You have accessJournal of UrologyBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Surgical Therapy and New Technology (I)1 Apr 20131967 SMALL RESECTED PROSTATE WEIGHT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A HIGHER REOPERATION RATE FOLLOWING TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE íV A STUDY ON 33905 PATIENTS Alex Tong Long Lin, Chih Chieh Lin, Hsiao Jen Chung, Eric Yi Hsiu Huang, Kuang Kuo Chen, and Tzeng Zi Chen Alex Tong Long LinAlex Tong Long Lin Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author , Chih Chieh LinChih Chieh Lin Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author , Hsiao Jen ChungHsiao Jen Chung Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author , Eric Yi Hsiu HuangEric Yi Hsiu Huang Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author , Kuang Kuo ChenKuang Kuo Chen Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author , and Tzeng Zi ChenTzeng Zi Chen Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.2386AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a well accepted procedure for relieving prostate obstruction to improve lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS). We conducted this nation-wide study to investigate as if the resected prostate weight is a predictive factor for reoperation of TURP, transurethral incision of bladder neck (TUIBN), and urethrotomy. METHODS The subset of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan contains data of all medical benefit claims and covers most Taiwan populations. According to the ICD codes-9, all patients with diagnostic codes, 600.X-602.X, and received TURP from 2006 to 2009. All patients with genitourinary cancers before TURP were excluded. The patients were excluded if the diagnosis of prostate cancer was recorded in one month after TURP. Owing to different benefit claims for different resected prostate weight, we could subdivide patients into three subgroups, small group (< 15 grams), medium group (15∼50 grams), large group (>50 grams). After first TURP, we recorded the incident rate and interval to following procedures. The relative risk between groups was further compared. RESULTS Among the total population of 22.8 millions, 33905 patients received TURP. The patient's number of each subgroups were 14511 (42.8%) in small group, 16487 (48.6%) in medium group, and 2907 (8.6%) in large group. The patients' number of reoperation in each subgroup (small, medium, large) were 663 (4.6%), 452 (2.7%), 90 (3.1%), respectively. The patients' number of receiving TUIBN in each subgroup were 183 (1.3%), 86 (0.5%), 5 (0.2%). The patients' number of receiving urethrotomy in each subgroup were 696(4.8%), 459 (2.8%), 63 (2.2%). The mean intervals of first TURP to reoperation of TURP, TUIBN, and urethrotomy were 1.39, 1.09, and 1.02 years, respectively. Relative risk of further surgical procedures after first TURP between each subgroup was detailed in the table 1. In the table, smaller group revealed higher risk to receive further surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS This study found that a smaller resected weight could be a predictive factor for further procedures, reoperation, TUIBN, and urethrotomy after TURP. It's necessary to strictly evaluate the indication of TURP for patients with a smaller prostate. Table 1. The relative risk between groups was further compared by logistic regression model Odds Ratio 95% CI p value Reoperation Small v.s. Large 1.4 1.2-1.8 0.002 Medium v.s. Large 0.9 0.7-1.1 0.23 TUIBN Small v.s. Large 6.7 2.8-16.4 < 0.001 Medium v.s. Large 2.9 1.2-7.2 0.02 Urethrotomy Small v.s. Large 2.2 1.7-2.9 < 0.001 Medium v.s. Large 1.3 1.0-1.7 0.07 Adjust with demography Factors: age, urbanized level, geographic location © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e807-e808 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Alex Tong Long Lin Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Chih Chieh Lin Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Hsiao Jen Chung Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Eric Yi Hsiu Huang Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Kuang Kuo Chen Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Tzeng Zi Chen Taipei, Taiwan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract