Resected Lung Cancer Research Articles

Impact of smoking on resected lung cancer depends on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

Smokers comprise the majority of surgical patients with primary lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-negative status impacts the treatment of recurrence. However, the prognostic impact of cigarette smoking stratified by EGFR mutation status has not been reported. Therefore, we assessed its impact on patients with resected lung cancer. We retrospectively analysed 362 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for stage 1 primary lung cancer at our institution between 2012 and 2021. The EGFR mutation status was evaluated using the real-time polymerase chain reaction. We compared the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without a history of smoking. The EGFR mutation-negative group included 194 patients, of whom 160 (83%) had a history of smoking. Male sex (P < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (P < 0.01) and adenocarcinoma (P < 0.01) showed significant differences between the groups. In the EGFR mutation-positive group, the 5-year OS and DFS were similar regardless of smoking status (OS: 86% vs 75%; DFS: 73% vs 73%). In the EGFR mutation-negative group, the 5-year OS and DFS were significantly poorer in the smoking group (OS: 87% vs 65%, P = 0.05; DFS: 84% vs 54%, P = 0.01). Deaths from other diseases were relatively high (n = 19, 53%). Cigarette smoking may be associated with a poor prognosis in EGFR mutation-negative lung cancer but had no impact on the prognosis of the EGFR mutation-positive group. This finding underscores the potential influence of smoking on the treatment of lung cancer recurrence but also highlights its significance in contributing to death from other diseases.

Risk factors for enhanced recovery after surgery failure in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with concomitant cardiovascular disease: A single-center retrospective study

ObjectiveEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease. MethodsIn total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (n = 152) and ERAS failure group (n = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure. ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; P = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure. ConclusionsOperation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.

CtDNA-Lung-DETECT: ctDNA outcomes for resected early stage non-small cell lung cancers at 12 months.

8018 Background: ctDNA Lung DETECT is a multicentre investigator initiated prospective study at 3 thoracic surgery centres in the Greater Toronto Area assessing ctDNA detection and association with recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCT05254782). Patients who have ctDNA detected perioperatively are offered ctDNA Lung RCT, a randomized trial investigating the benefit of adjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients where the standard of care is observation alone after surgery (NCT04966663). Herein, we report on ctDNA outcomes at 12 months for patients with resected early stage NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage I (T1-2N0) or multifocal T3-4 &lt; 4cm N0 NSCLC planned for resection at University Health Network consented to plasma ctDNA assessment before and after surgery, and at 12 months post-operatively or relapse using the tumor-informed RaDaR® assay, which detects up to 48 tumor-specific variants in plasma with a Limit of Detection (LoD₉₅) of 0.0011% variant allele fraction. Results: From July 2021 to January 2024, 178 patients were enrolled; 115 had sufficient tissue for assessment. Of these, 68/72 patients have 12 month post-resection ctDNA results available (3 withdrew, 1 sample failed). ctDNA was detected pre-operatively in 18 patients; 99% (71/72) had ctDNA clearance post-operatively, and 93% (62/67) remained ctDNA negative at 12 months. Median follow up time was 18.7 months (range 12.0– 28.3); 8/72 (11%) patients (5 stage I, 3 stage II) experienced lung cancer recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 13.9 months (range 6.2- 24.9). Of these, 3 had ctDNA detected on their preoperative and 12-month or recurrence sample, 1 had ctDNA detected at 12 months prior to relapse, 1 had ctDNA detected at 12 months and recurred around the same time, 2 had negative ctDNA samples and 1 missed sample collection preoperatively. The recurrence rate was 16.7% (3/18, 95% exact CI 3.6-41.4%) in patients with ctDNA detected pre-operatively vs. 7.5% (4/53, CI 2.1-18.2%) in those without. New lung cancers were diagnosed in 5/72 (median time to new primary 15.3 months, range 4.9-14.2) and 2/72 patients had new cancers diagnosed (ovarian/liposarcoma). For those with new lung primaries, 1 had ctDNA detected preoperatively but none had ctDNA detected at time of new primary diagnosis. Of 4 patients who have died, 2 were from recurrent lung cancer and 2 from new primaries (lung/sarcoma). Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest prospective cohorts of ctDNA kinetics in patients with resected lung cancer. Of patients with at least 12 months follow up, 8/72 experienced a lung cancer recurrence with a higher rate in those with pre-operative ctDNA detected (16.7% vs 7.5%). Pre-operative ctDNA detection may help identify patients with resected stage I NSCLC that could benefit from treatment intensification, currently under study in ctDNA Lung RCT (NCT04966663). Clinical trial information: NCT05254782 .

Impacts of Positive Margins and Surgical Extent on Outcomes After Early-Stage Lung Cancer Resection

BackgroundSublobar resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly considered appropriate but may compromise margins compared with lobectomy. This study evaluated resection extent, margin status, and survival in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. MethodsPatients with clinical T1-2 N0 M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (2006-2020) who were treated with primary surgery were compared stratified by margin status. The potential benefit of radiation was explored in subgroup analysis of patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins. ResultsPositive margins occurred in 5089 (2.8%) of 181,824 patients and were more common in sublobar resections compared with lobectomy (4.3% vs 2.4%; P < .001). Sublobar resection had the strongest association with positive margins in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.91-2.23; P < .001). Patients with positive margins were more likely to undergo both adjuvant chemotherapy (16% vs 13%; P < .001) and radiation (17% vs 1%; P < .001) but had worse survival in univariate analysis (44.0% 5-year overall survival vs 69.2%; P < .001) and multivariable Cox analysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.63-1.78; P < .001) in the entire cohort, as well as in a univariate subset analysis of lobectomy (46.9% vs 70.4%; P < .001) and sublobar resection (37.5% vs 64.1%; P < .001). Postoperative radiation for patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins did not improve 5-year overall survival (36.3% for irradiated patients vs 38.3% for nonirradiated patients; P = .57), and patients who underwent sublobar resection with positive margins who were treated with radiation had survival inferior to that of patients who underwent lobectomy with negative margins. ConclusionsPositive margins occur more frequently after sublobar resection of clinical stage I NSCLC compared with lobectomy. Patients with positive margins have worse survival than patients who undergo complete resection and are not rescued by postoperative radiation.

Tumor mutation burden and FAT3 mutation influence long-term survival in surgically resected small cell lung cancer.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly malignant and has a higher risk of recurrence even in patients who undergo early surgery. However, a subgroup of patients survived for many years. So far, the factors that determine the long-term survivorship remain largely unknown. To determine the genetic characteristics of long-term survival (LTS) after surgery in SCLC, we performed comprehensive comparative genomic profiling and tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis of resected tumor tissues from patients with LTS and short-term survival (STS) after surgery. The present study screened 11 patients from 52 patients with SCLC who underwent surgery at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from April 2008 to December 2017. A total of six LTS patients (≥4 years) with stage IIB or IIIA SCLC and five STS patients (<2 years) with stage IA or IB SCLC were included in the study. The STS patients were used as a control. All the patients underwent resection without neoadjuvant therapy. We assessed the genomic profiles of the resected tumor tissues and calculated the TMB using next-generation sequencing. We then analyzed and compared the molecular characteristics between the LTS and STS groups. Our data indicated that tumor tissues from patients with LTS harbor a high TMB. The median TMB for LTS patients was high (approximately 16.4 mutations/Mb), while that for STS patients was low (approximately 8.5 mutations/Mb). The median TMB of patients with LTS and STS showed a trend of significant difference (P=0.08). Gene alterations characterized the survival differences between the two groups. The FAT3 mutation was only found in the LTS group, and the P value determined by Fisher's exact test was 0.06. A high non-synonymous TMB and the FAT3 mutation could potentially influence LTS after SCLC resection. This study provides valuable information about the molecular differences between LTS and STS patients. Studies with larger sample sizes need to be conducted to confirm our findings in the future.

Assessing quality of care in early stage resected stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing and adjuvant (adj) therapy (tx).

8072 Background: In December 2020, the FDA approved the use of osimertinib in the treatment of stage IB-IIIA (ES) NSCLC patients (pts) with EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations (EGRFm) following tumor resection. Using real-world data, we sought to understand EGFR testing rates among ES pts and whether pts received osimertinib in the adjuvant setting based on EGFRm. Methods: We used the Integra Connect PrecisionQ real-world de-identified database of over 3 million cancer pts across 500 sites of care. From this database, we identified Stage IB – IIIA pts evaluated via medical chart curation who underwent lung cancer resection (R) between 12/1/2021 to 7/31/2023 (N = 803). We assessed adj treatment by stage, EGFR testing rates overall and by stage, EGFR testing rates by adjuvant treatment and non-adj treatment pts, timing of EGFR testing, and treatment rates with an EGFR TKI among EGFRm pts. Descriptive analyses were used and proportions were compared using a chi-squared test. Results: The mean age of the 803 ES R pts in the sample was 69 (SD = 8.3), 53.3% of the pts were female, , and 12% never smoked. We found adj treatment rates among ES R pts to be 56%; these were highest among stage IIIA (N = 245) pts at 70.2%, compared to stage IIB (N = 241) at 68.8%, stage IIA (N = 69) at 53.6% and stage IB (N = 240) at 31.7% (p &lt; 0.001). Among ES R pts, 70% (N = 563) were tested for EGFR; this rate was 78% (N = 455) among ES pts who were R and received adj treatment, compared to 59% (N = 348) among ES R pts who did not receive adj treatment (p &lt; 0.001). EGFR testing rates were highest among stage IIB pts at 76%, compared to stage IIIA pts at 73%, stage IIA pts at 72%, and stage IB pts at 60% (p &lt; .001). Among ES pts who were R and tested for EGFR (N = 563), 14% were tested before surgery, 38% were tested after surgery but before adj treatment, and 48% were tested after initiating adjuvant therapy. EGFRm was found in 10.4% of EGFR tested pts. Among EGFRm ES R pts (N = 59), 54% were treated with an EGFR TKI. EGFRm ES R pts treated with an adj EGFR TKI were highest among stage IIB pts (N = 14) at 93%, compared to stage IIA pts (N = 5) at 60%, stage IB pts (N = 20) at 45%, and stage IIIA pts (N = 20) at 35% (p &lt; 0.01). However, only 69% (N = 41) of EGFRm ES R pts received adj treatment (either chemotherapy or EGFR TKI) and among those pts, 78% (N = 32) received an EGFR TKI. Conclusions: Based on our findings using real-world data for EGFR testing and adjuvant osimertinib use, and in light of the published results from the ADAURA trial which showed disease free survival benefit (HR 0.2) and overall survival benefit (HR 0.49) of adjuvant osimertinib in ES NSCLC, we have identified an opportunity to improve patient outcomes following resection of ES NSCLC by increasing EGFR testing and encouraging treatment with EGFR TKI in exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutated pts.

Adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy in early and locally advanced resectable lung cancer: expanding treatment tentacles?

Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has been the main treatment following surgical resection with curative intent in early and locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) albeit with a 5% improvement in 5-year survival rates. Recent advances in biomarkers pave the way for targeted treatments and immunotherapy in a broader spectrum of patients with subsequently improved clinical outcomes. Targeted treatments and immunotherapy have established their place in the adjuvant setting of resected NSCLC.

A secure and light‐weight patient survival prediction in Internet of Medical Things framework

SummaryThoracic surgeries in major lung resections for primary lung cancer are fraught with potential risks, emphasising the need to understand factors contributing to postoperative mortality. This study investigates the interplay of objective and subjective data in predicting postoperative outcomes to reduce data transmission costs in the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). Objective metrics, such as forced vital capacity (FVC), offer consistent, quantifiable insights essential for predictive modelling. Conversely, subjective data derived from patient self‐reports suggest that the patient's personal experiences are crucial for assessing the quality of life postsurgery. Utilising a dataset from the University of California, Irvine's Machine Learning Repository (UCI), 17 distinct attributes were examined. Using ensemble learning classifiers, the extra trees classifier is superior when utilising all features, achieving an accuracy of 0.92. Combining select subjective features, specifically PRE6, PRE8 and AGE (demographic), with objective data, yielded a comparable accuracy of 0.91. Feature importance analysis further highlights the significance of features like PRE5, PRE4 and AGE. This suggests potential redundancies in the full feature set, emphasising the importance of feature selection. Importantly, when compared with existing literature, this study's findings offer insights into the future of predictive modelling in thoracic surgeries, with implications for the rapidly evolving field of the IoMT.

The risk analysis index is an independent predictor of outcomes after lung cancer resection.

The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a frailty assessment tool based on an accumulation of deficits model. We mapped RAI to data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database to determine whether RAI correlates with postoperative outcomes following lung cancer resection. This was a national database retrospective observational study based on data from the STS Database. Study patients underwent surgery 2018 to 2020. RAI was divided into four increasing risk categories. The associations between RAI and each of postoperative complications and administrative outcomes were examined using logistic regression models. We also compared the performance of RAI to established risk indices (American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) using areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). Results: Of 29,420 candidate patients identified in the STS Database, RAI could be calculated for 22,848 (78%). Almost all outcome categories exhibited a progressive increase in marginal probability as RAI increased. On multivariable analyses, RAI was significantly associated with an incremental pattern with almost all outcomes. ROC analyses for RAI demonstrated "good" AUC values for mortality (0.785; 0.748) and discharge location (0.791), but only "fair" values for all other outcome categories (0.618 to 0.690). RAI performed similarly to ASA and CCI in terms of AUC score categories. RAI is associated with clinical and administrative outcomes following lung cancer resection. However, its overall accuracy as a surgical risk predictor is only moderate and similar to ASA and CCI. We do not recommend routine use of RAI for assessment of individual patient risk for major lung resection.

Outcomes of Resected Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening and Incidental Pulmonary Nodule Programs in a Mississippi Delta Cohort

IntroductionEarly lung cancer detection programs improve surgical resection rates and survival but may skew toward more indolent cancers. MethodsHypothesizing that differences in stage-stratified survival indicate differences in biological aggressiveness and possible length-time and overdiagnosis bias, we assessed a cohort who had curative-intent resection, categorized by diagnostic pathways: screening, incidental pulmonary nodule program, and non–program based. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox regression, comparing aggregate and stage-stratified survival across cohorts with Tukey’s method for multiple testing. ResultsOf 1588 patients, 111 patients (7%), 357 patients (22.5%), and 1120 patients (70.5%) were diagnosed through screening, pulmonary nodule, and non–program-based pathways; 0% versus 9% versus 6% were older than 80 years (p = 0.0048); 17%, 23%, and 24% had a Charlson Comorbidity score greater than or equal to 2 (p = 0.0143); 7%, 6%, and 9% had lepidic adenocarcinoma; 26%, 31%, and 34% had poorly or undifferentiated tumors (p = 0.1544); and 93%, 87%, and 77% had clinical stage I (p < 0.0001).Aggregate 5-year survival was 87%, 72%, and 65% (p = 0.0009), including 95%, 74%, and 74% for pathologic stage I. Adjusted pairwise comparisons showed similar survival in screening and nodule program cohorts (p = 0.9905). Nevertheless, differences were significant between screening and non–program-based cohorts (p = 0.0007, adjusted hazard ratio 0.33 [95% confidence interval: 0.18–0.6]) and between nodule and nonprogram cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.99]). Stage I comparisons yielded p = 0.2256, 0.1131, and 0.911. In respective pathways, 0%, 2%, and 2% of patients with stage I disease who were older than 80 years had a Charlson score greater than or equal to 2 (p = 0.3849). ConclusionsNeither length-time nor overdiagnosis bias was evident in NSCLC diagnosed through screening or incidental pulmonary nodule programs.

Pre-Operative Measures of Systemic Inflammation Predict Survival After Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer

BackgroundMeasures of systemic inflammation (MSIs) have been developed and shown to help predict prognosis in patients with lung cancer. However, studies investigating the impact of MSIs on outcomes solely in cohorts of patients undergoing curative-intent resection of NSCLC are lacking. In the era of individualized therapies, targeting inflammatory pathways could represent a novel addition to the armamentarium of lung cancer treatment. MethodsA multicentre retrospective review of patients who underwent primary lung cancer resection between 2012 and 2018 was undertaken. MSIs assessed were neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and haemoglobin albumin lymphocyte platelet (HALP) score. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of MSIs on overall survival. ResultsA total of 5029 patients were included in the study. Overall 90-day mortality was 3.7% (n = 185). All MSIs were significantly associated with overall survival on univariable analysis. After multivariable Cox regression analyses, lower ALI (expressed as a continuous variable) (HR 1.000, 95% CI 1.000-1.000, P = .049) and ALI <366.43 (expressed as a dichotomous variable) (HR 1.362, 95% CI 1.137-1.631, P < .001) remained independently associated with reduced overall survival. ConclusionsMSIs have emerged in this study as potentially important factors associated with survival following lung resection for NSCLC with curative intent. In particular, ALI has emerged as independently associated with long-term outcomes. The role of MSIs in the clinical management of patients with primary lung cancer requires further investigation.

Variations in Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis Practices: Do the Guidelines Need a Closer Look?

BackgroundIn 2022, the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published joint guidelines regarding the timing, duration, and choice of agent for perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for thoracic cancer patients. Now, 1 year after their release, we looked to assess practices and general adherence to these recommendations. MethodsWe conducted a survey among board-certified/board-eligible thoracic surgeons in the United States, between July and October 2023. ResultsA total of 103 board-certified thoracic surgeons responded to the survey. Over half of the surgeons reported using preoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis routinely for lobectomy/sublobar resections (56.3%), pneumonectomy/extended lung resections (64.1%), and esophagectomy (67%). Over two thirds of thoracic surgeons limited the duration of postoperative chemical thromboprophylaxis to the patient’s length of hospital stay and never administered chemoprophylaxis post-discharge. Among surgeons who always continued chemical thromboprophylaxis post-discharge, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most commonly used agent (>70%), followed by direct oral anticoagulants (13.8%-16.7%). Only 33.3% of surgeons prescribing post-discharge chemical thromboprophylaxis after lobectomy/sublobar resections continued prophylaxis up to 4 weeks postoperatively. ConclusionsContrary to the 2022 joint AATS/ESTS guidelines, the majority of surveyed thoracic surgeons in the United States do not routinely prescribe postoperative thromboprophylaxis after lung and esophageal cancer resections. The dogma of routine extended thromboprophylaxis must be reevaluated as modern minimally invasive thoracic surgery allows for very earlier ambulation and enhanced recovery. There is a need for randomized controlled trials exploring the utility of extended thromboprophylaxis and newer agents such as direct oral anticoagulants.

Revolutionizing Localized Lung Cancer Treatment: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Immunotherapy for All?

Lung cancer poses a significant public health challenge, with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing 20 to 25% of all NSCLC cases, staged between I and IIIA. Despite surgical interventions, patient survival remains unsatisfactory, with approximately 50% mortality within 5 years across early stages. While perioperative chemotherapy offers some benefit, outcomes vary. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are imperative to improve patient survival. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy emerges as a promising avenue. In this review, we explore studies demonstrating the benefits of this combination therapy, its impact on surgical procedures, and patient quality of life. However, challenges persist, particularly for patients failing to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR), those with stage II lung cancer, and individuals with specific genetic mutations. Additionally, identifying predictive biomarkers remains challenging. Nevertheless, the integration of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the preoperative setting presents a new paradigm in managing resectable lung cancer, heralding more effective and personalized treatments for patients.

Association Between Utilization of Services and Perioperative Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resection

IntroductionLung cancer resection has largely focused on perioperative outcomes (eg, mortality) to benchmark performance. While variations in perioperative outcomes and in utilization of services (eg, ambulatory procedures, hospitalization) have been independently demonstrated, there has been limited evaluation of associations between these outcomes. We evaluated the association between perioperative outcomes and utilization of services to evaluate provider performance across a broader context of care. Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection in 2017 to 2019. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk- and reliability-adjusted mortality and risk-adjusted utilization of services, at the hospital-level. We then evaluated utilization of services across quartiles of perioperative mortality. ResultsA total of 15,168 patients across 297 hospitals underwent lung cancer resection. Mean risk- and reliability-adjusted 90-day mortality varied between 1.58% (95% CI, 1.54%-1.62%) and 2.74% (95% CI, 2.59%-2.90%) across quartiles. Risk-adjusted utilization of all ambulatory procedures was highest in the best performing (lowest mortality) quartile at 37.7% (95% CI, 33.6%-41.8%). Additionally, risk-adjusted inpatient utilization prior to and after surgery was lowest in the best performing quartile at 15% (95% CI, 13.7%-16.3%) and 19.3% (95% CI, 17.5%-21.0%), respectively. ConclusionsHospitals with the lowest perioperative mortality demonstrated trends towards using more outpatient resources prior to surgery, but fewer inpatient services surrounding lung cancer resection. This correlation highlights the importance of incorporating utilization of services in addition to other metrics to profile the efficiency and effectiveness of centers performing lung cancer resection across a broader spectrum of care.

Prognostic implication of consolidation-to-tumor ratio in early lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

The threshold value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) for distinguishing between ground-glass opacity (GGO)-predominant and solid-predominant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) needs to be clarified, as the lack of clarity has caused the prognostic implications to remain ambiguous. This study aimed to determine the threshold value of CTR for distinguishing between GGO-predominant GGNs and solid-predominant GGNs and elucidate the prognostic implications of the solid-predominant GGNs categorized by CTR on c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Between January 2016 and October 2018, 764 c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma cases were assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Of the 764 lesions, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were solid nodules (SNs) on thin-section computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the correlation of the 3-dimensional (3D) consolidation component volume ratio with CTR based on the coefficient of determination, r. After receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of 515 GGNs, we defined the nodule with CTR >0.750 as solid-predominant GGN and the nodule with CTR ≤0.750 as GGO-predominant GGN. Subsequently, the prognosis of 439 patients who had follow-up registration was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was employed to compare survival rates among different groups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among 764 patients, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were SNs on thin-section CT. For 515 GGNs, the 3D consolidation component volume ratio correlated well with CTR (r=0.888). CTR tended to be slightly larger than the 3D consolidation component volume ratio. A 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% was best predicted by CTR >0.750, followed by CTR >0.549. CTR >0.750 and CTR >0.549 predicted 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% with 85% and 99.2% sensitivity and 91.6% and 57.2% specificity, respectively. The 5-year RFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with 0.750< CTR <1 were worse than those of patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) but better than those of patients with CTR =1 (P=0.002 and P=0.03, respectively). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >2.1 [hazard ratio (HR) =12.516, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.729-90.598], CTR >0.750 (HR =13.934, 95% CI: 3.341-58.123), larger consolidation component size with diameter more than 20 mm (HR =1.855, 95% CI: 1.242-2.770), poorly differentiated (HR =1.622, 95% CI: 1.056-2.491), lymph node metastasis (HR =2.473, 95% CI: 1.601-3.821), and sublobar resection (HR =2.596, 95% CI: 1.701-3.962) could predict the poor prognosis. Patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 receiving sublobar resection had prognoses comparable to those receiving lobar resection, whether the tumor size ≤2 cm or consolidation component size ≤3 cm. Lobar resection was superior to sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm with CTR >0.750. Compared to CTR =0.5, the 2-dimensional (2D) CTR =0.750 found using the 3D consolidation component volume ratio as the gold standard better differentiated between solid-predominant GGNs and GGO-predominant GGNs. CTR >0.750 was an independent risk factor associated with the poor prognosis of patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Sublobar resection should be cautiously adopted in GGNs with 0.750< CTR ≤1.

Impact and Durability of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Lung Cancer Treatment

BackgroundMedicaid expansion began in 2014 after passage of the Affordable Care Act; however, the impact and durability of the effects on lung cancer treatment utilization are poorly defined. We aimed to determine whether there is a persistent difference in utilization of lung resection, lung biopsy, and nonoperative treatment of lung cancer in states participating in Medicaid expansion compared with states that are not. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was completed analyzing the difference in utilization between Medicaid expansion states and non-expansion states in 2012-2013, 2016-2017, and 2019. Patients diagnosed with and treated for lung cancer in the states of North Carolina and Florida (non-expansion states) and Maryland and New Jersey (expansion states) were included. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used. ResultsIn the immediate postexpansion period (2016-2017), DID analysis revealed increased utilization in expansion states with an adjusted DID of 0.50 lung resections/100,000 persons (P = .002) and an adjusted DID of 0.76 lung biopsies/100,000 persons (P = .001). A persistent increase in utilization was found in the delayed postexpansion period (2019), with an adjusted DID of 0.51 lung resections/100,000 persons (P = .008) and an adjusted DID of 0.84 lung biopsies/100,000 persons (P = .021). No significant difference between groups was observed in the utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemotherapy. ConclusionsIn our cohort, Medicaid expansion was associated with increased utilization of procedural care for the management of lung cancer, including percutaneous biopsies and surgical resection.

Pulmonary blastoma: A rare, unexpected diagnosis mimicking hydatid cyst on radiology

Pulmonary blastomas (PB) are rare, aggressive tumours which constitute &lt;0.1% of resected lung cancers. The fifth edition of WHO classification of thoracic tumors categorises them under sarcomatoid carcinomas along with pleomorphic carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. PBs are large and aggressive tumors that portend a poor prognosis with limited response to standard chemotherapy and chiefly occur in the fourth to fifth decade of life. Here, we present a unique case of a PB with extensive cystic degeneration in a young female, mimicking a hydatid cyst.

Applying ICF Framework to Explore the Factors That Influence Quality of Life in Patients After Lung Surgery.

To explore the relationship between pulmonary function, physical activity, and health-related quality of life (QoL) in resected lung cancer patients based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework developed by the World Health Organization to describe health and health-related states. A quantitative study was designed with postoperative lung cancer survivors to assess personal characteristics. We also assessed functional impairment related to the lung using forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1), activity limitations using maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), anaerobic threshold (AT) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and participation restriction using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey V1 (SF-36). Data analyses were conducted using the multivariate method and Smart- PLS to examine path coefficient among the measures. Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. FVC and FEV1 were poorly correlated with QoL, and 6MWD, AT, or VO2max were positively associated with QoL. AT or VO2max showed a significant (p<0.01) direct path with SF-36 in the ICF model. Although age and body mass index were not strongly correlated with QoL, these personal factors had a medium to large effect on perceived QoL. Disability is a complex in patients with lung resection, and physical activity plays an important role in enabling participation. Improving VO2max and AT is needed to improve the QoL of resected lung cancer patients. We should also pay more attention to contextual factors that have a significant impact on social participation.

Comparative efficacy of prophylactic protocols in reducing perioperative nausea and vomiting during video-assisted thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer

Lung cancer, a global mortality leader, often necessitates Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery. However, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, highlighting a need for effective management and prevention strategies in this context. A retrospective case–control study at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital evaluated patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer between May and September 2022. Patients were categorized based on PONV prevention methods, and data encompassing demographics, surgical history, and postoperative adverse events s were analyzed to assess the association between prophylactic protocols and PONV incidence. The Netupitant and Palonosetron Hydrochloride (NEPA) group showed a significant reduction in PONV occurrences post-surgery compared to Ondansetron (ONDA) and Control groups, emphasizing NEPA’s efficacy in alleviating PONV symptoms (P < 0.05). Furthermore, following VATS radical resection of lung cancer, NEPA markedly reduced the intensity of PONV symptoms in patients. Both univariate and multivariate logistic analyses corroborated that NEPA independently reduces PONV risk, with its protective effect also apparent in susceptible populations like females and non-smokers. NEPA utilization markedly reduced both the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing VATS radical resection of lung cancer, serving as an independent protective factor in mitigating PONV risk post-surgery.

Pathological Pleural Invasion is a Risk Factor for Late Recurrence in Long-Term Survivors of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Complete Resection.

Information regarding late recurrence after pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for late recurrence after surgery for NSCLC in the current era. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent complete resection for pathological I-III NSCLC between 2006 and 2015. Late recurrence was defined as a recurrence that met the following conditions: (1) the patient underwent chest computed tomography (CT) at or after 54 months after surgery and recurrence was not detected at that time, and (2) recurrence that occurred more than 5 years after surgery. The factors influencing late recurrence, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) after surgery were analyzed. A total of 1275 with 5-year relapse-free survival after surgery were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 66.4 years and 54% of the patients were men. The median interval between surgery and the latest follow-up examination was 98 months. In total, 35 patients (2.7%) experienced late recurrence and 138 patients have died thus far. The cumulative recurrence, RFS, and OS rates at 10 years were 3.9%, 84.9%, and 86.3%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that pleural invasion was an independent risk factor for late recurrence. Pleural invasion was a poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS. Pleural invasion was a predictor of late recurrence. Age>67 years, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)>5 ng/ml, non-adenocarcinoma, and pleural invasion were poor prognostic factors for RFS.