Residency Application Research Articles

Changing Perceptions About the Dermatology Residency Application Process Among Applicants and Program Directors: 2020-2022.

Importance Over the last two years, dermatology has undergone significant reforms in the residency application process in efforts to reduce applicant stress, increase equity, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective We aimed to determine applicant and program director (PD) perspectives in implementing these changes over the last two application cycles. Design, setting, and participants Anonymous online surveys were administered by theAssociation of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to PDs and applicants from the 2021-2022 dermatology residency application cycle. These results were compared with similar online surveys distributed after the 2020-2021 cycle. Results Coordinated interview release was introduced in the 2020-2021 dermatology application cycle. At that time, 57% of PDs and 84% of applicants wished that more programs participated in the release, compared to 53% and 84%, respectively, in the 2021-2022 cycle. In 2021, 28% of PDs reported matching applicants from their home institution higher on their list compared to 14% in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, 94% of PDs reported that diversity was an explicit goal in their application process. However, in 2021, 33% of PDs reported that they matched no UIMs (underrepresented in medicine) in their cohort, which grew to 39% in 2022. Conclusions This study identifies key trends in applicant and PD perspectives associated with changes in the application process such as coordinated interview release, virtual interviews, and emphasis on diversity. Additional data is needed from subsequent cycles in order to determine the efficacy of these reforms.

819 Pre-residency Research Output Amongst U.S. Neurological Surgery Residents

INTRODUCTION: Research productivity is often used in evaluating candidates for neurosurgery residency. Official Match data report successful candidates have on average ∼25 pre-residency research products; however, average number of indexed publications, the highest-valued research product, is not reported separate from other research products. METHODS: A list of all US neurosurgery residents who successfully matched between 2017-2021 was generated and narrowed to US MD seniors who applied to the authors’ institution. Each resident’s pre-residency publication quantity was extracted using Scopus. Additional variables were extracted from residency applications. RESULTS: 93.2% of all matched neurosurgery applicants from 2017 through 2021 were captured. Distribution of publication quantity was right skewed. Mean ± SD total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications for applicants who matched in 2021 were 8.1 ± 10.0, 6.6 ± 8.7, and 2.3 ± 3.8 respectively. Median (IQR) total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications were 5.0 (2.0, 11.0), 4.0 (1.5, 9.0), and 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in average total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author publications from 2017 to 2021 (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent, positive association between class year and publication quantity (1.07 (0.71-1.42), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Indexed publications constitute a small portion of total research products successful neurosurgery candidates apply with. A high number of publications is not necessary to match with approximately 50% of all applicants who successfully matched having fewer than five publications and 25% having fewer than two. That said, average pre-residency publication quantity is increasing over time at a rate of approximately one publication per year.

322 A Cost Analysis of Medical Students Applying to Neurological Surgery Residency: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database

INTRODUCTION: Medical Students applying to competitive residencies such as neurosurgery incur substantial costs associated with interviews, away rotations, and application fees. Researchers in the past have examined the sources of expenses during the residency application cycle, but few studies have compared the expenses prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The TEXAS STAR database was surveyed for applicants of neurosurgical residency programs during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) and post-pandemic (2022). In total, 66 applicants for the 2021 application cycle and 50 applicants for the 2022 application cycle completed the survey. We compared the application fees, away rotations cost, interview cost, and total expenses as reported by the neurosurgery applicants of the 2021 and 2022 application cycle. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for data normality, and a Mann-Whitney U-Test was used to compare costs during the 2021 and 2022 neurosurgery application cycle. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in total expenses in 2021 vs 2022 ($3,934 vs $9,860). Interview expenses and away rotation expenses were also decreased in 2021 vs 2022 (interview expenses $786 vs $4511, away rotation $1,083 vs $3,000, p < 0.001). Application fee expenses were not different between the 2021 and 2022 application cycle. Regional stratification revealed the greatest reduction in cost, an $11,908 savings, in the South region for the year of 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in the total fees associated with the neurosurgical residency application. The use of virtual platforms in place of in-person interviews could lessen the financial burden on applicants and alleviate socioeconomic barriers in the neurosurgical application process even after COVID-19.

814 Results and Opinions on the Implementation of a Preference Signaling System in Neurosurgical Residency Applications

INTRODUCTION: The 2022-2023 neurosurgery residency application cycle employed an optional preference signaling system that indicated a focused interest in a particular program. During this first iteration, applicants could signal interest in up to eight participating programs. METHODS: A survey consisting of 28 questions pertaining to the signaling process was distributed via email to all neurosurgery applicants participating in the 2022-2023 cycle. Results were compiled, and descriptive statistics were used to generate results. RESULTS: Of the 361 total applicants, 82 (22.7%) completed the survey; 84.1% attend a US MD program, 1.2% a DO program, 12.2% are international medical graduates, and 2.4% are post-graduates. The mean number of programs applied to was 78 (range 21-116 (all). The median number of interviews received was 17 (range 0 to 57). Notably, 14.6% of individuals signaled their home programs, and 63.4% signaled at least one externship program. 90.2% of applicants utilized all eight signals. Applicants averaged 3.5 interviews from programs they signaled, and 15.6% of applicants matched at a program they signaled. Sixty-five percent of applicants were unsatisfied with the application process, but 53.1% indicated preference signaling should continue. Regarding the number of available signals, 43.75% felt eight was appropriate, 32.5% felt it was too few, 13.75% thought it was too many, and 10% were indifferent. CONCLUSIONS: Preference signaling was implemented in the 2022-2023 applicant cycle to improve interview efficiency and equity. Applicant opinions were mixed about this first iteration. Two consistently noted themes were the desire for improved home and away rotation signaling standardization and the perceived lack of impact on match outcome.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Situational Judgment Testing Among Applicants to an Anesthesiology Residency Program.

Background The Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics (CASPer) is a situational judgment test (SJT) that assesses noncognitive skills like professionalism, communication, and empathy. There are no reports of the effects of race/ethnicity and sex on CASPer scores among residency applicants. Objective We examined the effects of race/ethnicity, sex, and United States vs international medical school attendance on CASPer performance. Methods Our anesthesiology residency program required all applicants for the 2021-2022 Match cycle to complete an online video and text-based SJT (CASPer). We compared these results, reported as z-scores, with self-identified race/ethnicity, sex, United States vs international medical school attendance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores. Results Of the 1245 applicants who completed CASPer, 783 identified as male. The racial/ethnic distribution was 512 White, 412 Asian, 106 Black, 126 Hispanic, and 89 Other/No Answer. CASPer z-scores did not differ by sex. White candidates scored higher than Black (0.18 vs -0.57, P<.001) and Hispanic (0.18 vs -0.52, P<.001) candidates. Applicants attending US medical schools scored higher than those attending international medical schools (z-scores: 0.15 vs -0.68, P<.001). There was no correlation between CASPer z-scores and USMLE Step 1 scores. Conclusions Our results suggest that CASPer scores favor White applicants over Black and Hispanic ones and applicants attending US medical schools over those attending international medical schools.

210 Defining the Learning Curve for Cerebral Angiography Using a Novel Web-Based Feedback Application and Head-Mounted Video Review

INTRODUCTION: The milestones that a resident or fellow should reach to achieve competence in cerebral angiography have yet to be defined. METHODS: Two neurosurgical residents were given a written knowledge exam before and after rotating on the endovascular service. Cerebral angiography diagnostic and treatment cases were prospectively collected in a novel web-based, multi-institutional feedback application. These residents performed cerebral angiography cases under graduated supervision while wearing head-mounted cameras for subsequent review with direct feedback. Residents and reviewers independently utilized CaseCurve, a novel neurosurgical resident performance tracking application, as a platform for performance rating. Numerical scores were assigned ranging from 1 (novice) to 5 (masterful) in the following categories: access, catheter navigation, table operation, closure, efficiency, finesse, angiographic interpretation, and catheter knowledge. The number of times the supervising surgeon had to take over the case was recorded. Arch anatomy and vessel tortuosity were graded. Operative videos were analyzed for operator inefficiencies and time metrics for sheath insertion and target vessel selection. Angiographic efficiency was assessed with fluoroscopic doses/times and procedural durations. RESULTS: Both residents demonstrated improvement in cognitive performance as measured by written assessment scores. Significant improvements were observed in technical performance as measured by numerical scores assigned by self-evaluation, faculty review, objective measures of angiographic efficiency, and the number of times the supervising surgeon had to take over the procedure. Concordance between faculty and resident self-evaluations was 74.2%, with residents underestimating their performance in 21% and overestimating in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant educational value for the trainer and trainee offered by our novel web-based feedback application and head-mounted video review. This data allows for accurate assessments of skill acquisition and delineation of appropriate milestones/learning categories for trainees in endovascular neurosurgery.

Preference Signaling in the Orthopaedic Surgery Match: Applicant and Residency Program Attitudes, Behaviors, and Outcomes.

The orthopaedic surgery match has experienced a consistent increase in both the number of applicants and applications submitted per applicant. Preference signaling was implemented during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle in part to curtail the rising application burden on both applicants and residency programs. Our aim was to explore the impact of the preference signaling system on applicant and residency program leader attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes. We distributed surveys to American Orthopaedic Association/Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors member program leaders (program directors, assistant program directors, and program coordinators) and applicants registered for the Electronic Standardized Letter of Recommendation after Universal Interview Offer Day 2022 (Fall Survey) and Match Day 2023 (Spring Survey). The surveys contained multiple-choice and numeric response questions on attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes that were analyzed and reported as percentages and medians, respectively. Open-text responses were reviewed for dominant themes. One hundred program leaders and 378 applicants (47%) completed the Fall Survey, and 146 program leaders and 290 applicants (36%) completed the Spring Survey. A majority of applicants (71%) and program leadership (91%) support the continued use of signaling. Applicants reported a 16% reduction in the number of programs to which they applied. Program directors largely used signaling as a tool for screening applications (75%), with few programs using signaling in the ranking process (20%). Applicants reported that 81% of their interviews were from programs they signaled. Slightly more than half of programs (53%) reported filling their last slot at a higher rank order position than the average of the previous 5 years. Qualitative analysis suggests a need for more transparency in the use of signals, consideration of application and/or interview caps, and reconsideration of the other components of the application. Preference signaling in the orthopaedic surgery match was met with positive feedback and led to a reduction in the number of applications. Future research will examine the continued impact of preference signaling and assess alterations for optimizing the match process.

Predicting academic productivity among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons fellowship faculty from publications acquired before and during surgical training

Orthopedic residency and fellowship applicants with a strong research record are highly valued for their potential in continuing academic excellence. Despite this, the association between research productivity during training and future academic productivity as an attending orthopedic surgeon is not well-established. We assess the effects of research output during different periods of surgical training as well as residency location on long-term academic productivity as an attending shoulder and elbow surgeon. A search of the 2022-2023 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Fellowship Directory was conducted to identify a list of orthopedic shoulder and elbow fellowship faculty members. Each surgeon's residency, fellowship and current institution of practice were determined and stratified by geographic location. Total publication counts acquired before residency, during residency, during fellowship, and after fellowship were collected for each faculty member. Attending publication rates and H-indices were calculated. A multivariate linear regression model was created, and significance was set at a P value <.05. A total of 149 shoulder and elbow fellowship faculty members representing 34 fellowship programs were identified. The average number of total publications per surgeon was 88.8±102. The average attending publication rate was 5.29±6.89 publications per year. The average H-index for included surgeons was 27.8±24.4. The number of publications acquired before residency (β=0.293; P<.001), during residency (β=0.110; P=.025) and during fellowship (β=0.593; P<.001) were significantly associated with an increased attending publication rate, but no association was observed with the H-index [before residency (β=-0.221; P=.574), during residency (β=0.045; P=.866), during fellowship (β=0.198; P=.678)]. There were no significant differences in total publication count (P=.397), attending publication rate (P=.237), or H-index (P=.364) based on location of residency training. Research output before and during surgical training is predictive of continued academic productivity as a shoulder and elbow surgeon. In particular, greater productivity during surgical fellowship was most predictive of academic output as an attending. While long-term academic productivity does not seem to be influenced by the geographic location of residency training, attending surgeons practicing in the Midwest had significantly greater total publication counts and H-indices but similar annual publication rates.

Osteopathic Students Have Decreased Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with Allopathic Students.

Orthopaedic surgery continues to be one of the most competitive specialties to match into as a medical student, particularly for osteopathic medical students. Therefore, in this study, we sought to examine the prevalence of osteopathic students (DO) matching into orthopaedic surgery at traditional Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited programs (former allopathic residency programs) in recent years. A retrospective review of National Residency Match Program annual reports and Association of American Medical Colleges's Electronic Residency Application Service Statistic reports were performed to determine the number of applications and match rates among osteopathic (DO) and allopathic (MD) medical students into orthopaedic surgery from 2019 to 2023. Data on the degree type of current residents at all ACGME-accredited residency programs were identified. During the analyzed study period of 2019 to 2023, there were 3,473 (74.5%) allopathic students and 571 (59.9%) osteopathic students who successfully matched into orthopaedic surgery. This match rate for allopathic students was 74.5% compared with 59.9% for osteopathic students. Of the 3,506 medical students who hold postgraduate orthopaedic surgery positions at former allopathic programs over the past 5 years, only 58 (1.7%) hold an osteopathic degree. Of the 560 medical students who hold postgraduate orthopaedic surgery positions at former osteopathic programs over the past 5 years, 47 (8.4%) hold an allopathic degree. The match rate of allopathic students at former osteopathic programs is significantly higher than the match rate of osteopathic students at former allopathic programs. Osteopathic students continue to match into orthopaedic surgery at lower rates than their allopathic counterparts. In addition, there remains a consistent and low number of osteopathic students matching into former allopathic programs. Allopathic students also have a higher likelihood of matching into former osteopathic programs when compared with osteopathic students matching into previous allopathic orthopaedic surgery programs.

815 Gender Parity in Neurosurgery Residencies: An Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The number of women graduating from U.S. medical schools has reached parity with that of men. However, persistent inequalities and barriers have made the pace towards equity in application and representation in neurosurgery residency slow despite initiatives to increase female representation. METHODS: Data on the number of active female neurosurgery residents and female applicants to neurosurgery was collected from the American Council of Graduation Medical Education Data Resource Book from 2007 to 2021 and Electronic Residency Application Service from 2014 to 2022, respectively. Bivariate linear regression analysis was used to predict percent of active female residents based on academic year (AY). Pearson Chi-squared was conducted to determine the odds ratio of a female applicant to neurosurgery. RESULTS: The percent of active female residents in neurosurgery increased from 11.0% in 2007 to 21.8% in 2021. Bivariate linear regression analysis using AY as predictor of percent of active females was statistically significant. On average, the percent of active female residents increases by 0.65% per year. If trends persist, parity in neurosurgery will not be reached until 2069. Linear regression analysis of the overall rate of attrition in neurosurgery as a predictor of percent of active female residents revealed that for every 1% increase in rate of attrition the percent of active female residents decreases between 1.4% to 4.4%. The percent of female applicants to neurosurgery increased from 19.6% in 2014 to 29.8% in 2022, yet the odds of a female applying to neurosurgery remains low. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgery continues to struggle with recruitment of female medical students, despite achievement of parity for female medical school matriculants. Greater effort is needed to recruit and retain female applicants to neurosurgery, including increased transparency in match and attrition metrics.

Editorial Comment on “Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail”

Editorial Comment on “Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail”

The Impact of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Transitioning To Pass/Fail on Medical Student Perception of Research Needed to Match Into One's Preferred Specialty.

Purpose To evaluate how the transition of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a pass/fail scoring influenced medical student perceptions of the importance of research required to match into their preferred residency specialty. Methods A 14-item survey was distributed by e-mail to medical students at one medical school in the southeastern United States in November of 2021. Responses were compared between medical students taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail in the future and medical students taking USMLE Step 1 for a three-digit score. Results A total of 168 medical students responded to the survey with 98 respondents who planned on taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail (45 first-year medical students (MS1) and 53 MS2) and 70 respondents who took USMLE Step 1 for a numerical score (37 MS3and 33 MS4). There were no differences in how each cohort scored the level of importance of research in matching into their preferred residency specialty (p=0.10); however, those taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail believe an average of 4.6 research experiences are necessary to match into their preferred residency, compared to only 3.4 research experiences for those who took it for a numerical score (p=0.04). Conclusion No statistically significant difference in the perceived importance of research in matching into one's preferred residency specialty was found between cohorts. However, the pass/fail cohort believes they will need more research experiences to match their chosen specialty than the numerical score cohort. Results could indicate that students participate in more research and extracurricular activities to be more competitive for residency applications.

103 Parental Occupation and Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Implications on Educational Debt, Scholarships, Medical School Ranking, and Resulting Match Rates

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Parental SES may influence the trajectory of students applying to orthopaedic surgery residency, perpetuating opportunistic disparities. Thus, we sought to examine the relationship between parental occupation/education and applicant match rate, education financing, and medical school background. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) documented parental occupation and education levels of 10,697 orthopedics applicants from 2011 to 2021. Parental occupations were categorized into physician vs non-physician, healthcare vs non-healthcare, working class vs non-working class, and STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, Medicine) vs non-STEMM. Parental education levels spanned from no college degree to doctorate degrees and were used as a proxy for SES. Outcomes analyzed included match success, premedical and medical school debt, total educational debt, scholarships, and representation from top 40 research medical schools as determined by NIH funding. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Physician parent applicants (20.1%) had better match rates (75.5% vs. 73.5%), lower debts, lesser scholarships, and higher top 40 school representation. Healthcare parent applicants (37.0%) had similar match rates, less debt and scholarships. Working class parent applicants (6.0%) had more debt and scholarships. STEMM parent applicants (48.6%) had higher match rates, lesser debts and scholarships, and higher top 40 representation. Applicants with parents without college degrees had lower match rates (68.6% vs 74.5%), more debt and scholarships. Doctorate parent applicants had better match success (75.9% vs 72.9%), lesser debts, and higher top 40 school representation (34.9% vs 29.6%). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Parental SES was associated with substantial variation in applicant financial burden and educational pedigree. Notably, applicants with parents lacking degrees had lower match rates, underscoring the need for supportive strategies to ensure equitable opportunities for aspiring orthopaedic surgeons.

Vascular In-person for Students In the match Trial: An investigation of postinterview site visits to address the limitations of virtual interviews

PurposeThe graduate medical education community implemented virtual residency interviews in response to travel restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this approach has persisted. Although many residency applicants wish to visit in-person prospective training sites, such opportunities could bias programs toward those who are able to meet this financial burden, exacerbating equity concerns. One proposed solution is to offer applicants the opportunity to visit only after a program’s rank list is “locked,” avoiding favoritism to applicants who visit, but allowing applicants to experience some of the camaraderie, geography, and local effects of an in-person visit. As debate about the optimal format of residency interviews continues, it is important to investigate whether in-person program visits, completed after program rank list certification, provide meaningful benefits to applicants in the residency match process. MethodsAll vascular programs entering the 2023 integrated vascular surgery residency match were invited to participate. Programs agreed to certify their National Resident Matching Program rank lists by February 1, 2023. Applicants then had the opportunity to visit the programs at which they interviewed. The particulars of the visit were determined by the individual programs. Applicants completed their standard rank list and locked on the standard date: March 1, 2023. Applicants then completed a survey regarding the impact of the visits on their rank order list decision-making. Program directors (PDs) completed a survey regarding their experiences as well. Data were collected using REDCap. ResultsTwenty-one of the 74 (28%) programs participated. Nineteen PDs completed the postinterview site visit survey (response rate 90%). Applicants interviewing at the participating programs (n = 112) were informed of the study, offered the opportunity to attend postinterview site visits, and received the survey. Forty-seven applicants responded (response rate 42%). Eighty-six percent of applicants stated that the visit impacted their rank list. Most important factors were esprit de corps of the program (86%), the faculty/trainees/staff (81%), and the physical setting (62%). Seventy-one percent of those participating spent ≤$800 on their visit. Eighty-one percent were satisfied with the process. Twenty-one percent of PDs would have changed their rank list if they could have based on the applicants’ in-person visit. Sixty-three percent of the visit sessions cost the programs ≤$500, and 63% were satisfied with the process. ConclusionsThis study is the first to document the impact of in-person site visits by applicants on a graduate medical education match process in one specialty. Our results suggest that this process provides meaningful data to applicants that helped them with their decision-making evidenced by most altering their rank lists, while avoiding some of the critical equity issues that accompany traditional in-person interviews. This may provide a model for future interview processes for residency programs.

Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades

BackgroundMedical school clerkship grades are used to evaluate orthopedic surgery residency applicants, however, high interinstitutional variability in grade distribution calls into question the utility of clerkship grades when evaluating applicants from different medical schools. This study aims to evaluate the variability in grade distribution among medical schools and look for trends in grade distribution over recent years. MethodsApplications submitted to Rush University's orthopedic surgery residency program from 2015, 2019, and 2022 were collected from the Electronic Residency Application Service. Applications from the top 100 schools according to the 2023–2024 U.S. News and World Report Research Rankings were reviewed. The percentage of “honors” grades awarded by medical schools for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships were extracted from applicants' Medical Student Performance Evaluation letters. ResultsThe median percentage of honors given in 2022 was 36.0 % (range 10.0–82.0) for the surgery clerkship and 33.0 % (range 6.7–80.0) for the internal medicine clerkship. Honors were given 6.6 % more in the surgery clerkship in 2022 compared to 2015. There was a negative correlation between a higher (worse) U.S. News and World Report research ranking and the percentage of honors awarded in 2022 for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships. ConclusionThere is substantial interinstitutional variability in the rate that medical schools award an “honors” grade with evidence of grade inflation in the surgery clerkship. Residency programs using clerkship grades to compare applicants should do so cautiously provided the variability demonstrated in this study.

Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study

Rooted in economics market strategies, preference signaling was introduced to the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) in 2022 for integrated plastic surgery residency applicants. This study surveyed program and applicant experience with preference signaling and assessed how preference signals influenced likelihood of interview invitations. Two online surveys were designed and distributed to all program directors and 2022-2023 applicants to integrated plastic surgery. Opinions regarding the utility of preference signaling were solicited, and the influence of preference signals on likelihood of interview offers was assessed. All integrated plastic surgery programs. All 88 program directors and 2022-2023 applicants to integrated plastic surgery. A total of 45 programs and 99 applicants completed the survey (response rates, 54.2% and 34.2%, respectively). Overall, 79.6% of applicants and 68.9% of programs reported that preference signals were a useful addition to the application cycle. Programs reported that 41.4% of students who sent preference signals received interview offers, compared to 84.6% of home students, 64.8% of away rotators, and 7.1% of other applicants; overall, students who signaled were 5.8 times more likely to receive an interview offer compared to students who were not home students and did not rotate or signal. After multivariable adjustment, programs with higher Doximity rankings, numbers of away rotators, and numbers of integrated residents per year received more preference signals (all p < 0.05). Applicants and programs report that preference signaling was a useful addition to the integrated plastic surgery application cycle. Sending preference signals resulted in a higher likelihood of interview offers among nonrotators. Preference signaling may be a useful tool to reduce congestion in the integrated plastic surgery application cycle.

Characteristics of Residency Applicants Choosing Virtual versus In Person Interviews

Characteristics of Residency Applicants Choosing Virtual versus In Person Interviews

A Qualitative Study of the Underrepresented in Emergency Medicine Resident Application Experience

A Qualitative Study of the Underrepresented in Emergency Medicine Resident Application Experience

Program Directors' Perspectives on Residency Applications in the Post‒United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Era: A Case for Standardized Letters of Recommendation?

The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 test evolved into a key metric utilized by program directors (PDs) in assessing candidates for residency. The transition to a USMLE Step 1 binary pass/fail scoring system has resulted in a loss of an important objective assessment. With national movements toward pass/fail systems for clerkship grading and trends toward abandonment of class ranking, assessing residency applications has become increasingly challenging. The Society of Academic Urologists convened a task force to, in part, assess the perspectives of urology PDs regarding the importance of various aspects of a residency application for predicting clinical performance. An anonymous survey was disseminated to all urology PDs in the US. Perspectives on 11 potential application predictors of clinical performance and demographics were recorded. Descriptive statistics characterized PD responses. Friedman test and pairwise Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate the relative ranks assigned to application elements by PDs. There was a 60.5% response rate (89/147). Letters of recommendation (LORs) were ranked as the most important predictor, with a mean rank of 2.39, median of 2 (IQR 1-3). Clerkship grades and USMLE Step 1 were comparable and ranked second. Medical school reputation ranked the lowest. There was significant subjective heterogeneity among categories; however, this was less so for LORs, which predominated as the most important factor among application elements (P < .001). To our knowledge, this is the largest sample size assessing PD perspectives on application factors that predict clinical performance. The second (clerkship grades) and third (USLME Step 1) most important factors moving toward binary pass/fail systems create an opportunity for actionable change to improve assessment objectivity. Our data demonstrate LORs to be the most important factor of residency applications, making a compelling argument for moving toward a standardized LOR to maximize this tool, mitigate bias, and improve interreviewer reliability.

A Study on Pre-clinical Anaesthesia Elective in Shaping Medical Students&amp;apos; Knowledge and Career Perspectives

Anesthesiology stands out as one of the rapidly growing and highly competitive medical specialties, necessitating students to cultivate an interest in anesthesia early and prepare extensively for clinical electives. Pre-clinical electives that introduce students to anesthesia and ready them for clinical settings in the early stages of their academic journey may confer benefits and enhance their competitiveness as residency applicants. This study implemented an eight-week pre-clinical elective titled &amp;quot;The History of Anesthesia&amp;quot; for first- and second-year students at Baylor College of Medicine. Eighty-eight students participated in the elective, with thirteen completing both pre-course and post-course surveys. The survey, consisting of thirteen questions related to anesthesia interest and relevant clinical knowledge, was analyzed, and statistical significance was calculated. The survey results demonstrated significantly elevated levels of self-assessed knowledge in the post-course survey compared to the pre-course survey (p &amp;lt; .05). Notably, topics considered more clinically relevant, such as modern anesthetic techniques, regional anesthesia, and obstetric anesthesia, exhibited significantly higher average survey results in the post-course compared to the pre-course results. The implementation of pre-clinical electives focusing on success in clinical settings appears beneficial for students aspiring to apply to an anesthesiology residency. Institutions should consider exposing students to anesthetic topics earlier in their academic journey to adequately prepare them for the competitive residency application process.