Colectomy Research Articles

SP3.6 - Do non-colorectal surgeons produce an inferior lymph node yield in emergency colorectal cancer resections?

Abstract Introduction Lymph node yield is a surrogate indicator of adequate resection and yields of 20 or more have been shown to be associated with better survival outcomes. There is controversy as to whether colorectal cancers should be operated on by non-colorectal surgeons in the emergency setting. This study explores whether there are differences in lymph node yield between colorectal and non-colorectal surgeons in the context of emergency Hartmann's procedures performed for malignancy. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at a 3-site Trust in South East England between 2012 and 2022. Theatre and Info flex Cancer records were used to obtain patients who had undergone a Hartmann's procedure for malignancy and their operating surgeon. The histology reports were then reviewed and statistical analysis was undertaken. Results 346 patients were included in the study, in a 197:149 male-to-female ratio. The mean age was 73 (28-92 IQR). Histology confirmed malignancy in all the study participants. 11% (38/346) of the operations were conducted by non-colorectal surgeons (UGI, Breast, and Endocrine). The mean lymph node yield for the non-colorectal surgeons was 28 (24-33 IQR). The mean lymph node yield for colorectal surgeons was 29 (26-34 IQR). There was no statistical difference between the lymph node yield between colorectal and non-colorectal surgeons (p=0.671) Conclusion The study concluded that adequate oncological colonic resections could be conducted safely by non-colorectal surgeons in emergency settings.

WP2.16 - Hartman’s Reversal; A comparison of conventional vs minimally invasive surgical approach

Abstract Background Hartman’s procedure is a safe operation for emergency colonic resections. Hartman’s reversal, however, is a technically challenging operation with high morbidity. Hence, almost half of the patients choose to live with lifelong stoma. Hartman’s reversal can be done open or laparoscopic, with single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) as an emerging minimally invasive technique. We will discuss the different surgical techniques along with their results and challenges. Methods This is a single centre retrospective study done at District General Hospital. All the Hartman’s reversals done between July 2021 to July 2023 were included in the study. Demographics, primary disease, interval between primary operation and reversal, post-operative complications and hospital stay was calculated. Results A total number of 19 Hartman’s reversal operations were done between July 2021 to July 2023. Average age of the patients was 61.8 years. The pathology was cancer in 7 patients and 12 cases were benign. The average interval between Hartman’s procedure and reversal was 23.2 months. Only 3 (15.7%) patients had a co-morbid. Out of 19 Hartman’s reversals done, 11 (57.89%) were done open, 5 (26.3%) SILS, 1 (5.2%) laparoscopic, and 2 (10.5%) laparoscopic converted to open. The complication rate in open cases was 61.5% vs 33.33% in laparoscopic/SILS. Average length of stay (LOS) was 10.38 days in open vs 9.19 days in laparoscopic group. Conclusion The limitations of this study are single centre and low sample size. The length of stay is slightly better in minimally invasive group, and much better post-operative outcomes. We suggest a multicentre study can help establish more reliable results.

MOY 1 - The Emergency General Surgeon: what should their future operative role be, and how can an EGS post be more attractive?

Abstract Aims Determine the desired future operative role of dedicated Emergency General Surgery (EGS) surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI), and how to improve the attractiveness of an EGS post. Methods A live interactive online survey, designed and endorsed by ASGBI, was completed by attendees at two ASGBI conferences in 2023. The study was conducted according to CHERRIES and exempt from REC according to HRA. Consent was obtained from study participants, who were asked using a Likert scale which operations a dedicated EGS surgeon should perform and how an EGS post could be more attractive. Results The survey was completed by 156/371 eligible participants, of which 132 responses were analysed once duplicate responses (n=16), and non-UK/ROI respondents (n=8), were excluded. Participants included consultants (34%), surgical trainees (42%), and other doctors (23%), 61% were male and 39% were female, aged between 25 and 69. Respondents stated the desired future operative role of EGS surgeons included most EGS operations, including for torso trauma. Few believed EGS surgeons should perform emergency colonic resection for cancer (49%) or inflammatory bowel disease (37%), gastric volvulus (34%), bariatric complications (26%), or Boerhaaves (28%). The vast majority agreed that EGS posts could be improved by including elective general and subspecialty operating lists, continuing professional development, minimally-invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) opportunities, rest days post-on-call, family-friendly hours, EGS ambulatory and follow-up clinics, and major trauma responsibility. Conclusions EGS surgeons should operate on the majority of EGS patients. Job plans that include elective operating, professional development, and patient follow-up may improve recruitment and retention.

WP4.19 - The Emergency General Surgeon: what is their current operative role?

Abstract Aims Determine the current operative role of dedicated Emergency General Surgery (EGS) surgeons in the United Kingdom (UK) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). Methods A live interactive online survey, designed and endorsed by ASGBI, was completed by attendees at two ASGBI conferences in 2023. The study was conducted according to CHERRIES and exempt from REC according to HRA. Consent was obtained from study participants, who were asked which surgeons usually perform the most common EGS operations in their hospital. Results The survey was completed by 156/371 eligible participants, of which 132 responses were analysed once duplicate responses (n=16), and non-UK/ROI respondents (n=8), were excluded. Participants included consultants (34%), surgical trainees (42%), and other doctors (23%), 61% were male and 39% were female, aged between 25 and 69. The general surgeon on-call – or a dedicated EGS surgeon, where such service exists – operates on the majority of EGS pathology through an un-selected take. A surgeon with the relevant sub-specialty interest usually operates on emergency non-traumatic complex upper gastrointestinal or colorectal pathology. These include emergency colonic resections for cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, and operations for gastric volvulus, bariatric complications, and Boerhaaves. Acute cholecystectomy forms a major part of a dedicated EGS surgeon’s practice. Conclusions Dedicated EGS surgeons deliver a wide variety of operations, in addition to the peri-operative management of acute surgical patients. Future curriculum design and NHS workforce planning should reflect this service delivery pattern, should EGS become a recognised specialty interest.

A case of resected anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas producing granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with literature review

BackgroundGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-producing tumors have been reported in various organs, and the prognosis of patients with G-CSF-producing pancreatic cancers is particularly dismal. In this report, we present a case of G-CSF-producing anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas (ACP), characterized by early postoperative recurrence and rapid, uncontrolled growth.Case presentationA 74-year-old man presented to our hospital with complaints of abdominal fullness and pain after eating. On admission, it was observed that the peripheral leukocyte counts and serum G-CSF levels were significantly elevated (23,770/µL and 251 pg/mL, respectively). Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a pancreatic head tumor involving the superior mesenteric vein. Pathologically, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration confirmed ACP. Subsequently, we performed a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein reconstruction and partial transverse colon resection. On postoperative day (POD) 7, the leukocyte count decreased from 21,180/μL to 8490/μL; moreover, computed tomography revealed liver metastasis. Therefore, mFOLFILINOX chemotherapy was initiated on POD 30. However, the tumor exhibited rapid progression, and the patient died on POD 45.ConclusionsG-CSF-producing ACP is rare, and the prognosis of patients is extremely poor. Basic research is required to develop effective drugs against G-CSF-producing tumors, and large-scale studies using national databases are needed to develop multidisciplinary treatment methods.

Adverse tissue reactions to ORISE gel during endoscopic mucosal resection and dissection

BackgroundSubmucosal injection of lifting agents (LAs) is frequently used to facilitate endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. ORISE (Boston Scientific Corporation) gel, approved in 2018 by the United States Food and Drug Administration, has been commonly used until recently. Its use proliferated because of its practical prefilled syringe, prolonged lift effect, and ideal coloration. However, it has been noted to cause unexpected tissue reactions, described as “giant cell reaction” (GCR), which can obscure macroscopic and microscopic views, potentially interfering with pathologic evaluation. This study aimed to describe the adverse effects of ORISE gel. MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed pathologic specimens from all consecutive patients who received ORISE injections for attempted polyp removal and subsequently underwent segmental colon resection at our center between 2019 and 2022. A descriptive analysis was performed. ResultsA total of 45 patients were included, of whom 17 (38.0%) were female and the median age was 66 years. The indications for surgery included adenocarcinoma in 14 patients (31%), suspected malignancy in 3 patients (7%) who had benign GCR-induced masses, and other indications in 28 patients, such as large polyps or recurrent polyps after initial endoscopic treatment. Surgical procedures included right hemicolectomy (44%), low anterior resection (13%), left colectomy (11%), sigmoidectomy (7%), and abdominoperineal resection (4%). Histologic evidence of previous LA injection was seen in 31 patients (69%), with 24 patients exhibiting GCR. At final pathology, no residual neoplasm was found in 9 patients (18%); however, 14 patients (31%) had adenocarcinoma (T1 [7], T2 [3], T3 [3], and T4 [1]). ConclusionORISE gel interacts with various tissue layers of the colon, frequently resulting in GCR. This reaction and the potential subsequent mass effect formation can affect decision-making regarding the management of complex colorectal lesions. Further study into the causes and consequences of LA tissue reactions is warranted.

Incidence of rectal cancer after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: nationwide study.

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia. A particular problem arises in patients who have undergone subtotal colectomy leaving a rectal remnant. The risk of future rectal cancer must be accurately estimated and weighed against the risks of further surgery or surveillance. The aim of this study was to estimate the 10-year cumulative incidence of rectal cancer in such patients. A nationwide study using England's hospital administrative data was performed. A cohort of patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between April 2002 and March 2014 was identified. A competing risks survival analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative incidence of rectal cancer. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on endoscopic surveillance was investigated using time-trend analysis. A total of 8120 patients were included and 61 patients (0.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer was 0.26% (95% c.i. 0.17% to 0.39%), 0.49% (95% c.i. 0.36% to 0.68%), and 0.77% (95% c.i. 0.57% to 1.02%) at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. A previous diagnosis of colonic dysplasia (HR 3.34, 95% c.i. 1.01 to 10.97; P = 0.047), primary sclerosing cholangitis (HR 5.42, 95% c.i. 1.34 to 21.85; P = 0.018), and elective colectomy (HR 1.83, 95% c.i. 1.11 to 3.02; P = 0.018) was associated with an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Regarding endoscopic surveillance, there was a 43% decline in endoscopic procedures performed in 2020 (333 procedures) compared with 2019 (585 procedures). The incidence of rectal cancer after subtotal colectomy is low. Asymptomatic patients without evidence of rectal dysplasia should be carefully counselled on the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic proctectomy.

Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.

Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists. A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience. In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.

Robotic parastomal hernia repair: A single-center cohort study.

Parastomal hernia is a common occurrence following stoma construction, necessitating surgical intervention in symptomatic cases. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Robotic-Assisted Parastomal Hernia Repair (r-PSHR), utilizing the Da Vinci Xi™ Surgical System. Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing r-PSHR at a high-volume center. Surgical variables, complications, and recurrence rates were assessed. The primary technique involved a modified Sugarbaker intraperitoneal onlay mesh. Eighty-six patients underwent r-PSHR, predominantly females (59.3%), with mean age 60.8years. Mean BMI was 31.0. Most patients were classified as ASA 2 (31.4%) or ASA 3 (65.1), with 64.6% having no prior PSH repair. Index procedures primarily involved laparoscopic colonic resections (27.8%) and open abdominoperineal resections (27.8%). Parastomal hernias were mainly associated with end ileostomy (50%) and end colostomy (47.7%). A hybrid modification was required in 22.1% of cases, with only one conversion to open repair. Mean operative time was 257min. Thirty-day morbidity was 40.7% and includes ileus (24.4%), deep surgical-site infections (7.0%), acute kidney injury (5.8%), and sepsis (5.8%). Grade IIIB complications occurred in 5.8% of cases. Thirty-day readmissions were observed in 19.8% of cases. There were five cases (5.8%) of recurrence within 15months post-surgery. This study highlights the effectiveness of r-PSHR in managing parastomal hernia. R-PSHR shows promising outcomes with an acceptable post-operative occurrence profile and a favorable recurrence rate.

Factors affecting treatment decisions for endoscopically resected low- and high-risk malignant colorectal polyps in a screening setting

IntroductionThe European Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening of 2006 state that only high-risk endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs), defined as poor/no differentiation or positive resection margins or lymphovascular invasion, require colonic resection. MethodsA multicentre series of 954 patients with screen-detected MCP (northern Italy, 2005–2016, age 50–69) was studied to identify (1) the factors affecting the choice of colonic resection, and (2) the factors associated with deviation from the European Guidelines for low- and high-risk patients. Data analysis was based on multilevel logistic regression models. ResultsFive hundred sixty-four (59.1 %) patients underwent colonic resection. The factors significantly associated with surgical referral included: distal and rectal versus proximal tumour site (inverse association); sessile and flat versus pedunculated morphology (direct association); tumour size (direct); moderate/poor versus good differentiation (direct); adenocarcinoma of not otherwise specified type versus adenocarcinoma with a residual adenoma component (direct); positive versus negative resection margins (direct); lymphovascular invasion (direct); and high-grade versus low-grade/absent tumour budding (direct). In low-risk MCPs, tumour budding encouraged strongly the decision for surgery. In high-risk MCPs, a distal/rectal tumour site encouraged the follow-up option. ConclusionThe identification of factors associated with treatment choices other than those currently recommended may help prioritise the clinical questions in the development of future guidelines.

Outcomes of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease among patients with psychiatric disorders

BackgroundPsychiatric disorders (PDs) are common among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Brain-gut dysfunction and psychotropic medications may have adverse effects on postoperative outcomes in patients with IBD. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PD and outcomes after surgery for IBD. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult patients with IBD who underwent small bowel, colon, or rectal resection in the 2016 to 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. PDs, including psychotic, mood, anxiety, eating, sleep, personality, and childhood-onset behavioral disorders, were identified. Records about colorectal cancer were excluded. Multivariate regressions were used to examine the association of PD with outcomes. ResultsOf 81,955 patients included in the study, 21,800 (26.6%) had PDs. On risk adjustment, PD was associated with significantly increased postoperative ileus (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.19), length of stay (β, +1.4 days; 95% CI, 1.1–1.7), and costs (β, +$2100; 95% CI, $1200-$3100) compared with no PD. In addition, patients with PDs experienced increased odds of nonhome discharge (AOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12–1.34) and 30-day readmission (AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.43). Over the study period, the prevalence of PDs significantly increased from 24.3% to 28.5% (P < .001), along with an increase in the rates of ileus among patients with PDs (8.1%−15.8%; P < .001). ConclusionPD is associated with a significantly greater burden of adverse clinical and financial outcomes after IBD operations. Given the growing prevalence of mental health conditions among patients with IBD, further efforts to optimize preoperative psychiatric care may enhance the quality of colorectal surgery.

Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery-A Single Center Observational Study.

Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.

On-demand robotics—The best of both worlds for robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery

A modular, combined use of robotic and laparoscopic platforms has been suggested to address challenges in optimal workspace utilization. The 3-arm on-demand open Dexter Robotic System was developed to combine the advantages of robot-assisted precision surgery in narrow spaces with the laparoscopic approach for frequent position changes in larger spaces. The system integrates 2 patient carts, a fully controllable endoscope arm, and a sterile surgeon open console, allowing for a rapid switch between robot-assisted surgery and laparoscopy. When switching, the robotic arms may be folded into a laparoscopic home position at any time during a procedure, allowing unrestricted access to the patient. Switches take 15–30 seconds, occurring seamlessly without redocking or recalibrating upon returning to the robotic mode. During oncologic colorectal resections, some procedure steps (eg, central vessel ligation and lymphadenectomy) are best suited for the robotic approach, providing advantages related to 3-dimensional vision, improved ergonomics, and improved dexterity within confined spaces. In contrast, the laparoscopic platform is better suited for procedure steps requiring frequent movements within a large workspace (eg, lateral to medial mobilization of the colon). The Dexter system provides a portfolio of 7 robotic instruments with monopolar and bipolar function operating with any existing available generator. Furthermore, existing operating room equipment, including insufflating devices, optics, and trocars can be used with the Dexter robotic platform. Recently, the first published clinical experience from the authors’ institution, involving 12 pilot cases, demonstrated the safety and feasibility for right colonic resections for benign and malignant indications and ventral mesh rectopexies.

Massive bleeding and perforation due to post-colectomy pan-enteritis with a significant response to biologic in a patient with ulcerative colitis: a case report

BackgroundPost-colectomy pan-enteritis in ulcerative colitis (UC) is very rare, but it is often severe and fatal. We present a case of massive bleeding and perforation due to post-colectomy pan-enteritis, which showed a significant response to biologics in a UC patient.Case presentationA 30-year-old woman with a 5-month history of pancolitis UC underwent subtotal colectomy with ileostomy and mucosal fistula for refractory UC. She was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction on postoperative day (POD) 8 and bowel bleeding was observed on POD18. Reoperation was performed for bowel obstruction and bleeding on POD20. Intraoperatively, adhesive small bowel obstruction in the ileum and multiple erosions and ulcers with perforation were observed throughout the small bowel. We diagnosed post-colectomy pan-enteritis, and jejunostomy, lavage, adhesiolysis, and a simple closure of the perforated ileum were performed. High-dose steroid therapy for pan-enteritis was administered immediately after reoperation, and infliximab was administered because of worsening bleeding on day 3 after reoperation. Bleeding decreased one day after biologic administration and bleeding completely disappeared on day 10 after biologic administration. Specimens obtained from the terminal ileum at colectomy showed a normal ileum without inflammation and villus atrophy, while specimens from the perforated ileum showed congestion, villous atrophy, epithelial erosion, and mononuclear cell infiltration. No cryptitis, crypt distortion, or basal plasmacytosis (common characteristics in UC) were observed in either specimen.ConclusionAn early diagnosis and intervention are important for post-colectomy pan-enteritis, and infliximab may be effective. Post-colectomy pan-enteritis with a multiple ulcer phenotype has different histological characteristics from UC and may have a different pathogenesis.

Outcomes after right-sided colon surgery in Crohn's disease versus cancer.

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is considered to have more complications due to the underlying inflammation, immunosuppression, and malnutrition.We sought to study the outcomes of right-sided colonic resection in patients with CD and patients with cancer at a high-volume tertiary center utilizing a standardized perioperative protocol. This is a retrospective study of outcomes for all patients with CD or patients undergoing ileocolic resection or right hemicolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis at a single institution from 2013 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they simultaneously underwent another procedure or ostomy creation. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-squared tests for univariate analyses, and logistic and linear regressions for multivariate analyses. In total 141 patients with CD and 589 patients with cancer were included. Patients with CD were significantly younger with lower body mass index and less likely to have comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension. Patients with CD were less likely to have a smoking history or prior abdominal surgery, but more likely to be on steroids. Both groups had similar rates of laparoscopy, intraoperative complications, and blood loss. Despite the preoperative and intraoperative differences, both patients with CD and patients with cancer had similar lengths of stay (LOS), readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates.None of the surgical outcomes differed significantly between the two groups.On multivariate analysis, CD diagnosis was not associated with reoperation, readmission, mortality, or LOS while controlling for other characteristics. With the use of standardized perioperative protocols, surgery for CD at a high-volume center with expertise in CD can be performed with comparable results to other indications like cancer.

National Landscape of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Colon Cancer

IntroductionSurgery followed by pathology-guided adjuvant therapy is standard treatment for colon cancer. Data from the FOxTROT clinical trial showed potential benefit of a 6-wk neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in T3/T4 patients. The present study evaluated real-world outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in a national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer. Methods169,120 patients with clinical stage I, II, or III colon cancer from the National Cancer Database registry were included. Patients were categorized as having received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (NACT), surgery then adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), or surgery alone. Factors associated with treatment sequencing and outcomes were assessed. ResultsOf identified patients, 1.4% received NACT including 0.5% of stage I, 1.8% of stage II, and 3.0% of stage III. For stage I, 5-y overall survival (OS) was 74.7% after AC, 62.2% after NACT, and 76.4% after SA. For stage II, 5-y OS was 73.2% after AC, 66.8% after NACT, and 64.3% after SA. For stage III, 5-y OS was 67.3% after AC, 67.7% after NACT, and 42.4% after SA. Cox proportional-hazards model suggested NACT had worse outcomes versus AC in clinical stages I (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-1.85, P < 0.01) and II (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52, P < 0.01). In stage III, there was no difference in OS between NACT and AC (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.99-1.22, P = 0.05). ConclusionsIn a real-world national cohort of patients with resectable colon cancer, NACT had no OS benefit over AC. Future studies should examine which subset of patients might benefit from neoadjuvant approaches.

Assessing robotic-assisted surgery versus open approach in penetrating Crohn's disease: advantages and outcomes in ileocolic resection.

Penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, with the open approach traditionally favored. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential benefits but remains understudied in this complex patient population. Additionally, the lack of standardized surgical complexity scoring in CD hinders research and comparisons. We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with penetrating CD who underwent either robotic-assisted ileocolic resection (RICR) or open ileocolic resection (OICR) at our institution from January 2007 to December 2021. We assessed endpoints, including length of stay, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and other perioperative outcomes. RICR demonstrated safety outcomes comparable to OICR. Importantly, RICR patients experienced significantly reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (median 4.5days versus 6.9days; p = 0.01), lower surgical site infection rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01), and decreased 30-day readmission rates (0% versus 15.4%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed the need for additional strictureplasties (coefficient: 84.8; p = 0.008), colonic resections (coefficient: 41.7; p = 0.008), and estimated blood loss (coefficient: 0.07; p = 0.002) independently correlated with longer operative times). Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be a safe and potentially beneficial alternative for the surgical management of penetrating CD, offering advantages in perioperative outcomes reducing length of stay, blood loss, surgical site infection rates, and readmission rates. Further validation with larger cohorts is warranted.

ОДНОМОМЕНТНАЯ ГЕРНИОПЛАСТИКА ПРИ ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦИОННЫХ ГРЫЖАХ В КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНОЙ ХИРУРГИИ

The results of operations in 18 patients with incisional hernias that occurred after obstructive colon resections due to complications of cancer and benign diseases were analyzed. The hernias were eliminated simultaneously with the restoration of the continuity of the colon. 9 patients with large hernias underwent operations with separation of abdominal wall components (component separation). Despite the increase in the duration of operations, their simultaneous execution was not accompanied by significant complications.

Influence of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Surgical Outcomes for Patients With Sigmoid Diverticulitis in France

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent colonic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis (SD). Background: The potential impact of socioeconomic inequalities on the management of SD has been scarcely studied in the literature. Considering other gastrointestinal pathologies for which lesser access to optimal treatment and poorer survival have been shown, we hypothesize that deprivation could be associated with outcomes for SD. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted at 41 French hospitals between January 1, 2010, and August 31, 2021. The main outcome was the occurrence of severe postoperative complications on postoperative day 90, according to the Clavien-Dindo scale (≥3). The European Deprivation Index was used to approximate deprivation for each patient. Multiple imputations by a chained equation were performed to consider the influence of missing data on the results. Results: Twenty percent of the 6415 patients operated on had severe postoperative complications at 90 days. In the multivariate regression analysis, increasing age, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, conversion to laparotomy or upfront open approach, surgical procedures, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for severe postoperative complications. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, emergent setting, blood transfusion, indications for surgery, surgical approach, and procedures, the probability of severe postoperative complications increased with socioeconomic deprivation (P=0.026) by day 90. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the surgical outcomes of SD. Socioeconomic deprivation should be considered as a risk factor for severe postoperative complications during the preoperative assessment of the patient’s medical conditions.

Intrarenal venous flow patterns - Guiding fluid management in sepsis with AKI: A case report.

Sepsis often leads to acute kidney injury (AKI), presenting significant challenges in fluid management. This study explores the potential of analyzing intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns to guide tailored fluid therapy, aiming to improve patient outcomes. A patient was admitted to the intensive care unit with symptoms of septic shock, including fever, severe hypotension, and altered mental status, secondary to a perforated ascending colon adenocarcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with perforated ascending colon adenocarcinoma, septic shock, and AKI. Clinical findings included elevated inflammatory markers and impaired renal function. The primary therapeutic interventions included surgical resection of the perforated colon, administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and fluid resuscitation. Fluid management was guided by continuous monitoring of IRVF, which facilitated precise adjustments to optimize fluid balance and renal perfusion. By utilizing IRVF patterns to guide fluid therapy, the patient's circulatory status and renal function significantly improved. The individualized fluid management approach contributed to better stabilization of the patient's condition. This case underscores the potential utility of IRVF patterns in guiding fluid management strategies for patients with sepsis and AKI. The main is the benefit of IRVF-guided fluid therapy in improving patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate the efficacy and safety of this approach, with the aim of enhancing clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.