectional survey of 12 quantitative residency characteristic items and the five DEI milestone ratings, and distributed the survey to program directors of family medicine residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in the spring of 2022. We generated descriptive statistics, including item frequencies and cross-tabulations, and completed subgroup comparisons with analysis of variance. We collected aggregate milestone data for 194 family medicine residencies of 588 eligible programs (33% response rate). Respondents represented 48 states and US territories: 107 community-based, university-affiliated; 48 community-based; 34 university-based; and 5 military/other programs. Overall, the curriculum milestone was rated the highest (mean=2.54, SD=1.03), whereas the faculty pathway (mean=1.94, SD=1.04) and resident pathway (mean=2.02, SD=1.06) milestones were rated lowest. DEI milestone data may support residency programs as they assess their institution's developmental progress across five key domains. Additionally, aggregate data may shed light on collective strengths and areas for improvement.

632 Barriers to providing training in opioid use disorder: a survey of OB/GYN residency program directors

632 Barriers to providing training in opioid use disorder: a survey of OB/GYN residency program directors

Factors associated with psychological distress in emergency medicine residents: findings from a single-center study

Emergency medicine (EM) residents face significant levels of psychological stress from work and non-work-related factors which can impact their well-being. The objective of this study was to determine the factors that may worsen or mitigate the prevalence of psychological distress among EM residents in a university-based tertiary medical center. Over a 3-month period, after an EM block, residents completed a survey on their demographics, work-related factors, and the Kessler-10 psychological distress scale. Fisher’s exact and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to determine statistical significance. Significant variables were then analyzed using ordinal and multiple linear regression to determine predictor variables. The study enrolled 38 participants, with an average age of 27 ± 1.5 years and a male preponderance. 44.74% had varying degrees of psychological distress, with females more likely experiencing severe distress. Participants who reported curtailing their daily activities more frequently were found to have a 1.58 times higher likelihood of severe psychological distress. Participants remaining after end-of-shift to complete tasks and those experiencing more negative interactions with colleagues had significantly higher levels of distress. We found a high prevalence of varying degrees of psychological distress among emergency medicine residents with almost one fifth in our study population having a high likelihood of severe distress. Female gender and work-related problems that lead to a reduction in normal daily activities seem to correlate with the severity of psychological distress in EM residents. However, future research would need to account for a wider range of institutional, social and societal factors that may contribute to residents’ likelihood of psychological distress. Nonetheless, it is essential for residents, mentors of residents, and residency program directors and personnel to understand reasons behind these factors, i.e., negative interactions with colleagues and increased workload and to strategize early identification and mitigation techniques to promote resident wellness.

A complete year of urology residency training under COVID-19: impact on education and health.

To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemics on clinical and surgical practice, educational activities, health and lifestyle behavior of Brazilian urology residents after 1 year of socio-economic restrictions. An electronic survey was e-mailed to all postgraduate (PG) students registered by the Brazilian Society of Urology. The survey inclu-ded an assessment of socio-demographic, clinical practice, educational, health-related and behavior parameters. We also evaluated which subareas of urology were predominantly affected. A similar survey was adapted and sent to the directors of all urology residency programs. COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the clinical, surgical, and educational activities of urology residents in Brazil. Urology residents reported >50% decrease in multiple surgical modalities. We highlight kidney transplantation surgeries (66.2%), minor surgeries (62.3%), endoscopic surgeries (42.6%) and reconstructive surgeries (38.8%). This could represent a critical skills gap that residents may face beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, PG students faced stressful situations that caused worsening of mental and physical health, such as getting redirected to assistance of COVID-19 patients (66.9%), and high rate of infection by SARS-CoV-2 (58.2%). The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the clinical, surgical, and educational activities of urology residents in Brazil. This could represent a critical skills gap that residents may face beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. PG students faced stressful situations that caused worsening of mental and physical health such as redirection to assistance of COVID-19 patients, concern about their own contamination and of family members.

Underrepresented Applicants Post-USMLE Pass/Fail: A National Survey of Competitive Residency Directors.

To report the selection criteria important to residency program directors (PDs) and whether they believe pass/fail scoring will impact underrepresented in medicine (URM), International Medical Graduate (IMG), or osteopathic (DO) residency applicants after the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) changed Step 1 score reporting to pass/fail in January 2022. A Qualtrics survey was sent between August 2022 and January 2023 to 1141 US PDs from specialties with traditionally low residency selection rates: dermatology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, interventional radiology, diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, thoracic surgery, vascular surgery, plastic surgery, and urology. Contact information was obtained from AMA, FRIEDA, or program websites. We received 433 responses (38%). When asked to anticipate the difficulty student groups will face matching into their specialty, PDs reported: for URM, 24.0% increased, 46.0% unchanged, and 30.0% decreased; for DO, 49.19% increased, 44.58% unchanged, and 6.23% decreased and for IMG, 56.35% increased, 39.72% unchanged, and 3.93% decreased. When asked to rank the most important selection factors, the top two responses were Step 2 CK score and away rotation participation at their site. PDs overwhelmingly believed residency selection difficulty would either increase or remain unchanged for DO (93.77%) and IMG (96.07%). In contrast, 76.0% reported difficulty for URM students would either decrease or remain unchanged. PDs ranked Step 2 CK score and away rotation participation as the most important selection factors. Despite PDs' belief that the Step 1 pass/fail scoring system may mitigate one barrier for URM students, emphasis on Step 2 CK and away rotations place additional barriers.

From the Desk of the Residency Program Director

From the Desk of the Residency Program Director

Financial Relationships in General Surgery Education: Recent Trends in Industry Payments to General Surgery Residency Leadership

Residency programs and their directors frequently receive funding from industry payers. Both general surgery residency program directors (PDs) and assistant program directors (APDs) receive industry funding for various reasons, including educational advancement. This study investigates recent trends in industry payments to both PDs and APDs to better understand the financial relationships among leaders in residency education. We compared industry payments to general surgery residency PDs and APDs from 2019 to 2021 utilizing the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) open payments database. In addition, secondary analyses were performed among PDs to assess differences based on gender, practicing surgical specialty, and geographical region. During the study period (2019-2021), PDs received payments amounting to 2,882,821 USD. PDs were found to receive more funding than APDs, with each receiving average funding of 10,045 vs. 323 USD (p < 0.01), respectively, over the study period. There was a significant decrease in total payments from 2019 to 2020 (1,512,190 vs. 868,811 USD; p < 0.01). Total payments made in 2021 were similar compared to 2020 (905,836 vs. 868,811 USD; p = 0.1). We found that male PDs received significantly more in-industry payments when compared to female PDs (11,702 USD per PD vs. 3971 USD per PD, p < 0.01). This study presents initial data that residency program leadership has robust biomedical industry relationships, and further research is warranted to investigate the impacts of these payments on program resources, educational opportunities for residents, and program outcomes. Male PDs received significantly more industry payments when compared to female PDs. Leaders in the surgical training community must cautiously ensure that these industry relationships are appropriately navigated.

Navigating obstacles: Perspectives of US pharmacy residency directors on non‐US candidates for PGY‐1 residencies: A survey‐based research

AbstractIntroductionPharmacy education and postgraduate training in the United States (US) are esteemed, drawing international students to American Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)‐accredited schools and pursuing residency training after graduation. Despite this, limited literature addresses the obstacles international students face in pursuing American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists (ASHP) accredited residency programs.ObjectivesTo summarize potential eligibility barriers for international graduates of ACPE programs during the residency application process from residency program directors' (RPDs) perspectives.MethodsA 16‐question electronic survey was developed and distributed to all RPDs of US‐based ASHP‐accredited postgraduate year‐1 (PGY‐1) programs in July 2021. Questions addressed whether non‐US citizens were eligible to apply, barriers to recruiting non‐US citizen candidates, and barriers to offer visa sponsorships. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.ResultsA total of 196 programs responded to the survey (response rate, 13.5%). Eighty‐nine (45.4%) programs reported that candidates with F‐1/optional practical training (OPT) status were eligible to apply for their program, while 86 programs (43.9%) reported candidates were not eligible. Barriers for recruiting candidates with F‐1/OPT status included lack of resources to support application process (n = 42), citizenship requirements (n = 41), institution policy (n = 33), department preference (n = 12), and unfamiliar with procedures in selecting these candidates (n = 18). Over 70% (n = 146) would not offer visa sponsorship for pharmacy resident positions. Barriers to offering sponsorship were lack of support resources (n = 62), cost (n = 60), time preparing applications (n = 46), citizenship requirements (n = 45), and department preference (n = 23).ConclusionThis study investigates the obstacles encountered by non‐US citizens in the residency application process, as perceived by program directors. The primary obstacle in recruiting candidates with F‐1/OPT status and providing visa sponsorships revolves around the inadequate support and resources available for the application process.

Positive perceptions of virtual didactics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of dermatology residents' satisfaction, perception of efficacy and preferences.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, resident didactics at many institutions, including ours, were transitioned from in-person to virtual. We aimed to examine dermatology residents' attitudes towards virtual didactics, assessing their satisfaction, impression of effectiveness and preference, along with factors correlating with these responses. An online questionnaire was administered to dermatology residents at our institution 3-6 months following the transition to virtual didactics. The response rate was 26 of 31 residents (84%). Of the 26 respondents, 20 (77%) expressed satisfaction, 15 (58%) effectiveness and 12 (46%) a preference towards virtual didactics. Factors associated with satisfaction included feeling that virtual didactics positively impacted learning retention, represented time well spent and utilized high-quality images. Perception of effectiveness correlated with using high-quality images, baseline preference for online instruction and feeling engaged. Factors associated with preference for virtual didactics included having opportunities for critical thinking, using high-quality images and utilizing images applicable to teledermatology care. Advantages of virtual didactics included convenience, decreased commuting and easily hosting guest lecturers. Disadvantages included distractions/decreased focus, reduced social interaction and difficulty with communication. Residents expressed satisfaction with, effectiveness of and some preference towards virtual didactics, which correlated with numerous factors relating to the learning environment, prior educational experiences and technology. Our findings suggest that it is reasonable to maintain a virtual didactic component as part of dermatology resident education. Furthermore, our data provide insights into strategies that residency programme directors and educators may consider when/if integrating virtual didactics into future educational curricula.

Current Utilization and Perceptions of Formal Education of Point-of-care Ultrasound in Urology

ObjectiveTo assess the extent of formal POCUS training, current utilization of POCUS, and contemporary perceptions of POCUS amongst urologists. MethodsA survey including questions regarding demographics, prior ultrasound education, current ultrasound utilization in practice/training, perceived optimal POCUS utilization, and the perception of formal ultrasound training was developed. The survey was disseminated to residency program directors (PDs) via the SAU and members of AUA sub-section organizations. Data was collected via Redcap. ResultsA total of 40 PDs and 159 other respondents completed the survey with approximately half (51%) in an academic practice and two-thirds (68%) with more than 10 years in practice. PD response rate was 28%, and general response rate was 2%. Among all respondents, 95% (186/196) and 82% (160/194) agreed/strongly agreed formal POCUS training would be worthwhile during and after residency. Among urology residency program directors, 93% (37/40) agreed/strongly agreed that formal POCUS training is worthwhile in residency. The majority of respondents used some form of ultrasound in practice (77%, 154/199). However, only 37% (72/199) of all respondents had prior formal POCUS training, and 19% (5/26) of program directors reported formal training in their programs. Of respondents without formal training, 63% (80/127) reported interest in pursuing formal training. ConclusionsPOCUS is widely utilized in many practices. Yet, most urologists have not participated in formal POCUS training and most programs do not have curricula. Urologists have favorable opinions of the utility, safety, and efficacy of POCUS and desire training.

The Financial Relationship Between the Medical Industry and Residency Leadership in OB/GYN and Urology.

Background Industry payments to physicians exceed millions of dollars. Payments can influence physicians' practices and potentially impact trainees. Objective To examine the magnitude of industry payments to obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) and urology residency directors and department chairs in the United States. Methods For this retrospective cross-sectional study, program directors and department chairs of OB/GYN and urology residency programs were identified in December 2021. Nonresearch payments between August 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020, from drug or device manufacturers to program directors and department chairs of OB/GYN and urology residency programs were compiled from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a linear mixed-effects model. Results A total of 19 903 payments, totaling $6,041,585, were provided to 396 physicians, with a median of $232.62 per physician over the 6 years analyzed. Urologists received more payments and higher amounts per payment than OB/GYNs (7820 vs 12 083, P<.01; $1,689,519.48 vs $4,352,066.40, P<.01). Department chairs received more payments per year than program directors (8 vs 4, P<.01). There were also geographic differences, with higher payments in the Northeast US region ($131.10 more, P<.01). Based on the linear mixed-effects model, 3 variables predicted the magnitude of industry payments received: physician age, number of years in leadership position, and geographic location. Conclusions Urologists and OB/GYN US residency program directors and department chairs received considerable nonresearch industry payments from 2013 to 2020.

Program Signaling in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate how obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors used applicant signaling and to understand how two tiers of signals influenced interviews, ranking, and matching into programs. A multimethod, deductive-sequential design was employed using a national survey of residency program directors and a convenience sampling of programs to study how obstetrics and gynecology program directors used program signals in the 2022-2023 residency-application cycle. A total of 80.5% (236/293) of program directors receiving the survey provided information about signaling, and 20 programs provided application outcome data for applicants who signaled them. The majority of program directors (86.9%) opted into signaling, 43.4% used signals as part of their initial screening, and 33.1% used it as a tiebreaker after reviewing applications, with 45.4% feeling it improved their ability to conduct a holistic review and 41.5% inviting applicants they may not have invited previously. Among programs providing applicant data, the influence of signals on the chances of an applicant being interviewed varied, but an overall strong positive effect of signaling was observed across the sample. The mean rank was 42 for gold signals, 45 for silver, and 38 for no signal (F(3)=5.97, P <.001). Signaling was widely used by programs and was an effective tool to allow applicants to communicate real interest in a program. Signaling was associated with an increased likelihood of an applicant's being interviewed but did not influence an applicant's position on the rank list.

National ABSITE Preparation Practices: A Survey of General Surgery Residency Program Directors

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) was designed as a low-stakes, medical knowledge examination for US general surgery residency programs. However, in practice, this exam has been utilized for higher stakes purposes, such as resident promotion or remediation, and fellowship selection. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ABSITE preparation resources, but best practices for ABSITE preparation and national preparatory habits are currently unknown. The aim of this work was to determine current residency programs' strategies for ABSITE preparation. We distributed an electronic survey to program directors or program coordinators of US general surgery programs asking them to anonymously report program ABSITE educational practices and ABSITE scores. We analyzed the proportion of responses using descriptive statistics and compared the effect of various strategies using the Mann-Whitney testing for nonparametric data. An average ABSITE percentile score was calculated for each residency based on program self-reported scores. Association of Program Directors (APDS) Listserv PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residency programs participating at the time of distribution (278). Response rate was 24% (66/278); 41 programs (62.1%) identified as university-affiliated, and 25 (37.9%) were community-based. Median intern class size was 8 (range: 3-14), including preliminary interns. Average ABSITE percentile score was 52.8% (range 36.9%-67.6%). There were no significant differences in ABSITE scores based on affiliation or program size. Educational resources utilized for ABSITE preparation included SCORE (89.3%), Q-banks (50%), and surgical textbooks (25.8%). The majority (56.1%) of programs reported using a year-long curriculum for ABSITE preparation, and 66.6% used a time-limited curriculum completed in the months immediately prior to ABSITE. Most programs reported that ABSITE scores were a low priority (63.6%) or not a priority (13.6%). The existence of a year-long curriculum for ABSITE was positively correlated with score as compared to programs without a year-long curricula (53.9% vs 48.5%, p <0.01). Programs using a time-limited curriculum demonstrated lower scores as compared to programs without time-limited curricula (51.3% v 56.1%, p < 0.01). General surgery programs use a variety of strategies to prepare residents for the ABSITE. Despite reporting that they utilize ABSITE scores for a variety of high stakes purposes including evaluation for promotion and as a predictor of the preparedness for the ABS QE, many programs reported that they consider ABSITE scores as a low priority. A year-long focused curriculum was the only strategy correlated with increased scores, which may reflect the value of encouraging consistent studying and spaced repetition. Additional work is needed to guide programs in optimal utilization of ABSITE scores for remediation and resident evaluation, as well as understanding how ABSITE preparatory strategies correlate with clinical performance.

Women physicians in academic pathology leadership.

To evaluate the gender composition of departmental chairs and program leadership of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pathology residencies and American Board of Pathology-certified subspecialty fellowships across the United States. In this cross-sectional analysis, we examined the gender of individuals holding leadership positions in academic pathology in the United States. Using publicly available online data, 2 authors independently coded perceived gender (ie, man/woman/other) with 100% concordance. In 144 pathology residency programs, more women hold residency program director positions (52.1% [75/144]). Among 11 pathology subspecialties, women overall hold fewer fellowship program director positions (45.0% [212/471]). Among the residency-associated pathology department chair positions identified, women hold fewer positions (31.8% [42/132]). There is some geographic variation in pathology leadership gender composition when stratified using US Census regions. Women in academic pathology departments are well represented in residency and overall fellowship program leadership but are underrepresented in department chair and certain pathology subspecialty leadership positions. The disproportionate number of women in department chair positions is observed across medical specialties, highlighting the need for improved gender equity among high-level academic medicine positions.

Assessment of Longitudinal Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Programs in Preparing Pharmacy Students for Residency Training

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) pharmacy residents felt more prepared for residency training after having completed a Longitudinal Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (LAPPE) program during pharmacy school. MethodsThis was a multicenter, two-arm, cross-sectional study among PGY-1 pharmacy residents. The primary outcome was self-reported residency preparedness. Secondary outcomes included self-reported competency in key indicators for success during early residency and matching with a preferred residency program. A survey was developed to obtain these data and was sent via email to all residency program directors of qualifying programs, who then redistributed it to PGY-1 residents in their respective programs. ResultsA total of 960 PGY-1 residents were included in the study. Of these, 180 (19%) reported prior participation in a LAPPE program. Longitudinal Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience participants reported increased preparedness for residency training as compared to nonparticipants (mean 6.18 vs 5.72 on a 7-point Likert scale; difference 0.46, 95% CI 0.309–0.618). Longitudinal Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience participation was also associated with greater self-reported clinical knowledge and skills (mean 5.18 vs 4.95, difference 0.23, 95% CI 0.093–0.372). Self-reported matching with a preferred residency program was common and similar between cohorts. ConclusionPostgraduate year 1 residents who had completed a LAPPE felt better prepared for residency than those who had not completed a LAPPE. Prior LAPPE participation was also associated with greater self-reported clinical knowledge and skills at the start of residency training.

Perception and Comfort with Endometriosis Management Among OB/GYN Residents.

The diagnosis of endometriosis often takes several years, delaying appropriate care while patients suffer from pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Understanding whether residents in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) are being adequately exposed to and trained in the diagnosis and management of the disease is important for improving care. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of OB/GYN residents to investigate their comfort level and familiarity with endometriosis diagnosis and management. Residency program directors and coordinators of 20 OB/GYN residency programs in California, USA were emailed to disseminate the 31-question, anonymous survey in January to February 2023. Responses were collected using Redcap and analysis was conducted using STATA. 67 residents answered at least one non-demographic question and were included. A resident response rate was not calculated because we were unable to determine how many programs distributed the survey. 84% of residents felt they could recognise symptoms of endometriosis but over 30% of senior residents were not comfortable with sonographic diagnosis of endometrioma. Approximately one third of residents felt comfortable managing hypoestrogenic symptoms, osteoporotic risks, and add-back progestin for certain hormonal therapies. Academic-hospital based residents had significantly more exposure to attendings prescribing long-acting reversible contraception, GnRH antagonists, and GnRH agonists but there were no significant differences in trainee prescribing practices or comfort. More respondents would feel comfortable medically managing endometriosis (52%) than surgically managing the disease (26%) if they were in practice today, with only 39% of PGY3-4 residents feeling comfortable surgically managing endometriosis. There is considerable room for improvement in the education of residents in the diagnosis and medical and surgical management of endometriosis.

Evaluation of Teaching Activities Completed by PGY2 Pharmacy Residents at Colleges of Pharmacy.

Evaluating PGY2 pharmacy residency programs and their academic opportunities is crucial for developing future clinician-educators and advancing pharmacy education. There is a lack of newer data available on residency programs' teaching activities and older studies are limited by timely survey instruments and low response rates. The objective of this project was to describe teaching responsibilities among PGY2 pharmacy residents nationwide using a short, electronic survey. A survey consisting of ten multiple-choice questions was emailed to residency program directors to assess the teaching and precepting responsibilities of PGY2 and PGY1/PGY2 combined pharmacy residents across the country. The survey was converted to an online form using QualtricsXM and had an estimated completion time of 2min. Data was reviewed and analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 292 out of 594 PGY2 or PGY1/PGY2 combined pharmacy residency program directors responded to the survey (49% response rate), with the majority of programs being ASHP-accredited. Only 13% of PGY2 residency programs surveyed did not have their residents complete a didactic lecture at a college of the pharmacy and 50% of programs have their residents facilitate labs or recitations at colleges of pharmacy. Sixty-eight percent of programs have their residents serve as the primary preceptor for experiential rotations. The majority of PGY2 pharmacy residency programs include teaching opportunities. Continuous efforts are needed to increase teaching opportunities for PGY2 residents to help fill vacant academic positions with qualified academicians.